Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU) | Module Title | 5L7V0004 Research Methods |
| Word Count | 3000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | dissertation proposal |
For this assignment, you need to compose:
A dissertation proposal that is maximum of 3000 words excluding references.
On successful completion of this Course Unit students will be able to:
This assessment will contribute to the achievement of the following Programme Learning Outcomes (PLOs):
PLO5: apply advanced specific knowledge, professional and research skills in addressing complex issues.
| Assignment Details and Instructions |
|
Assignment Details and Instructions. PG Dissertation Research Proposal Template Maximum of 3000 words excluding References. Pass mark is 50%. |
| Student name and registration number |
| For example: John Bloggs, 12345678 |
| Programme title and mode of attendance |
| For example: MSc International Business Management Full-Time |
| Title of the research project |
| For example, ”Supply Chain Systems in the Food Industry: the feasibility of advanced global models in India” |
| Introduction |
| This section should set out the business context and any existing strategic issues, demonstrating to the reader the relevance of the study. In this section you are expected to describe aims and objectives for the investigation, and to identify specific research questions. |
| Literature Review |
|
This section provides a critical review of the literature related to the issue you are investigating. This means that you should demonstrate your ability to identify and to analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the theories or schools of thought relevant to your topic. You should also demonstrate your ability to identify how your study may contribute to the existing body of knowledge. This section should conclude with the articulation of a conceptual framework, that is, a comprehensive synthesis of the analytical models and concepts which you will use to help you answer your research questions. Typically a conceptual framework explains the importance of certain concepts and their interconnections. The conceptual framework will help you identify what problem dimensions need to be examined, or what ‘measurable’ concepts may constitute evidence to support your argument. It will therefore help you determine the nature of the data to be collected. |
| Methodology |
|
This section should include:
When identifying the sources of evidence or data, and when planning the data collection, you may decide that you will collect most of the data yourself (primary data), or you may decide that you will use mostly data collected by second parties (secondary data). Also, you may decide to investigate or research an issue with a specific organisation in mind – a client organisation – rather than a generic organisation. Indicate in this section your dissertation orientation:
|
| Ethics |
|
You do need to discuss any ethical issues arising from your proposed research and ways you intend to address these issues. You DO NOT need to complete an Ethics Application via EthOS Application Portal for this proposal. However, it is an essential part for your actual dissertation. |
| References |
|
Include in this section the details of all sources referenced in the body of your Research Proposal. Cite Them Right Harvard has replaced MMU Harvard as Manchester Met’s institutional Harvard referencing style from 1st August 2023. |
Please note stepped marking is applied as below:
In marking this assessment, the marking rubric below will be applied, and all aspects of the unit learning outcomes and professional skills (PLOS) will be evident.
| FAIL 0 - 49 |
PASS 50 - 59 |
PASS WITH MERIT 60 - 69 |
PASS WITH DISTINCTION 70 - 85 |
PASS WITH DISTINCTION 86 - 100 |
|
|
Criterion 1 objectives of the research Criterion 1 Identify the macro and micro organisational contexts for the dissertation and the objectives of the research. This should be in the light of a client’s briefing if applicable. |
The organizational context and current issues are not identified leading to no clear research objectives. | The organizational context and current issues are sufficiently identified and expressed, but lacks clarity in some areas, leading to an adequate but somewhat loose identification of research objectives. | The organizational context and current issues are clearly identified and scoped, leading to the identification of appropriate research objectives. | The organizational context and current issues are unambiguously identified, scoped and prioritized, leading to well framed research objectives. | The organizational context and current issues identified are theoretically grounded. Factual data are well used to iterate the business scenario that leads to precisely framed research objectives. |
|
Criterion 2 review the literature Criterion 2 Critically review and synthesize the relevant literature on the subject area in order to construct a conceptual framework to underpin the research. PLO5 apply advanced specific knowledge, professional and research skills in addressing complex issues. |
There is an insufficient range of literature considered. This impairs the analysis and integration of concepts, models and theories that might lead to a conceptual framework to underpin the research. | There is a sufficient range of literature considered, and some attempt at analysis and integration, but lacking in critical focus towards a clear conceptual framework to underpin the research. | There is an adequate range of literature considered. Analysis and integration of concepts, models and theories have an adequate critical focus, leading to a substantiated conceptual framework to underpin the research. | An extensive range of literature is considered. Good analysis and integration of concepts, models and theories with substantial critical content. The conceptual framework underpinning the research is well argued for. | Very good application and critique of concepts with evidence of breadth and depth of literature reviewed and integrated, leading to a sound conceptual framework and a theoretically well grounded investigation. |
|
Criterion 3 research design Criterion 3 There is a clear link between the extant literature in the field, the development of research aims/objectives/questions, and the design of a clear conceptual framework. The above are used to clearly guide the research design. |
There are no links provided between the literature, the research aims and resultant research design strategies. No conceptual framework is proposed and fieldwork or secondary data is non-existent or very little. | There are sufficient relevant links between the literature, research aims and the data collection (primary or secondary). This is underpinned sufficiently by the conceptual framework underpinning the research, but further detail is required. | There are sufficient and relevant links between the formulation of the research aims relative to literature and context, and this is derived from a clear analysis of the separate streams of literature and how they form the focus for the current study. The data collection (primary or secondary) is clearly informed by the conceptual framework underpinning the research. | A wide and critical literature base is assimilated accurately in formulating the study aims and there is clear consideration of a research gap and the relevance of making a contribution to knowledge. The data design and collection (primary or secondary) is clearly and largely informed by the conceptual framework underpinning the research. | A wide and critical literature base is assimilated accurately in formulating the study aims and there is a very clear and thoughtful consideration of a research gap, contribution to knowledge and the strategies needed for design of the current study. The data collection (primary or secondary) is clearly and very thoroughly informed by the conceptual framework underpinning the research. |
|
Criterion 4 appropriate methodology Criterion 4 Apply an appropriate methodology for collecting and for analysing primary data with due regard to ethical considerations. Critically discuss the methodology used for secondary data where applicable; student has completed the Ethos Application and attached it to the proposal. PLO5 apply advanced specific knowledge, professional and research skills in addressing complex issues. |
There is no or very little awareness of currently recognized research methodologies and methods, and of consultancy approaches (if applicable). No method, justified or recognized in the research methods literature, has been applied. Student has not attached the Ethos Application form. | There is sufficient awareness of currently recognized research methodologies and methods, and of consultancy approaches (if applicable). Research methods are applied, and its choice and appropriateness are sufficiently justified. Justification for the chosen consultancy approaches (if applicable) is limited. The Ethos Application form has been completed but ethics is superficially mentioned. |
There is a clear understanding of currently recognized research methodologies and methods, and of consultancy approaches (if applicable). There is a competent use of research methods, and its choice and appropriateness are adequately justified. There is a review of and adequate justification for the chosen consultancy approaches (if applicable). The Ethos Application form is attached and there is clear consideration given to Ethics in the research design. | There is a very clear understanding of currently recognized research methodologies and methods, and of consultancy approaches (if applicable). There is a competent and thorough use of research methods, and its choice and appropriateness are well justified. There is a thorough review of and well-argued choice of consultancy approaches (if applicable). The Ethos Application form is attached and there is well recognised understanding of Ethics in the research project. |
There is an excellent understanding of currently recognized research methodologies and methods, and of consultancy approaches (if applicable). There is an excellent use of appropriate (even innovative) methods, and a very robust justification of the methodology / methods employed and of the consultancy approaches taken (if applicable). The Ethos Application form is attached and there is excellent discussion on ethics with regards the research project. |
Get Expert Help with 5L7V0004 Research Methods Answers
chat with Expert on WhatsAppIf you are struggling with your 5L7V0004 Department of Economics, Policy and International Business CWK Assignment? Be stress-free! AI-free International Business Assignment Help is here for you. We assure you that our Economics Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. A free list of assignment samples written by PhD experts is also provided here that can help you boost your study power and check the quality of the research paper. So contact us today and get your high-quality assignment!
See the solution of this brief click on 5L7V0004 Dissertation Proposal Example
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
