Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Leeds Beckett University (LBU) | Module Title | Risk Management |
| Word Count | 4,000 words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | Risk Report |
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |

Hello and ‘Welcome’ to this module on Risk Management!
This module is used in many degree pathways across the Postgraduate provision in Leeds Business School (LBS). These include:
Just as several pathways use this module, there are many ways in which we can address Risk Management. This programme is based on the textbook for the Chartered Governance Institute (CGI) UK & Ireland core text on Risk Management, which is part of the reading list for the module. The CGI curriculum is focused on Board Governance. This is a specialist area of corporate management mixing many disciplines and needing a mixture of legal, ethics, strategy, accounting, etc. skills. This will be our starting point, and we will focus on applying knowledge to situations and communicating the consequences to the organisation’s board level.
Due to the range of programmes that take this module, we will be referring to other approaches to risk and contexts within which risk is understood. It is hoped that through this diverse approach to the topic, you will gain crucial skills and capabilities for your future career progression.
The students coming to this module are from diverse backgrounds, and it is recognised that board governance hasn’t necessarily been part of their working experience.Therefore, we will be looking at Risk Management from the perspective of three disciplines:

The lectures will focus on Risk Management across the three areas, and in seminars you will analyse case studies that lend themselves to multiple angles of consideration. I have taken on board feedback from previous student cohorts regarding the salience to different career aspirations and industrial contexts. As a result, the specific cases we look at will be kept up to date and may include current affairs and business developments occurring during the teaching semester.
At the time of writing this module handbook, the intended issues we will address include:
I do stress that if something happens that is particularly important, we may change incorporate that issue as well or instead of one of the above.
Mode of Delivery
There will be an online lecture released each week on a Monday morning. This will be pre-recorded and available for you to watch from 9am that day ahead of your seminars. Please ensure that you view the recording and do the recommended reading ahead of your seminars.
An on-campus lecture will extend and support the online recorded session. This is an essential session that looks at the topic in more depth. It is a chance for you to ask questions about the material, and to clarify any points.
Seminar sessions are scheduled throughout the week. You will need to ensure that you check your timetable for the exact timing and location of each session. Please ensure that you have prepared for the session. The pre-reading / exercises will be detailed on the module page.
In section 2 below you will find a summary of each week’s focused activity.
During the seminar sessions you may be split into groups and will be expected to undertake a discussion on the issues raised during that week’s activity and from this to report back to the whole group on your reflections and suggestions. This means that you will have to ensure that you plan in reading and reflection time. The issues being considered are complex, can be considered from multiple angles and do not have a black and white answer.
Please note: we will be using digital tools in some of the seminars, but not all. If you are tasked with discussing a topic in a group and are asked to not use digital aids such as ChatGPT or Google searches , then please respect the request. The emphasis should be on the people in the room discussing and making decisions. This is to teach you about when it is appropriate to use digital tools, and when it is not.
The module aims to develop skills in independent thinking and collaborative working as students analyse and apply both the classic concepts and contemporary approaches to how strategy pertaining to risk is carried out in today’s organisations.
The module strongly emphasises peer-to-peer learning. We therefore expect you to be an active participant in this module, contributing to a positive atmosphere by questioning, sharing and helping out others, engaging in meaningful discussions where we learn together. You will need to read each and every week on the topic for the next week. Resources will be placed online to assist you, while each week you should review the textbook. You will be expected to apply knowledge and come up with options for Board consideration.
Regarding attendance, we expect you to keep on track by regularly attending class in order to benefit from learning within a community. This module is meant to be a place where you learn with and from, others. In this sense, we would like you to experience collaboration and peer-feedback, so please make sure you follow up with your peers to enrich the overall learning experience.
Follow ‘MyBeckett’ and respect the module and course policies and the general moral code of academia. Any attempt to engage in plagiarism or academic misconduct will be viewed dimly and dealt with in accordance with the University’s regulations.
The tutor will guide you throughout the course, providing weekly content, promoting and engaging in discussions during seminars, and providing regular feedback and support.
During weekdays, your tutor will aim to respond within 48 hours to questions on the module content.
The Module Leader is Greg Barnes, whose email is g.r.barnes@leedsbeckett.ac.uk. Also teaching on the module is Ella Smith, who is available at E.Smith@leedsbeckett.ac.uk
All answers to common questions regarding assessment will be posted on MyBeckett for the benefit of everyone. Please carefully read this module handbook before emailing the tutor.
You must notify your Course Administrator if you are absent for more than one day (for example for an interview, emergency unforeseen circumstances, or for compassionate leave). If you are going to apply for mitigation you will need to provide written evidence of the reason for your absence (see Extenuating Circumstances and Mitigation for further information).
Please note: the module leader and module team are NOT able to grant an extension and you must follow the Extenuating Circumstances route.
Please see the specific support and contact hours for each seminar tutor on the module page.
Your timetable will have the lecture and seminar that you have been assigned. For reference, the lecture is running on:
The module has been built around the requirements of the Corporate Governance Institute (CGI) risk management curriculum, and therefore we have adopted their core textbook which is available digitally from the library. We are also using an excellent book on the Fundamentals of Risk Management that has a good overview of enterprise level risks:
Ashby, Simon (2022) Risk Management. https://leedsbeckett.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1181166609
Hopkin, P; Thompson, C (2022) Fundamentals of Risk Management, Sixth Edition. Kogan Page https://leedsbeckett.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1300754988
These textbooks are additionally supported by material from the University Reading List system that is linked from the module page on MyBeckett. The week-by-week breakdown below outlines what basic reading is required by students prior to the seminar.
There will be more supporting material also available on the module page that you can engage with if you wish to extend your knowledge
You will be requested to bring laptops for some of the sessions (either personal or borrowed from the library) or we may utilise the university computer labs in the Leslie Silver Building for computer-based work. Please ensure you pay attention to the module announcements and your timetable to stay up to date with locations.
Are You Looking for Answer of Your Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentDisabled students requiring additional support or alternative arrangements must declare and provide evidence of their disability to the Disability Advice Team as early as possible: https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/student-information/disability-advice/.
| Week Commencing Date | Topic | Case Study Companies | Reading and additional resources for the seminars |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic 1 (22/09/202 5) | Introduction to Risk Management | Pizza Express | Ashby (2022) CH1: The Global Risk Environment (p1 – 23) Hopkin & Thompson (2022) Ch 1 (p15-30) |
| Topic 2 (29/09/202 5) | Key Concepts & Risk Standards | ASOS: Fashion with Integrity | Montgomery, C (2012) The Strategist Chapter 5 (p57-78) Ashby (2022) Ch4 / 5 P61 -109 Hopkin & Thompson (2022) Ch3 / 4 p42-68 |
| Topic 3 (06/10/202 5) | Risk Management and Success | Southwest Airlines | Ashby (2022) Ch6 p110-121 Hopkin & Thompson (2022) Ch14 p155-166 |
| Topic 4 (13/10/202 5) | Risk Culture, Appetite and Compliance | Titan Submersible Disaster | Ashby (2022) Ch10 p190-210 Optional: The Netflix film “Titan: The Oceangate Submersible Disaster” |
| Topic 5 (20/10/202 5) | Risk Identification | Aerated Concrete in public buildings | Ashby (2022) Ch9 p163-189 Rostami, A (2016) Tools and Techniques in Risk Identification: A Research into SMEs in the UK Construction Industry. Universal Journal of Management 4(4) |
| Topic 6 (27/10/202 5) | Risk Assessment and Risk Registers | Assessment Case Study Company | Ashby (2022) Ch9 p163-189 Hopkin & Thompson (2022) Ch5 |
| Topic 7 (03/11/202 5) | Risk Mitigation Strategies | Rave Coffee | Ashby (2022) Ch12 p231-253 Hopkin & Thompson (2022) Ch15-18 p167-205 |
| Topic 8 (10/11/202 5) | Risk Monitoring, Assurance and Reporting | Thames Water | Leech, T; Hanlon, L (2016) Three Lines of Defense versus Five Lines of Assurance: Elevating the Role of the Board and CEO in Risk Governance. The Handbook of Board Governance: A Comprehensive Guide to Public, Private and Not for Profit Board Members. Wiley, London. |
| Topic 9 (17/11/202 5) | Enterprise Level Risk Management | BBC Workplace Culture Review | Hopkin & Thompson (2022) Ch6 /7/ 8 p83-104 Glette-Iversen, Flage, Aven (2023) Extending and improving current frameworks for risk management and decision making: A new approach for incorporating dynamic aspects of risk and uncertainty. Safety Science 168 |
| Topic 10 (24/11/202 5) | Building Resilience | Taylors of Harrogate | Ashby (2022) Ch14 / 15 p274-307 |
| Topic 11 (01/12/202 5) | Risk Assurance and reporting in practice | BBC Staff Behaviour | Ashby (2022) Ch13 p254-273 |
| Topic 12 (08/12/202 5) | Assessment Support Q&A | N/A | N/A |
| Assessment Method: | Re-assessment Method: |
|---|---|
| Word Count: 4,000 words total (3,000 report and 1,000 equivalent for risk register) | Word Count: 4,000 words (3,000 report and 1,000 equivalent for risk register) |
| Assessment Release Date: 27 October 2025 (Week 6) | Assessment Release Date: 27 October 2025 (making good the same case study) |
| Assessment Deadline Date & Time: Tuesday 6th January 2026 | Reassessment Deadline Date & Time: 31 March 2026 |
| Feedback Method: Via Turnitin | Feedback Method: Via Turnitin |
| Feedback Date: 6th February 2026 | Feedback Date: 5th May 2026 |
Coursework
The coursework for this module is an analysis of a real company. The company’s information will be provided for you to analyse, and the material in this case study must be used in your work.
The company we will be analysing this semester will be: Taylors of Harrogate
You must analyse the case study company. Do not write your assignment for any other company.
Students on the ‘MSC Corporate Governance’ programme ONLY may choose to analyse the risk profile of their employer. This is subject to approval by your module leaders.
Assessment Company Information
The assessment company materials will be available on the Module page w/c 27 October 2025 ( Week 6).
The company has agreed to be interviewed for the purpose. The materials in the case study are bespoke for this exercise and based on their current and emerging risk profile.
The case study information will include:
You have been asked by the board of the company to analyse their main risks and prepare a risk report. This will entail four major elements and offer a strategy for the company to respond to their risk profile:
The structure of the report should be as follows:
Describe the risk identification ‘tool’ you have used, and how it was used to identify the risks to the business, and why this tool was the appropriate choice for this business (around 500 words excluding figures)
Risk identification ‘tools’ are structured processes that a manager follows to identify risks to a company. We will be covering a number of these tools during the module. Each tool has an ‘output’ – for example, a root cause analysis may be expressed using an ‘Ishikawa’ diagram. You must include the diagram or other ‘output’ from the tool you use.
You are NOT permitted to use a PESTLE or SWOT (or other version of the same tools) in your assignment.
The tool selected should be one of the following:
A detailed assessment of the top 5 risks that the company is currently facing and an explanation of
the mitigations that you will put in place to control for the risk exposure to these risks (circa 2000 words)
A recommendation to the board on how ERM or ISO31000 may be used in this company to ensure
that the risks and mitigations are effectively managed. This section should clearly link to the risks and mitigations from the previous section (circa 500 words).
A full reference list for all the sources you have used for your assignment.
A separate EXCEL spreadsheet should be provided via a second Turnitin link on the module page.
This will contain your full risk register.
This spreadsheet must conform to the standard approaches we have followed in the module. It must be in Microsoft Excel format and be presented on ONE sheet. It should contain a minimum of 25 clearly defined risks, the inherent exposure, mitigations and residual exposure
To write the assignment, we recommend the following workflow which is based on the risk management cycle:
In the seminars, we will be working on examples and practice exercises that follow the same processes that are used in the assignment so you will have opportunity to practice and get feedback on this way of working.
Reference MUST be made to the academic content of the module and include the use of concepts detailed in the reading list for the module. In particular, this should include the module textbook Ashby (2022) Risk Management and Hopkin & Thompson (2022) Fundamentals of Risk Management. Page numbers MUST be used when referring to any books or journal articles.
Reference MUST be made to the Assessment Company materials. There will be information that is only available to our module and is not in the public domain. If you do not use the Assessment Company materials, then you will not demonstrate your ability to apply the learning from the module.
Word Count
The word count for the report (Word Document) is 3,000 words +/- 10%.
You need to complete the Risk Register (Excel spreadsheet) with a minimum of 25 risks that clearly link to the Assessment company. There is no word count limit for the Excel spreadsheet.
The deadline for submission of this assessment is 14:00 on 6th January 2026. Please note that you can submit this assessment before the deadline.
The Business School are operating a flexible assessment submission policy during 2024/25. This means that if you require additional time, you are permitted to submit up to 5 working days after the deadline, without late submission penalties being applied and without applying for an extension. This means the final date and time for submission without late penalty is 14:00 on Tuesday, 14th January 2025.
If you require more time beyond the additional 5 working days flexible submission period, you can apply here for an additional 5 working days (making 10 working days from the original deadline) or apply for Mitigation to request to defer your assessment to the next module assessment period. Please note that both a 10-day extension or mitigation request must be accompanied by appropriate documentary evidence, for example a doctor’s letter and will be reviewed. Further information on the flexible assessment submission policy and mitigation in general can be found here.
This module requires you to submit your work online.
You MUST submit your work through MyBeckett using the link set up by the tutor. Receipt of your work will be recorded.
Your "Turnitin assignments" in MyBeckett can be set up so that you can check your assignment yourself as you submit it. This checking is done by creating a "Similarity Report". If this report shows that there are some problems with your work, such as un-cited quotations, you should be able to make corrections and re-submit the work again before the due date. More information about Turnitin is available online here: https://libguides.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/it_support/mybeckett/turnitin
Please note: Tutors will follow up any suspected breach of academic integrity found after the submission date as per University policy. Late penalties will apply as per University Regulations.
To be clear, your module tutors cannot grant an extension for submission and you must instead follow the process outlined above regarding mitigating circumstances if you are in need of more time to submit your work.
Instructions to Students
Please read carefully the assessment and grade/marking descriptors overleaf. You should aim to evaluate your own work against this rubric, and the rubric is the grading system that will be used by your tutors when marking your work.
Use of Artificial Intelligence
The use of Generative AI is not permitted in this assignment. This is due to the particular nature of the bespoke case study you are analysing. If you wish to use AI, and AI based translation or proofreading tool, or other such service or product, then you must reference its use in your reference list at the end of the report. Failure to do so may result in a deduction of marks.
|
100-86% |
85-70% |
69-60% |
59-50% PASS |
49-40% FAIL |
39-30% FAIL |
29-15% FAIL |
14-0% FAIL |
|
|
Research and Analysis 30% |
Clear identification of risks with correctly applied techniques and relevant detailed research support. Linkages between the risks, the business/risk environment, and the strategic direction of the case study company are clear and well developed. Research and commentary is up to date, clear and unambiguous.
|
Clear identification of risks with correctly applied techniques with research supporting the statements. Linkages between the risks, the business/risk environment, and the strategic direction of the case study company are clear. Research and commentary is clear and unambiguous.
|
Identification of risks with correctly applied techniques and supported by research and reading of the case study.
Linkages between the company and the business / risk environment, and business strategy is apparent.
|
Identification of risks with some reference to research and supporting statements from the case study.
Linkages between the company and the business / risk environment, and business strategy is present.
|
The work is weakly structured with points arranged and some key themes developed and explored in a basic way
There is a lack of clearly developed identification processes and techniques.
No company research or reference to the case study is apparent and material is generic in nature.
|
The work lacks structure and key themes
Identified risks are generic. There is little supporting evidence for statements made or the risks identified.
|
The works lacks structure and key themes.
Risks identified are presented without justification and are generic in nature.
Little analysis or prioritisation of the risks that have been identified.
Little research or contextualisation of the work completed.
|
No reference to the case study materials / company and lacking an analysis. |
|
Comprehension of Conceptual Frameworks 25% |
Demonstration of synthesis associated with the application of conceptual and theoretical frameworks and knowledge in the academic field. |
Areas of synthesis associated with the application of conceptual and theoretical frameworks and knowledge from the academic content in the module. |
Areas of critical analysis are present in dealing with concepts and frameworks used in the module. |
Demonstrable understanding of conceptual frameworks and concepts present in the module. |
Lacking a clear or highly generic conceptual framework, knowledge or application of concepts from the module. |
Lacking in the justification of the work with relation to theoretical frameworks and concepts of the module. |
Little to no reference to the concepts and academic content of the module.
|
No use of concepts or academic content of the module. |
|
Solutions and Rationale 30% |
Excellent solutions based on up-to-date information that are presented in a professional and coherent manner. Clear linkages to the theoretical perspectives in the module. |
Excellent solutions based on up-to-date information presented in a coherent manner that are linked to the theoretical content of the module. |
Good solutions and proposals based on relevant information presented in a consistent manner linked to the content of the module. |
Solutions presented are linked to relevant debates. Mitigations are effective and some rationale provided. |
Weak solutions that have not linked to contemporary debates in risk, or do not address the key risks identified. |
Very weak solutions that do not address the key risks identified and have little linkage to the module content. |
Little effort to provide a considered response, or mitigations suggested do not match the risks identified. |
No solutions or effort to engage with this aspect of the assessment |
|
Format and Presentation 15% |
The paper uses a professional level of presentation for a board report. The paper has excellent citations and is referenced following the Harvard referencing style (see Quote/Unquote). |
The paper uses an excellent recognised format for a Board report. The paper has excellent citation and references with clear reference list following Harvard referencing (see Quote/Unquote). |
The paper uses a good, recognised format for an internal company report. The paper has good citation and references with clear reference list with minor gaps following Harvard referencing (see Quote/Unquote). |
The paper uses an appropriate recognised format for a business report. The paper has acceptable citation and references with a reference list, with gaps following Harvard referencing (see Quote/Unquote). |
The paper doesn’t use a recognised format for a Board report. The paper has some citation and references with a reference list but contains gaps following Harvard referencing (see Quote/Unquote). |
The paper is not structured as a Board report. The paper has poor or very poor citation and references within the reference list, with major gaps following Harvard referencing (see Quote/Unquote). |
The paper has little that can be considered to relate to a board report. Poor or few citations and references in the document with no attempt to use Harvard referencing (see Quote/Unquote). |
Exceptionally poor, or little effort to present the material effectively. No references provided. |
|
Guidance Notes |
A pass mark will be considered for those papers that follow the academic conventions and material in the module to present a professional piece of work. This should include a clear reference to the cycle of risk management, risk frameworks, and include a complete risk register. |
A fail mark will be considered for papers that have little relevance to the case study company, do not engage with the academic material in the module, and fail to offer a coherent risk strategy for the business. |
No (0%) or little attempt made. |
|||||
Hire Experts to solve your Assignment before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentIf you are worried about the Risk Management Assignment? no need to worry anymore! Our experts provide risk management assignment help that has been designed for the students. You will get expert guidance and help on assignments that will strengthen your concepts. We also provide you with free assignment samples that will help you understand. And the best part? All the content is 100% original, written by PhD expert writers, and well-researched, so that you get the best quality. So don’t delay now; boost your grades with our help!
See the solution of this document clcik here: Risk Management Assignment Report
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content