Category | Assignment | Subject | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|
University | -------------- | Module Title | MSB001-6 International Trade and Monetary Policy |
Word Count | 1300 words (+/-10%) |
---|---|
Assessment Type | Case Study |
Assessment Title | Assignment 1 Coursework |
Submission date: | 15/08/2025 |
In recent decades, digital technologies have revolutionized global trade, creating new opportunities and challenges. Despite the ubiquity of digital tools, regulatory frameworks governing digital trade remain disjointed, impacting various parts of the supply chain differently. This assignment tasks you with conducting a comprehensive analysis of regulatory challenges in digital trade through a case study analysis.
al Listen the podcast that is posted on BREO and prepare an individual analysis for the topic discussed in the podcast: 'Navigating the Digital Trade Landscape: Challenges and Opportunities.
Introduction (10%)
Analysis and Evaluation of Main Issues/Problems (25%)
Recommendations on Effective Solutions/Strategies (15%)
Overall Presentation and Referencing (10%)
Ensure the essay is well-structured and coherent:
Structure: Organize the essay logically with clear sections and subheadings.
Clarity: Write clearly and concisely, avoiding jargon and ensuring all arguments are easy to follow.
In text citations: Use appropriate referencing throughout the essay to support arguments and cite sources from the podcast, academic literature, and regulatory documents.
Conclusion
Summarize the key findings from your analysis and discussion.
Reiterate the significance of understanding the current state of globalization and the evolving role of the WTO.
Provide a concluding statement on whether globalization is under threat and what the future might hold for global trade.
References
Provide a list of all sources cited in the essay following the appropriate academic referencing style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).
Length: 1300 words (+/-10%).
Format: Use headings and subheadings to organize the content clearly.
Sources: Cite academic journals, reputable news sources, and the podcast episode itself as primary sources. Analysis: Include critical analysis and reflection on the podcast episode and related literature.
Clarity: Ensure concepts are explained clearly and examples are used to illustrate key points.
Hire Experts to solve MSB001-6 Assignment 1 before your Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentSearch for job adverts in relation to your career aspirations and connect/ consult with individuals in the specialised field. Write 500 words reflecting on skills and characteristics that you need to be eligible for your desired job.
1.Introduction (30-50 words)
2.Job Search Summary (100-120 words)
3.Reflection on Skills and Characteristics (250-280 words)
4.Conclusion (30-50 words)
References (Optional)
If you used specific resources (e.g., job postings, professional advice), consider including a brief list of references or resources consulted.
|
70%+ (Distinction) |
60-69% (Commendation) |
50-59% (Pass) |
40-49% (Pass) Threshold Standard |
30-39% (Fail) |
0-29% (Fail) |
|
Excellent |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Inadequate |
Introduction - Identification of Main Theoretical Concepts and Issues (10%) |
Clearly identifies and introduces main theoretical concepts related to recent trends in globalization vs. contributing factors. Provides a thorough explanation and sets a strong |
Introduces main theoretical concepts related to digital trade with clarity. Explanation is adequate but may lack some depth or detail. |
Identifies basic theoretical concepts related to digital trade. Explanation is somewhat clear but lacks depth or detail. |
Introduces theoretical concepts related to digital trade with limited clarity or relevance. Explanation is vague or inaccurate. |
Fails to introduce or identify theoretical concepts related to digital trade. Explanation is absent or completely incorrect. |
No attempt to introduce theoretical concepts; content is completely irrelevant or missing. |
|
70%+ (Distinction) |
60-69% (Commendation) |
50-59% (Pass) |
40-49% (Pass) Threshold Standard |
30-39% (Fail) |
0-29% (Fail) |
|
foundation for analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Main Issues/Problems (35%) |
Thoroughly analyses and evaluates WTO's current role in regulating global trade, considering the challenges it faces in a changing global environment. Provides insightful and well-supported analysis with clear connections to theoretical concepts. |
Analyses and WTO's current role vs. globalization with clarity. Provides adequate support and demonstrates understanding of theoretical concepts. |
Provides a basic analysis WTO's current role vs. globalization. Some connections to theoretical concepts are made, but analysis lacks depth or insight. |
Offers a limited analysis of WTO's current role vs. globalization. Analysis is superficial and lacks clear connections to theoretical concepts. |
Analysis of WTO's current role vs. globalization is inadequate or irrelevant. Does not demonstrate understanding of theoretical concepts. |
No meaningful analysis provided; content lacks relevance or is absent. |
Discussion (30%) |
Provides a comprehensive and insightful discussion of the analysis, including implications and potential solutions. Demonstrates a deep understanding of the complexities WTO's current role vs. globalization. |
Offers a clear and coherent discussion of the analysis, highlighting key points and implications. Shows good understanding of WTO's current role vs. globalization. |
Provides a basic discussion of the analysis, though some aspects may lack depth or clarity. Discussion touches on key points but lacks thorough exploration of implications. |
Presents a limited discussion of the analysis with unclear or superficial exploration of key points and implications. |
Discussion of the analysis is unclear or disorganized. Key points and implications are not adequately addressed. |
No meaningful discussion of the analysis. Discussion is absent, irrelevant, or completely lacking in substance. |
Effective Solutions/Strategies (15%) |
Provides innovative and well-justified recommendations on effective solutions or strategies to address WTO's current role vs. globalization. |
Proposes recommendations on effective solutions or strategies with adequate justification. Solutions are feasible but may lack some originality. |
Proposes basic recommendations on solutions or strategies with limited justification or clarity on feasibility. |
Proposes simplistic or unclear recommendations on solutions or strategies with minimal justification or feasibility considerations. |
Recommendations for solutions or strategies are inadequate or irrelevant. Justification is missing or severely flawed. |
No proposals for solutions or strategies provided; content is completely absent or irrelevant. |
|
70%+ (Distinction) |
60-69% (Commendation) |
50-59% (Pass) |
40-49% (Pass) Threshold Standard |
30-39% (Fail) |
0-29% (Fail) |
|
Recommendations are supported by thorough analysis and demonstrate originality and feasibility. |
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Presentation and Referencing (10%) |
Presentation is exceptionally clear, precise, and well- structured. Ideas are logically presented with impeccable clarity. Referencing is consistent and correctly follows academic format. |
Presentation is clear and mostly free from errors. Structure is effective in communicating ideas. Referencing is mostly consistent with minor errors. |
Presentation is generally clear but may contain occasional errors in clarity or structure. Referencing has noticeable errors but is mostly adequate. |
Presentation lacks clarity in some areas, with occasional errors in structure. Referencing is inconsistent or contains multiple errors. |
Presentation is unclear and may lack coherent structure. Numerous errors in clarity and structure hinder comprehension. Referencing is consistently incorrect or missing. |
Presentation is incomprehensible due to severe errors in clarity and structure. Referencing is absent or completely incorrect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element 2 |
70%+ (Distinction) |
60-69% (Commendation) |
50-59% (Pass) |
40-49% (Pass) Threshold Standard |
30-39% (Fail) |
0-29% (Fail) |
|
Excellent |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Inadequate |
Reflection (your job) 100% |
Excellent skills audit, provides a detail reflection on the skills and a clear direction on how will the skills be improved in the future |
Very good skills audit, provides a detail reflection on the skills and with a very good direction on how will the skills be improved in the future |
Good skills audit, provides some detailed reflection on the skills and with a reasonable direction on how the skills will be improved in the future |
Satisfactory skills audit, lacks detail reflection on the skills and with but provides some direction on how the skills will be improved in the future |
Poor skills audit, lacks reflection overall on the skills and unclear direction on how the skills will be improved in the future |
Inadequate skills audit, No reflection on the skills and no direction on how the skills will be improved in the future
|
Buy Answer of your MSB001-6 Assignment 1 & Raise Your Grades
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentNeed help with your MSB001-6 International Trade and Monetary Policy Assignment 1? Our assignment help online services are designed for UK students to provide expert guidance to critically assess international trade theories, debates, and the impact of the business environment on global business performance. From analyzing international and European monetary systems to implementing business models and policy changes, our experts ensure high-quality content with impeccable presentation, writing, and analytical skills. Struggling with coursework? Our coursework helper for UK students provides free assignment samples as well as personalized support to guide you. Achieve academic success with our reliable and affordable services - contact us today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content