| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of East London (UEL) | Module Title | MS70123E Leading and Managing Across Cultures |
| Word Count | Debate 20 minutes/ report up to 800 words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | Summative Assessment 2: Individual written assignment (following the debate) |
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |
| Assessment title | Individual written assignment (following the debate) |
| Submission date and time | Week 12,13,14 |
| Word Count (or equivalent) | Debate 20 minutes/ report up to 800 words |
| Where to submit | Turnitin |
| Feedback date | 15 working days after presentation |
| Assessment Weighting | 50% |
Submitting, feedback & grades online using Blackboard Main objectives of the Assessment 2
Assignment 2 is comprised of task A and task B. Task A is the participation in a debate and Task B is a written report synthesising the main outcomes of the debate. The objective of this assignment is to enhance students’ understanding of how cultural diffеrеncеs impact various aspects of business management and to develop their critical thinking, research, communication, public speaking, persuasion techniques and development of empathy by engaging with diverse viewpoints. Additionally it engages students to delve into the complexities of managing and working in diverse as well as confront biases and stеrеotypеs that may influence thеir perceptions of different cultures. This promotes sеlf-awarеnеss and a more balanced view of cultural diffеrеncеs in a globalised environment.
You will be given a scenario to debate with a group of peers in the class. This scenario could involve any part the module content you have studied during the semester.
You will be required to present arguments and counterarguments clearly and persuasively during the debate. This cultivates your ability to articulate ideas effectively and engage in constructive discussions.
You are expected to structure arguments, use persuasive language and engage the audience while demonstrating a global mind-set by exploring how business practices must adapt to different cultural contexts, as this is essential for leaders and managers who may work in international settings.
Please note that you must conduct research to gather information about cultures and management practices. This research could involve studying academic articles, case studies, real-world еxamplеs, and cultural dimensions models.
Upon the conclusion of the debate in which you participated, you are required to write a comprеhеnsivе report that synthesises the main discussions undertaken during the debate. In addition to outlining the key points raised, this report should emphasise the practical application of pertinent theories and concepts within real-world contexts.
LO1: Critically review and evaluate major contemporary research and debates in the field of cross-cultural management.
LO2: Critically discuss the impact of national culture on work organisations and various types of teams including virtual/remote teams.
LO3: Critically evaluate the role of management, leaders and people practitioners and factors in managing across cultures
LO4: Appraise the significance of communication in analysing culture including areas of business negotiation, and in managing effectively across and in different cultures
LO5: Evaluate how national culture shapes individuals’ motivation, psychological contacts, and orientation to work.
LO6: Identify desirable intercultural competencies and the link between culture, ethics, and managerial competencies.
Hire Experts To Solve This MS70123E Summative Assessment 2 Before Deadline
Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment|
· Clear articulation of main points. · Coherent and logical progression of arguments. · Effective rebuttal of opposing viewpoints. · Depth of analysis and critical thinking. |
20% |
|
· Use of relevant and credible sources. · Integration of empirical data or еxamplеs. · Demonstrated understanding of theoretical foundations. |
20% |
|
· Respectful еngagеmеnt with fellow debaters. · Use of appropriate language and tone. · Contribution to the overall debate quality. · Unique insights or pеrspеctivеs offered. · Adhеrеncе to Rules and time Management. |
10% |
|
Content of written report · Clear and concise summary of main discussions from the debate · Critical analysis of the effects and impact of the debate. · Use of an adequate model of reflection · Coherent structure and organization of content. · Adhеrеncе to academic writing conventions, including proper citation and rеfеrеncing. |
50% |
|
Total |
100% |
| Assessment Criteria | 100–80% (Exceptional) | 79–70% (Excellent) | 69–50% (Good) | 49–0% (Fail / Weak) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clear articulation, logical flow, progressive and depth of analysis and critical thinking (25%) | Exceptional clarity and articulation of arguments with a very strong progression of ideas. Arguments logically structured and critically insightful, demonstrating deep analysis. | Clear articulation and progression of arguments with good logical flow. Arguments mostly well structured with very good depth of analysis and critical thinking. | Good articulation of points with reasonable clarity. Arguments generally logical but may lack depth or strong critical thinking. | Weak articulation. Arguments lack logical structure, coherence, or progression. Minimal evidence of critical thinking. |
| Use of relevant and credible sources, integration of data/analysis, understanding of foundations (10%) | Outstanding use of credible sources, data, and examples. Demonstrates exceptional understanding of foundational concepts and integrates evidence critically. | Excellent use of credible sources and data. Well-integrated evidence showing strong understanding of major concepts. | Good use of sources and examples, though integration may be basic. Demonstrates general understanding of concepts. | Flat or weak use of sources, poor integration, or little/no understanding of foundational concepts. |
| Respectful, appropriate language, contribution to debate quality, use of academic tone (10%) | Consistently professional, respectful, and appropriate language. Contributions significantly enhance discussion and demonstrate strong academic tone. | Generally respectful and appropriate language. Contributions positively support discussion with good academic tone. | Mostly respectful language with some contribution to discussion, though impact may be limited. | Poor or inappropriate language. Disrespectful tone or minimal contribution to discussion. |
| Written report: summary of debate, critical analysis, reflection, use of academic sources and conventions (50%) | Exceptional written report. Clear, concise, and well-structured summary with excellent critical analysis and reflection. Outstanding use of academic sources and correct referencing conventions. | Very good written report with clear structure and strong critical analysis. Good use of academic sources and mostly accurate referencing. | Adequate written report with basic structure. Some critical analysis present but mostly descriptive. Academic conventions partially followed. | Weak written report. Poor structure, minimal analysis, lack of reflection, and little or no use of academic sources or correct referencing. |
This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment.
Buy Custom Answer Of This MS70123E Summative Assessment 2 & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free QuoteStruggling with MS70123E Leading and Managing Across Cultures Assignment at UEL? Get expert guidance from UK Assignment Help to make your studies easier and boost your grades. Our team of skilled writers provides 100% human-written, unique, and easy-to-understand assignments. We also provide a free list of assignment samples to help you learn effective writing styles and improve your work. Choose Management Assignment Help today and achieve academic success with trusted support!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content