EG6019 Advanced Manufacturing Technology Part A & B Assignment Brief | University East London

Assignment title 

Part A - Manufacturing Simulation Using WITNESS Software 

Part B – Design A Product for Computer-Integrated  Manufacturing

Weighting 

100% (Part A – 50% and Part B-50%)

Handout date 

Part A & B: 7th October 2024

Submission date 

Part A: 15th November 2024 @ 16:00 via Turnitin  Part B: 20h December 2024 @ 16:00 via Turnitin

Learning outcomes assessed  by this assignment 

As listed in module specifications

Turnitin submission  

requirement 

Yes 

Turnitin Grade Mark feedback  used?

No

Moodle Assignment  

submission used?

No 

Moodle Assignment feedback  used?

Yes

Other electronic system  used? 

No 

Are submissions / feedback  totally electronic?

No

Technique 

Product 

Product Size 

File  

format 

Fabrication

1

Laser  

cutter

Hinged  

box

Less than 200  mm

.dxf file 

Students to book and use the lasers

2

3D  

printing

Gears (2  

or more)

To be decided  by the student. 

.stl file 

Students to book and use 3D printing

100-70 

69-60 

59-50 

49-45 

45-40 

39-30 

29-1

1st Class 

2nd class upper 

2nd class lower 

3rd class 

Fail 

Bad fail

Content of coursework

Interpretation 

and scope

• Has entirely  

addressed the topic set • An excellent attempt  to reflect the scope of  the assignment 

• Almost no omissions  or no  

misunderstandings

• Has correctly  

addressed the topic set • A very good attempt  to reflect the scope of  the assignment 

• Only a few minor  omissions and  

misunderstandings

• A reasonable  

attempt at addressing  the topic set 

• Some minor  

omissions and  

misunderstandings 

• No irrelevant  

material

• Has begun to  

address the topic set • Occasional minor  omissions and  

misunderstandings 

• Some irrelevant  

material

• Has only just begun  to address the topic set • A few major  

omissions and  

misunderstandings 

• Some irrelevant  

material

• Not really addressed  the topic set 

• Many major  

omissions and  

misunderstandings 

• Much irrelevant  

material

• Not  

addressed the  topic set 

• No irrelevant  material

Identification of information

• Substantial evidence  of independent  

information seeking 

• Much evidence of  independent  

information seeking 

• Evidence of  

independent  

information seeking

• Some evidence of  independent  

information seeking

• Little evidence of  independent  

information seeking

• Very little evidence  of independent  

information seeking

• No evidence  of independent  information  

seeking 

• Evidence of  potential use  

of unfair  

means

Technical 

analysis

• Excellent standard  of technical analysis

• Very good standard  of technical analysis

• Good technical  

analysis but some  

omissions and/or  

errors

• A reasonable level  of technical analysis  but some omissions  and/or error

• Analysis attempted  but too many  

omissions and/or error

• Analysis superficial • part of analysis  

missing

• Analysis  

very  

superficial or  non-existent

Evaluation of 

findings 

• Significant  

evaluation and an  

excellent approach to  the synthesis of  

relevant evidence to  support  

arguments/points

• Significant  

evaluation and  

synthesis of relevant  evidence to support  arguments/points

• Evidence of  

evaluation and  

reasonable synthesis  of relevant evidence to  support  

arguments/points

• No evidence of  

evaluation and only  some evidence of  

synthesis of relevant  evidence to support  arguments/points

• No evidence of  

evaluation and very  little evidence of  

synthesis of relevant  evidence to support  arguments/points

• Evidence presented  with little attempt at  evaluation and almost  no attempt at synthesis 

• No attempt  

at evaluation  

or synthesis

Structure 

• Structure excellent,  logical order and  

appropriate to task 

• Introduction and  

conclusion excellent

• Clear structure  

appropriate to task 

• Introduction and  

conclusion good

• Structure appropriate  but could be improved • Introduction and  

conclusion adequate

• Some structure but  flawed 

• Introduction and  

conclusion do not  

serve their function  well

• Structure has major  flaws 

• Introduction and  

conclusion weak

• Inappropriate  

structure  

• Introduction and  

conclusion almost  

perfunctory

• No structure  • No  

introduction  

and/or  

conclusion 

100-70 

69-60 

59-50 

49-45 

45-40 

39-30 

29-1

1st Class 

2nd class upper 

2nd class lower 

3rd class 

Fail 

Bad fail

Presentation and style of the coursework

Use of English 

• Very high standard • Negligible errors.  Clear and easy to  

read

• Very good  

standard 

• Very occasional  errors. 

• Minimal errors in  punctuation, the  

misuse of words,  

spelling and  

sentence  

construction 

• Occasional errors  in punctuation,  

misuse of words,  

spelling and  

sentence  

construction, style – make work difficult  to understand 

• Some errors - 

punctuation, misuse  of words, spelling  and sentence  

construction, style – make work  

frequently difficult  to understand 

• Frequent errors - punctuation,  

spelling, sentence  construction etc. 

often make work  

difficult to  

understand 

• Frequent errors - 

punctuation, misuse  of words, spelling,  sentence construction  – make work largely  incomprehensible

Presentation of data and references

• Excellent use of  relevant data,  

examples, figs,  

models 

• Excellent use of  citations within the  text 

• All references and  citations accurately  cited and listed 

• All references and  citations consistently  cited and listed

• Very good use of  relevant data etc.  

• Good use of  

citations within the  text 

• Most references  and citations  

accurately cited and  listed 

• Most references  and citations  

consistently cited  

and listed

• Some good use of  relevant data etc.  

• Some good use of  citations within the  text 

• The majority of  

references and  

citations accurately  cited and listed 

• The majority of  

references and  

citations consistently  cited and listed

• Reasonable use of  relevant data etc.  

• Occasionally good  use of citations  

within the text 

• The minority of  

references and  

citations accurately  cited and listed 

• The minority of  

references and  

citations consistently  cited and listed

• Superficial use of  relevant data etc.  

• Very few citations  within the text 

• Few references  

and citations  

accurately cited and  listed 

• Few references  

and citations  

consistently cited  

and listed

• Poor use of  

relevant data etc.  

• Little  

understanding of  

referencing systems

• Very few or no  

references 

• Very little or no  

understanding of  

referencing systems • The use of unfair  means was identified

Overall presentation 

• Excellent.  

Carefully organised  and well presented 

• Carefully  

organised and well  presented 

• Presentation  

satisfactory

• Presentation  

adequate

• Presentation only  just acceptable

• Unacceptable  

presentation

• No attempt to  

present the work