| Category | Assignment | Subject | Computer Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Huddersfield | Module Title | CMI3416/CMI7416 Effective Research and Professional Practice |
| Word Count | 1500 (word) |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Research proposal |
| Assessment Title | Assignment 2 |
| Academic Year | 2024-25 |
To gain experience in formulating a proposal for a research project.
To become skilled in identifying research gaps and questions that address them.
To become skilled in recognising and investigating a wide range of issues in computing research and practice.
Plan, document, manage, deliver and critically evaluate a rationale for a project in computing (and in the context of the degree being studied) using appropriate methods of research, analysis and investigation, together with an evaluation of scientific risk.
Identify and delineate the professional, legal and ethical issues raised by computing practice in organisations and research, as well as the state of the art in a particular computing domain.
Reflect critically on your own personal and professional development.
For this assignment, you need to write a research proposal on a topic of your choice, relevant to your degree. This proposal is a statement of intent for a research project to be undertaken and a reference point from which the project is examined. For instance, the proposal can be in preparation for your MSc individual project or for a PhD programme. Note, however, that there is no requirement that you undertake the project in the submitted proposal. In preparing your submission, you need to consider the following notes regarding topic choice, structure and content requirements.
Choosing your Topic
You are strongly encouraged to base your choice on the results of the academic literature review conducted for assignment 1. While this is not mandatory, it will significantly reduce your workload since you would not have to conduct a literature review from scratch.
Structure
You are free to structure your proposal in any way that you feel is more suitable to your topic. Indicatively, you can include the following:
The content of your research proposal is directly dependent on your topic. However, the following are required as a minimum:
|
Assessment Criterion |
Weighting % |
|
Analysis of literature and aims/objectives |
20 |
|
Discussion of proposed methodology |
30 |
|
Discussion of risks and relevant issues |
20 |
|
Project plan |
10 |
|
Presentation |
10 |
|
Citation style |
10 |
A detailed grading rubric is available on the next page.
|
|
Marks Available |
||||||||
|
Criterion |
0 to 29% |
30-39% |
40-49% |
50 - 59% |
60 - 69% |
70 - 79% |
80-89% |
≥ 90% |
|
|
Analysis of literature and aims/objectives |
Little to no analysis/ or aims/objectives |
Superficial analysis of literature, barely adequate aims and objectives |
Adequate but not well-supported analysis and aims/objectives |
Systematic analysis of literature and aims/objectives |
Nearly excellent analysis of literature and well thought out aims/objectives |
Excellent analysis of literature and aims/objectives |
Exceptional analysis of literature and innovative aims/objectives |
Outstanding analysis of literature and highly innovative aims/objectives |
|
|
Discussion of proposed methodology |
Little to no discussion of methodology |
Proposed methodology barely able to address aims/objectives |
Limited discussion of proposed methodology |
Systematic discussion of acceptable methodology |
Nearly excellent discussion of methodology that successfully addresses aims/objectives |
Excellent discussion of methodology that successfully addresses aims/objectives |
Exceptional analysis of an innovative proposed methodology |
Outstanding analysis of a highly innovative proposed methodology |
|
|
Discussion of risks and relevant issues |
Little to no appreciation of risks and issues related to the topic |
Superficial analysis of risks and issues related to the topic |
Adequate but not well-supported analysis of risks and issues related to the topic |
Systematic analysis of risks and issues related to the topic |
Nearly excellent analysis of risks and issues related to the topic |
Excellent analysis of risks and issues related to the topic |
Exceptional and insightful analysis of risks and issues related to the topic |
Outstanding and deeply insightful analysis of risks and issues related to the topic |
|
|
Project plan |
Unsuitable plan for the proposed research |
Barely adequate plan for the proposed research |
Adequate plan for the proposed research |
Project plan with consideration of milestones and deliverables |
Nearly excellent plan with well thought out milestones and deliverables |
Excellent plan with well thought out milestones and deliverables |
Exceptional plan with well thought out milestones and deliverables |
Outstanding plan with remarkable milestones and deliverables |
|
|
Presentation |
Major grammatical and spelling errors. No evidence of scientific writing. No relevant figures |
Major grammatical or spelling errors. Writing barely scientific. Few or largely irrelevant figures |
Many grammatical or spelling errors. Scientific writing on a low level. Most figures accurate but not very relevant |
Minor grammatical or spelling errors. Scientific writing on an adequate level. Most figures accurate, some not very relevant |
Minor grammatical or spelling errors. Writing on par with nationally recognised venues. Most figures accurate and informative |
Very minor spelling errors. Writing on par with internationally recognised venues. Almost all figures accurate and informative |
No grammatical or spelling errors. Writing on par with excellent, internationally recognised venues. All figures accurate and informative |
No grammatical or spelling errors. Report publishable in world-leading international venues. All figures accurate and informative |
|
|
Citation style |
Little to no evidence of use of citation style. Little to no consistency and accuracy in reference list |
Citation style mostly inappropriate. Many inconsistencies and errors |
Citation style partly inappropriate. Many inconsistencies between text and list with many major errors |
Citation style somewhat consistent. Many references inconsistent between text and list, with many minor errors |
Citation style mostly consistent. Some references inconsistent between text and list, with many minor errors |
Citation style consistent. Reference list almost complete, with some minor errors |
Citation style correct and consistent. Reference list complete, but with a few minor errors |
Citation style correct and accurate throughout. Reference list completely accurate with no errors |
|
Buy Answer of This Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Request to Buy AnswerIf you are looking for the solutions for assignment CMI3416/CMI7416 Effective Research and Professional Practice in UK? Don’t worry, we are here to provide the best UK assignment help that covers all assessment solutions like assignment writing, dissertation writing, research proposal writing, coursework writing, and more. No matter whether you want computer science assignment help or any management and big data spring assignment solution, our expert team of writers is always there to help you and will solve all your queries. You can also check the list of free assignment samples created by our writers with AI and plagiarism-free writing skills. So don’t delay and hire our services to score well in your academics.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
