OFFERS!
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Bishop Grosseteste University | Module Title | BUS73023 Leadership and People Management Across International Borders |
| Assessment Type | Presentation of Academic Poster |
|---|---|
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |
This assignment is an individual assignment.
It requires you to prepare and present an academic poster over a 20-minute period (including questions from an audience) that critically identifies the approach to leadership you consider most important for effective management within an international business.
It should meet the following requirements:
Introduction
Leadership and Organisational Performance
Leadership Across International Borders
Leadership and Team-Working
Conclusion
The presentation should expand upon the themes identified in the academic poster. It should not just verbally describe what has already been written. The most important thing to remember is that the academic poster and presentation should collectively deliver a coherent argument.
Further Task Requirements Include:
Submit your presentation slides in the following format to Turnitin: ‘BUS73023_A1_BNUMBER’
Develop systematic knowledge and critical understanding of practical skills that are pivotal to effective management and leadership practices in international business, including teamwork and leadership skills associated with personal effectiveness.
Critically evaluate theory, concept and principles related to leadership and people management in an international context.
Demonstrate originality in critical analysis of leadership situations, using theories, concepts, ideas, and knowledge from a variety of sources (of appropriate academic quality) to inform their learning.
Your submission folder will open 5 days before the submission deadline. You can resubmit your work as many times as you like up until the deadline. Your tutor will mark and feed back on your final submission. If you submit through Turnitin, YOU MUST ONLY SUBMIT ONE FILE (multiple documents must be combined). You can submit an electronic copy through Turnitin in one of the following formats: Microsoft Word (DOCX) or PDF. Your submission must contain a minimum of 20 words to avoid a Turnitin error. Please ensure you review your submission after upload. Make sure you download and keep your digital receipt as proof of submission. If the submission method for your assignment is Blackboard, you will receive a receipt via email, and you will also be given the option to download one. Please allow sufficient time for your submission to upload; large files with audio/video take longer.
Feedback is available from 9 am on the date specified, unless advised otherwise. If you have any specific questions relating to the comments on the feedback sheet, please contact your Module Tutor and arrange a tutorial with them. Tutor details are provided in the ‘Module Information’ section of your Blackboard module.
The mark scheme (found at the end of this assignment brief) is used in conjunction with the module outcomes (above) to award appropriate marks for the assignment.
All the main criteria headings are equally weighted and assessed, but a single overall mark is awarded.
You will receive comments under the main criteria headings, which will help you to identify your strengths and weaknesses in the different areas.
All marks are subject to the confirmation of the Board of Examiners.
You must ensure that you familiarise yourself with the relevant section of the Quality Handbook, which governs all Bishop Grosseteste University assessments.
Your tutor will be available to answer any questions you have regarding the assignment, and you should check their availability to access their support.
You can get support with your academic practice from Learning Development. This support includes online resources, workshops, drop-in sessions and one-to-one appointments. You can also get support for any technical aspects of your submission from Digital Learning. Please visit the ‘Getting Started and Support’ section of your Blackboard module to find out more. Additional help is available from the CELT Centre.
Please also make use of support available from the Library, either through their Blackboard and LibGuides sites or by visiting the Cornerstone building.
To get the most from the support available, please access it at the earliest opportunity.
The University uses APA (American Psychological Association) 7th as its referencing standard as laid out in the Handbook for Written Coursework (APA7th).
Your attention is drawn to the relevant section of the University’s Quality Handbook covering academic misconduct, including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, cheating, soliciting or commissioning work, and collusion. Penalties for academic misconduct can be severe and can include the withdrawal of the right to resubmit work and/or termination of studies. On submission of the assignment, you will be required to declare that the work is your own and that all sources have been properly acknowledged.
The University uses originality software to check student work. Occasionally, requests will be received from other institutions to see student work where the software has noted potential high levels of duplication. In these instances, the University reserves the right to share the work anonymously with the institution concerned.
Get Answer of BUS73023 Leadership and People Management Assignment before the deadline
Pay & Buy Non-Plagiarised AssignmentGeneral information on layout, referencing and presentation can be found in the Handbook for Written Coursework (APA7th).
Unless your assignment is submitted by the deadline indicated above, penalties will be applied in accordance with the relevant section of the Quality Handbook. Please note: if work is submitted more than 24 hours after the deadline, it will receive a mark of zero. If you wish to submit within the 24-hour late period, please send your work to latesubmissions@bishopg.ac.uk.
If you require any advice or support with making your submission, please contact the Digital Learning Team at digitallearning@bishopg.ac.uk or by calling 01522 563866.
| Mark Scale | Knowledge and Understanding of Issues | Argument and Critical Analysis | Use of Sources and Evidence, and Academic Referencing | Communication and Presentation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90-100% | An outstanding, extensive knowledge and understanding, and excellent scholarship with reference to current debates, concepts, issues, and methods. The poster presentation demonstrates an excellent ability to discuss the complexities and the potential and/or limitations of the evidence. It is considerably original and creative. | Exceptionally insightful, persuasive poster presentation that demonstrates exemplary levels of criticality and assessment. It demonstrates an exemplary critical evaluation and engagement with evidence drawn from primary and secondary sources chosen effectively. It demonstrates the potential to be of exhibitable quality. | Exemplary scholarly use of evidence drawn from excellent primary and secondary sources. The assignment demonstrates impressive command of the evidence used drawing on an excellent range of visual material and selected primary and secondary sources. It presents an outstanding bibliography and excellent academic referencing. | The poster presentation shows excellent communication skills, making precise use of specialist language. It demonstrates outstanding standards of accuracy and eloquence. It is flawless: it engages the audience with an exceptional use of images, eye-contact, pace, voice projection, and use of body language. |
| 80-89% | An extensive and highly sophisticated knowledge, understanding, and scholarship with reference to current debates, concepts, issues, and methods. A persuasive examination of the issues displaying sensitivity to the potential and/or limitations of the chosen evidence. It shows considerable originality and creativity. | Effective and sustained argument which demonstrates outstanding levels of criticality and assessment. The poster presentation demonstrates a sophisticated critical evaluation and engagement with evidence drawn from well-selected primary and secondary courses selected. It shows a considerable degree of originality. | Highly precise use of sources and evidence. The poster presentation demonstrates impressive command of the evidence used drawing on an excellent range of primary and secondary sources. It includes an outstanding bibliography and academic referencing conventions that are employed accurately consistently. | The poster presentation shows outstanding communication skills, making precise use of specialist language. It demonstrates very high levels of accuracy and eloquence. It is carefully planned with attention to details, delivered virtually flawlessly. It engages the audience with a sophisticated use of images, eye-contact, pace, voice projection, and use of body language. |
| 70-79% | The poster presentation demonstrates high levels of knowledge, understanding and scholarship with reference to current debates, concepts, issues, and methods. An examination of the issues that displays understanding of the potential and/or limitations of the evidence used. It shows some originality and/or creativity. | Highly effective structure and sustained argument which demonstrates high levels of criticality and assessment. This poster presentation demonstrates a sophisticated critical evaluation and engagement with the textual and visual evidence drawn from primary and secondary sources. It shows some degree of originality. | Precise use of sources and evidence. The poster presentation demonstrates perceptive command of the evidence used drawing on a high-level range of primary and secondary sources. It employs referencing conventions accurately. It conveys complex issues, debates, and concepts concisely and effectively. | The poster presentation shows high-level communication skills, making precise use of specialist language. It demonstrates high standards of accuracy and eloquence. Effective deployment of visual materials and strategies of visual design (poster) and high standards of accuracy, eloquence, presentation skills, and audience engagement (presentation). The assignment is clear and well-suited, carefully planned with attention to details. |
| 60-69% | The poster presentation demonstrates good knowledge and understanding. It demonstrates learning outcomes have been met at good satisfactory standards. Treatment of issues, concepts, theories, and texts demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the knowledge. Evidence of scholarly engagement with and insight into relevant issues. | The poster presentation shows evidence of insight though it might lack finesse and originality. The structure is clear, and the arguments made are well supported. The poster presentation evidences well-developed skills in analysis and synthesis together with textual and visual examples of evaluation. | The poster presentation draws on a good range of primary and secondary sources and shows effective research. It demonstrates a broad range of scholarly resources is accessed. Critical appraisal and analysis are good and sometimes insightful and/or imaginative. The poster presentation employs academic referencing conventions appropriately. | Expression is generally clear and concise. Arguments are put forward succinctly both in written and oral form, showing a good level of specialist language. The poster presentation is well-structured, well-thought out and coherent. It shows clear and concise deployment of visual materials and strategies of visual design (poster) and succinctly. It shows a good level of specialist language, presentation skills, and audience engagement (presentation). This assignment is well structured, planned, and coherent. |
| 50-59% | The poster presentation demonstrates competent and adequate knowledge and understanding. Significant learning outcomes have been met at satisfactory standards. Competent work and acceptable level of understanding is subjected to critical appraisal, though its depth is sometimes limited. The issues chosen for discussion in the poster and its presentation are central to the relevant field, but standards of scholarship are incomplete. It shows some evidence of scholarly engagement with and insight into relevant issues. | A satisfactory range of issues is selected for discussion and analysis. Structure and argument of the poster presentation are competently constructed and sustained with textual and visual examples of evaluation. | A competent range of literature is accessed, including important scholarly resources. Analysis of primary and secondary sources is sound, but their critique is not always insightful. The poster presentation demonstrates reasonable levels of scholarship and research. | Expression is clear and accessible. Arguments are articulated adequately. The structure is satisfactory, but planning could have been improved. Competent and adequate deployment of visual materials and strategies of visual design (poster) and clear and accessible verbal expression, and presentation skills (presentation). Issues, debates, concepts, and arguments are articulated adequately. |
| 40-49% | The poster presentation demonstrates a partial and superficial knowledge and understanding. It does not demonstrate the full achievement of the learning outcomes. Understanding and analysis are partial and superficial. | The poster presentation’s selection of issues and their discussion are limited and superficial. The structure and argument employed shows partial evidence of sound development. The poster presentation is not substantiated by appropriate, relevant textual and visual evidence drawn from primary and secondary sources. | Limited range of scholarly resources, with little attempt to assess evidence from primary and secondary sources. Examples provided are not well chosen or employed. There is overreliance on secondary sources or provided material. Referencing impression detracts from the quality of the work. | There is some weakness in expression and issues, debates, concepts, and arguments are not fully articulated adequately. The structure may be imbalanced and/or unclear. The range of evidence drawn from primary and secondary sources is not presented appropriately. It shows some lack of attention in planning and execution. The poster presentation shows weak presentation skills. |
| 30-39% | The poster presentation demonstrates inadequate knowledge and understanding. The assignment does not demonstrate the full achievement of the learning outcomes. Understanding and analysis are inadequate. | The selection of issues and their discussion are inadequate. The poster presentation lacks coherence and does not demonstrate an ability to reflect critically on relevant issues, concepts, or evidence. | Inadequate range of scholarly resources and scarce attempt to assess evidence. The poster presentation does not employ relevant examples or material. Inadequate scholarship and lack of care in referencing. | Weakness in expression. The structure may be fragmented and/or imbalanced. The material is not presented appropriately. The assignment lacks attention in planning and execution. |
| 20-29% | The poster presentation demonstrates extremely inadequate knowledge and understanding. It does not meet the learning outcomes. It shows a seriously inadequate understanding and analysis. | The poster presentation’s selection of issues and their discussion is extremely inadequate. The poster presentation is poorly constructed and inadequately sustained. It is inadequately executed and/or delivered. | An insignificant range of scholarly resources, and minimal indication of awareness of relevant evidence drawn from primary and secondary sources. Extremely inadequate scholarship and lack of care in referencing. | Very weak expression makes the poster presentation difficult to understand. The structure is incoherent, and/or incomplete. The poster presentation lacks attention to planning and execution. |
| 10-19% | The poster presentation lacks evidence of knowledge and understanding almost entirely. It does not meet the learning outcomes. | The issues discussed are almost entirely irrelevant. The argument is poorly constructed and substantiated. | The poster presentation lacks evidence of engagement with evidence drawn from appropriate primary and secondary sources. It does not demonstrate appropriate referencing. | Inadequate written expression makes the poster presentation difficult to understand. The assignment lacks care in planning and execution. |
| 0-9% | No evidence of engagement with relevant information, knowledge or understanding. The poster presentation is not connected to the task. | The poster presentation shows no evident engagement or awareness of appropriate relevant issues, theories, or debates. It is very poorly constructed and/or substantiated. | The poster presentation lacks engagement with evidence drawn from appropriate primary and/or secondary sources. | The poster presentation is not complete and/or accessible. The assignment shows no evidence of care in planning and/or execution. |
Buy Custom Answer Of BUS73023 Leadership and People Management Assignment
Chat with an International Business ExpertNeed expert help with your BUS73023 Leadership and People Management Across International Borders Assignment? We provide AI-free and plagiarism-free Assignment Help. Our team of professional writers delivers top-quality assignments that are original and crafted without AI tools, ensuring the highest academic standards. We also offer a free list of assignment samples and answers, written by experts, to guide your work. Get your assignment checked with an AI and plagiarism report for complete peace of mind. Contact us today for reliable, expert international business assignment help in the UK and boost your grades!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
