Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Open Polytechnic | Module Title | CQS103 Construction Planning & Construction Methodology |

Weighting 40%
By submitting your assessment, you confirm that it is your own, original work.
This assessment is designed to enable you to:
The project is based around a case study as outlined in the assessment file.
Read the fact sheets for Modules 1 and 2. The information you need for this assessment is contained in the fact sheets and web links for these modules. We would also encourage you to do your own research to enhance your answers.
Try the job briefs to help you build up your knowledge and your writing skills. The more assessment work you do, the more confident you will become.
NOTE: If you would like to upload your Microsoft Project file for your assessment, please convert your file into a ZIP file and upload it accordingly (Please make sure that your zip file has Microsoft project file only, rest of the files have to be uploaded directly in the word format.). If you have any issues, please contact Helpdesk at: helpdesk@openpolytechnic. ac.nz
Your company is submitting a tender for the construction of the Bethlehem Medical Centre, as outlined in the attached Request for Tender documents. As part of the tender documents you are required to provide:
The methodology statement is to be written for the client and will describe the method you propose to use to complete the project. It will require a professional presentation that contains
The methodology statement is also a marketing tool, as you are using it as an opportunity to convince the client that your company is the best choice.
Your statement should leave the client with confidence that you understand the nature of this contract and have considered the most appropriate options to meet the client’s needs.
Your preliminary programme of work must contain the following:
You are NOT required to include a critical path.
Documents submitted with this tender are:
These documents were sent out with the Request for Tender and are appended to this assessment.
Note: For this assessment, you just need to submit your work i.e.
You need to factor the following constraints into your programme:
| Introduction | 5-4.5 marks | 4-3.5 marks | 3-2.5 marks | 2 marks | 1.5-1 marks |
| Clearly written introduction that leads reader into the report | Introduces subject and explains topic. | Provides basic introduction to subject | Insufficient introduction of the subject | Fails to introduce subject adequately | |
| Selection of client needs | 15-12.5 marks | 12-10 marks | 9.5-7.5 marks | 7-6 marks | 5.5-1 marks |
| At least 5 specific client needs selected. All are relevant, appropriate and specific to the building in this case study | At least 5 client needs selected. Most but not all appropriate or specific to the building in this case study | At least 5 client needs selected, but some not appropriate to the building in this case study | Less than 5 client needs met or are mostly not appropriate | Insufficient client needs identified, and not appropriate | |
| Choice of methodology | 15-12.5 marks | 12-10 marks | 9.5-7.5 marks | 7-6 marks | 5.5-1 marks |
| Use of a methodology that meets current good construction practice; offers alternatives where appropriate and is specific to the building in this case study. | Methodology adequately explained and shown to meet current good construction practice and is specific to the building in this case study | Methodology adequately explained and shown to meet current good construction practice | Methodology inadequately explained an not shown to meet current good construction practice | Methodology not incorrectly explained | |
| Conclusion | 5-4.5 marks | 4-3.5 marks | 3-2.5 marks | 2 marks | 1.5-1 marks |
| Conclusion provides excellent summary of methodology statement and provides logically derived recommendations | Conclusion provides adequate summary of methodology statement
and derived recommendations |
Conclusion provides adequate summary of methodology statement | Conclusion misses some items or adds new material | No conclusion provided | |
| Presentation | 10-8.5 marks | 8-7 marks | 6.5-5 marks | 4.5-4 marks | 3.5-1 marks |
| Presentation (page layout, font size, title, paragraph spacing, sentence spacing…) are of an excellent standard.
Spelling, grammar and word choice are correct and appropriate to audience |
Layout is consistent and appropriate to subject and audience.
Spelling and grammar are mostly correct |
Layout is consistent. Some errors in spelling and punctuation | Layout is inconsistent
Many errors in spelling |
No thought given to presentation. Large number of spelling and grammatical errors | |
| Total marks for Part A | 50 |
| Presentation and Format | 15-12.5 marks | 12-10 marks | 9.5-7.5 marks | 7-6 marks | 5.5-1 marks |
| Presentation conforms to MSP with no errors. Displays appropriate title, colour choice and setout and has high readability.
Grid lines are used properly, making it easy to follow & which looks good. Gantt chart format meets current industry good practice standards in all respects |
Presentation has a low number of errors, and title, colour choice, and setout are appropriate.
Grid lines are used properly, making it easy to follow but doesn’t look good. Gantt chart format can be followed and conforms to industry good practice standards in most respects. |
Presentation has a low number of errors but title and/or colour choice and/or setout are not appropriate.
Gantt chart format can be followed but does not conform to industry good practice standards |
Presentation has a high number of errors. Formatting is illogical and/or unclear | Presentation mostly incorrect. Formatting is illogical and/or unclear | |
| Identification of tasks | 10-8.5 marks | 8-7 marks | 6.5-5 marks | 4.5-4 marks | 3.5-1 marks |
| 75+ tasks identified, and all are appropriate | 60+ tasks identified, and most are appropriate | 50+ tasks identified, but some are not appropriate | 50+ or less tasks identified, but most are not appropriate | Less than 40 tasks identified | |
| Sequencing of tasks | 15-12.5 marks | 12-10 marks | 9.5-7.5 marks | 7-6 marks | 5.5-1 marks |
| Sequence is logical and clear, allows for constraints and follows industry good practice standards
All parallel activities are duly considered. |
Sequence is logical and allows for constraints.
A few parallel activities are considered. |
Sequence is apparent but contains some logical flaws | Sequence is apparent but contains many logical flaws | Little or no sequence apparent | |
| Time frames | 10-8.5 marks | 8-7 marks | 6.5-5 marks | 4.5-4 marks | 3.5-1 marks |
| Time frames are entirely realistic for project.
Holidays and work timings are given consideration, which meets industry practices. |
Timeframes are realistic.
Holidays and work timings are given consideration. |
Timeframes provided mostly realistic | Timeframes provided but are not realistic | Timeframes not stated | |
| Total marks for Part B | 50 |
Feeling overwhelmed by CQS103 Construction Planning & Construction Methodology Assessment 1? You are not alone - that's where NZ Assignment Help Online For Students comes in. From "do my assignment for me" requests to university assignment examples for students to help you fine-tune your skills, our writers have you covered. Whether it's construction schedules, breakdowns of methodology or fully cited and plagiarism-free submissions, we'll ensure our solutions align with your coursework. We've helped thousands of New Zealand students get the academic help they need, on time and on target - so why not get some too? Let's let the experts do the heavy lifting while you concentrate on learning and achieving.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
asdasf