Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Nursing |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Universal College of Learning (UCOL) | Module Title | BN710710 Rangatiratanga Rangahau and Evidence Based Practice |

First, click on the assessment forum where you need to submit your presentation.
Click the button that says, “Add a new discussion topic.” Give your post a clear subject like “My Research Presentation – Name ##.”
Find the box for attaching files. You can either:
After the file finishes uploading, just click “Post to forum.”
This assessment will assess the following learning outcomes and contribute 50% to your final grade:
LO3: Apply rangahau and contemporary research evidence to support quality improvement initiatives.
(NCNZ Pou standard descriptors: 4.3, 4.4, 6.4, 6.6)
All UCOL assessments are governed by the Academic Statute and the Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. By submitting or undertaking this assessment, you confirm that your work meets these requirements. To ensure a high standard of academic integrity, you are required to:
As part of assessments, generative AI tools can be utilised for:
However, you must then produce the content of your assessment. Generative AI cannot be utilised to write your sections of your assessment or replace your work.
To support academic integrity, you are required to save your draft documents, or version history, using UCOL OneDrive. If a breach of academic integrity is suspected, you will be required to share a link to these draft documents as evidence of your work.
All closed book exams must be completed using the Safe Exam Browser. Students must not use any unfair means, including unauthorised resources, communication, or tools, during examinations or assessments.
The following penalties may apply if you are found to have been dishonest in your assessment:
For clarity a reduction of mark may mean you receive no marks and therefore if this is a re-sit will mean you fail the course.
Instructions for completing this assessment – please read carefully
For this assignment, you will create and upload a PowerPoint Presentation:
Your PowerPoint presentation must include:
Your PowerPoint must include a maximum of 10 main slides (in addition to your introduction and reference slides).
In addition to the uploaded PowerPoint Presentation, you will need to.
The question could be based around the following examples.
Respond to Questions: Student is to respond to all questions that the other group members ask about their presentation. Responses should provide a clear rationale and be supported by appropriate literature.
Task 1: Introduction and Formulating the Research Question
Task 2: Literature Review and Appraisal
Task 3: Evidence-Based Intervention Recommendations
Task 4: Implementation of the research evidence.
Task 5: Forum Participation
This task evaluates your engagement with your peers in an academic context.
The following is suggested PowerPoint slide content guidance:
1. Add an Introduction Slide
Slide 1. Introduce your Clinical Observation
2. Importance of the phenomenon or practice for nursing practice
3. Create a PICO Research Question
(Or use of an alternative recognised research question format)
4. Select 4-5 Research Articles
5. Appraise the ‘Quality’ of 2 of your selected Articles
6. Provide a Summary of Overall Findings
7. Identify Recommendations from Your Articles
*Use appraisal tools (e.g., CASP, JBI checklists).
8. Discuss Nursing leadership role in change management
9. Discuss principles of change management relating to recommendation implementation.
Change Management: Discuss the application of change management principles (e.g., Kotter’s 8-Step Model, Lewin’s Change Model) to address any potential barriers and the facilitation of your recommendations in the nursing setting.
* Add a Reference List
| Ākonga name and ID | Marked by | Date | ||||||
| TASK 1 | Beginning (E-grade) | Developing (D-grade) | Satisfactory (C-grade) | Accomplished (B-grade) | Exemplary (A-grade) | |||
| Introduction and research question | The introduction is missing or unclear. The research question is absent or not aligned with the clinical observation and nursing practice. | Attempts to introduce the clinical observation and its importance, but the connection to nursing practice is vague. The research question is present but lacks clarity and focus | Introduces the clinical observation and its relevance to nursing practice. The research question is clear and mostly relevant, with minor improvements needed for specificity. | Introduces the clinical observation and its strong relevance to nursing practice. The research question is clear, relevant, and specific. | Clearly and concisely introduces the clinical observation, demonstrating its significant importance to nursing practice. The research question is highly relevant, specific, and well-articulated. | |||
| 0-9 | 10-12 | 13-14 | 15-17 | 18-20 | ||||
| COMMENTS | MARK | |||||||
| TASK 2 | Beginning (E-grade) | Developing (D-grade) | Satisfactory (C-grade) | Accomplished (B-grade) | Exemplary (A-grade) | |||
| Literature Review and article appraisal | Literature selection is poor or non-existent. Appraisal and summary of the literature is missing or incorrect. | Selects some relevant contemporary literature but may include irrelevant sources. The appraisal is superficial or descriptive rather than critical. The summary of the literature is basic and lacks synthesis. | Selects relevant contemporary literature. The appraisal is generally good but may lack critical depth in some areas. The summary is accurate and presents the main points of the literature. | Selects highly relevant contemporary literature. The appraisal is critical and demonstrates a good understanding of the sources. The summary is accurate and synthesises key findings well. | Selects highly relevant contemporary literature. The appraisal is critical, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the sources’ strengths and weaknesses. The summary is concise. accurate, and synthesises key findings effectively. | |||
| 0-9 | 10-12 | 13-14 | 15-17 | 18-20 | ||||
| COMMENTS | MARK | |||||||
| TASK 3 | Beginning (E-grade) | Developing (D-grade) | Satisfactory (C-grade) | Accomplished (B-grade) | Exemplary (A-grade) | |||
| Recommendations based upon your task 2 literature | Recommendations are missing, impractical, or not supported by any evidence. | Recommendations are present but lack a clear link to evidence or are not very practical. They only partially address the research question. | Recommendations are mostly evidence-based and practical. They align with the research question but could be more specific or innovative. | Recommendations are evidence-based, practical, and directly address the research question. They are well-justified by the literature. | Recommendations are evidence-based, highly practical, and directly address the research question. They demonstrate a clear understanding of best practices in the field. | |||
| 0-9 | 10-12 | 13-14 | 15-17 | 18-20 | ||||
| COMMENTS | MARK | |||||||
| TASK 4 | Beginning (E-grade) | Developing (D-grade) | Satisfactory (C-grade) | Accomplished (B-grade) | Exemplary (A-grade) | |||
| Implementation of recommendations and leadership change and management discussion | Recommendation Implementation and change management discussion is missing or entirely unrealistic. | Describes a basic implementation plan, but it lacks detail and is not very practical. The change management strategy is weak and does not fully address potential barriers. | Presents a clear plan for implementation. The change management strategy is sound but may overlook some minor details or potential challenges. | Presents a detailed and realistic plan for implementation. The change management strategy is sound and considers most key stakeholders and potential barriers. | Presents a detailed, realistic, and wellthought-out plan for implementing the recommendations. The change management strategy considers all key stakeholders and potential barriers, demonstrating an advanced understanding of the process. | |||
| 0-9 | 10-12 | 13-14 | 15-17 | 18-20 | ||||
| COMMENTS | MARK | |||||||
| TASK 5 | Beginning (E-grade) | Developing (D-grade) | Satisfactory (C-grade) | Accomplished (B-grade) | Exemplary (A-grade) | |||
| Forum Participation | Participation is minimal or absent. Question and response are irrelevant or incorrect. | Question and response are present but are superficial or do not add significant value to the forum discussion. | Question is relevant and encourages discussion. Answer is accurate and shows a good understanding of the material. | Question is insightful and contributes well to the discussion. Answer is accurate, articulate, and demonstrates a strong understanding of the topics. | Question is insightful, thought-provoking, and contributes significantly to the discussion. Answer is well-researched, articulate, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the topics discussed. | |||
| 0-4 | 5-6 | 7-8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
| COMMENTS | MARK | |||||||
| TASK 6 | Beginning (E-grade) | Developing (D-grade) | Satisfactory (C-grade) | Accomplished (B-grade) | Exemplary (A-grade) | |||
| Academic presentation for PowerPoint, voiceover and APA references | Pace of delivery not adapted to time allocated. Voice-over / Video: Delivery is confusing, difficult to understand, or missing. PowerPoint: Slides are poorly formatted and contain numerous errors that distract from the content. References: are either missing or so poorly formatted that it is impossible to identify the sources. | Pace of delivery not adapted to time allocated. Voice-over / Video: Delivery is sometimes difficult to follow with several grammatical errors. PowerPoint: Formatting is inconsistent and unprofessional with several spelling or punctuation errors. References: are present but have significant errors or inconsistencies. | Pace of delivery adapted to time allocated. Voice-over / Video: Delivery is understandable but may lack confidence with a few minor grammatical errors. PowerPoint: Slides are generally well-formatted but may have some inconsistencies and a few minor spelling or punctuation errors. References: are mostly correct, but some inconsistencies or errors are noticeable. | Pace of delivery adapted to time allocated well. Voice-over / Video: Delivery is clear and mostly professional with very few minor grammatical errors. PowerPoint: Slides are well-formatted and professional with one or two minor spelling or punctuation errors. References: Sources are correctly cited with minimal inconsistencies or errors. | Presentation is adapted to time allocated well. Voice-over / Video: Delivery is clear, confident, and professional with flawless language. PowerPoint: Slides are visually engaging, professionally formatted, and free of spelling and punctuation errors. References: All sources are meticulously cited and follow the required citation style perfectly. | |||
| 0-4 | 5-6 | 7-8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
| COMMENTS | ||||||||
Working on BN710710 Rangatiratanga Rangahau and Evidence Based Practice Assessment One can be tricky when you’re trying to connect research, cultural values, and practical nursing knowledge in one piece of work. If you need Assignment Help From Our NZ Writers, we provide clear and straightforward guidance that helps you understand each requirement without making it feel complicated. You can also go through nursing assignment examples to see how ideas are structured and presented in a proper academic format. This makes it easier to organise your thoughts, improve your writing, and complete your assessment with more confidence and less confusion.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content