| Category | Coursework | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Buckinghamshire New University | Module Title | BM561 Business Consulting CW1 Assignment |
| Assignment No. and Type | CW1 Research Report |
| Word Count | 1500 words |
| Academic Year | 2024-25 |
You are a management consultant in one of the reputable consultancy organisations. your client has asked you to conduct secondary research that shows how well you understand the client's project/problem. You are not required to provide a set of solutions to the client’s problem at this stage.
Using one of the client project briefs (available on LSST Connect), answer the following questions:
Word count is 1,500 (+/- 10%) INCLUDING INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSIONS.
1. Provide a brief description of the company, its products or services, market position, and the challenges it faces.
2. Using research, break the problem down by critically analysing and presenting areas of importance to the client. Use appropriate business analysis tools and frameworks such as (e.g. STP, SWOT, Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, etc).
3. From your analysis above, state what the top three issues the client is facing with a rationale as to why you have chosen these three areas.
This is an individual report assignment that needs to be completed independently, building on your reading and research. As a result, it should NOT be done in collaboration with another student or students.
- Please take note that any additional words found in text boxes within the report body, tables, or diagrams, WILL be included towards the word count. The Appendices may only contain two sides of A4 at most (not including the list of references). Tables and graphics can be found in the appendices.
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes:
Please see your programme handbook for information on the standard referencing style, presentational requirements and process for submitting your work.
Please reference your work according to the Harvard Referencing style as defined in Cite Them Right Online. This information is also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2016). Cite them right: the essential reference guide. 10th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are available via the university library.
The Cite Them Right database can be accessed via the Library – A to Z list of e-resources. This assignment should be submitted electronically using the relevant submission point in the Upload My Assignment section on LSST Connect.
Please also note that work that is submitted up to 10 working days beyond the submission date will be considered a late submission. Late submissions will be marked and the actual mark recorded, but will be capped at the pass mark (typically 40%), provided that the work is of a passing standard. Work submitted after this period will not be marked and will be treated as a non-submission.
You are expected to take responsibility for maintaining and managing confidentiality issues in your work. You should maintain and respect confidentiality concerning the protection of personal, technical and/or commercial information of a sensitive nature in your assessed work, whatever the format. For further information and guidance, please see the relevant section in your programme handbook.
Do You Need BM561 Assignment of This Question
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentAcademic integrity means taking responsibility for your work.
When you submit an assignment, you are making a declaration that it is your work and that you have acknowledged the contribution of others and their ideas in its development (for example, by referencing them appropriately).
|
0-34 (F) – Fail Not successful |
35-39 E – Marginal fail Below required standard |
40-49 (D) Pass Satisfactory |
50-59 (C) Pass Good |
60-69 (B) Pass Very Good |
70-79 (A) Pass Excellent |
80-100 (A+) Pass Outstanding |
|
|
Knowledge and Understanding This should include evidence of 30% - Depth and understanding of the client - Reputable and range of relevant secondary research sources |
Work demonstrates alimited or no understanding with few or no sources used with limited or no relevance. |
Work demonstrates insufficient understanding. Very few sources used, all of secondary nature yielding irrelevant or very shallow information, or, many sources used but with little attempt to consider their relevance. |
Work demonstrates asufficient understanding. Very limited range of secondary sources used, yielding only superficial information, or, wide range of sources used but many are of marginal relevance. |
Work demonstrates awell-developed understanding. Limited range of secondary sources used or, wide range of sources used but some are of marginal relevance. Reasonable level of depth of investigation |
Work demonstrates asophisticated understanding informed by relevant secondary sources, yielding insightful information. Sources are authoritative and credible. Clear evidence of depth of investigation. |
A highly accomplishedargument informed by a highly accomplished range of relevant secondary sources, yielding insightful and comprehensive information. Sources are authoritative and credible. Clear evidence of depth of investigation. |
An exceptionally accomplished argument informed by an exceptionally accomplished range of relevant secondary sources, yielding insightful and very comprehensive information. Sources are authoritative and credible. Clear evidence of depth of investigation. |
|
Application and Practice-50% This should include evidence of: - Analysis of the client, the problem they would like addressed and their wider business environment - Analysis based on evidence from research |
Limited or no analysisfrom the secondary material |
Insufficient analysis and tends to repeat facts from the secondary material, rather than considering their implications. Does not get to grips with what the information means. |
Sufficient analysis butoften it is more descriptive than evaluative. Attempts to assess implications and draw conclusions. Sufficient consideration of the ‘so what’ factor. |
Consistent and informed analysis, but which may not fully reflect the data collected. Consistent and informed insight interspersed with some weaker parts |
Capable and effective,thoughtful and balanced analysis of the material collected, recognising its implications. Capable and effective level of linkages between the data collected and the client’s business and problem. Firmly based on the evidence provided |
Highly accomplished,thoughtful, insightful and balanced analysis of the material collected, critically recognising its impact on and implications for the client’s business and problem. Very firmly based on the evidence provided |
Exceptionally accomplished, thoughtful, insightful and balanced analysis of the material collected, critically recognising its impact on and implications for the client’s business and problem. Very firmly based on the evidence provided. |
|
0-34 (F) – Fail Not successful |
35-39 E – Marginal fail Below required standard |
40-49 (D) Pass Satisfactory |
50-59 (C) Pass Good |
60-69 (B) Pass Very Good |
70-79 (A) Pass Excellent |
80-100 (A+) Pass Outstanding |
|
|
Transferable Skills (Assignment parameters)-20% This should include evidence of: Accurate spelling, punctuation and grammar Completing all of the assignment tasks Appropriate language use Appropriate report writing conventions Accurate Harvard referencing |
Limited or no ability tocommunicate ideas and information accurately and reliably in written academic English |
Demonstrates an insufficient ability to communicate ideas and information accurately and reliably in written academic English. |
Demonstrates a sufficient ability to communicate ideas and information accurately and reliably in written academic English |
Demonstrates a consistent and confident ability to communicate ideas and information accurately and reliably in written academic English. |
Demonstrates a highlyproficient ability to communicate ideas and information accurately and reliably in written academic English. |
Demonstrates a highlyaccomplished ability to communicate ideas and information accurately and reliably in written academic English |
Demonstrates an exceptional ability to communicate ideas and information accurately and reliably in written academic English. |
Buy Answer to This Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Buy Today, Contact Us
Do you want a solution for the BM561 Business Consulting CW1 Assignment Brief? Is your assessment deadline approaching? If that is true, we are ready for you, we are helping with online assignments help all over the UK. If you want coursework help or any other assessment writing help, don't worry, our expert writers are always there to help you. If you are looking for any help with management assignments, ask our team and tell them your requirements, and as a result, the writer will fulfil your wishes by giving you a well-structured assessment that will be completely AI and plagiarism-proof.
If you want to see the solution to this Assignment then Click here: BM561 Business Consulting CW1 Research Report Example
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
