OFFERS!
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Asia Pacific International College (APIC) | Module Title | BIS2005 Enterprise Architecture Assessment 1: Case Study |
| Word Count | 3500 words +/- 10% |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Group Assessment |
| Academic Year | 2026 |
Unit Learning Outcomes
In this assessment, you will be tested on whether you have successfully met the following Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs):
Submission Type and Required Format
The type of assessment you will be completing is a Case Study. It should include the following:
Information about the case study can be found here on the Library and Learning Support website: Case Study
Assessment Purpose
This case study will assess your knowledge of key content areas taught in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and identify further support needs. For successful completion of the case study, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and participate in the discussion forums.
The prescribed textbook is the main reference, along with the recommended reading material. By completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to identify key aspects of information systems. This will help in achieving ULO4.
The case study will be completed and submitted in week 5.
Assessment Instructions
Ignite Innovation is a multinational company that provides important services of a social nature to its customers. From a technology perspective, the organisation can be considered a late adopter of innovations and characterised by relative underinvestment in IT, which has certain implications for both its IT landscape and respective management practices. On the one hand, Ignite Innovation’s IT landscape is very heterogeneous and includes many legacy information systems and technologies, some of which have been in use for decades, and Ignite Innovation's business activities are not properly aligned with IT. Ignite Innovation’s IT-related management practices are also rather archaic. For instance, the relationships between business and IT leaders in the organization exhibitevident signs of“us and them” mentality, while new investments in IT are viewed by business mostly to reduce costs of the existing operations.
Ignite Innovation has a centralised IT department headed by the Chief Information Officer(CIO) and responsible for developing and supporting information systems for all its business units. The IT department employs around 137 specialists and consists of three main functions: architecture, development and service. The architecture function includes a few architects focused predominantly on specific IT solutions. Ignite Innovation previously tried to uplift the maturity of its EA practice and extend the scope of architectural planning beyond separate initiatives, but these attempts failed due to misalignment of its business and IT; therefore, respective architects had been made redundant.
Now, the CIO decided to undertake another deliberate effort to evolve Ignite Innovation’s EA practice with the involvement of external consultants at Lion IT-Consulting. For this purpose, the organisation engaged a rather well-known EA consultancy (Lion IT-Consulting) to help initiate a full-fledged EA practice. The consultancy at Lion IT-Consulting formed a project team consisting of four architects specialised in different subject areas. This consulting team acted according to a detailed engagement plan agreed with Ignite Innovation’s senior IT leadership. The plan stipulated in which sequence and when exactly various EA artifacts willbe produced. In total, consultants worked for 6-10 months, analysed the organisation, interviewed numerous stakeholders and developed all the EA artefacts specified in the plan. Specifically, they started by analysing Ignite Innovation's business in terms of current and desired maturity of its business capabilities and mapped existing applications to respective capabilities. Then, they captured all relevant data entities, documented all technologies used in the organisation, depicted current and defined target application portfolios andcreated more detailed CRUD (create, read, update and delete) relationship matrices.
You are hired as Head of EA team at LionIT-Consulting, which Ignite Innovation engaged; based on the case study above and EA lecture notes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, write a report that addresses the following questions:
Discuss the challenges faced in achieving business and IT alignment in Ignite Innovation. How can Lion IT-Consulting help Ignite Innovation in addressing the challenges?
1. What are the benefits and potential threats posed by disruptive technologies to Ignite Innovation? Provide current examples.
2. Why is Enterprise Architecture considered a continuous practice rather than a one-time project? How does this impact its implementation in Ignite Innovation?
3. Describe the role of ITIL in driving digital transformation within anIgniteInnovation. Provide examples of how ITIL tools can support next-generation technologies like automation.
4. Discuss how Design and Standard could be used at Ignite Innovation if Lion IT-Consulting successfully implements Ignite Innovation’s EA?
5. Discuss the four key discussion points (Operating model, Business capabilities, Specific business needs, Business processes, and Business requirements) and how they facilitate communication between Ignite Innovation business executives and IT stakeholders.
6. Why is it important for Ignite Innovation to balance fundamental and strategic initiatives with urgent and architectural initiatives? What challenges arise when this balance is not achieved?
Assessment Resources
It is strongly recommended that you use the following to find academic peer- reviewedsources of information.
For in-text citation and referencing, follow the ECA HE Student Guide to APA 7th Referencing.
Submission Requirements
On completion of your assessment:
Assessment Support
For academic support or feedback on a draft of your assessment, please emailacademic.support@eca.edu.au
For assistance with finding resources, such as books and journal articles, please emaillibrary@eca.edu.au
For information and guides on tackling assessments and developing your academic skills, please visit the ECA Library and Learning Support website: https://eca.libguides.com/
For queries about this specific assessment task, please contact the Unit Coordinator.
| Marking Criteria | Not satisfactory (0–49%) | Satisfactory (50–64%) | Good (65–74%) | Very Good (75–84%) | Excellent (85–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discuss the challenges faced in achieving business and IT alignment in Ignite Innovation. How can Lion IT-Consulting help Ignite Innovation in addressing the challenges? (10%) | Lacks sufficient detail and/or discussion, does not cover key aspects of the question | Discussion is presented briefly and is missing key aspects of the question | Discussion provides a general level of detail along with key aspects of the question | Discussion is well researched, and the key aspects of the question are covered in detail | Discussion is thoroughly addressed, and the key aspects of the question are covered in great detail |
| What are the benefits and potential threats posed by disruptive technologies to Ignite Innovation? Provide current examples. (10%) | Lacks sufficient detail, and/or discussion does not provide insightful recommendations. | Discussion is presented briefly and somewhat provides insightful recommendations. | Discussion provides a general level of detail and provides some insightful recommendations. | Discussion is well researched and provides some very insightful recommendations. | Discussion is very well researched and provides exceptionally insightful recommendations. |
| Why is Enterprise Architecture considered a continuous practice rather than a one-time project? How does this impact its implementation in Ignite Innovation? (10%) | Lacks sufficient detail, and/or discussion does not provide insightful recommendations. | Discussion is presented briefly and somewhat provides insightful recommendations. | Discussion provides a general level of detail and provides some insightful recommendations. | Discussion is well researched and provides some very insightful recommendations. | Discussion is very well researched and provides exceptionally insightful recommendations. |
| Describe the role of ITIL in driving digital transformation within Ignite Innovation. Provide examples of how ITIL tools can support next-generation technologies like automation. (13%) | Lacks sufficient detail, and/or discussion does not provide insightful recommendations. | Discussion is presented briefly and somewhat provides insightful recommendations. | Discussion provides a general level of detail and provides some insightful recommendations. | Discussion is well researched and provides some very insightful recommendations. | Discussion is very well researched and provides exceptionally insightful recommendations. |
| Discuss how Design and Standards could be used at Ignite Innovation’s IT if Lion IT-Consulting successfully implements Ignite Innovation’s EA? (15%) | Lacks sufficient detail, and/or discussion does not provide insightful recommendations. | Discussion is presented briefly and somewhat provides insightful recommendations. | Discussion provides a general level of detail and provides some insightful recommendations. | Discussion is well researched and provides some very insightful recommendations. | Discussion is very well researched and provides exceptionally insightful recommendations. |
| Why is it important for Ignite Innovation to balance fundamental and strategic initiatives with urgent and architectural initiatives? What challenges arise when this balance is not achieved? (15%) | Lacks sufficient detail, and/or discussion does not provide insightful recommendations. | Discussion is presented briefly and somewhat provides insightful recommendations. | Discussion provides a general level of detail and provides some insightful recommendations. | Discussion is well researched and provides some very insightful recommendations. | Discussion is very well researched and provides exceptionally insightful recommendations. |
| Summary, Writing Quality & Adherence to Format Guidelines (10%) | The report shows a below-average/poor writing style, lacking in elements of appropriate standard English and following Harvard guidelines. Frequent errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, usage, and/or formatting. | The report shows below average and/or casual writing style using standard English and following Harvard guidelines. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, usage, and/or formatting. | The report shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English and following Harvard guidelines. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, usage, and/or formatting. | The report shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English and following Harvard guidelines. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting. | The report is well written and clear, using Harvard guidelines and standard English, characterised by a strong writing style. It is free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. |
| Presentation slides Visual Appeal (5% marks) | There are too many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. The slides were difficult to read, and the slides contained information copied onto them from another source. No visual appeal. | There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information was contained on many slides. Minimal effort was made to make the slides appealing. | There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information on more than three or more slides. The presentation has a good visual appeal. | There are a few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information on two or more slides. The presentation has significant visual appeal. | There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Presentation is visually appealing/engaging. |
| Presentation topic knowledge/content (7% marks) | The presenters did not understand the topic. The presentation was a brief look at the topic, but many questions were left unanswered. The majority of the information is irrelevant, and significant points are left out. | The presentation was informative, but several elements were unanswered. Much of the information is irrelevant; coverage of some of the major points. | The presentation was a good summary of the topic. Major information covered: The presentation contains some irrelevant information. | The presentation was a very good summary of the topic. Almost all-important information is covered; the presentation contains little irrelevant information. | The presentation was excellent and shows extensive knowledge of the topic with comprehensive and complete coverage of information. |
| Presentation skills (5% marks) | Unsatisfactory presentation with no clarity, appropriate pause, intonation and is not capable to engage listeners. | Satisfactory presentation with some clarity and with a pause. | Good presentation with clarity and pauses in the majority of the speech. | Very good presentation with clarity and pause and able to engage listeners for most of the time. | Excellent presentation with clarity, pause, intonation and is capable to engage listeners all the time. |
Order Custom Answer for BIS2005 Enterprise Architecture Assessment 1: Case Study
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentMany students in Australia struggle with complex business courses like BIS2005 Enterprise Architecture Assessment 1: Case Study at Asia Pacific International College (APIC). Analysing real-world leaders, evaluating leadership traits, and assessing their impact on organisational culture using academic theories can be daunting. But there’s no need to worry—Assignment help Australia is now easily accessible. With professional business plan assignment help, you can get 100% custom, human-written essays tailored to UCC requirements. Explore our assignment samples for reassurance, and order today to secure top-quality support for your BIS2005 Enterprise Architecture Assessment 1.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
