Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
---|---|---|---|
University | Canterbury Christ Church University (CCCU) | Module Title | AFM01MA Introduction to Management Accounting |
Assignment Title: | Costing And Budgeting At BioTube Ltd. |
Academic year: | 2025 |
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes:
Module Outcome 1 | Demonstrate an understanding of the elements of costing. |
---|---|
Module Outcome 2 | Demonstrate the application of practical and theoretical classification of costs. |
Module Outcome 3 | To understand the importance of budgeting and cost management to improve business performance. |
This case study involves BioTube Ltd., a company specialising in manufacturing high-quality blood testing tubes. The focus is on applying management accounting concepts to assess and improve BioTube Ltd.’s financial management, particularly in costing, budgeting, and variance analysis.
As an Assistant Accountant of BioTube Ltd., you are required to submit a detailed report covering cost classifications, budget formulation, variance analysis, and recommendations for BioTube Ltd.’s financial management improvements. Please see below for the company’s background information and the suggested report format:
BioTube Ltd. is a manufacturing company specialising in producing high-quality blood testing tubes used in medical laboratories. The company is planning a new project to manufacture an advanced blood testing tube model named “VitaTube Pro.” Management needs a detailed budget for effective cost management and optimal resource allocation, emphasising costing, budgeting, and variance analysis.
Are You Looking for Answer of This Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentBioTube Ltd. is preparing for the launch of VitaTube Pro. Using the provided data, demonstrate how BioTube prepares budgets and performs variance analysis using full costing. Additionally, explain activity-based costing (ABC) and discuss how it differs from full costing.
VitaTube Pro’s Budgeting and Costing Data:
Buy Answer of This Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Request to Buy AnswerThe Marking Scheme (otherwise known as a rubric) is available on the Assignment Information Tab on Moodle.
Submission Platform This assignment should be submitted electronically using Moodle to the Module Submission link
Submission Date &Time All submission & resubmission dates and time are as stated at the beginning of this Assignment brief.
You should submit your Assignment for all deadlines earlier than 2:00pm on the date stated.
Late submissions can be accepted for Summative Submissions only up to a maximum of 2 working days after the submission deadline. This does not apply to resubmission deadlines. A 10 mark deduction will be made by CCCU for all late submissions.
Work submitted more than two working days after the deadline will not be accepted and will be recorded as a non-submission.
Assignments submitted to the Resubmissions deadlines will be capped at 40 by CCCU.
If you are affected by events which are unexpected, outside your control and short-term in nature (i.e. lasting one to two weeks), under the exceptional circumstances procedure you may be eligible for:
Please note students are only eligible to have a maximum of 2 self-certification requests per academic year.
You can make a self-certification request up to 14 calendar days before your deadline:
Issue with the Assignment | Penalty to be Applied |
---|---|
Suspected Academic Misconduct or Breach of Academic integrity | The Assignment will be graded zero. Written feedback will be ‘This assignment has been identified as potential Academic Misconduct/Breach of Academic Integrity. You will be invited to a meeting to discuss’.
You will be invited to a meeting with an academic Misconduct reviewer. When you attend the meeting if Academic Misconduct or the breach of Academic Integrity is upheld you will be asked to rewrite the section of the assignment it applies to and re-submit the assignment. Do not upload any assignments to the AMC submission links before the meeting otherwise it will be removed. Failure to attend the meeting means the assignment will remain graded at zero and you will be unable to pass the module until you have attended the meeting. |
The assignment is more than 10% over the prescribed wordcount i.e. for 3,000 words, if 3,400 is submitted excluding the cover page, table of contents, references and appendices. | A 10-mark deduction applied to the overall grade that is manually entered by the Lecturer. This deduction is capped at 40%, which means an assignment cannot get less than 40% if a deduction has to be made.
For example, if the mark for the assignment was 60. The lecturer would deduct 10 marks and the mark will be 50. Written feedback will also state ‘This assignment is 10% over the wordcount and 10 marks have been deducted’. |
Where assignments are more than 10% less than the prescribed wordcount and lecturers cannot identify if the learning outcomes have been met. | This assignment will be graded below 40. |
Where a student submits a .pdf instead of a word document. | This assignment will be graded a Fail.
The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘This is a pdf submission and is not allowed. All submissions should be in Microsoft Word format’. |
Students not working in their groups as agreed by the lecturer. | This assignment will be graded a Fail.
The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘This submission was not completed in the designated group’. Please note: Where a student has asked the lecturer to move from their original group and the lecturer has agreed this does not apply. |
For a presentation assignment that requires oral delivery, and the student does not present in person. | The Oral rubric criteria is not moved, and the oral criteria will remain at zero. |
For a presentation assignment and the student does not upload a converted PPT To Word File with speaker notes. | The communication rubric criteria is not moved, and the communication criteria will remain at zero. |
For a presentation assignment that requires oral delivery, and the student did not present on the day or upload the presentation to a Word document with speaker Notes. | This assignment will be graded a Fail.
The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘There was no Oral presentation in class and the submission was not converted to Microsoft Word’. |
For a presentation assignment the student uploads a file that contains no slides and is simply continuous text. | This assignment will be graded a Fail.
The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘There are no slides present in the assignment submission’. |
If the assignment is group work and the resubmission is not changed to individual work.
If a group assignment is failed then the resubmitted work must be changed by a minimum of 25% to make it an individual piece of work. This means if a Group Presentation is 12 slides a minimum of 3 must be different to the group submission. If the assignment is a Group Poster with 6 text boxes then a minimum of 2 of them must be different to the Group Poster. |
This assignment will be graded a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘This resubmission should be individual and a minimum of 25% of the assignment has not changed’. |
Where a written assignment has text that is unable to be read by Turnitin because it is either a graphical image (excluding Presentations & Posters); for example, a screenshot or the assignment is written within text boxes on each page. | This assignment will be graded 0 and the written feedback should state ‘This assignment is unreadable by Turnitin and cannot be checked for Academic Misconduct. It has been referred for an AMC meeting’.
The assignment will then be referred for Academic Misconduct investigation. |
An assignment that does not make use of any Mandatory references provided in the assignment brief/Module Handbook. | The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero |
An assignment has a reference list, but no citations. | The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero. Written feedback should state ‘The reference criteria has been graded Zero as no citations have been used. Please include citations in your assignment to support the academic points being made’. |
An assignment has no citations and no reference list. | Foundation & Level 4 – The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero. The written feedback will state ‘Please ensure that you use citations and references to support your assignment submission’.
At Level 5 and Level 6 this would be graded as a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and written feedback will also show ‘This assignment has no citations and no reference list’. |
Where False references are included in an assignment. | This will be referred for Academic Misconduct.
This assignment will be graded 0 and the written feedback should state ‘This assignment contains false references and has been referred for Academic Misconduct. You will be invited to attend an Academic Misconduct meeting’. |
Assignment is submitted after the Late Deadline or if it is a Resubmission, after the Resubmission deadline | This assignment will be graded a Fail.
The lecturer will grade as 1 and written feedback should state ‘This assignment was submitted after the deadline. Please resubmit at the next resubmission opportunity.’ |
The values of student integrity expected by CCCU are:
Students might choose to get support from their peers when preparing assessments, such as discussing the subject of the assessment, exchanging ideas, and receiving suggestions for improving the work. This is peer-support, and the University accepts this as a reasonable expectation when completing assessments. However, peers must not make any changes to anyone’s assessments as such actions could lead to allegations of academic misconduct.
Students cannot write an assessment in another language and subsequently translate their work into English or have it translated by any form of third-party. Use of translation software or third-party translators is a form of academic misconduct.
Students must write the entire assessment without using AI software such as ChatGPT. Submitting an assessment that contains any form of AI is a form of academic misconduct.
Students can make use of Microsoft Word’s grammar and spell-checking functions but the use of Grammarly is not allowed as it uses AI text generation. If student’s use third-party proofreaders, these cannot make any changes that alter the assessment in anyway including correcting language or citation format errors. Third-party alterations to the assessment are a form of academic misconduct.
Plagiarism can be defined as incorporating another person’s material from books, journals, the internet, another student’s work, or any other source into assessment material without acknowledgement. It includes:
Achieve Higher Grades AFM01MA Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentFacing challenges with your AFM01MA Introduction to Management Accounting Assignment? Well! Stop worrying now. You are at the right place. Our platform provides UK assignment help. We have experienced writers who provide high-quality, no-plagiarism assignments with 100% original content, and we are assured that our Management Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. Contact us now!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content