| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Manchester Metropolitan University | Module Title | 5Z7V0006 Digital Leadership Transformation |
| Word Count | 3500 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | Portfolio |
For this assignment, you need to submit: A portfolio of work (TOTAL 3500 words) that consists of 2 parts.
A PERSONAL CRITICAL REFLECTION (MAX 1000 words) on some aspect or critical incident in your professional or learning experience that enables you to identify goals to further develop your leadership and change management skills. Ensure that when you are setting these goals, you also reflect on ethical issues that may affect your leadership practice. (15%)
LO1: Analyse the role of digital technology in the continuous improvement and transformation of contemporary organisations in their business environment
LO2: Critically evaluate strategic planning, leadership, and change management approaches relevant to the challenges faced by contemporary organisations.
LO3: Apply entrepreneurial approaches to recognising opportunities and developing strategies for improvement and change.
This assignment will help further develop your information gathering capabilities, critical analysis and thinking skills and practical decision making, as well as enhancing your written communication skills essential for employability and life-long learning.
AOL Programme learning outcomes Assessed
1. AOL PLO 1.1.1: Identify and interrogate relevant data and literature sources using methods appropriate to the level of study and to the discipline
2. AOL PLO 2.1.1: Organise work in a logical structure to draw conclusions that follow from the line of argument
3. PLO 2.1.2: Consistent and appropriate referencing and in-text citation
4. PLO 2.1.3: Effectively communicate information appropriately and accurately using a range of media
5. AOL PLO 3.1.1: Recognise, explore and reflect on key ethical issues as they affect own and others' practice.
AOL Programme Learning outcomes Developed
1. PLO4. Our graduates will demonstrate professional and commercial/corporate awareness (developed)
“Identifying the opportunities, drivers and challenges of organisational improvement and change through digital transformation in particular times of uncertainty as found in a case study of your choice. The case study could be in any industry (private or public sector). Ensure that you include in your report an approach for leading and managing this particular digital transformation proposed.”
“A PERSONAL CRITICAL REFLECTION on some aspect or critical incident in your professional or learning experience that enables you to identify goals to further develop your leadership and change management skills. Ensure that when you are setting these goals, you also reflect on ethical issues that may affect your leadership practice.”
This is how your work will be graded. You will receive an overall grade that will be GUIDED by each of the criteria. The University has introduced a step marking scheme. Within a grade band, you will be awarded a mark of 2, 5, or 8, eg 52, 55, 58 or 62, 65, 68, indicating whether your work is overall mid, low, or high within that grade band.
|
Mark |
PGT Classification |
|
95-100% |
Distinction |
|
90% |
|
|
85% |
|
|
80% |
|
|
75% |
|
|
72% |
Marginal Distinction |
|
68% |
Merit |
|
65% |
|
|
62% |
|
|
58% |
|
|
55% |
|
|
52% |
Marginal pass |
|
48% |
Marginal Fail |
|
45% |
|
|
42% |
|
|
38% |
Fail |
|
35% |
|
|
32% |
|
|
28% |
|
|
25% |
|
|
22% |
|
|
18% |
|
|
15% |
|
|
12% |
|
|
8% |
|
|
5% |
|
|
2% |
|
|
0% |
|
|
MARKING CRITERIA |
0-19% |
20-29% |
30 - 39% |
|
Key points framed and contextualised, explaining background and critical issues |
No points outlined or framed |
Extremely limited background context and framing of concepts |
Some back ground and contextualisation offered, incomplete and superficial points raised |
|
Use of core knowledge in critical analysis and evaluation of digital transformation in the organisational context |
Little/no/inappropriate use of core knowledge areas in analysis of organisational context. |
Purely descriptive with very limited critical discussion on core knowledge areas in analysis of organisational context. |
Some critical discussion on factors affecting digital transformation. |
|
Identify and interrogate relevant data and literature sources using methods appropriate to level of study and to discipline PLO. 1.1.1 |
No use of literature |
Extremely limited use of evidence or data from literature |
Limited or weak use of literature and weak evidence used |
|
Conclusions and recommendations are evidence based and supported through critical discussion PLO 2.1.1 |
Does not include conclusions and recommendations |
Very limited conclusions and recommendations that have tenuous links to the discussion |
Some conclusions, recommendations drawn but are more opinionated than evidence based |
|
Consistent and appropriate referencing and in text citation PLO 2.1.2 |
No evidence of MMU referencing and in text citation |
Very few references, inappropriate sources, poor in text citation. Poor use of MMU Harvard style |
Some references and in text citation. Not in the MMU Harvard style or inconsistently applied |
|
Effectively communicate information appropriately and accurately using a range of media PLO 2.1.3 |
Very poor structure, standard of communication including very poor |
Poor structure, disrupted flow. Limited logical flow. Poor use of relevant digital media |
Some structure and logical communication flow, but it is too jumbled. Satisfactory use of relevant digital media |
|
Assessment descriptor |
Fail 0-19% |
20-29% |
Fail 30-39% |
Marginal fail 40-49%
|
Pass 50-59% |
Merit 60-69% |
Distinction 70-79% |
Distinction 80-89% |
Distinction 90-100% |
|
Relevant personal leadership development goals identified and supported by personal critical reflection PLO 3.1.1.
|
No personal reflection or goals identified. Limited attempt to justify. |
Extremely limited personal reflection or goals identified. Limited attempt to justify and no ethical insights raised. |
Some limited need for personal development identified. Some attempt to justify, but poor relevance to leadership and/or very weak justification. Limited ethical insights raised. |
Identifies some appropriate personal development goals, but weakly justified. May be due to weak focus on leadership, descriptive approach, lack of theory and/or framework for analysis, lack of ethical insights raised. |
Identifies appropriate leadership development goals through satisfactory critical reflection using appropriate theory and a reflection framework. Some ethical insights raised. |
Identifies clear leadership development goals, supported by thorough critical reflection using appropriate theory and a reflection framework with good ethical insights raised. |
Identifies feasible professional development goals through rigorous critical reflection using appropriate theory, ethical insights and a reflection framework. Demonstrates some awareness of factors affecting feasibility of achieving goals. |
Illuminating and insightful professional development goals through rigorous critical reflection, using appropriate theory, ethical insights and a reflection framework. Expertly highlights factors affecting feasibility of achieving goalsl |
Identifies and justifies credible leadership development goals through rigorous critical reflection using appropriate theory, ethical insights and a reflection framework. Outstanding consideration of key factors affecting achievement. |
If you are struggling with the 5Z7V0006 Level 7 Digital Leadership Transformation Assignment? We are here to provide assignment help. We helped thousands of Students by providing Assignment Writing Services and also providing Solutions for essays, free assignment samples, and many more. Choose our Assignment Service for Work.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
