| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Sheffield Hallam University ( SHU) | Module Title | 44-710366 International Management Competencies |

Through collaborative experiences including work on case studies, class discussions and exercises you will consider the challenges and opportunities facing the international manager in managing across cultures. You will also examine the ethical and sustainable aspects of leadership decision making.
You will be challenged to apply ethical reasoning into international management practice - demonstrating awareness of opportunities to advance diversity and inclusiveness inside international firms and in collaboration with stakeholders.
You will work with other learners to reflect on and critically examine practices to advance responsible international leadership and management.Through the activities on the module, you will be challenged to reflect on your own international management competencies and to consider ways to develop your competencies further. This will be in areas including the management of diversity, cross cultural communication, cross cultural teamworking, negotiation and leadership. This will support your development and ability to thrive culturally, socially and professionally.
Today’s business graduates need both a solid understanding of business theory as well as the interpersonal and social skills required for managing and working together with people in organizations. Competent interpersonal skills are considered to be an important, if not the most important, characteristic for managerial effectiveness. For those working in organizations that have an international dimension, such a capability is influenced and made more difficult by the need to be effective in a variety of cultural environments.
This module aims to facilitate the development of international management competencies relevant to functioning in the multicultural environment of contemporary international business organizations. It will provide practical underpinning for other modules and significant opportunity for personal development relevant to contemporary international management practices and working with others in intercultural contexts.
The module will be delivered with a combination of in person lectures and in person seminars.
|
FORMAT |
HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THIS |
|
One face to face lecture weekly 90 MINUTES |
Come prepared by checking the module guide and learning materials for topic information and readings. |
|
Two 90 minute seminars weekly |
In advance of the seminar check the module guide and learning materials for that week. Look through the seminar activities planned for that week. |
Seminars will be student focused and will seek to maximise the opportunity for learning in an interactive setting which can strengthen critical reflection and encourage personal development through opportunities presented to share experiences and collaborate in groupwork. There will be opportunity to discuss the material from the lectures and reflect on them in terms of the implications for international management practice and the development of personal competencies to work cross culturally. Given the multicultural nature of the student cohort and their wide range of international experience, the learning activities will focus on utilizing these characteristics. The lectures will introduce key theory and concepts which can then be applied to your own experiences and discussed in the seminars. Students will need to prepare thoroughly for the seminars- following required reading and reflection on the topic each week.
How this module supports your global and international perspective
Internationalisation is embedded in the module as all of the topics that are introduced have an international dimension and context. The module explores the challenges raised in working cross culturally in the contemporary international management context.
How this module adopts the Principles of Responsible Management Education
The module works on developing competencies in intercultural communication. It facilitates reflection on ethical principles surrounding cross cultural dialogue. This is embedded in coverage of all the themes on the module and is also brought together in the final session of the module.
How you will develop the attributes and skills that graduate employers are looking for
The module seeks to facilitate the development of students in their own learning and self- evaluation of international management competencies. The lectures and seminars encourage student to apply new insights to their own personal development plan.
How research informs what and how you study this module
Research informed teaching is applied in this module. Students are introduced to contemporary research, debate and analysis in areas such as cultural diversity in organisations, cross cultural negotiation, sustainable leadership in a cross- cultural environment and working with international teams. Emerging themes are explored including for example bicultural competence and culture and language in multicultural team effectiveness.
How will Blackboard be used with this module?
The module Blackboard site will provide key teaching material. It will also be used for communication between module leaders, tutors and their students and for online assessment submission/ turnitin submission. Students will need to have access to blackboard and the blackboard module site during the teaching. Learning materials are accessible through the blackboard site ‘Learning Materials’.
Your deadlines for all your coursework can be accessed via Assessment Diary. Please ensure you check this and you know when all your submission deadlines are due. There is a deadline time of 3:00pm for all coursework submissions in the Faculty. Submissions should be online via the Blackboard submission point. Please be aware that if you do not submit via the Blackboard submission point it will be deemed a non-submission and therefore receive a mark of zero. You are also required to submit to Turnitin by the deadline for originality / similarity checking in addition to the submission for marking purposes.
It is very important to make sure that you submit your coursework by the deadline time on the date that the submission is due. Late submissions cannot be accepted. Failure to submit by your deadlines will mean that your work for that assessment task cannot be marked - this may mean that you will be referred in that module.
If you are referred / deferred in a module, you will be expected to undertake reassessment work in order to pass that particular module. The deadline for any reassessment coursework will be confirmed via Assessment Diary.
If you have any problems submitting on-line you will need to contact IT Support before the deadline.
Turnitin
Submit through Turnitin as well as through the online submission point. The Turnitin system will produce a report identifying any similarities between the work and existing literature or other sources and can be used to help students avoid plagiarism and assist with referencing.
Please note that you therefore need to submit the assessed work to two places-
1. the online submission point and
2. turnitin.
Receiving student feedback for this module and how it will be used.
Feedback from students will be obtained via on-going dialogue throughout the module, student representatives, the staff-student meeting. The teaching team will work with course reps to gather feedback at an early - mid point and produce a set of action points in relation to this feedback. At the end of the module, students will be invited to complete the School’s Module Evaluation Questionnaire, the results of which inform the final Module Review and Action plan.
|
Module Title: International Management Competencies |
||||||
|
Academic Year: 2025/26 |
Level: 7 |
Credits: 30 |
||||
|
Courses: MSc International Business Management. |
||||||
|
Module Leader: Diana Sharpe. Module Team: Caroline Kom, Giulio Giusti, Karen Grierson, Diana Sharpe, Myriam Gomez-Cardenas, Helen Hellaby, Ralph Spence ASSESSMENT PACKAGE - portfolio |
||||||
|
TASK |
Weighting |
Date to be submitted |
||||
|
INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO- Individual Self Evaluation and Development Plan
|
100% |
Submission in one file on-line via Blackboard submission point and Turnitin by Tuesday December 16th 2025
|
||||
This module aims to develop the international management competencies required for diverse cultural and competitive international business environments.
|
LO Ref |
Learning Outcome |
|
1 |
Critically evaluate and synthesise relevant literature on Contemporary International Management and identify the implications for cross-cultural management practices that embed equality, diversity, inclusion and sustainability. |
|
2 |
Demonstrate critical self evaluation of current competencies relevant to a future career in international management by identifying and critically applying relevant theory, concepts and frameworks . |
|
3 |
Critically reflect on learning experiences and apply insights gained to continuing professional development planning |
Global mobility of workers and competencies development
You will be supported in your learning to achieve the learning outcomes in the following ways:
Learning Design Principles
Your learning on this module is experiential as you engage with the tools/frameworks and critical thinking related to international management practices.
Through collaborative experiences including work on case studies, class discussions and exercises you will consider the challenges and opportunities facing the international manager in managing across cultures. You will also examine the ethical and sustainable aspects of leadership decision making.
You will be challenged to apply ethical reasoning into international management practice - demonstrating awareness of opportunities to advance diversity and inclusiveness inside international firms and in collaboration with stakeholders.
You will work with other learners to reflect on and critically examine practices to advance responsible international leadership and management. Through the activities on the module, you will be challenged to reflect on your own international management competencies and to consider ways to develop your competencies further. This will be in areas including the management of diversity, cross cultural communication, cross cultural teamworking, negotiation and leadership. This will support your development and ability to thrive culturally, socially and professionally.
You will:
Students will be supported in their learning, to achieve the learning outcomes in the following ways:
Given the multicultural nature of the student cohort and their wide range of international work experience, learning activities will focus on utilizing these characteristics. We will seek to maximise the opportunity for learning from seminar discussions and exercises, which can strengthen critical reflection. During the seminars there will be discussion around the material presented in the lecture and opportunities to ask questions alongside having individual and group reflective exercises.
We will be using a personal Log book/ Diary during your study of this module. A reflective diary entry structured around each week’s topic/s will help you address the assignment and should be referred to in the assignment. You should refer to relevant log book entries located in the appendices of your work to support/ evidence your self evaluation and development planning.
Order Custom Answers for 44-710366 Assignment
Request to Buy Answer|
Task No. |
Description of Assessment Task |
Assessment Task Type Coursework (CW) Written Exam (EX) Practical (PR) |
Word Count or Exam Duration |
Task Weighting % |
|
1 |
Portfolio Consisting of self -evaluation and development plan with supporting diary entries. |
CW |
4000 |
100 |
|
University Week |
Week of Teaching Date w/com |
Lecture and Seminar Topics |
Assessment & Feedback |
Notes |
|
9 |
22/09/25 WEEK 1 |
TOPIC 1 Introducing Contemporary International Management Practices. International Management competencies Cultural Intelligence |
|
One live face to face lecture Two face to face seminars each week |
|
10 |
29/09/25 WEEK 2 |
TOPIC 2 Learning and Reflective Practice |
|
|
|
11 |
6/10/25 WEEK 3 |
TOPIC 3 The Nature of Culture/ Cultures |
|
|
|
12 |
13/10/25 WEEK 4 |
TOPIC 4 Tools of Cultural Analysis |
|
|
|
13 |
20/10/25 WEEK 5 |
TOPIC 5 Cross Cultural Management |
|
|
|
14 |
27/10/25 WEEK 6 |
TOPIC 5 continued |
|
|
|
15 |
03/11/25 WEEK 7 |
TOPIC 6 Communicating across cultures/ Working with Language Diversity/ Cross Cultural Negotiation |
|
|
|
16 |
10/11/25 WEEK 8 |
TOPIC 7 Multicultural Teamwork |
|
|
|
17 |
17/11/25 WEEK 9 |
TOPIC 8 Leadership and Motivation in a Cross cultural / International context. Leading Global Human Resource strategies – staffing/ global mobility and worker competency development. |
||
|
18 |
24/11/25 WEEK 10 |
TOPIC 9 International Management Competencies for sustainable global human resource management Managing global human resources to support diversity, inclusivity and ethical management practices. Competencies around greening of Global Human Resource management practices. |
||
|
19 |
01/12/25 WEEK 11 |
Module Review / Assignment Review |
|
Review in lecture and seminars this week |
|
20 |
08/12/25 WEEK 12 |
Study week |
|
No lecture/seminar |
|
21 |
|
Submit assignment by 16th December 2025 3pm. |
Assignment Submission Deadline |
Submit as one file through both the On line submission point and Turnitin points |
|
Student's own experiences and observations are an important reference point on the module and should be reflected on with the help of the tools, concepts frameworks and ideas from the course content and recommended readings. You are expected to consult peer reviewed journal articles in the topic area during your reading and assignment preparation. Start with the learning materials posted on blackboard by topic You are expected to demonstrate engagement with the learning materials on the blackboard site. See the reading list online- link from the blackboard site. Recommended Readings Key texts *Browaeys M. and Price R., 2019 or later , ‘Understanding Cross- cultural Management’, Prentice Hall. Fourth Edition . Deresky H., 2017, Ninth Edition or later International Management: Managing across Borders and Cultures. Pearson. Harzing, A-W and Pinnington A. (2015 edition or later) International Human Resource Management. Fourth edition. READINGS BY TOPIC INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES Ogrean,C. Herciu M. and Belascu L. 2009 Competency Based Management and Global Competencies- Challenges for Firm Strategic Management. International Review of Business Research Papers. Vol. 5, n.4. June 2009 : 114-122. Hajro,A. and Pudelko, M. 2010. An analysis of core competencies of successful multinational team leaders. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 10 (2) 175-194. Early P.C. and Ang, S. 2003 'Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions across cultures. Stanford CA. Stanford University Press. Bucker J. and Erik Poutsma 2009 Global Management Competencies: A Theoretical Foundation. Journal of Managerial Psychology. Vol.25,8: 829-844. Early and Mosakowski, 2004, ‘Cultural Intelligence’, Harvard Business Review, October. Graf, A. 2004 Screening and training inter-cultural competencies: Evaluating the impact of national culture on inter-cultural competencies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 15 96) 1124-1148. LEARNING AND REFLECTIVE PRACTICE Kolb, A.Y. and Kolb, D.A. (2005) Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Academy of Management Learning and Education. Vol.4,2: 193-212. THE NATURE OF CULTURE Means, A. Davey K.M. and Dewe P. 2015. Cultural Differences on the Table. .International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 15,3, 305-328. King, P.C. and Wei, Z. 2018. The role of face in a Chinese context of trust and trust building. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 2018. Vol. 18, 2, 149-173. Abugre J. B. 2017 A phenomenological study of time concept and management and productivity in a sub-Saharan African context. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management Vol.17 (2) 197-214. TOOLS OF CULTURAL ANALYSIS Venaik S. and Midgley D.F. (2015) Mindscapes across landscapes: Archetypes of transnational and subnational culture. Journal of International Business, 46, 1051-1079 Hofstede,G. ,2005, Cultures and organizations ;Software of the mind., 2nd edition, London:McGraw-Hill. Hofstede , G. 2015, "Culture’s causes: the next challenge", Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 22 Iss 4 pp. 545 - 569 Chuapetchararasapon, P. et. al. 2018. Cultural Mosaic beliefs as a new measure of the psychological climate for diversity. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 18,1, 7-32. Capar, D. et al . (2015) Conceptualizing and measuring culture in international business and management: From challenges to potential solutions. Journal of International Business 46,1011-1027. Javidan et al. ( 2006) Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE'S and Hofstede's approaches. CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT Barker, G.G.. 2017. Acculturation and bicultural integration in organisations. International Journal of Cross cultural management, 17,3, 281-304. Brannen, M.-Y., Thomas, D.C. 2010. Bicultural individuals in organizations: Implications and opportunity, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 5-16. COMMUNICATING ACROSS CULTURES Shah D. and Barker M. (2017)Cracking the cultural code: Indian IT expatriates' intercultural communication Challenges in Australia. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. Vol. 17 (2) .215-236. Cohen L. and Kassis-Henderson J. (2017) Revisiting culture and language in global management teams: Towards a multilingual turn. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, (1) 7-22. CROSS CULTURAL NEGOTIATION Mahadevan, J. 2015. Understanding the process of intercultural negotiations through liminality: Insights on biculturality, marginality and cultural expertise from a Sino- German business context. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. Vol 15 (3) 239-258. MULTICULTURAL TEAMWORKING Hong H.J. (2010) Bicultural Competence and its impact on Team Effectiveness. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. Vol.10 (1) 93-120 CROSS CULTURAL LEADERSHIP AND MOTIVATION Mendenhall.M.E. et al, 2013. 'Global Leadership: Research, Practice and Development'. Routledge, London. Mansur, J., Sobral, F., & Goldszmidt, R. (2017). Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures Journal of World Business, 52(5), 702. Jackson T. (2016) Paternalistic Leadership The missing link in cross- cultural leadership studies? International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. Vol. 16. (1) 3-7. Javidan et al. (2006) In the Eye of the Beholder: Cross Cultural Lessons in Leadership from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives , February. 67-90. Bird, A. et al. 2010 Defining the content domain of intercultural competence for global leaders. Journal of Managerial Psychology 25(8) 810-828. Wu M. and Wang. J. (2012) Developing a charismatic leadership model for Chinese organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 23:19 -4069-4084. Validov, A. F., & Pulaj, E. (2016). leadership styles in transitional economies. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 15, 1 Yang, I. (2016). Lost overseas?: The challenges facing Korean transformational leadership in a cross-cultural context. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 12(2), 121-139. ETHICS AND CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Kolk A. ( 2016) The Social Responsibility of International Business : From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business. 51, 23-24. Maria J. F. and Lozano J.M. ( 2010) Responsible Leaders for Inclusive Globalization. Journal of Business Ethics. 93:93-111. Brown, M. and Trevino L.K. (2006) Ethical Leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 595-616. Additional Readings: General Texts: Aycan, Z. et al 2014 Organizations and Management in Cross-Cultural Context. London; Sage. Deardorff, D.K. (Ed.) 2009 The Sage Handbook of Intercultural Competence. Thousand Oaks, Ca. Sage. Javidan et al 2010 Making it overseas. Harvard Business Review 88, 4 : 109-113. Mead,R.and Andrews T. 4th Ed. 2009, International Management’, Wiley Mor Barak, M.E., 2014. Managing Diversity, Sage, London. |
|
Module Title: |
International Management Competencies |
|
Assessment Title: |
Portfolio |
|
Individual/Group: |
Individual |
|
Weighting: |
100% |
|
Submission Date: |
On line individual submission required through submission point and turnitin by 3pm Tuesday 16th December 2025 Include diary entries in an appendix and refer to them. |
|
Word Count |
4,000 words |
Instructions To Students For Submission Of This Coursework
Individual Report of 4,000 words (refer to diary entries for evidence/ examples and include these diary entries in an appendix.)
Choose three topics/ competencies from the syllabus to focus on.
This section should contain a self- evaluation of your attributes, skills and competencies relevant to a future career in international management. It should comment on your personal development in these three areas. The self-evaluation should utilise the concepts, tools, theories and ideas introduced on the module through the module topics and the recommended readings and exercises on the topics. These should be referenced.
Choose two topics/ competencies from the syllabus to focus on.
This should contain a personal development plan for the next six months. This should take into consideration the self- evaluation in Section 1 and identify two specific competencies (taken from the module topics) that you would like to develop further in those six months.
Explain how you are looking to develop the chosen competencies. Demonstrate awareness and understanding of relevant concepts, tools, frameworks, theories and literatures on the topic (see module topics and relevant readings). Demonstrate ability to apply this understanding of the topic in informing your self- development plan. The plan should be SMART containing specific, measurable, achievable and realistic targets.
A table can be used as a starting point in discussing your SMART Plan. Include practical plans for HOW you will achieve your targets. Identify opportunities to support your plan.
Particular instructions to students
Include a reference list and acknowledge all sources used in the assignment. Appendices can be used - make sure you refer to them and discuss them in the report. Diary entries should be included in the appendices.
Note: Use of a Log-Book / Diary is expected during your study of this module. A reflective diary entry structured around each weeks topic/s can help you prepare for the assignment. Note down experiences in the module and outside of the module, on campus/ off campus that can be drawn on to discuss/ evidence your self- evaluation. Include diaries that you have referred to in your appendix.
On- line submission via Blackboard submission point and Turnitin.
You must include a declaration that states use of AI.
For this assignment AITS 1 and AITS 2 are permitted.
Feedback & Feed-forward Strategy and how students can access their Feedback
The self-evaluation and development plan will receive individual written feedback using an assessment grid three weeks after submission.
Introduction
Choose three topics/ competencies from the following
Cultural Intelligence
Managing across cultures (Understanding cultures/ analysing cultures and managing across cultures)
Communicating across cultures/ Cross cultural negotiation/ Working with language diversity
Multicultural Teamworking
Cross cultural motivation / Cross cultural Leadership
Competencies in Ethical, Sustainable Management Practices
Choose two topics
You can choose the same topics you used in section 1 or use different topics
Include a table showing the Development Plan over a six month period for each competency.
Discuss the plan.
This should refer back to theory/ concepts and literature to support the rationale for the planned activities and the evaluation of your development. See blackboard learning materials posted for each topic including journal articles. Evidence engagement with these articles.
This should be very specific, measurable goals to be achieved, specific actions to work on the identified competencies.
Refer to theory/ literature on the topic area to inform your plan.
APPENDICES
To include the weekly diary entries that are referred to as evidence/ examples in the body of the report. (include a good range of diary entries to do this-advise at least five in-depth diary entries. Each diary entry is based on that week’s seminar activities and includes your own personal engagement/ reflection in that seminar.
It is important that if you use AI tools to generate an assignment that you do not submit it as if it were your own work. You must check the AI Transparency Scale (AITS) to determine what level of AI use is allowed.
Our regulations state:
Contract cheating/concerns over authorship: This form of misconduct involves another person (or artificial intelligence) creating the assignment which you then submit as your own. Examples of this sort of misconduct include: buying an assignment from an ‘essay mill’/professional writer; submitting an assignment which you have downloaded from a file-sharing site; acquiring an essay from another student or family member and submitting it as your own; attempting to pass off work created by artificial intelligence as your own. These activities show a clear intention to deceive the marker and are treated as misconduct. Further guidance is available here: SHU Assessment
For this assessment, the permitted use of Artificial Intelligence is highlighted in the table below. All students are required to include a transparency declaration statement which can be added as an appendix to the assessment (not included in the word count) Transparency declaration statements
Your statement should:
|
AITS |
Descriptor |
Transparency Statement |
AI Contributions |
Human Contribution |
|
1 |
No AI |
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has not been used for any part of the activity. |
AI is not used for any part of the activity. |
All aspects of the activity are human generated, created, edited, and developed. |
|
2 |
AI for |
AI has been used to shape the initial and/or final parts of the activity. |
AI is used for shaping parts of the activity. This includes initial outlining, concept development, prompting thinking, and/or improving structure/quality of the final output. |
Most of the activity is human developed/generated. AI ideas and suggestions are refined and reviewed. AI outputs are used for discrete and specific goals/outcomes. |
|
3 |
AI for Developing |
AI has been directed for enhanced development of concepts and outputs. |
AI is used to undertake detailed development of many or most aspects of an activity and outputs of that activity. |
The human takes a significant role in the enhancement, refinement, and critical review of AI generated elements, combining or curating for any outputs. |
|
4 |
AI for Enhancing |
AI has been implemented for all elements of the task. |
AI is used extensively throughout the task to achieve goals and outcomes. |
The human directs the use of AI for effective outcomes within an activity. Critical thinking is evidenced for any outputs. |
|
5 |
AI for Innovating |
AI has been used for all elements of a task or piece of work, and it has been used in new, creative, and innovative ways through advanced techniques. |
AI is implemented in an advanced and innovative way throughout all aspects of the activity. |
AI is used creatively and critically by the human. The human uses AI a co-creator with a critical thinking approach to generating novel AI activities and outputs |
Purvis, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Transparency Scale (AITS). National Teaching Repository.
|
Course Title: |
|
||
|
Module Title: |
International Management Competencies |
Level |
7 |
|
Assessment Title: |
Portfolio Self Evaluation and Development Plan |
Weighted: |
100% |
|
Criteria & Weighting |
80 - 100% DISTINCTION Exceptional Work |
70 - 79% DISTINCTION Excellent Work |
60 - 69% MERIT Good |
50 - 59% PASS Sufficient |
40 - 49% FAIL Work does not meet the assessment criteria |
0- 39% FAIL Work does not meet the assessment criteria |
|
Undertake self-evaluation of attributes, skills and competencies relevant to international management. |
Comprehensive, objective and sophisticated self- evaluation critical self reflective writing |
Excellent depth and breadth of self- evaluation excellent self reflective writing |
Competent objective self -evaluation good self reflective writing |
Self- evaluation includes wider range of self -evaluation satisfactory self reflective writing |
Self- evaluation in limited areas only. does not adequately demonstrate relevant self reflective writing |
No relevant self -evaluation. No relevant self reflection |
|
Employ relevant theoretical concepts and frameworks. |
Critical employment of relevant concepts and theoretical frameworks demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of the subject matter. Excellent critical engagement with blackboard learning materials with further critical and focused reading beyond the blackboard materials. |
Critical employment of relevant concepts and theoretical frameworks demonstrating excellent engagement with the module readings. |
Rigorous employment of a wide range of relevant concepts and frameworks showing good engagement with the learning materials |
Satisfactory employment of a range of relevant concepts and frameworks showing some engagement with the learning materials. |
Basic employment of a limited number of relevant concepts and frameworks. Limited engagement with the learning materials. |
No relevant theoretical concepts or frameworks. |
|
Employ evidence to support analysis/ examples from your own personal experiences |
Examples used are relevant, recent, drawn from different contexts. Justified evidence obtained and presented rigorously for all areas. Diary entries are detailed and have strong critical engagement with the seminar activities. Excellent depth and breadth of diary entries based on personal engagement in the seminars and drawing on wider experiences also. |
Examples used are relevant, recent, drawn from different contexts. Justified evidence obtained for all areas. Diary entries show critical engagement with the seminar activities – very good depth and breadth. Brings in some wider personal experiences also that are relevant for reflecting on the issues being covered in the seminar. |
Examples used are relevant, recent, drawn from different contexts. Evidence clearly provided. Good depth and breadth of diary entries around the personal experiences in the seminars that week. |
Examples used are relevant, recent and drawn from different contexts. Some evidence provided Some personal engagement and reflection on seminar activities as evidenced in diary entries. |
Limited examples are provided Diary entries do not adequately reflect on personal experiences n the seminars and other contexts. Personal examples used are too generic and vague. |
There is no or weak supporting evidence Diary entries are not related to personal experiences in the seminar. Examples used are vague and not specific to the seminars. |
|
Class |
Category |
Grade |
Mark range |
% |
General Characteristics |
|
Distinction
|
Exceptional Distinction |
16 |
93 - 100 |
96 |
Exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding evidenced by own independent insight and critical awareness of relevant literature and concepts at the forefront of the discipline; evidence of extensive and appropriate independent inquiry operating with advanced concepts, methods and techniques to solve problems in unfamiliar contexts; Cogent arguments and explanations are consistently provided using a range of media demonstrating an ability to communicate effectively in a variety of formats using a sophisticated level of the English language in an eloquent and professional manner to both technical and non-technical audiences; a sustained academic approach to all aspects of the tasks is evidenced; academic work extends boundaries of the disciplines and is beyond expectation of the level and may achieve publishable or commercial standard. |
|
Distinction |
High Distinction |
15 |
85 - 92 |
89 |
Excellent knowledge and understanding evidenced by some clear independent insight and critical awareness of relevant concepts some of which are at the forefront of the discipline; evidence of appropriate independent inquiry operating with core concepts, methods and techniques to solve complex problems in mostly familiar contexts; Arguments and explanations are provided that is well-supported by the literature and in some cases uses a range of media demonstrating an ability to communicate effectively in a limited number of formats using own style that is suited to both technical and non-technical audiences; a sustained academic approach to most aspects of the tasks is evidenced; one or more aspects of the academic work is beyond the prescribed range and evidences a competent understanding of all of the relevant taught content. |
|
|
Mid Distinction |
14 |
78 - 84 |
81 |
|
|
|
Low Distinction |
13 |
70 - 77 |
74 |
|
|
Merit |
High Merit |
12 |
67 - 69 |
68 |
Very good knowledge and understanding is evidenced as the student is typically able to independently relate taught facts/concepts together some of which are at the forefront of the discipline; evidence of some competent independent inquiry operating with core concepts, methods and techniques to solve familiar problems; Arguments and explanations are provided that are typically supported by the literature and in some cases may challenge some received wisdoms; competently uses all taught media and communication methods to communicate effectively in a familiar settings; an academically rigorous approach applied to some aspects of the tasks is evidenced; some beyond the prescribed range, may rely on set sources to advance work/direct arguments; demonstrates autonomy in approach to learning. |
|
|
Mid Merit |
11 |
64 - 66 |
65 |
|
|
|
Low Merit |
10 |
60 - 63 |
62 |
|
|
Pass |
High Pass |
9 |
57 - 59 |
58 |
Satisfactory knowledge and understanding of the area of study balanced towards the descriptive rather than critical or analytical and mostly confined to concepts that are not at the forefront of the discipline; evidence of some independent reading and research to advance work and inform arguments and approaches; Arguments and explanations are limited in range and depth although some are adequately supported by the literature albeit descriptively rather than critically; competently uses at least one taught media and communication method to communicate appropriately in familiar settings; although the approach applied to some aspects of the tasks may lack academic rigour, there are some clear areas of competence within the prescribed range. Relies on set sources to advance work/direct arguments and communicated in a way which shows clarity but structure may not always be coherent. |
|
|
Mid Pass |
8 |
54 - 56 |
55 |
|
|
|
Low Pass |
7 |
50 - 53 |
50 |
|
|
Fail
|
Borderline Fail |
6 |
40 - 49 |
45 |
Knowledge and understanding is insufficient as the student only evidences an understanding of small subset of the taught concepts and techniques; fails to make sufficient links between known concepts and facts to adequately solve relevant aspects of the brief/problem; little ability to independently select and evaluate reading/research with almost total reliance on set sources and unsubstantiated arguments/methods; communication/presentation may be competent in places but fails to demonstrate structure, clarity and/or focus; inability to adequately define problems and make reasoned judgements; the general approach to tasks lacks rigor and competence. |
|
|
Mid Fail |
4 |
30 - 39 |
35 |
|
|
|
Low Fail |
2 |
20 - 29 |
25 |
|
|
Fail |
Very Low Fail |
1 |
6-19 |
10 |
Knowledge and understanding is highly insufficient as the student is unable to evidence any meaningful understanding of taught concepts or methods; very limited evidence of reading and research to advance work; inadequate technical and practical skills as the student is unable to use and apply such skills to address problems or make judgements; limited or lack of understanding of the boundaries of the discipline and does not question received wisdom; approach to learning lacks autonomy and approach to tasks is not sustained; inability to communicate coherently. |
|
Zero |
Zero |
0 |
0-5 |
0 |
Work not submitted, work of no merit, penalty in some misconduct cases. |
Topic one….Management Competencies in a Multicultural Environment / Cultural Intelligence
Topic two. Learning and reflective practice
Topic three.The nature of culture.
Topic four.Tools for cultural analysis.
Topic five. Cross cultural management styles.
Topic six. Communicating across cultures/cross cultural negotiation
Topic seven. Multicultural teamworking
Topic eight. Leadership and Motivation in an international/ cross cultural context
Topic nineCompetencies in ethical, sustainable management practices
Buy Custom Answer Of This 44-710366 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free QuoteNeed last-minute online assignment help with your 44-710366 International Management Competencies Assignment? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our Management Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free assignment examples and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content