| Category | Assignment | Subject | Nursing |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Griffith University | Module Title | 1803NRS Foundations of Professional Nursing |
| Word Count | 850 words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Essay |
| Assessment Title | A1 Written Assignment- Essay |
| Academic Year | 2024-25 |
This assessment aims to demonstrate an understanding of the value of reflective practice in nursing. This written assignment is scheduled early in the Bachelor of Nursing program so you can build on your strengths and address any identified deficits (weaknesses).
This assessment item will assess Learning Outcome 1: Describe reflective practice and its importance in nursing. In module 2, topic 2 of your course, you have explored:
For this task, you will write an 850-word essay about reflective practice. In your essay you need to: 1. Introduce the topic of your essay and identify the aim (approx. 50 words).
Apply your identified reflective practice model to a learning experience or situation that has occurred in your own life (go through the steps). Discuss what you gained from this experience and reflect on not only what you could have done differently but also what you did well (approx. 300 words). You can use the pronoun “I” in this section, i.e., you can write in the “first person”, but only in this section of the essay.
Are You Looking The Solution of 1803NRS Assignment 1
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment|
Assessable Elements |
EXEMPLARY Exceptionally high quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
ACCOMPLISHED High quality performance or standard of learning achievement. |
DEVELOPING Satisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
BEGINNING Unsatisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
TOTAL MARK |
|
Criterion One Provide an introduction that clearly contextualises your assignment and identifies the aim |
Very high standard as evidenced by succinct and engaging introduction, well planned opening sentence and introduction that clearly outlines the aim and contextualises the essay. |
High quality standard as evidenced by an engaging introduction, concise opening sentence that introduces the topic and introduction that outlines the aim and contextualises the essay. |
Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an adequate introduction, topic is introduced but opening sentence is weak and/or wordy, and introduction includes a basic outline of the aim and contextualises the essay. |
Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by an unclear or absent opening sentence. The aim of the essay is unclear or absent, and context of the essay is confusing, unclear or absent. |
/6 |
|
Mark allocation |
6 |
4-5 |
3 |
0-2 |
|
|
Criterion Two Define and describe reflective practice, then discuss two (2) reasons why reflective practice is important to the role of the Registered Nurse |
Very high standard as evidenced by a succinct definition, and a clear and comprehensive description of reflective practice. A comprehensive and insightful discussion that includes two well-chosen examples to highlight the importance of reflection for the Registered Nurse. |
High quality standard as evidenced by a succinct definition, and a clear description of reflective practice. Includes two accurate examples in a broad discussion to highlight the importance of reflection for the Registered Nurse. |
Satisfactory standard as evidenced by a basic definition and description of reflective practice. A brief discussion with two broad examples to highlight the importance of reflection for the Registered Nurse. |
Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by an unclear or absent definition or description of reflective practice. A discussion regarding the importance of reflection has not been developed and/or there are <2 examples to highlight the importance of reflection for the Registered Nurse. |
/16 |
|
Mark allocation |
14-16 |
11-13 |
8-10 |
0-7 |
|
|
Criterion Three Identify a reflective practice model and briefly describe the steps of the model. |
Very high standard as evidenced by the accurate identification of a reflective practice model with a clear and comprehensive description of the steps of the model. |
High quality standard as evidenced by the accurate identification of a reflective practice model with a clear description of the steps of the model. |
Satisfactory standard as evidenced by the accurate identification of a reflective practice model with a brief description of the steps of the model. May be lacking some important details about the steps or some details are not clear. |
Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by an incorrect identification of a reflective practice model with an inadequate description of the steps of the model. |
/16 |
|
Assessable Elements |
EXEMPLARY Exceptionally high quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
ACCOMPLISHED High quality performance or standard of learning achievement. |
DEVELOPING Satisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
BEGINNING Unsatisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
TOTAL MARK |
|
Mark allocation |
14-16 |
11-13 |
8-10 |
0-7 |
|
|
Criterion Four Apply your identified reflective practice model to a learning experience or situation that has occurred in your own life. |
Very high standard as evidenced by insightful reflection and highly effective and comprehensive application of the reflective practice model to a relevant experience. Well chosen situation, high level discussion of personal reflection, e.g,, factors that influenced the situation, power at play and/or clear evidence of self- awareness. High level, critical discussion regarding change required or recommended, positive approach to continue or personal or behaviours to alter. |
High quality standard as evidenced by honest reflection and effective application of the reflective practice model to a relevant experience. Situation relevant and good discussion of personal reflection occurring, e.g., factors that influenced the situation, and/or clear evidence of self-awareness. Some connections in discussion not clearly linked. Good, analytical discussion about change required or recommended, positive approach to continue or personal or behaviours to alter. |
Satisfactory standard as evidenced by beginning reflection skills and an adequate attempt to apply the reflective practice model to a relevant experience. Description of thoughts, feelings and or personal approach covered at a superficial level. Some obvious connections in discussion not made. Basic discussion of facts about change required or recommended, positive approach to continue or personal approach or behaviours to alter. |
Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by descriptive writing rather than reflection. Unsatisfactory application to the reflective practice model. Chosen experience is not appropriate. Feelings or thoughts discussed at a shallow level. Connections not made between reflective practice model and scenario in any depth. Recommendations for future actions covered at a superficial level or not linked to the scenario |
/24 |
|
Mark allocation |
22-24 |
17-21 |
12-16 |
0-11 |
|
|
Criterion Five Write a conclusion that summarises the overall assignment |
Very high standard as evidenced by succinct conclusion that clearly summarises the essay. No new information or references are included. |
High quality standard as evidenced by a conclusion that clearly summarises the essay. No new information or references are included. |
Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an basic conclusion that briefly summarises the essay. Minimal new information or references might be included. |
Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by an unclear or absent conclusion. New information and references were included. |
/6 |
|
Mark allocation |
6 |
4-5 |
3 |
0-2 |
|
Assessable Elements |
EXEMPLARY Exceptionally high quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
ACCOMPLISHED High quality performance or standard of learning achievement. |
DEVELOPING Satisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
BEGINNING Unsatisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. |
TOTAL MARK |
|
Criterion Six Use of the literature |
Very high standard as evidenced by synthesis and accurate integration of a wide range of high quality, credible evidence to support ideas that are relevant to the topic. 4 or more scholarly references used |
High quality standard as evidenced by some synthesis and integration of a range of good quality, credible evidence to support ideas that are relevant to the topic. 4 scholarly references used |
Satisfactory standard as evidenced by attempting synthesis and integration of credible evidence to support ideas that are relevant to the topic. 4 scholarly references used |
Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by a lack of synthesis and integration of evidence resulting in a lack of support for ideas. 2 or less scholarly references used |
/12 |
|
Mark allocation |
11-12 |
9-10 |
6-8 |
0-6 |
|
|
Criterion Seven Presentation, grammar and academic writing |
Exemplary demonstration of academic writing standards; Exemplary sentence and paragraph structure, with few, if any errors, exemplary and overall logical flow, that indicates a sophisticated ability to communicate ideas effectively. |
High quality demonstration of academic writing standards; appropriate sentence and paragraph structure, with some errors and overall logical flow, that indicates an effective ability to communicate ideas. |
Sufficient demonstration of academic writing standards; Developing sentence and paragraph structure, and/or there are some errors that disrupt the logical flow or communication of ideas. |
Does not comply with academic writing standards; Poor sentence and paragraph structure, and poor logical flow demonstrates an inability to communicate ideas effectively. |
/12 |
|
Mark allocation |
11-12 |
9-10 |
6-8 |
0-6 |
|
|
Criterion Eight Referencing |
Exceptionally high standard as evidenced by exemplary use of APA 7 format in-text and reference list with no errors |
High quality standard as evidenced by the consistent use of APA 7 format in-text and reference list with minimal errors. |
Satisfactory standard as evidenced by the developing use of APA 7 format in-text and reference list, but with several errors. |
Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by the beginning of APA 7 format in-text and reference list with many errors. |
/8 |
|
Mark allocation |
7-8 |
6 |
4-5 |
0-3 |
|
|
/100 |
|||||
Hire Experts to solve your 1803NRS Assignment 1 before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentLooking for the Australia Assignment Help of the 1803NRS Foundations of Professional Nursing Assignment 1? Look no further! There are specialized professionals for all categories of assignments who offer you plagiarism-free and superior content. You are assured that our Nursing Essay Writing Service will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. A free list of assignment samples written by PhD experts is also provided here that can help you boost your study power and check the quality of the assignment. So contact us today and get your top-notch assignment!
See the solution of this brief click here: 1803NRS Essay Assignment 1 Sample
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
