| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of the West of England (UWE Bristol) | Module Title | UMOCQW-15-M People and Orgnisations |
| Word Count | 2500 words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Written Assignment |
| Academic Year | 2025/26 |
Module title: People and Orgnisations
Module code: UMOCQW-15-M
Submission deadline: Before 14:00 on 5th January 2026
Assessment title: An Individual, Written, Critical Analysis of a case study based on three topics from this module. Please see the module schedule for a list of the topics.
Assessment type: Written Assignment
Assessment weighting:100% of total module mark
Size or length of assessment: Maximum 2500 words (no +/- 10% to be used)
Module learning outcomes assessed by this task:
Use of Al in assessment: You may use Al to search for links between module theory and the assignment case study. However, do not use Al to write any part of the assignment, not even a paragraph. In other words, do not submit Al generated work in your assessment. If in doubt, please discuss with your module staff and consider UWE's guidance to students on Using generative Al at UWE Bristol - Study skills | UWE Bristol.
Please note that the aim of referencing is to demonstrate you have read and understood a range of sources to evidence your key points. You need to list the references consistently and in such a way as to ensure the reader can follow up on the sources for themselves. Please use the UWE Bristol Harvard referencing system. No other referencing system will be acceptable. Please see the assessment marking rubric for the marks associated with referencing.
Using the information in the specific case study provided as a starting point, analyse the situation in the case study using three of the study units from the module, with at least one topic from Organisation Studies and one from Human Resources. You need to analyse the people aspects of the case not the business aspects. It is likely you will need to do further research on the case or organisation to develop your analysis.
The minimum pass mark for this module is 50%. Please examine the marking rubric and raise any questions with the Module Leader or your seminar tutor.
Struggling with your UMOCQW-15-M People and Orgnisations Assignment?
Request to Buy AnswerThe weekly lectorial sessions provide the subject relevant content, here you will learn about each topic. In the sessions the key ideas and theorists will be presented. You can also use the lecture slides to follow up on references to assist with researching for your essay.
The weekly tutorial sessions are designed to aid the completion of your assessment. In class, you will be asked to draw links between theory and the examples you have drawn and present some of your key findings at the end of the session.
There will also be an online assignment support session held which give advice on how to approach the assignment and how to write it.
Please explore the following links for additional resources. In addition, the library runs weekly online semnars that could be invaluable. These are regularly displayed on the announcement board in the library. If in doubt, please ask to speak with a business school librarian.
It is recommended that you review all of the relevant materials on Blackboard. You can also speak to your module leader for advice and guidance.
UWE Bristol offer a range of Assessment Support Options that you can explore through this link, and both Academic Support and Wellbeing Support are available.
For further information, please see the Student study essentials.
Use the support above if you feel unable to submit your own work for this module. The most common form of assessment offence is collusion, this is where students work together closely and write their assignments in collaboration, rather than independently. It is fine for you to work with your peers but please make sure you write up your assignments on your own.
Some students also use essay writing services, this is quite easily detected so please make sure you only present work that you have written.
Please see academic-conduct-policy-and-academic-misconduct-procedures (1).pdf
| Criteria | Insufficient (Fail) 0–39% | Marginal Fail 40–49% | Satisfactory 50–59% | Good 60–69% | Excellent 70–79% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion 1 – Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of relevant and appropriate theories relating to people and organisations. (30%) | Unclear or confused articulation of theory. Irrelevant theory somewhat disconnected with the module materials. | Limited understanding shown. No evidence of reading beyond the core information from lectures. | Demonstrates some awareness of relevant authors and theories, but is somewhat descriptive. Some arguments need further justification by using relevant evidence. | Demonstrates awareness of relevant authors and theories. Arguments supported throughout by use of relevant evidence. | Demonstrates a strong awareness of relevant authors and theories. Arguments supported throughout by use of relevant evidence that has been critically evaluated. |
| Criterion 2 – Link theory to practice in the case study using well-developed arguments and appropriate case study examples. (30%) | No links between theory and practice. Mainly descriptive. Unclear evidence drawn from case. Unsupported assertions. | Limited evidence of linking theory and practice. Substantive points are not supported by evidence. No critical reflection. | Has made an effort to link theory and practice. The critical reflection is not well developed. | Clear exposition of theory and evidence with some good critical reflection on the relationship between theory and practice. | Has shown insight in exploring theory and evidence with extensive critical reflection on the relationship between theory and practice. |
| Criterion 3 – Demonstrate critical insights into how different and multiple perspectives can be used to analyse the experiences of people in organisations. (30%) | None or very limited evidence of analysis, predominantly descriptive account of the case study. | Limited evidence of analysis from different perspectives. Limited or no criticality. | Makes an attempt to identify insights but these are not critical or coherent. | There is analysis, some of which is well developed. There is good academic support for the analysis but it is superficial. Overall, the analysis is not coherently linked together. | The analysis is rooted in differing perspectives and informs the writer’s argument which is well supported by academic evidence. There are |
| Criterion 4 – Ideas are assembled coherently, with arguments logically progressed. (10%) | Difficult to read. No clear narrative. A weak or no attempt to reference. | Poor presentation. Language confused and incoherent. Poor academic style. Referencing does not follow Harvard style and/or there are major inaccuracies/omissions. | Presentation complies with assignment brief. Meaning is clear though there may be some problems with language. Referencing does not always follow Harvard style and/or there are some inaccuracies/omissions. | Generally addresses the assignment brief. Has a weak argument. Introduction or conclusion are too general. Use of UWE Harvard referencing contains small errors. | Consistently addresses the assignment brief. Has a clear, informative argument with good introduction and conclusion. No errors or omissions in UWE Harvard referencing. |
Achieve Higher Grades of UMOCQW-15-M Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentIf you are worried about the UMOCQW-15-M People and Orgnisations Assignment at UWE Bristol? then no need to worry anymore! Our experts provide management assignment help that has been designed for the students. You will get expert guidance and help on assignments that will strengthen your concepts. We also provide you with free UWE Bristol Assignment Samples that will help you understand. And the best part? All the content is 100% original, written by PhD expert writers, and well-researched, so that you get the best quality. So don’t delay now; boost your grades with our help!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content