| Category | Assignment | Subject | Engineering |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of the West of England ( UWE Bristol) | Module Title | UFMFBM-30-M Sustainable Engineering for Global Challenges |
| Word Count | 3000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Task B: Group Report |
This task is a to prepare you for writing a strategic consultancy report that draws its knowledge, recommendation, and advice from both academic and practitioner publications. The reports should help stakeholders, including governments at all levels (national, regional, and local), to have deep understanding of your chosen SDG. The group must clearly determine their own chosen SDG from the UN SDGs.
One of the biggest challenges when it comes to understanding Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs) is determining where we are on the journey towards accomplishing the UN SDGs.
Students will identify one of Sustainable Development Goals and analyse where a company of their choice is today in delivering the sustainable development goal. The students will identify the key elements and factors that hinder or facilitate the achievement of the identified sustainable goals and make recommendations on the way forward using engineering and innovative solutions.
The group must aim to offer a practical guide on how to achieve SDGs in line with the strategic vision or goal of the chosen company and how to measure performance of the proposed solution within a given period of time [minimum of three years and maximum of five years].
Are You Looking The Solution of UFMFBM-30-M Assessment Task B
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentYou will be required to identify the key elements and factors that hinder or facilitate the achievement of the identified sustainable development goal and make recommendations on the way forward using engineering and innovative solutions.
How do I achieve high marks in this assessment?
Please refer to the marking criteria matrix in the module handbook to understand the criteria upon which you will be assessed.
Your assessment will be marked according to the following marking criteria.
|
Criteria |
weight |
>35% |
35-39% |
40-49% |
50-59% |
60-69% |
70-79% |
≥ 80% |
|
Overall knowledge of topic area (including literature) |
15% |
Confused |
Superficial understanding |
Simple undeveloped understanding |
Sufficient understanding |
Good and complete understanding |
Original and insightful understanding |
Expert and innovative understanding |
|
Support for argument (evaluation of issues) |
35% |
No relevant evidence. |
Nearly non- existent use of relevant material |
Direct use of Course material only, little or no use of other readings. |
Direct use of Course material, reasonable use of other readings. |
Good use of course material and academic literature with indication of practitioner material. |
Very good support from wide readings and evidence of critical selection of practitioner and academic resources. |
Excellent support from wide readings and evidence of highly critical selection of practitioner and academic resources. |
|
Assessment of proposed solution (analytical & critical ability) |
40% |
None |
Little |
Some evidence, limited discussion on important parts of the assignment |
Reasonably developed, some discussion on important parts of the assignment |
Well-developed discussion on important parts of the assignment. Very good discussion on important parts of the assignment. Author opinion is clear. |
Highly-developed. Demonstrates some originality in thinking and argument. Very good discussion on important parts of the assignment. Author opinion is integrated well. |
Sophisticated and mature. Demonstrate originality. Excellent discussion on important parts of the assignment. Author opinion is integrated well. Effective evaluation of real business situations with applied recommendation. |
|
Argument presentation |
10% |
Unstructured, under thinking, and very difficult to understand |
Little use of structure, poor clarity of ideas and/or difficult to understand. |
Some use of structure, sufficient clarity to poorly understand the main argument. Poor quality of writing. |
Adequate organisation of ideas, clarity and writing quality. Understandable but with extra efforts. |
Good organisation of ideas, clarity and writing quality. Easy to read and understand. |
Highly developed structure to excellently support argument along with clear presentation of ideas and consultant writing quality |
Executive structure to excellently support argument along with exceptionally clear presentation of ideas and excellent consultant writing quality. |
Buy Answer of UFMFBM-30-M Assessment Task B & Raise Your Grades
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentFinding the UFMFBM-30-M Sustainable Engineering for Global Challenges Task B Assessment difficult? Now it's time to say goodbye to the tension! We bring Assignment help from UK writers that guarantee high-quality and 100% AI & Plagiarism-free content! Whether you need Help With Engineering Assignment or a free UWE Bristol Assignment Samples, we will provide everything. Our experts prepare well-researched and tailored content that will make your grades top-notch. So what are you waiting for? Contact us today and make your assignments stress-free, creative and impressive!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
