OFFERS!
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Regent's University London | Module Title | SEL520 Why We Post: Social Media and Us |
| Word Count | 1,500 words [7 minutes talk + 3 minutes equivalent media] (+/- 10%) |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Multimedia Presentation |
| Assessment Title | Multimedia Presentation |
| Academic Year | 2026 |
| Criteria | Band 0 (0-20%) | Band 1 (21-39%) | Band 2 (40-49%) | Band 3 (50-59%) | Band 4 (60-69%) | Band 5 (70-85%) | Band 6 (86-100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collaboration and Active Learning | Does not answer the brief or is off topic or empty. There is no work in the presentation. | May refer to collaboration in class but with limited use of evidence and limited reference to specific activities or experiences. | Describes and evidences at least one example of collaboration in class and active learning and idea proposal. There is presence, in the presentation, of some collaboration. | Describes evidences and partly evaluates from within the collaborative work in class and shows one example of active learning (media research) on one social media platform and its communities or groups. There is presence of the student in the final presentation. | Describes, evidences and evaluates one social media platform as part of collective social experience and partially applies insights and presents socially-aware situations with regards to social media to a wider context of media, culture and society. Shows some limited use of socially critical situations, perhaps reduced to current use of the platforms but the proposal of the presentation has been considered against the social media context. There is clear effort in the digital skills (learning from the community you studied). | Describes, evidences and evaluates more than one example of social media and collaborative work in creating this assignment. Applies active learning and is able to consider the use of social media as different than they are today, where the final outcome suggests critical thinking. Shows socially engaged uses of media and social solutions. Ideas are clearly outside the box. The presentation demonstrates regular, critical and supportive class collaboration towards an effective presentation. | Evidences critical and complex insights about analysing social media. The individual research with a community contributes to maximum effect of an effective presentation, and wider demonstration of ownership of learning in relation to social media use. Shows originality beyond the expectations of the task in relation to media and social solutions, overall technical presentation of the work and design of the immersive media. |
| Knowledge and Use of Digital Tools | Does not make use of digital tools or is off topic or empty. | May refer to social media, digital environments but with limited exploration of any specific examples from the learning experience. | Describes and evidences at least one example of social media and attempts to evaluate why this tool was appropriate or not to become a more active learner. Evidence of work in the presentation that is personal contribution. | Describes and evidences use of at least one example of social media and partially uses digital tools and is able to evaluate why the social media platform or tool was appropriate; helping the student re-define initial ideas through digital media and partially applies critical theory to the use of these social media tools. | Describes and evidences use of at least one social media platform and one digital tool. Evaluates why these platforms and tools were appropriate for the chosen group/audience, or not, and partially applies socially critical insights to future adaptations of these tools. | Describes and evidences use of more than one social media platform and more than one digital tool with reference to ethical, cultural and issues around social media. Evaluates why these platforms were appropriate or not, able to identify challenges, contradictions and is able to respond to the social issues using or demonstrating the replication of the media (if, for example, the community or group uses instagram, the presentation may follow the instagram format, or be created for instagram). | Evidences and evaluates the use of several social media platforms and digital tools with reference to ethics, responsible use, issues around social media as spaces for transformation, discussions on political power and critical reflections on the course literature on digital media and tools. The individual applies creative use of digital media, social media in the wider context of the academic and professional development. |
| Reflection on the Study Area (Discipline/ Interdisciplinary) | No engagement with the course content, off topic or empty. | May address some ideas on social media but these are descriptive and generic with limited evidence of research or limited exploration of examples. | Describes and evidences at least one approach to applying social media to a specific chosen group/audience, with some consideration for what exists in social media platforms and the market. The analysis of social media is descriptive. | Describes and evidences at least one approach to social media as applied to the main chosen group/audience, reflecting on how these applications impact the outcome. The analysis of social media presents sides (or phrased as 'the positive and negative of social media'). | Describes, evidences and evaluates at least one similar and one different approach to managing social media for social change, reflecting on why these differences arise and demonstrating some criticality in the application of these ideas to the final outcome. The analysis of social media is contextual beyond positive/negative overviews, has a sound use of theory. | Describes, evidences and evaluates more than one connection and divergence between disciplines in the context of approaches to social media. Is able to demonstrate 'emergence' as a result of critically reflecting on how and why the various social media platforms impact the solution to the chosen group/audience. The analysis of social media is critical of the positive/negative approach and theoretically coherent, critical of theory, able to complement theories interdisciplinarily. | Evidences and evaluates several connections and divergences between disciplines in the context of approaches to social media. Is able to demonstrate curiosity about context and future use of social media. Applies insights gained to the values of multiple interconnections between social media and it is clearly interdisciplinary. It goes beyond expectations in showing how multiple perspectives can be applied to understanding the meanings that people give to social media in a critical and reflexive way. The analysis of social media is critical of the positive/negative approach and theoretically coherent, critical of theory, able to complement theories interdisciplinarily. |
| Communication | The media used is limiting, no commitment to telling a story. | Limited use of media technologies when telling the story, appears read and superficial. | The presentation may be produced in a general way with limited use of the technology, the format is too long or too short. The presentation can be understood, it may sound over performed but the message can reach the audience. | The presentation is clear, appears natural and has a good tone and a story telling approach that engages the audience. The media used supports the presentation to good effect. | Describes, evidences and evaluates at least one example of effective communication in various formats and one of addressing multicultural contexts, partially applying this to the presentation. The presentation is very good because the images, text, audio are very well presented, aesthetically meaningful, logic sequencing and is able to narrate a story about the community and their use of social media in a balanced way. The immersive media is strong and creative, perhaps using unusual media. | Describes, evidences and evaluates more than one example of approach to critically reflection on social media use by the given community/group, reflecting why these differences arise and demonstrating some criticality. The presentation is excellent because the narrative, story-telling is engaging at all levels, perfectly timed, clear and has a strong message that is able to convey complexity and criticality and empathy, grounded knowledge of the group. Is able to speak for the group balancing issues of representation and power. The immersive media enhances the presentation and it is done in the style of the group. | Evidences and evaluates multiple instances of effective communication in various formats across multicultural contexts and audiences with comprehensive critical elaboration and explanation. Is able to critically demonstrate complex articulation of social media use, critically reflecting on how and why various groups and social platforms impact each other, and how the groups/communities come to shape social media. The presentation is outstanding because story-telling is at near-professional level, it is engaging at all levels, perfectly timed, reflexive and personable, it has a strong message, one that is able to convey complexity, criticality and empathy and grounded knowledge of the group and their articulation of social media. Is able to speak for the group balancing issues of representation and power and may have advanced technical or immersive media that enhances the presentation at that level, and is done in the style of the group. |
| Work as a Whole | Off-topic, empty or generic, no engagement with core principles in social media. Very poor communication. No referencing of sources, and no referencing of AI prompting. No work in the presentation. AI is used uncritically to produce random ideas or generic images. No digital skills are present. No evidence of research work. | May refer to a presentation and may attempt to say something about social media but the exploration of concepts and evidence is limited. No relevant work presented, or last minute notes that evidence limited engagement. The presentation will not make much sense when presented. Poor AI prompting and poor referencing (or references and prompts missing or incomplete, or unexplored). AI is used uncritically to produce random answers or generic ideas. No new digital skills are demonstrated. Poor evidence of research, the work is mostly superficial description of a group's media. The narrative could benefit from more critical engagement. | Describes and evidences a personalised use of social media, use of digital tools and knowledge or practice of these in society. Communicates reasonably clearly. The presentation text, images or audio can be understood but require use of notes for clear understanding of the concept. Use of PowerPoint (or other media) will be textual and bullet pointed without critical links. The work as a whole is mostly descriptive and there is no attempt to consider future differences of the social media, it is not reflexive. Sources are adequately referenced. Use of AI appears supported by prompts. Prompts are limitedly explored but makes sense in the context. There is evidence of transformation of prompts into personal interpretation or analysis. Too much dependence on AI beyond the needs of the brief. | Describes, evidences a personalised toolkit of digital skills, and knowledge of social media, and partly evaluates the needs of the presentation. The presentation can be understood perhaps with some aid of notes as background reference, but the concept is clear and evidenced visually or in writing. There are alternatives used to PowerPoint, and it is not too textual, there is a limit to bullet points. The work may be descriptive but there is attempt to consider alternative uses of the social media. Communicates the presentation clearly and presents the work professionally in most aspects. Sources are well referenced. Use of AI appears supported by prompts. Prompts are limitedly explored but makes sense in the context. There is evidence of transformation of prompts into personal interpretation or analysis. AI dependence is limited to the specifics of the brief. The student is able to present their individual voice and experience of social media but may be stronger than that of the community it represents. | Describes and evidences a personalised toolkit of digital and technical skills individually and socially (learning from the research group/community). Communicates very clearly the proposed concept and how they have arrived to it. Presents the work professionally, beyond the use of stale PowerPoints or generic use of AI generated images. The use of AI is critical, with changes to prompting and alteration of AI responses. AI dependence is limited to the specifics of the brief. Sources and prompts are referenced fully and accurately. The presentation is elegantly built, it is easy to navigate and enhances the presentation of the work. The presentation has a rich balance of media that can be understood without the need of additional prompts or supports. Watching the work is clear. The student has created good meaningful visual story of the group and social media used. The student has worked to present ideas towards an effective presentation. | Describes and evidences a personalised toolkit of digital and technical skills individually and socially (learning from the research group/community). Communicates very clearly the proposed concept and how they have arrived to it. Presents the work professionally, beyond the use of stale PowerPoints or generic use of AI generated images. The use of AI is creative, critical, and the prompts have been revised and used various times. Sources and prompts are referenced fully and accurately. The design of the media presentation is elegantly and professionally thought through, easy to navigate through the presentation with no technical glitches, and contributes to enhancing the presentation of the work. The work has a rich balance of media that elevates the pitch without any need to explore additional notes in order to understand the concept. The presentation demonstrates empathetic understanding of the studied community. The student has clearly worked to transform ideas towards an effective presentation but the digital skills for presenting work are of good quality and may include different software or sources that are not traditionally used for assignments or may reflect exploration of new social media skills. A critical reflection on learning may be found on the presentation itself. | Goes beyond expectations in providing original insights about social media and how it may apply to a wider context through digital tools. Communicates very clearly and with numerous instances of specific evidence drawn from individual and group experience in critically assessing social media. The presentation is presented professionally to a level that is engaging to any audiences. The use of AI is responsible, critical and creative. The prompts have been revised, discarded, images have been re-edited. Sources and prompts are accurately referenced. The design of the platform (or other relevant media) is elegantly and professionally thought through, easy to navigate through the presentation with no technical glitches, and contributes to enhancing the presentation of the work. Individuals and groups are presented with context of social and political relationships. The work reflects a qualitative and collective work that shows evidence of professional engagement and media collaboration, mirroring that of professional practice. The student may have included different media or academic sources that are not usually used for assignments, or may reflect critical exploration of new digital media. A critical reflection on learning may be found in the presentation and/or in the actual presentation itself. |
Buy Custom Answer Of SEL520 Why We Post: Social Media and Us Assignment
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentNeed expert support for your SEL520 Why We Post: Social Media and Us Assignment? Get reliable and high-quality Anthropology Assignment help from experienced academic writers who understand university guidelines and marking criteria. We provide well-researched, plagiarism-free content tailored to your requirements. You can also access our Free list of Assignment Samples Examples to understand structure, formatting, and referencing styles. Improve your grades with clear, simple, and professionally written solutions delivered on time. Achieve academic success with trusted human rights law assignment help today.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
