Research Methods Individual Presentation Assessment Brief | CCCU

Published: 13 Sep, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Education
University Canterbury Christ Church University (CCCU) Module Title Research Methods

Research Methods Individual Presentation Assessment Brief

Assignment task

This assessment is an individual presentation of the research proposal that presents student’s ability to effectively communicate the idea, objectives and research methodology of the planned research project and justify chosen research design. The students are expected to logically substantiate theoretical framework for preliminary research and research methodology, choice of data to be collected and analysed, methods and procedures to complete the research, as well as the research timeline and its feasibility.

Depending on the context, the presentation of the research proposal might be needed in a range of situations either in the employment in tourism sector or in an academic setting, where students will need to solve a theoretical and/or practical problem. Therefore, the ability to orally present a research proposal in a clear, concise and convincing way and support the presentation with effective and appealing slides is an essential component of professional skillset of the would-be Bachelor in Business and Tourism Management. Another essential skill is ability to handle questions effectively, demonstrate readiness to provide additional details and justify choices and decisions.

Individual presentation of the research proposal is the final assignment in Level 5, and logically prepares students to undertaking a dissertation at Level 6. By presenting this assignment, students must demonstrate they have achieved their learning objectives, i.e. have knowledge and understanding of approaches to research design and are able to evaluate the usefulness of various methods and techniques for primary data-gathering and analysis, ethical, practical and theoretical considerations and limitations of their research. 

This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes:

LO 1 Define and justify an appropriate business-related research issue to investigate empirically.
LO 2 Explain and critically evaluate the main social scientific research methodologies and methods appropriate for the business.
LO 3 Draw on relevant academic literature and appropriate data sources to develop and evaluate insights from published materials related to chosen research area.
LO 4 Demonstrate an informed understanding on key ethical considerations of conducting research projects.
LO 5 Demonstrate appropriate academic writing skills, referencing and good academic practice and make decisions on organising material in a logical and coherent way with an audience in mind.

Task requirements

Overview of the assignment

Individual presentation of the research proposal will repeat the research proposal in some parts, but will substantially develop the following parts: 
-Rationale for the research, stating and justifying the research problem, aim, objectives and research approach.
-Theoretical framework as the basis for the literature review.
-Previous research, gap in the research or evidence of the research necessity, e.g. from reports.
-Research methodology.
-Proposed outcomes of the research and personal contribution.

Consequently, this assignment provides the opportunity for students to demonstrate the ability to understand and interpret information relevant to the research methodology and present it to a variety of audiences in both academic and business environments in a written form as a 2000 words research proposal with required appendices.

You will need to prepare a Power Point presentation and present the proposal orally. You must be able to respond questions concerning theoretical framework, previous research, gap in the research, practical and theoretical implications with appropriate referencing to the relevant primary and secondary resources. You will need to justify your interest and your role in the future research.

Referencing and research requirements

Please reference your work according to the Canterbury Harvard style guidance which you can access on Moodle. Include at least 15 references. In addition to the research proposal, you will need to use more references for the theoretical framework to explain key theories and concepts and provide evidence of the research problem. Overall, the presentation will refer to more than 20 academic and business resources.

Submission details

This assignment should be submitted electronically via Moodle (module tutors will discuss this process with you during class time). 

Please ensure that your work has been saved in an appropriate file format (Microsoft Word). You PowerPoint presentation will have speaker notes and then will be saved as the Word Document Handouts with speaker notes below slides (see the instruction enclosed in Appendix C.)

Please, note, that you CANNOT submit the set of images of slides and images of speaker notes, as this will be viewed as Academic Misconduct and the attempt to avoid similarity check on Turnitin. Your submitted text on the slides and the speaker notes must be editable, and not in the textbox or frame.

The text in the slides and the speaker notes as well as the scheme of the theoretical framework, and the materials in the appendices to the proposal, will comprise the total of 2000 words. Please, note, that you do not need to repeat all the text of the proposal in the speaker note sand the slides, though some parts will be repeated. However, some parts will require different presentation than in the research proposal.
You can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If you do submit your work more than once, your earlier submission will be replaced by the most recent version.
 
Once you have submitted your work, you will receive a digital receipt as proof of submission, which will be sent to your forwarded e-mail address (provided you have set this up). Please keep this receipt for future reference, along with the original electronic copy of your assignment 

You are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic misconduct, which can be viewed on the University website: Academic Misconduct Policy. In submitting your assignment, you are acknowledging that you have read and understood these regulations.

Are You Looking The Solution of Assignment

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Assignment Guide – Individual Presentation

You will create your own template to the PowerPoint presentation. 
The structure of the presentation below is tentative, and students have autonomy to decide where they need more slides. However, the total presentation must not exceed 15 slides.

Title (1 slide)

To ensure that your title and topic point directly to the focus of your research, check to see that key terms in the statement of the gap in the literature and the research aim are reproduced in the title.

Research problem or justification (1-2 slides)

Description of your research – what, how, why (the research needs to be done)
What issue, problem, controversy, or important matter has led to research on the topic and set your research into wider context of the discipline.

Theoretical framework (2 slides)

Theoretical framework will be presented as a model or a flowchart and supported by detailed description in the speaker notes. It will justify three topics investigated further in the Literature Review. 
In summary, the theoretical framework model and literature review are interconnected in the research process. The literature review informs the development of the theoretical framework by identifying relevant theories and concepts, integrating them into a coherent framework, and establishing the conceptual basis for the research study. In this presentation students need to demonstrate the Theoretical framework model not actually the literature review.
As an option, you may have 1 slide for Theoretical framework, and 1 slide for Conceptual Framework, both presented as mind maps, or flowcharts, or as models. To create mind-maps / flowcharts you are advised to use instruments presented in slides 39-44, Week 1, Day 1.
References are mandatory. Resources, not used in the research proposal, are needed in this section of the presentation. 

Gap in the literature or evidence of the problem from reports, etc. (1 slide)

Outlines the field of literature and the ‘gap’, the main findings to date, theories, debates, and remaining questions within the literature, and explains how the research will contribute to the gap. References are mandatory.

Research aim, research objective and a research question (1 slide)

Outline the focus or names the specific knowledge the research methodology aims to generate.

What will you need to know to answer the research question? How can you find this out?

  • Explain the research design and methodology: qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods.
  • Clarify the correlations between the research objectives and the chosen approach.

Research method and methodology (4-5 slides)

Explain what you will do to achieve the research aim or reach your conclusions. You might consider the following:

-Data and resources.
-Possible collaboration with organisations and institutions in the tourism sector in the UK. Or educational/research institutions.
-Budget.
-Research design and choice of research methods.
-Samling design: the population or sample from which participants will be selected; location of the sample; the sample size; how the sample will be selected; surveys, questionnaires, including the one(s) you created, and tests used; how the data generated will be analysed. 
-Choice/creation of research instruments, including online platforms, applications or software needed to a) collect data; b) analyse data.
-Your personal role in the research, your readiness (previous experience, research, training?). You need to explain and persuade your audience that you are the right person to complete the research, and competent enough to resolve the research problem.
-Understanding legislation.
-Ethics and confidentiality: Does your research involve people? Can you get enough data? How will you keep it confidential? Health and Safety considerations.

Summary or statement of proposed outcomes of the research (1 slide)

Research timeline (1 slide). 

Justify the research feasibility. Explain practical limitations and how you plan to deal with them.

You will have 10 minutes to present the research proposal orally, and 10 minutes to respond questions.

References must be clearly readable in the speaker notes. References are not included in the word count.

Appendix A

Table of Penalties

Issue with the Assignment

Penalty to be Applied

The assignment is more than 10% over the prescribed wordcount i.e. for 3000 words, 3301 is submitted excluding Assignment Front sheet, Content page, the Reference list, and the Appendices

A 10-mark deduction applied to the overall grade that is manually entered by the Lecturer. This deduction is capped at 40%, which means an assignment cannot get less than 40% after a deduction for being more than 10% over the total wordcount.

Where assignments are more than 10% less than the prescribed wordcount and lecturers cannot identify if the learning outcomes have been met.

This assignment will be graded below 40.

Where a student submits a .pdf instead of a word document.

This assignment will be graded a Fail.

Students not working in their groups as agreed by the lecturer.

This assignment will be graded a Fail.  

Please note: Where a student has asked the lecturer to move from their original group and the lecturer has agreed this does not apply.

For a presentation assignment that requires oral delivery and the student does not present in person.

The Oral rubric criteria is not moved and the oral criteria will remain at zero.

For a presentation assignment and the student does not upload a converted PPT To Word File with speaker notes.

The communication rubric criteria is not moved and the communication criteria will remain at zero.

For a presentation assignment that requires oral delivery and the student did not present on the day or upload a converted PPT to Word file with speaker Notes.

This assignment will be graded a Fail.

For a presentation assignment the student uploads a file that contains no slides and is simply continuous text.

This assignment will be graded a Fail.

If the assignment is group work and the resubmission is not changed to individual work.

If a group assignment is failed then the resubmitted work must be changed by a minimum of 25% to make it an individual piece of work.

This means if a Group Presentation is 12 slides a minimum of 3 must be different to the group submission. If the assignment is a Group Poster with 6 text boxes then a minimum of 2 of them must be different to the  Group Poster.

The Assignment is failed and graded as Zero.

 

Written feedback will state ‘This resubmission should be individual and a minimum of 25% of the assignment has not changed’.

Where a written assignment has text that is unable to be read by Turnitin because it is either a graphical image (excluding Presentations & Posters); for example, a screenshot or the assignment is written within text boxes on each page.

This assignment will be graded 0 and referred for Academic Misconduct investigation.

An assignment does make use of any Mandatory references provided in the assignment brief/Module Handbook.

The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero

An assignment has a reference list, but no citations.

The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero

An assignment has no citations and no reference list.

Foundation & Level 4 - The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero.

At Level 5 and Level 6 this would be graded as a Fail.

Where False references are included in an assignment.

This will be referred for Academic Misconduct

Academic Misconduct or Breach of Academic integrity

The Assignment will be graded zero.

Written feedback will be ‘This assignment has been identified as potential Academic Misconduct/Breach of academic integrity. You will be invited to a meeting to discuss’.

You will be invited to a meeting with an academic Misconduct reviewer. When you attend the meeting if Academic Misconduct or the breach of Academic Integrity is upheld you will be asked to rewrite the section it applies to and re-submit the assignment.  Failure to attend the meeting means the assignment will remain graded at zero and you will fail the module.

Appendix B. Individual Presentation of the Research Proposal: Marking rubrics

Area

Reference

Weighting %
(Must add up to 100 in multiples of 10)

Criteria

100-80 : Excellent

79-70 : Very Good

69-60 : Good

59-50 : Sound

49-40 : Satisfactory

39-20 : Fail

19-0 : Fail

A) Knowledge & Understanding

1

10

Information

Information gathering/ processing

Uses initiative to seek out new sources of information, evaluates their validity against a range of relevant information and synthesises and evaluates their validity comprehensively. 

Selects a broad range of highly relevant information. Demonstrates a developing understanding of the complexity of the information and processes it comprehensively. 

Selects appropriate information and processes it thoroughly with some critical evaluation. 

Selects appropriate information and evaluates and comments on it with some critical evaluation, includes some readings beyond the set range. 

Selects generally appropriate research and primary sources and shows ability to comment on them adequately. 

The selection of sources/data here is not appropriate to the task and there are not enough evidenced evaluations of readings and research to support the work. 

The selection of sources/data here is not appropriate to the task and the evidence gathered is not evaluated systematically. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B) Cognitive Skills

2

10

Referencing

Referencing

Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list and used fluently to support discussion. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. All elements of individual references are present. 

Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list and used to support discussion. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. All elements of individual references are present.  

Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list and support discussion. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. All elements of individual references are present. 

Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. Most elements of individual references are present. 

Sources of information are acknowledged and integration between text and reference list is mainly effective. Attempts to follow systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. Elements of individual references are generally complete. 

Some sources of information acknowledged but links between text and reference list are unclear. Referencing does not follow a systematic approach. Elements of individual references are incomplete and/or absent. 

Little or no acknowledgement of sources of information in text and/or reference list in this submission. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

10

Methods

Selecting research methods (Relationship between method chosen and the nature of the inquiry)

Methodology selected is effective and appropriate to the aims of the task enabling successful and efficient collection and recording of complex data. The rationale for choosing this methodology from several methodologies is self-determined and convincingly explored. 

Methodology selected is effective and appropriate to the aims of the task enabling effective collection of complex data. The rationale for choosing this methodology from several methodologies is convincingly explored. 

Methodology chosen is appropriate to the task and attention given to the selection of a methodology from the range of prescribed ones. 

Methodology used is appropriate to the task and the rationale offered refers to established guidance. 

Methodology used is appropriate to the task and brief rationale offered refers to established guidance. 

In this piece of work the choice of methodology and relationship to information and/or data being collected is confused and confusing.  

In this piece of work the issue of methodology is not addressed and/or an inappropriate methodology is selected. There is little evidence of how planning was used to complete the task. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C) Practical Skills

4

20

Performance

Performance

Compelling, communicative, and precise performance demonstrating near-professional level of authority, thorough awareness of style, proficiency in technical and interpretative issues. Improvisations are imaginative, creative, and stylistically assured. Accurate, flexible, focused, well-rehearsed, convincing, and precise performance. Stage craft presentation nearly suitable for professional performance. 

Highly focused, convincing performance demonstrating communication, commitment, and thorough understanding of style with careful attention to detail, displaying a high level of technical ability and interpretive skills. Improvised passages are creative, stylistically assured and considered. Performance well prepared, assured and persuasive. Stage craft presentation of a very high standard.  

Focussed performance demonstrating communication, commitment and a thorough understanding of the style with careful attention to detail, displaying a high level of technical ability. Improvisation is stylistically correct and considered. Performance well- prepared and/or rehearsed, assured, and focussed. Stage craft presentation of a high standard.  

Performance demonstrates communication, commitment and understanding of the genre with reasonable attention to detail, displaying a good level of technical ability. Improvised passages show a sound understanding of style. Well-rehearsed. Stage craft presentation of a good standard. 

Performance that demonstrates communication, commitment and understanding of the genre. Attention to detail and technical ability are basic but competent. Improvised passages show some understanding of style. Lacks confidence and stage conduct requires further development. 

Performance in which communication, commitment and style are limited by struggles with technical control. Improvised passages show poor understanding of the style and may be inappropriate. Performance is under-rehearsed and unconvincing and stage conduct is barely addressed.  

Performance in which fluency and focus are severely limited by a lack of technical control. Improvised passages do not yet show understanding of style/genre or conventions of performance here. This performance is under-rehearsed, lacking in confidence and stage conduct is inappropriate, and /or unacceptable. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D) Transferable Skills

5

20

Visual Presentation (visual)

Exceptional presentation for level 5 with strong visual impact which enhances the message. 

Message is presented sophisticatedly and creatively with visual impact. 

Presentation is effective and has good visual effect with creativity. 

Presentation has a sound structure and visual impact with some creativity. 

Visual aspect and/or structure of presentation is adequate with limited creativity.  

Presented in a disorganised manner. Lacks appropriate support from visual tools. 

Presentation is disorganised and/or incoherent and/or medium is non-visual. 

 

6

20

Oral Presentation (oral)

Presentation is exceptional for level 5, well structured, imaginative, and thoroughly engaging. Audibility and pace are appropriate to audience and used with excellent effect to enhance the presentation. 

Presentation is very well structured, creative, and engaging. Audibility and pace are effective in engaging the audience.  

Well-structured and addressed effectively to audience. Pace and audibility are excellent. 

Presentation has a sound structure. Pace and audibility are effective. 

Pace, audibility and/or structure of presentation are adequate. 

Delivery is disorganised and/or pace and audibility is poor. 

Presentation is not understandable and/or inaudible and/or not an oral presentation.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E) Professional Competencies

7

10

Reflectivity

Reflective practice

Consistently analyses practice by critically reflecting on personal contributions and that of others and the rationale behind these. Demonstrates imaginative thinking about potential alternatives and their implications for further practice.  

Confidently analyses personal contribution and that of others to practice through reflection and considers possibilities and their consequences in a range of contexts. Develops effective action plans. 

Evaluates personal contribution and that of others to practice and develops consistent plans of action.  

Demonstrates ability to evaluate own practice and that of others using several frames of reference. Considers future actions 

Able to interpret own practice and that of others based on specific frames of reference. Identifies some future actions. 

Limited interpretation of own practice and that of others here. As a result, appropriate future action planning is extremely limited. 

Incomplete or inaccurate interpretation of own practice and that of others here. As a result, not yet able to plan any appropriate future actions. 

Appendix C

Instruction on exporting the Power Point Presentation slides and speaker notes into Word Document Handouts

Research Methods Assessment Individual Presentation Appendix C

Order Custom Answers for This Assignment

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Looking for the solution of the Research Methods Assignment? Look no further! There are specialized professionals for all categories of assignments who offer you plagiarism-free and superior content. You are assured that our Research Paper Writing Service will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. A free list of assignment samples written by PhD experts is also provided here that can help you boost your study power and check the quality of the assignment. So contact us today and get your top-notch assignment!

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

MKT724 Global Marketing Assignment Example | Ulster University

Category: Assignment Example

Subject: Marketing

University: Ulster University

Module Title: MKT724 Global Marketing

View Free Samples

MG5642 PG Dissertation Coursework Assignment Example 2024-25 | BUL

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: Brunel University London

Module Title: MG5642 PG Dissertation

View Free Samples

BA40101E Analysis of Real-World Issues Assessment 2 Case Study Example

Category: Assignment

Subject: Sociology

University: BPP Business School

Module Title: BA40101E Analysis of Real-World Issues

View Free Samples

FY028 Inquiry Based Learning Cw1 Project Report Assignment Example | BNU

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: Buckinghamshire New University

Module Title: FY028 Inquiry Based Learning

View Free Samples

FY027 Preparing for Success: Self-Development and Responsibility CW1 Portfolio Example

Category: Assignment Example

Subject: Education

University: Buckinghamshire New University

Module Title: FY027 Preparing for Success: Self-Development and Responsibility

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK