Category | Assignment | Subject | Science |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of Bedfordshire | Module Title | PUB017-6 Principles, Policies and Issues |
Assessment Type | Report |
---|---|
Academic Year | 2025-26 |
1. Demonstrate the Following Knowledge and Understanding
A critical understanding of the role of contemporary public health policies and programs for improving health outcomes.
2. Demonstrate the following skills and abilities
A critical evaluation of the gaps in contemporary public health policies and programs for improving health outcomes and propose solutions (new initiative(s) and strategy (ies) and recommendations for improvement.
Write a 3000-word briefing paper for decision makers outlining the background to your selected public health issue, present the key summary points of your evaluation of existing policies and programs designed to improve health outcomes, and offer solutions (new strategies) and initiative(s) and recommendations for improvement.
We will be completing this section together in week 1 and then during other weeks/assignment support sessions.
Each week the principles, policies and issues lectures will discuss the key principles of public health and the public health policies that shape the way in which public health issues might be addressed.
In this assignment you will present a detailed critical discussion of a selected public health issue identifying the relevant policies and programmes implemented to address the public health issue selected and evaluate the impact of these policies and programmes on health outcomes. Using the existing evidence base to draw on examples of good practice you will propose and discuss ways of enhancing the effectiveness of the policies and programmes related to the selected public health issue by suggesting a new initiative(s) and associated strategy (ies) and costs needed to improve health outcomes in this area.
Are You Looking The Solution of PUB017-6 Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentYour assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page. You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.
|
70%+ |
60-69% |
50-59% Threshold standard |
40-49% (Fail) |
35-39% (Fail) |
0-34% (Fail) |
1 Written expression and structure |
Excellent or outstanding presentation of publication standard. Written expression is concise, accurate and articulate. Excellent, coherent in-depth discussion. Briefing paper tightly focuses on and successfully addresses the assignment question. Minor spelling and grammatical errors |
Presentation of briefing paper, including figures and tables is very good. Briefing paper has a clear structure and information is well organised. Very good, detailed and coherent discussion. Demonstrates very good understanding and use key terminology. Focuses on addressing assignment question and avoids inclusion of irrelevant information. Minimal spelling and grammatical errors |
Good, well presented briefing paper but figures and/or tables lack informative titles, or are poorly presented. Briefing paper has a good, well organised structure and points are explained coherently Good, correct use of key terminology, but explanations are relatively basic. Attempts to address the assignment question well, but briefing paper includes some irrelevant information. Some spelling and grammatical errors. |
Overall presentation of the briefing paper is satisfactory, but lacks informative figures and/or tables. Most points are explained coherently, but structure and organisation of the briefing paper is very weak. Satisfactory use of key terminology, but explanations are vague and over simplistic. The assignment question is addressed superficially. Briefing paper includes interesting but irrelevant details throughout. Many spelling and grammatical errors throughout briefing paper. |
Some of the elements of the briefing paper are present but overall poorly presented. Written expression contains errors points are not clear. Key terminology used but with errors or inaccuracies. Spelling and grammatical errors throughout the briefing paper limit understanding of the content. The assignment question is only addressed in part and contains irrelevant information or detail throughout. |
Does not include the elements required for the briefing paper and is poorly presented. Written expression contains errors and is confusing. Key terminology not used. Description of the issue and points unclear. |
2 Use of literature and referencing |
An excellent, comprehensive range of current |
Good range of evidence cited including current |
Good range of evidence cited including current |
Has identified essential literature but |
Literature used is inadequate and not specific |
Literature used is minimal or absent. |
|
70%+ |
60-69% |
50-59% Threshold standard |
40-49% (Fail) |
35-39% (Fail) |
0-34% (Fail) |
|
primary literature is used effectively to support discussion. References and citations are consistently formatted in the UoB Harvard style. |
peer-reviewed primary literature. Most references and citations are formatted in the UoB Harvard style but some inaccuracies remain. |
peer-reviewed primary literature. Most references and citations are formatted in the UoB Harvard style but some inaccuracies remain. |
minimal range of literature is cited. References and citations are included but UoB Harvard style is not used consistently. |
enough to the issue. Literature is not adequately cited and referenced in UoB Harvard style. |
Literature used is not relevant to the issue. Literature is not adequately cited and reference in UoB Harvard style. |
3 Application of knowledge |
Excellent competent use of public health outcome data to describe the impact of the selected issue.
Insightful discussion of impact on public health highlighting broad range ways in which the issue effects the population. |
Very good, competent use of public health outcome data to describe the impact of the selected issue.
In addition to simply describing the selected public health issue the action plan discusses broader ways in which the issue effects the population... |
Good use of use of public health outcome data to describe the impact of the selected issue.
In addition to simply describing the selected public health issue the action plan identifies broader ways in which the issue effects the population, but lacks a tight focus on health. |
Satisfactory use of public health outcome data to describe the impact of the selected issue on health outcomes.
Discussion of the selected public health issue is superficial.
Evaluation of existing policies and programmes in the selected area lacks depth. . |
Limited use of outcome data to describe the impact of the selected issue on health outcomes.
Discussion of the selected public health issues is minimal, inconsistent or inaccurate.
Minimal evaluation of existing policies and programmes. |
No use of outcome data to describe the impact of the selected issue on health outcomes.
Discussion of the selected public health issue is absent or unintelligible.
No evaluation of existing policies. |
4 Critical reflection on current public health policies programmes |
In-depth insightful discussion demonstrates excellent understanding of specific strengths and weakness of current public health policies and programmes in the selected area. |
Discussion demonstrates very good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of current public health policies and programmes in the selected area. |
Describes strengths and weaknesses of public health of current public health policies and programmes in the selected area. |
Limited description of strengths and weaknesses of current public health policies and programmes in the selected area. |
Minimal description and discussion of existing policies or absent.
Key policies not identified. |
Relevant policies not identified.
No description and discussion of relevant policy. |
5 Critical analysis, synthesis and |
Presents excellent, in- depth evidence- |
Very good critical analysis of impact on public health |
Attempts to synthesise |
Some attempt to analyse the impact on public |
Minimal attempt to analyse the |
No attempt to analyse the |
|
70%+ |
60-69% |
50-59% Threshold standard |
40-49% (Fail) |
35-39% (Fail) |
0-34% (Fail) |
proposed new initiative/s, strategy/ies and recommendations for improvement. |
based critical evaluation of the impact on public health. Excellent evidence based analysis for proposed new initiative(s), associated strategy (ies). The action plan ends with insightful recommendations for improvement. |
based on synthesis of information from multiple sources of good quality information. Very good evidence based analysis for proposed new initiative(s), associated strategy (ies) and recommendations for improvement. |
information from multiple sources. Presents good evidence based analysis for proposed new initiative(s), associated strategy (ies) and recommendations for improvement. |
health but action plan lacks critical depth. Weak proposed new initiative(s), associated strategy (ies) and recommendations for improvement. |
impact on public health. New initiative(s) and recommendations for improvement not described or absent. |
impact on public health.
New initiative(s) and recommendations for improvement absent. |
Buy Answer of PUB017-6 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentNeed last-minute online assignment help with your PUB017-6 Principles, Policies and Issues Assignment Report? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our Public Health Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free assignment examples and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!
See the solution of this brief click on PUB017-6 Assignment Report Sample
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content