| Category | Assignment | Subject | Nursing |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Auckland University of Technology | Module Title | NURS841 Integrative Practice I |
In submitting this work, I agree that:
For guidance on academic integrity please visit the referencing page of Your library (https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/7624/pages/referencing) on Canvas.
Strategic Health Action Plan and Te Tiriti o Waitangi Integration (2000 words)
Presentation: A 2000 word academically written assignment submitted as a word document digitally to Turnitin
(https://aut.au.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=f05c9a70-e23f-47d8-8f64-af56006d34cd&pid=6b33914e-a738-40d6-b885af56006dcc3d&start=4.426532) on Canvas.
With reference to the action plan, critique how the 4 articles Kawanatanga and co-governance; Rangatiratanga and selfdetermination; Oritetanga and equity of outcomes; Wairuatanga and valuing the measurable and preamble He Whakaputanga and building relationships are applied/honoured or could be better applied to practice.
Support your evaluation with authoritative and reliable evidence. All points and claims you make must be supported with references to relevant literature. The majority of the sources you reference must be contemporary (i.e., from the last five years). Higher marks will be awarded for synthesising the literature (i.e., support points with two or more references).
The word count includes the main text but not the Appendix, Tables, Figures or End-Text References.
Critical Tiriti Analysis (CTA) is a five-step framework designed to evaluate public policies in relation to Te Tiriti o Waitangi, aiming to promote equity and Indigenous rights in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Overview of CTA: A Methodological framework that assess the alignment of public ploicies with the principles and articles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
The CTA process consists of five defined phases, which guide practitioners in evaluating policies against the principles of Te Tiriti:
Came, H., O’Sullivan, D., Kidd, J., & McCreanor, T. (2024). Critical Tiriti analysis: a prospective policy making tool from Aotearoa New
Zealand. Ethnicities, 24(6), 985-1004. (https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7698439?wrap=1)
(https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7698439/download?download_frd=1)
Came, H., O’Sullivan, D., & McCreanor, T. (2020). Introducing critical Tiriti policy analysis through a retrospective review of the New
Zealand Primary Health Care Strategy. Ethnicities, 20(3), 434-456. (https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7698440?wrap=1)
(https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7698440/download?download_frd=1)
Systematic Review Workshop by AUT Research Services, Te MātāpunaLibrary & Learning Services
(https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7213206?wrap=1) (https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7213206/download?download_frd=1) Submission date: 9th March, 8am
With every assignment submission, please use the template below in submitting any assignments
Program Name: Master of Nursing Science
Course Title: NURS841 Integrative Practice One
Assignment Title: Strategic health action plan and Te Tiriti o Waitangi integration
Date:
Student Name:
Student ID:
Word Count:
In submitting this work, I agree that:
Student’s Signature:
LO3: Critically analyse health inequities in the context of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Criteria explanation and grading for Strategic Health Action Plan and Te Tiriti o Waitangi
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Identification of an action plan | A range (20 – >15.8 pts) Clearly identifies a relevant, contemporary plan with precise context, scope, intended outcomes, target populations, and setting. Demonstrates nuanced understanding of prevention/management strategies and implementation.B range (15.8 – >12.8 pts) Identifies a relevant plan with adequate context and purpose. Shows solid understanding of aims and approaches. Minor gaps in scope or setting detail.C range (12.8 – >9.8 pts) Identifies a plan but lacks clarity or relevance. Limited understanding of scope, outcomes, or implementation. Context is vague. D (Fail) (9.8 – >0 pts) |
20 |
| 2. Critical evaluation using the five-step Critical Te Tiriti Analysis Framework | A range (20 – >15.8 pts) Systematically applies all five steps. Provides deep, balanced analysis of integration into assessment and treatment, clearly linking to supporting documents (policies, service protocols, partnership agreements). Judges effectiveness and limitations and offers practice-grounded improvements.B range (15.8 – >12.8 pts) Applies most steps clearly. Provides sound analysis with some critique of effectiveness and gaps. Supporting documents are referenced, though integration may be uneven.C range (12.8 – >9.8 pts) Applies the framework superficially or inconsistently. Predominantly descriptive. Limited critique of effectiveness or alignment. Few or weak supporting documents. D (Fail) (9.8 – >0 pts) |
20 |
| 3. Critique of Te Tiriti four articles and preamble in practice | A range (30 – >23.8 pts) Insightfully critiques: Kawanatanga (co-governance); Rangatiratanga (self-determination); Oritetanga (equity of outcomes); Wairuatanga (valuing the measurable); and the preamble He Whakaputanga (building relationships). Identifies strengths, gaps, and proposes specific, feasible practice improvements.B range (23.8 – >19.3 pts) Discusses all articles and the preamble with some critique. Identifies improvement areas with moderate specificity. Minor omissions or generalities.C range (19.3 – >14.8 pts) Mentions most articles/preamble but superficially. Limited linkage to practice or improvement suggestions. Conceptual misunderstandings may appear. D (Fail) (14.8 – >0 pts) |
30 |
| 4. Evidence & Referencing | A range (20 – >15.8 pts) Uses authoritative, reliable, contemporary sources (majority within last five years). Consistently synthesises literature (two or more sources per key point). Referencing is accurate and consistent; every claim is supported.B range (15.8 – >12.8 pts) Uses reliable sources mostly contemporary. Some synthesis is evident. Referencing mostly accurate; occasional unsupported claims.C range (12.8 – >9.8 pts) Limited, outdated, or less authoritative sources. Minimal synthesis. Referencing inconsistent with several unsupported claims. D (Fail) (9.8 – >0 pts) |
20 |
| 5. Academic Writing & Structure | A range (10 – >7.9 pts) Well-organised, cohesive, and clear. Strong introduction, logical headings, smooth transitions, and a concise conclusion. Academic tone; precise language; minimal errors.B range (7.9 – >6.4 pts) Generally well-structured with clear flow. Minor cohesion or clarity lapses. Academic tone with occasional errors.C range (6.4 – >4.9 pts) Some organisation, but uneven flow and clarity. Headings or transitions weak. Tone inconsistent; noticeable errors. D (Fail) (4.9 – >0 pts) |
10 |
Please download the Grade Map 1 and Criteria Description for Strategic Health Action Plan and Te Tiriti o Waitangi Integration Essay.
(https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7666848?wrap=1) (https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7666848/download? download_frd=1)
| Grade | Description | Percentage Range | Number Allocated |
|---|---|---|---|
| A+ | Pass with High Distinction | 89.50-100% | 9 |
| A | Pass with Clear Distinction | 84.50-89.49% | 8 |
| A- | Pass with Distinction | 79.50-84.49% | 7 |
| B+ | Pass with High Merit | 74.50-79.49% | 6 |
| B | Pass with Clear Merit | 69.50-74.49% | 5 |
| B- | Pass with Merit | 64.50-69.49% | 4 |
| C+ | High Pass | 59.50-64.49% | 3 |
| C | Clear Pass | 54.50-59.49% | 2 |
| C- | Pass | 49.50-54.49% | 1 |
| D | Fail | 0.00-49.49% | 0 |
| Hurdle is Pass/Fail | |||
Please see some resources below.
APA 7th Brief Guide Tables and Figures (https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7212924?wrap=1)
(https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7212924/download?download_frd=1)
APA 7th Brief Guide (https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7213164?wrap=1)
(https://canvas.aut.ac.nz/courses/21461/files/7213164/download?download_frd=1)
AUT Library Assignment Assistance (https://library.aut.ac.nz/doing-assignments/help-with-academic-writing)
This is a scholarly piece of academic writing, please take the time to undertake your assignment and use the appropriate literature to support your submission.
A 2000 word academically written assignment submitted as a word document digitally to Canvas.
Get Solution For NURS841 Written Assignment before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentFor students working on the NURS841 Integrative Practice I Written Assignment, getting the right academic guidance can make a big difference in achieving strong results. Our NZ Assignment Help Services provide professional support tailored to nursing and healthcare students studying in New Zealand. If you are studying at AUT, our experts also offer AUT Assignment Help for Students, helping you understand assignment requirements, apply nursing theories, and structure your work according to academic standards. With access to well-researched AUT assignment answers, you can improve the quality of your submission and confidently complete your integrative practice assignment on time.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content