| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Leeds Beckett University | Module Title | MSc Industry Analysis |
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |
|---|
Submit to VLE by 24th October 2025 (Week 5) at 12:00
Submit to VLE by 16th Jan 2026 (Week 14) at 12:00
On completion of this module, students should:
Explore through practice-based research strategies to contribute, disrupt, or innovate within your field. Your project will be informed by your current professional practice and will be evidenced through case studies, critical analysis, and evaluation of your methodologies. You will critically reflect on your processes to evaluate and rationalise impacts on your current profession, industries, and future employability.
The module adopts a synoptic strategy and provides the opportunity for students to design a project based on individual professional practice within an identified work-based context. With the support from your tutor, you will identify and formulate your learning objectives within a project plan, containing defined and measurable impacts, aligned, and derived from the module learning outcomes.
This will be evidenced through a written report as well as a practice-based activity.
As part of your study, evaluation, and assessment, indicative content will include:
Note: All components of the assignment are to be completed individually.
To be submitted via MyBeckett by 24th October 2025 (Week 5) at 12:00
The project plan will define your agreed research and report objectives supported by a subject-specific advisor. As your study programme is self-directed through negotiated study, you will create an initial outline of your proposed research/practice activities based on the themed and identified ‘Report’ (Assessment 2). The report should outline and draw focus on how your practice can enhance an existing industry & transform/disrupt current processes within a specialised professional role or organisation.
Personal/individual creative interests, professional practice, or research agenda/critical enquiry will define your topic. Your tutor will assist you in finalising your report (Assessment 2) to the agreed project objectives.
Indicative Project Plan Content
| Format & Specification | Description |
|
Project Plan PDF/Word Document *Template will be provided |
Approx. 1000 Word document outlining key/titled theme and subject of the project proposal, formatted appropriately with key headings utilising a formal Harvard Style referencing where required*. The proposal should indicate evaluation methods with research & practice activities to be later expanded and investigated within the Report (Assessment 2). The project plan should include an initial discussion and focus on topics/themes: A rationale for change (Current & Future) • Current trends and activities in the target sector • Critical reflection on current trends and practices • Proposed interventions, development, and rationale for change |
|
Bibliography & Appendices (Final pages of the document) |
Research should be framed within the larger community of applied creative technologies, related media, or industries. Robust engagement with material involves effective integration and critical commentary within your discussion. All referencing in the bibliography should adhere to the Harvard Style. |
Submission Requirements
Files may be in either MS Word.doc/x or PDF document format. It is your responsibility to ensure that any file submitted for assessment can be opened on university computers.
To be submitted via MyBeckett by 16th Jan 2026 (Week 14) at 12:00
You will produce a themed & self-titled report (approx. 3000 words) that will investigate an industry practice relevant to your chosen specialism. The report will outline strategies and interventions reflective of the proposed rationale for change and agreed objectives, providing a critical review/analysis with a conclusive evaluation of impact or novel methodologies within the area of expertise. The report should be suitable for company stakeholders, teams, or decision-makers within your targeted profession. Your report should identify specific opportunities, address challenges, and propose innovative solutions within your targeted industry and related practice, concluding with a reflective summary of practical recommendations for implementation.
Indicative Report Content
| Format & Specification | Description |
|
Report PDF/Word Document *Template will be provided |
A report (3000 words approx.) or agreed format appropriate to your study and project plan will be delivered, detailing research, discoveries, and critical analysis of your practice with innovative transformation within your target industry or profession. The report should be presented using formal Harvard Style referencing (where appropriate to format) and include a range of academic research & practice, case studies, and professional industry press. The report should demonstrate how professionals, stakeholders, or industry sectors in related practices have been considered in your initial proposal and final report, presenting a coherent rationale and vision for change. |
|
Bibliography & Appendices (Final pages of the document) |
Research should be framed within the larger community of applied creative technologies, related media, or industries. Robust engagement with material involves effective integration and critical commentary within your discussion. All referencing in the bibliography should adhere to the Harvard Style. |
Submission Requirements
Files may be in either MS Word.doc/x or PDF document format. It is your responsibility to ensure that any file submitted for assessment can be opened on university computers.
Feedback is a form of communication that informs you and your tutor of where you are in your learning and what you need to do to improve. Effective feedback clearly tells you what you have done well, and how you can improve in a fashion that is timely, honest, and relevant to you. In this module, we aim to provide prompt feedback in several ways:
You will receive immediate, formative feedback on several occasions during your module- e.g., your tutors will provide feedback in the timetabled tutorial sessions. This feedback is usually verbal.
You may receive generic feedback on assignments before submitting the assignment or within 3 weeks of submitting the assignment.
This will support you in developing your learning. Alternatively, you will receive individual feedback on your work within 4 weeks of submitting the work. This feedback will be structured and allow you to see how you have performed against the learning objectives and set you specific targets for improvement.
The learning activities included in the module contain tasks to develop your understanding and confidence in practice-based research methodologies; you will regularly receive formative feedback in your tutorial sessions.
Each component will receive a small amount of written feedback with the marks you have gained (summative assessment). These results can be discussed with your module tutor/supervisor(s) to gain further feedback.
You will have the opportunity to provide feedback formally at the end of your module. These comments will be reviewed by your Course Director and course team, and some may be considered at your annual course enhancement meeting. Your Student Representative will attend this and take your views to this meeting for discussion.
| Assessment 1: Project Plan (20%) | Breakdown | |||||
|
|
|
A Mark of 60%+ |
|
|
|
|
| Project Plan |
A Mark of 70%+ Demonstrated an excellent grasp of essential & appropriate practice and research strategies in relation to their chosen topic.
There will be a clear alignment of proposed objectives as well as evidence of critical enquiry in defining the topic & themes.
|
Demonstrated a very good & practical understanding of appropriate practice and research strategies in relation to their topic. There will be an established set of objectives indicated within the proposal, but there could be some refinement required in improving critical enquiry in regards to topic. |
A Mark of 50%+ Demonstrated a competent and practical understanding of appropriate practice and research strategies with their topic. The proposal may be provided without evidence of critical enquiry into the topic and project theme. |
A Mark of 40%+ Work submitted might be lacking or complete in presenting clear evidence of understanding of practice & research strategies. Proposal may be incomplete and lack alignment with formal objectives and associated activities about the theme/topic. |
A Mark of -40% Evidence of an understanding of the assignment objectives and presentation of evidence of research or study. The proposal will lack a clear, identified project theme and be deficient in its overall objectives in respect to essential research & practice activities. |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Bibliography & Appendices |
Cited all sources of information and images accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented.
|
Cited most sources of information and images accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. | Cited some sources of information and images accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. | Cited sources of information and images are incomplete and provide little or no supporting references to support the documentation. | No cited sources of information and images and no demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. |
|
| Assessment 2: Report (80%) | Breakdown | |||||
|
|
|
A Mark of 60%+ |
|
|
|
|
| Report |
A Mark of 70%+ Demonstrated an excellent grasp of essential & appropriate practice and research strategies in relation to their chosen topic.
There will be a clear alignment of proposed objectives as well as evidence of critical enquiry in defining the topic & themes.
|
Demonstrated a very good & practical understanding of appropriate practice and research strategies in relation to their topic. There will be an established set of objectives indicated within the proposal, but there could be some refinement required in improving critical enquiry in regards to topic. |
A Mark of 50%+ Demonstrated a competent and practical understanding of appropriate practice and research strategies with their topic. The proposal may be provided without evidence of critical enquiry into the topic and project theme. |
A Mark of 40%+ Work submitted might be lacking or complete in presenting clear evidence of understanding of practice & research strategies. Proposal may be incomplete and lack alignment with formal objectives and associated activities about the theme/topic. |
A Mark of -40% Evidence of an understanding of the assignment objectives and presentation of evidence of research or study. The proposal will lack a clear, identified project theme and be deficient in its overall objectives in respect to essential research & practice activities. |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Bibliography & Appendices |
Cited all sources of information and images accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented.
|
Cited most sources of information and images accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. | Cited some sources of information and images accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. | Cited sources of information and images are incomplete and provide little or no supporting references to support the documentation. | No cited sources of information and images and no demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. |
|
The usual University penalties apply for a late submission.
This is an individual assessment. Submission of an assessment indicates that you, as a student, have completed the assessment yourself, and the work of others has been fully acknowledged and referenced.
By submitting this assessed work, you are declaring that you are fit to submit, and you will therefore not normally be eligible to submit a request for mitigation for this work.
If your result for this assessment is recorded as ‘non-submission’ or your mark for this assessment and for the whole module is below 50%, you will have the opportunity to take reassessment with a submission date of 12:00 on Wednesday, 8th July 2026, and your mark capped at 40% (see reassessment information below). If you are granted a deferral through the mitigation process, you may complete the reassessment with a full range of marks available.
If you fail to attend the presentation at the scheduled date and time without agreed mitigation, you will be given one further opportunity to present your work (incurring a 5% late penalty) at a time scheduled by the module team. If you miss this second opportunity, your result will be recorded as Non-Submission. If your result is recorded as Non-Submission or your mark for this assessment and for the whole module is below 40%, you will have the opportunity to take reassessment and your mark capped at 40% (see Reassessment information below). If you are granted a deferral through the mitigation process, you may submit for the reassessment with a full range of marks available.
For further information, please refer to your Course Handbook or University Assessment Regulations.
If your result for this assignment is recorded as ‘non-submission’ or your mark for this assignment and the whole module is below 40%, you will have the opportunity to take reassessment with a submission date of 8th July 2026 (see Reassessment information below). If you are granted a deferral through the mitigation process, you may complete the reassessment in July 2025 with a full range of marks available.
Students should submit a revised portfolio where the previous failed submission was indicated as deficient. This is not required to be ‘new’ or an original project/portfolio, but must address and make good where activities failed to meet the assessment criteria set. Your supervisor will negotiate the requirements and benchmark for your refined submission before reassessment.
Students should submit a revised project with indicated corrections in the previous submission. This is not required to be ‘new’ or an original project/report, but must address and make good where activities failed to meet the assessment criteria set. Your supervisor will negotiate the requirements and benchmark for your refined submission before reassessment.
By submitting an assignment, you declare that
1. You have completed the assignment yourself.
2. The work of others has been fully acknowledged and referenced.
3. You are 'fit to submit' and will not normally be eligible to submit a request for mitigation for this work.
4. You have read and agree to your responsibilities as outlined in this section.
You must be able to explain and justify all elements of the submitted work. If you are unable to do so for certain elements of your work, no marks will be given for those elements.
You must submit your work through MyBeckett using the correct link set up by the tutor.
It is your responsibility to ensure that file uploads to MyBeckett have been successful. You can check this after uploading by downloading the file(s) from MyBeckett and checking that these downloads are correct and complete. It is important that you regularly check your student email after assignment submission in case your tutor seeks clarification on your work.
If your submission is very large (>250MB), you may submit by copying it to your student Google Drive and sharing the file or folder with your tutor. You must still submit to MyBeckett a text document containing a link to the shared location and not make any changes to, or delete the file until after the exam board results have been published.
Submit Your MSc Industry Analysis Assignment Questions & Get Plagiarism-Free Answers
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentStruggling with your MSc Industry Analysis assignment? Let us help! Our Management Assignment Help service is the best for you. We offer professional, affordable assignment writing services that are AI-free, plagiarism-free, and delivered on time. Our team of PhD experts understands what universities expect and creates high-quality content tailored to your needs. We also offer free assignment samples so you can check our quality before booking. We’re available 24/7 to support you with Business Management or any subject. Don’t wait until the last minute—contact us now and make your academic life easier with trusted expert help! We also provide Leeds Beckett University Assignment Samples that have been written by the phd expert writers. Contact us now!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
