OFFERS!
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%
Get Expert-crafted assignments
| Category | Assignment | Subject | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Eastern Institute of Technology (EIT) | Module Title | MHS8.443 Health in Aotearoa New Zealand HB Campus |
| Word Count | 2000-word |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Report |
| Assessment topic | Impact of Colonisation on Health in Aotearoa |
| Assessment type | Report |
| Word restriction | 2000-word report (excluding 20-30 references) |
| Submission details |
Note: Submission will only be accepted via EIT online. Your assignment will be checked for plagiarism, which will be considered a breach of EIT’s academic honesty policy. Use of Artificial Intelligence tools: Do not use Artificial Intelligence tools to create or modify any part of your assessments, except as explicitly permitted by the assessment instructions. Artificial Intelligence tools include generative tools such as ChatGPT, paraphrasing tools such as Grammarly, translation tools such as Google Translate, and grammar checking tools such as the MS Word Editor function. If an assessment is found to contain any AI generated content, then this will be treated as a serious breach of Academic Integrity, and in most cases the assessment will receive a grade of 0. Repeated breaches of Academic Integrity may result in termination of your studies. |
| Weighting | 45 % of overall course grade |
| Due Date | Fri 11th April 2025, no later than 5 pm |
| Assessment last reviewed | Feb 2024 |
| Course learning outcomes covered | 1. Evaluate the historical, socio-cultural, legal and economic contexts of health in Aotearoa New Zealand, including Te Tiriti o Waitangi. |
| Background to this assessment | Te Tiriti o Waitangi is the founding document that forms a relationship between the Crown (government) and Māori whānau, hapū and iwi. The colonisation of Aotearoa has been associated with disparities in health, and has impacted the sociocultural, political and economic status of indigenous Māori. |
| Assessment Task |
How has colonization and the resulting changes in their socio-economic statusimpacted the health of Māori in Aotearoa? Write a 2000-word report that provides a critical analysis of your research to provide an answer to the above question. |
|
Guidelines: Please carefully read all of the information provided in this document and in the assessment marking criteria below.Provide a title of your own, an abstract, a table of contents, an introduction, your method, a review of the literature, your results or main findings, a critical discussion, a conclusion(s) and recommendation(s) all with appropriate headings. APA 7th edition reference list with in-text references must be used in your report.In this task, you are required mainly to show your ability of your foundation of knowledge, your ability to synthesize knowledge, your application of knowledge and academic scholarship in accordance with the assessment marking criteria below. |
|
|
Be sure to consider the assessment marking criteria below. |
|
Need Expert Help for Your MHS8.443 Health in Aotearoa New Zealand HB Campus Assessment?
Request to Buy AnswerPlease include the headings below to format your report
Name of the Course, Assessment number, Assessment Title, Student Name, Due date. (Not included in your WC)
List all section headings and sub-headings in your report. (Not included in your WC)
Provide some background and discuss the contents of your report. This should prepare the reader for what to expect in the upcoming report.
State the method used for your investigation. Provide enough detail so that someone else can replicate your research.
Below are some topic suggestions that you might want to include, although you are not obligated to do what is exactly written below. These are just some guidelines to help you:
Examine the relationship between socio-economic changes for Māori since the formal colonisation of Aotearoa New Zealand in 1840. Explain how these have impacted Māori health up to the present day:
Consider some important factors such as:
List all the references used in this report. Use APA formatting.
Appendices Identify these as Appendix A, Appendix B, etc., and only include if they are referred to in the report.
Glossary Alphabetically list key terms and abbreviations, and their definitions.
Index Alphabetically list report topics and the relevant page number.
| Grade description | ||||
| ‘A’ grade (> 80%) | ‘B’ grade (65% - 79.9%) | ‘C’ grade (50% - 64.9%) | Fail grade (<50%) | |
| Knowledge base 10% |
5 Demonstrates a proficient command of the subject matter. 5 Demonstrates a consistent ability to seek out reliable information to improve knowledge. |
5 Demonstrates an adequate level of knowledge of subject matter with only minor gaps in knowledge-base. 5 Demonstrates an adequate ability to seek out reliable information to improve knowledge. |
5 Demonstrates a general, fundamental understanding of the subject matter but with some obvious gaps in the knowledge base. 5 Demonstrates some ability to seek out information to improve knowledge. |
5 Demonstrates little or no understanding of the subject matter. 5 Demonstrates very little or no ability to seek out information to improve knowledge. |
| Synthesis and analysis of information 30% |
5 Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assessment requirements. 5 Provides a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of details, facts and concepts. |
5 Demonstrates a generally adequate level of understanding of the assessment requirements. 5 Provides a moderate level of analysis of details, facts and concepts. |
5 Demonstrates some understanding of the assessment requirements but has not fully understood them. 5 Provides some analysis of details, facts and concepts. |
5 Demonstrates little or no understanding of the assessment requirements. 5 Shows no or little evidence of analysis of details, facts and concepts. |
| 5 Provides a robust conclusion after presenting a variety of well-supported points for discussion. | 5 Provides a conclusion after presenting some well-supported points for discussion. | 5 Provides a conclusion after presenting a limited number of well- supported points for discussion. | 5 Presents a weak conclusion with very few or no well-supported points for discussion. | |
|
5 Presents a highly structured argument, using information from a variety of robust sources. 5 Proficiently explains complex ideas or concepts in simple terms. 5 Proficiently explains medical terminology and/or physiological processes in simple terms. |
5 Presents a structured argument, using information from robust sources. 5 Adequately explains complex ideas or concepts in simple terms. 5 Adequately explains medical terminology and/or physiological processes in simple terms. |
5 Presents a structured argument, but supported with limited information from robust sources. 5 Explains some complex ideas or concepts in simple terms. 5 Explains some medical terminology and/or physiological processes in simple terms. |
5 Demonstrates little or no ability to present a structured argument and support it with information from robust sources. 5 Explains few or no complex ideas or concepts in simple terms. 5 Explains little or no medicalterminology and/or physiological processes in simple terms. |
|
| Evidence of critical thinking 30% |
5 Highly competent critiquing of information 5 Proficiently discusses conflicting pieces of 5 Proficiently supports a conflicting viewpoint 5 Demonstrates a proficient level of clinical / |
5 Adequate critiquing of information presented. 5 Adequately discusses conflicting pieces of information to produce an evidence-based conclusion. 5 Adequately supports a conflicting viewpoint when responding to information presented. 5 Demonstrates an adequate level of clinical / diagnostic reasoning. |
5 Some critiquing of information presented. 5 Some discussion of conflicting pieces of information to produce an evidence- based conclusion. 5 Some support of a conflicting viewpoint when responding to information presented. 5 Demonstrates some clinical / diagnostic reasoning. |
5 Poor or no critiquing of information presented. 5 Little or no discussion of conflicting pieces of information to produce an evidence-based conclusion. 5 Little or no support of a conflicting viewpoint when responding to information presented. 5 Demonstrates little or no clinical / diagnostic reasoning. |
| Use of academic literature15% |
5 Uses a wide variety of relevant and up-to-date 5 Presents all sources of information accurately 5 Consistently integrates the literature as a 5 Proficient in paraphrasing academic |
5 Uses a range of relevant sources of information but not always the latest and/or peer-reviewed literature. 5 Presents most sources of information accurately in APA 7th style in the text and reference list, with some errors/omissions. 5 Generally integrates the literature as a foundation for argument. 5 Adequate in paraphrasing academic literature accurately and concisely. |
5 Uses some relevant literature but little of the latest and/or peer-reviewed literature. 5 Presents some sources of information accurately in APA 7th style in the text and reference list, with many errors/omissions. 5 Some integration of the literature. 5 Demonstrates some ability to paraphrase academic literature accurately and concisely. |
5 Uses little relevant literature and/or peer-reviewed literature, and/or uses outdated literature. 5 Presents sources of information inaccurately and/or not in APA 7th style. 5 Very few or no links made between the literature and the assessment topic/ subject. 5 Demonstrates little ability to paraphrase academic literature accurately and concisely. |
| Academic writing skills 15% |
5 Consistently presents information in a logical sequence. 5 Proficient formulation of sentences and use of grammar. 5 Consistently adheres to the |
5 Presents most of the information in a logical sequence. 5 Adequate formulation of sentences and use of grammar. 5 Generally adheres to the EIT‘Academic Writing Style’ guidelines. |
5 Presents some of the information in a logical sequence. 5 Writing difficult to follow in places and/or numerous minor grammatical. Sometimes adheres to the EIT ‘Academic Writing Style’ guidelines. |
5 Little or no logical flow to the delivery of information. 5 Poor formulation throughout and/or numerous grammatical errors. 5 Rarely adheres to the EIT ‘Academic Writing Style’ guidelines. |
Struggling With Your MHS8.443 Assignment? Deadlines Are Near?
Hire Assignment Helper Now!Are you a Eastern Institute of Technology student looking for expert guidance on your MHS8.443 Health in Aotearoa New Zealand HB Campus assignment? Don't worry, there's no need! We're here to help you with your assignments. Whether you need NZ Assignment Help or well-designed solutions, we'll provide you with everything. You'll find free assignment examples and samples that will strengthen your study materials. With our expert team providing all assignment services, you'll receive accurate, clear, and original content. Stop worrying about your marks and complete your assignments hassle-free with expert support. So what are you waiting for? Join us now and make your study journey easier!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
