OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

MAR041-2 Cross-Cultural Management in Business Assignment 2 Brief | UG | AY25-26

Published: 03 Dec, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Business
University University of Bedfordshire Module Title MAR041-2 Cross-Cultural Management in Business
Academic Year 2025/26

MAR041-2 Assignment Brief | UG | AY25-26

Assessment deadline Marks and feedback
To be submitted Before 10 a.m. on: 20 working days after deadline (L3,4, 5,6 and 7)
  15 working days after deadline (block delivery)
05/12/2025 Click or tap to enter a date.

Please note, for Exams the date is arranged centrally aligned to the academic calendar. Exams timetables will be released 6 weeks before the exam period.

Key assignment details
Unit title & code Cross-Cultural Management in Business MAR041-2
Assignment number & title Assignment 2:  Case study
Assignment type (including exams)Clearly indicate if an exam Case study
Weighting of assignment 60%
Size or length of assessment or exam durationClearly indicate if an exam The word-limit for the assignment is 1,800 words (+/- 10%). This does not include the title page, executive summary, table of contents, reference list and appendices.
Use of generative AI Not permitted
Use of self-plagiarism Not permitted

Completing your assignment

What am I required to do in this assignment?

There will be two examples of intercultural incidents (small case studies); these are examples of different behavioural and communication problems. You are asked to apply your understanding of relevant theories, frameworks and ideas and propose solutions to demonstrate the extent of your intercultural awareness in different business interactions. All theories and frameworks should be referenced correctly using the Harvard system.

CHOOSE ONLY ONE CASE (OUT OF 2,) TO DISCUSS. Apply your understanding of relevant theories, frameworks and ideas and propose solutions to demonstrate the extent of your intercultural awareness in different business interactions. 

Case studies for S1:

Case 1:

George McDougal had been chosen to set up a branch office of his engineering consulting firm in Seoul, Korea. Although the six engineering consultants who would eventually be transferred to Seoul were Americans, George was interested in hiring local support staff. He was practically interested in hiring a local person with excellent accounting skills to handle the company’s books. He was confident that he would be able to find the right person for the job because his company was prepared to offer an excellent salary and benefits package. After receiving what he considered to be several excellent leads from a friend at the Rotary Club, he was surprised to be turned down by all four prospective candidates. They were very appreciative of being considered for the position, but all preferred to stay with their current employer. George just couldn’t understand why all four of these Koreans chose to pass up an increase in salary and fringe benefits.  

  • Where did George go wrong?
  • How could you help George better understand this cross-cultural problem?
  • Use intercultural theories to explain it and support your discussion.
  • What would be your advice to George?

Case 2:

Several months after beginning sales efforts in China, Anna, a German manager, was discussing her new job challenges with a friend. At first, she had been charmed by the Chinese, especially by the fact that they were so nice. But now she is wondering if they are perhaps too nice. “For example,” Anna said to her friend, “I can never get clear feedback from the Chinese people I supervise. If I ask for their help in solving a problem, they always start by saying, ‘This is just a suggestion, but….’ And if I ask for input during a meeting, they will very rarely make negative statements. Isn’t the idea to get all the pros and cons out on the table so that we can discuss things objectively? I think this politeness is going a little too far! What’s going on?”

  • Where did Anna go wrong?
  • How could you help Anna better understand this cross-cultural problem?
  • Use intercultural theories to explain it and support your discussion.
  • What would be your advice to Anna?

Are You Looking The Solution of MAR041-2 Assignment 2: Case Study?

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

What do I need to do to pass? How do I achieve a good grade? 

The Unit Information Form states the Threshold Expectations that inform both you and markers what is the minimum needed to be demonstrated to pass the assessment. They should, therefore, answer the question "What do I need to do pass?”. During the assessment introductory session, you should be given the opportunity to check your understanding of the threshold statements and what you need to do to surpass them.

The assessment marking criteria listed below show how your work is assessed. The assessment criteria are informed by the unit’s learning outcomes and the assessment task. Carefully reading the assessment criteria should help you understand the aspects that will be used to judge your progress and achievement of the learning outcomes and offer guidance on “how do I achieve a good grade”.

In order to pass Assessment 2, you will need to:

  • Examine the problems found in the cross-cultural management of joint ventures and mergers. 
  • Compare and contrast the distinctive features of different management behaviour across two different cultures and draw on cultural frameworks in your analysis.

How will my assignment be marked?

Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations (see the Unit Information Form uploaded on BREO) and the specific marking criteria below (marking rubric). Please read carefully as they will help you prepare and evaluate your own work before you submit. They will also help you understand the grade and feedback received once marked.

 

 70%+

(1st Class)

60-69%

(2:1)

50-59%

(2:2)

40-49%

(3rd Class)

Threshold Standard

30-39%

(Fail)

0-29%

(Fail)

1 Knowledge

Broad and critically evaluative knowledge of relevant theories and concepts. In-depth and accurate understanding

Very clear and appropriate focus. Very insightful discussion and original, inspirational thinking.

Broad knowledge of relevant theories and concepts.  Thoughtful and accurate understanding

Clear and appropriate focus. Thoughtful discussion that shows independent thinking.

Fairly broad knowledge of relevant theories and concepts. Mostly accurate understanding.

Quite clear focus but sometimes strays from the topic. Logical and coherent discussion of concepts and issues, but limited originality.

Piecemeal knowledge of relevant theories and concepts. Some noticeable misunderstandings and/or inaccuracies.

Rather confused focus that quite often strays from the topic. Limited discussion of concepts and issues.

 

 

 

Partially relevant attempts to address the task.

Some evidence of irrelevance or omissions.

Inconsistent application of theory, with weaknesses in accuracy.

Partially relevant attempts to address the task.

Some evidence of irrelevance or omissions.

Inconsistent application of theory, with weaknesses in accuracy.

2

Analysis

Comprehensive analysis of a range of related concepts and ideas. Evidence based argument demonstrating an excellent understanding of theory and/or practice. Statements of ‘fact’ and personal belief supported by citations from an extensive range of appropriate up to date third party sources, research and relevant literature.

Good analysis of related concepts and ideas. Appropriate evidence-based argument demonstrating good understanding of theory and/or practice. Statements of ‘fact’ and personal belief reinforced by citations from an appropriate and broad range of third-party sources, research and relevant literature.

Satisfactory analysis of some appropriate concepts. Some evidence-based argument demonstrated which draws on theory and/or practice. Statements of ‘fact’ and personal belief reinforced by citations from an appropriate, but limited, range of third-party sources, research and relevant literature.

Limited analysis. Lacks enough evidence-based argument. Limited reference to theory and/or practice or used inappropriately. Statements of ‘fact’ and personal belief insufficiently reinforced by citations from appropriate third-party sources, research and relevant literature.

 

 

 

Partially relevant attempts to address the task.

Some evidence of irrelevance or omissions.

Inconsistent application of theory, with weaknesses in accuracy.

Fails to present theory relevant to the assignment, or demonstrates an application of theory without accuracy

3

Presentation

The discussion presented is produced in strict conformity with the guidelines contained in the assignment brief. The text is wide-ranging, the style mature, the approach measured, the presentation reader friendly.

The overall presentation of the discussion is articulate, lucid, structurally sensible and mature in expression. The references are organised conscientiously and comprehensively.

Though the discussion presented is generally systematic, there are improvements that the student should have implemented, for example, over-long and discursive paragraphs or too short and fragmented paragraphs which render some pages not reader friendly.

Though the discussion presented is reasonably systematic, there are improvements that the student should have implemented, for example, over-long and discursive sections/paragraphs or too short and fragmented sections/paragraphs which render some pages not reader friendly. There is scope for the work to be better organised.

Largely unstructured and does not have a clear logical flow.

Presentation of paper is ineffective.

Fragmented &   incoherent organisation; inaccurate or incomplete referencing.

A lack of structure beyond a loosely connected list of points.

Presentation of paper is inappropriate.

4

Persuasion

Very advanced and persuasive arguments based on a firm foundation from the question through to the conclusions constructed.

Advanced and persuasive arguments based on a firm foundation from the question through to the conclusions constructed.

Precise and persuasive arguments based on a firm foundation from the question through to the conclusions constructed.

Reasonable and academically sound language and formatting.

 

 

Inaccurate or inarticulate English; meaning is of   sometimes unclear.

Communication is hindered.

Communication is obstructed.

Poor standard of English; meaning is unclear.

5

 

 

       

Hire Experts To Solve This MAR041-2 Assignment 2: Case Study Before Deadline

Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment

UK assignment help is now available for MAR041-2 Cross-Cultural Management in Business Assignment 2: Case Stufy! Struggling with your Assessment? We've got you covered. Our experts provide affordable Business Management Assignment Help, ensuring 100% human-written content – no AI. Get A+ guaranteed, with plagiarism-free content and on-time delivery. We provide free assignment samples. Enjoy affordable, high-quality services and stress-free learning as you receive top-notch assistance with your assignments. Let us help you excel in your course!

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

ACC217 Accounting Information Systems Assignment Sample | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Accounting

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences | SUSS

Module Title: Accounting Information Systems (ACC217)

View Free Samples

ACC210 Accounting for Decision Making and Control Assignment Answers SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Accounting

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS)

Module Title: ACC210 Accounting for Decision Making and Control

View Free Samples

BUS105 Statistics Assignment Sample Solution Docx | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: Statistics (BUS105)

View Free Samples

MKT542 Digital Marketing Analytics Assignment Sample Answer

Category: Assignment

Subject: Marketing

University: Singapore University of Socical Sciences

Module Title: MKT542 Digital Marketing Analytics

View Free Samples

ELT201 Understanding Poetry SUSS Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: English

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: ELT201 Understanding Poetry

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK