LNDN07004 Introduction to Human Resource Management Written Essay 2024-25 Term 3  | UWS

Element

What does this contain?

Is it included in the word count?

How many words should it be?

Title Page

(Please use your Banner ID number only; do not put your name on the essay.)

Introduction to Human Resources (LNDN07004)

Your Banner ID

Title of your essay

NO.

NOT INCLUDED IN WORD COUNT

1.Introduction

Introduce the topic briefly and outline key ideas and the main issues around the topic. Set up the argument and inform the reader what to expect.

YES.

INCLUDED IN WORD COUNT

Approx. 300 -400 words).

2. Heading 1 (Please insert a heading suitable to your essay)

Explanation and discussion of key ideas and issues mentioned in the introduction.

YES.

INCLUDED IN WORD COUNT

Approx. 1600 -1800 words

3.Heading 3 (Please insert a heading suitable to your essay)

Discuss different views from academic and practitioner literature. What are the main issues? Does everyone share this view? Are there any different views? Support your arguments using academic and practitioner literature.

YES.

INCLUDED IN WORD COUNT

5.Conclusion

Sum up – summarise key issues

Reaffirm argument/points to the essay topic. Give the reader a sense of closure. Do not introduce new information or ideas.

YES.

INCLUDED INWORD COUNT

Approx. 300 -400 words).

Reference List

Harvard Referencing (Check UWS Guidelines).

Alphabetical order.

Make sure all your references used in the essay are included on the list.

NO.

NOT INDLUCED IN WORD COUNT

Total

2500 words

-     Banner ID:

-     Content:

Weight

Mark

Comments

Introduction (approx. 300-400 word)

●        Introduces the topic briefly

●        Outlines key ideas and the main issues around the topic accurately

●        Sets up the argument and informs the reader what to expect

20

Quality of the argument put forward (approx. 1600-1800 words)

40

●        Follows the issues highlighted in the introduction in a logical manner, progression from one point to the next

●        Evidence of understanding of the main issues

●        Evidence of understanding of main academic theories

●        Supports points critically with appropriate academic discussions for and against the points raised

●         

Conclusion (approx. 300-400 words)

●        Briefly summarises key issues

●        Reaffirms argument/points to the essay topic

●        Gives the reader a sense of closure

●        Does not include any new points or new information

20

Presentation

10

●        Clear, coherent, grammatical accurate, in academic tone and style

Referencing

10

●        Matches with the references used in the main body of the essay (no missing or additional references)

●        Correct and consistent with Harvard referencing both in text and in the reference list

●        Utilises numerous academic books, journal articles and online academic resources

●        Uses appropriate and relevant sources

●        Does not only rely on random online sources or Search Engines

Meeting Deadline & Word Count:

☐

☐

☐

-5 marks (excess < 20%)

-10 marks (excess > 20%)

-10 marks (late submission)

Marks only deducted for late submission and/or exceeding word count *

Overall:

100

Grade

Numerical (%)

Definition

Descriptor

A1

90-100

Exceptional

Student work is exemplary and exceeds the threshold standard by a significant margin.  It displays exceptional knowledge and understanding; insight, originality and exceptional ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other process skills; very high ability in professional practice skills (where relevant) including evidence of high degree of almost complete autonomy and independent judgement relative to threshold expectations.

A2

80-89

Outstanding

Student work significantly exceeds the threshold standard.  It displays a consistently thorough, deep and extensive knowledge and understanding; originality and/or very high ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other process skills; very high ability in professional practice skills (where relevant) including evidence of high degree of autonomy and independent judgement relative to threshold expectations.

A3

70-79

Excellent

Student work very much exceeds the threshold standard.  It displays a consistently thorough, deep and/or extensive knowledge and understanding; originality and/or very high ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other process skills; very high ability in professional practice skills (where relevant) including evidence of high degree of autonomy and independent judgement relative to threshold expectations.

B1

60-69

Very good

Commendable

Student work is well above the threshold standard.  It displays a consistently very good level of knowledge and understanding; high ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other process skills; high ability in professional practice skills (where relevant) including exercise of significant independent judgement relative to threshold expectations.

B2

50-59

Good/

Highly
competent

Student work is clearly above the threshold standard.  It displays generally good knowledge and understanding; good ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other process skills; evidences highly competent performance of professional practice skills (where relevant).

C

40-49

Satisfactory

Competent

Student work is at the threshold standard.  It displays generally satisfactory knowledge and understanding in most key respects; competence in analysis and most other process skills; evidences competent performance of professional practice skills (where relevant).

D

30-39

Unsatisfactory

Student work is marginally below the threshold standard.  It displays some knowledge and understanding but this is incomplete or partial; limited ability in analysis and other process skills; evidences lack of or partial competence in professional practice skills (where relevant).

E

1-29

Very
unsatisfactory

Student work is well below the threshold standard.  It displays very limited knowledge and understanding; evidences very limited or no analytical or other process skills; very limited competence over the range of professional practice skills.

N

0 (at first diet)

0-100 at second or subsequent diet

No work
to assess

There is no work to assess at first diet or no further attainment at the resit diet or either incomplete or no engagement with re-assessment diet