OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

L4 19844 PPAD in Sport Management Module Handbook 2025/26 | LBU

Published: 03 Nov, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Management
University Leeds Beckett University Module Title PPAD in Sport Management

Module Handbook 2025/26 PPAD in Sport Management

School

Carnegie School of Sport

Level

4

Semester

1

Credits

20

CRN

19844

Module Aims

This module aims to support students’ transition into and through a university degree. More specifically, it aims to:

  • Help students develop independence, initiative and personal responsibility in the learning process
  • Introduce students to the provisional nature of knowledge and the implications for approaches to studying and learning
  • Introduce students to research and study skills (reading, collecting, analysing and interpreting complex information)
  • Develop students’ skills in communicating their work effectively within a university setting.

The module will support an early assessment point to facilitate good study practices. The module is strategically aligned to the Academic Adviser programme with Academic Advisers delivering small group content to their advisees. 

Module Learning Outcomes

1

Develop key academic skills and attributes within the context of Sport Business Management or Sport Marketing degree.

2

Develop an appreciation of personal attributes, strengths and weaknesses in relation to career aspirations.

3

Develop an understanding of skills for sport business and sport marketing industries, particularly creativity, enterprise, research, teamwork, communication and leadership.

4

Develop a basic understanding of research techniques in sport business and sport marketing.

Module Learning Activities

Indicative Module Content and Learning Activities:

  1. Lectures will be used to introduce key themes and topics. 
  2. Seminars and workshops will be used to develop student understanding of topics and develop practical skills e.g. literature searching and provide opportunities for students to learn in different groups and different environments. 
  3. Practical sessions and tutorials will focus on developing transferable skills such as creativity, enterprise, communication, teamwork and leadership.

Students are expected to:

  • Attend and participate in lectures, seminars, workshops, tutorials and practical sessions. 
  • Be self-motivated and be independent learners completing formative assessments when directed and undertaking independent learning tasks as directed by staff including volunteering opportunities. 
  • Undertake and engage with self-reflection and self-audits as tools for personal development and career planning. 
  • Read academic books and journals to further their knowledge and learning

Weekly Schedule Semester 1

Week Commencing Date Lecture Seminar Assessment Focus
22/09/2025

Introduction to Module

Assessments Overview

Skills required to work in Sport Management

Personal Development

Time Management Activity

Organisation Discussion

Understanding your learning style

Assessment 1 - Skills Audit and Study Smart
29/09/2025

Academic Good Practice & Searching for Literature

How to submit your skills audit

What skills do you have?

Goal setting

Academic Good Practice and Learning to search for literature.

Assessment 1 - Skills Audit and Study Smart
06/10/2025 Critiquing Literature & Developing Arguments

Careers in Sport Management

LinkedIn profile building.

Searching the job market.

Assessment 1 - Skills Audit and Study Smart
13/10/2025

Research in Sport Management:

Primary & Secondary Research

Harvard Referencing and Plagiarism

Research to inform practice.

Referencing in Practice.

Assessment 2 support.

Assessment 2 – Research Methodologies Case Study
ASSESSMENT 1 SKILLS AUDIT DUE MONDAY 13TH OCTOBER 2025 BY 12 NOON
20/10/2025 Research in Sport Management: Quantitative & Qualitative Methods Quantitative and Qualitative Research Skills Assessment 2 – Research Methodologies Case Study
27/10/2025 ENRICHMENT WEEK
03/11/2025 Presentation Skills

Mock Presentations

Peer Feedback

Group Reflection

Improvisation Exercises

Assessment 3 – AI Essay Critique
ASSESSMENT 2 RESEARCH CASE STUDY DUE MONDAY 3rd NOVEMBER BY 12 NOON
10/11/2025

Essay Planning

Academic Writing Skills

Action Planning/Essay Development Assessment 3 – AI Essay Critique
17/11/2025

Reflective Skills

Critical Analysis

Artificial Intelligence

Reflection in Practice

Use of Artificial Intelligence

Assessment 3 – AI Essay Critique
24/11/2025 Utilising Feedback

Case study analysis

Peer feedback exercises

Feedback plan

Overcoming emotional barriers

Assessment 3 – AI Essay Critique
01/12/2025 Introduction to PPSI Module Planning for Placement
08/12/2025 Assessment 3 Support Assessment Tutorials
ASSESSMENT 3 ESSAY DUE THURSDAY 8TH JANUARY 2026 BY 12 NOON

Assessment 1 Summary

 Assessment Method: Portfolio (20%) Re-assessment Method: Portfolio (20%)
Word count: 500 words Word count: 500 words
Assessment Date and Time:  13/10/25 by midday Re-assessment Date and Time: 17/03/2026
Feedback Method: Written online Feedback Method: Written online
Feedback Date: 10/11/25 Feedback Date: 14/04/2026
Learning Outcomes Assessed: 1,2,3,4 Learning Outcomes Assessed: 1,2,3,4

Assessment 2

Assessment Method: Portfolio (20%) Re-assessment Method: Portfolio (20%)
Word count: 500 words Word count 500 words
Assessment Date and Time: 03/11/25 by midday Re-assessment Date and Time: 17/03/2026
Feedback Method: Written online Feedback Method: Written online
Feedback Date: 01/12/25 Feedback Date: 14/04/2026
Learning Outcomes Assessed: 1,2,3,4 Learning Outcomes Assessed: 1,2,3,4

Assessment 3

Assessment Method: Portfolio (60%) Re-assessment Method: Portfolio (60%)
Word count: 1000 words

Word count:

1000 words
Assessment Date and Time: 08/01/26 by midday

Re-assessment Date and Time:

17/03/2026

Feedback Method:

Written online

Feedback Method:

Written online

Feedback Date:

05/02/26

Feedback Date:

14/04/2026

Learning Outcomes Assessed:

1,2,3,4

Learning Outcomes Assessed:

1,2,3,4

Indicative Inclusive Assessment Information:

Students will be required to engage in a series of formative assessments, aligned to specific teaching and learning activities throughout the module. These will include the timely completion of related self-audits, reflections, writing exercises and presentations, concluding with a summative action plan of future priorities and planned behaviours.

Assessment 1 – Portfolio - Skills Audit (20%) (500 words)

  • You are required to write a 500-word critique of a completed skills audit.
  • Assessment 1 instructions: Complete one skills audit. Templates for skills audits can be found under the ‘Assessment 1 Materials’ tab on MyBeckett.

  • Task 1: Review Your Current Skills (200 words)

Based on the results of your skills audit, provide a brief overview of the skills you identified as strengths. For each strength, explain how you have developed these skills and give real-life examples from your previous experiences (e.g. school, work, extracurricular activities, volunteering). Highlight any specific successes or achievements that have resulted from these strengths.

  • Task 2: Identify Key Areas for Development (200 words)

Look at the skills in which you scored lower on your audit and identify at least two key areas for improvement. For each skill, discuss why you believe it needs development and how improving these skills will benefit your personal, academic and professional life. Mention any challenges or barriers that have prevented you from developing these skills so far.

  • Task 3: Set Developmental Goals (100 words)

Using the results of your audit, set two short-term and two long-term goals to improve the skills identified in Task 2. For each goal, describe the action(s) you will take to achieve it, including any resources or support available to you (Skills4Learning workshops, tutors, academic support services). Ensure that your goals are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound).

Assessment 2 – Research Skills Case Study (20%) (500 words)

  • The research skills case study assessment examines the role of social media in fan engagement for sport organisations, focusing on the contrasting approaches and outcomes between them. By reviewing both quantitative and qualitative data, you will explore the relationship between an organisation’s social media following and engagement rates, as well as the differing fan experiences and perceptions. The case study encourages you to assess how sport organisations of different sizes utilise social media to build brand loyalty and drive revenue. Through this assessment, you will develop your research skills, learning to understand both quantitative and qualitative methods in real-world sport management scenarios.
  • The case study and supporting questions to answer will be provided in your lectures and seminars.

Assessment 3 – Use and Application of Artificial Intelligence in Sport Management

  • This assessment focuses on the role of AI in sport management and its ethical use in academic work. You will engage with AI-generated essays on the topic "How is conventional business different from sport business?" or “How is conventional marketing different from sport marketing”. You will assess their quality, reliability, and potential pitfalls. The assessment aims to help you develop an understanding of AI tools in both professional and academic contexts, while also reinforcing the importance of academic integrity.
  • Part 1 – Reviewing AI-Generated Essays (500 Words)
  •  You will be provided with three AI-generated essays on the topic "How is conventional business different from sport business?" In this section, you will write a 500-word review, addressing the following:
  • The quality and depth of the content in the AI-generated essays.
  • The accuracy and relevance of the arguments presented.
  •  The limitations or issues with using AI for academic writing, including potential ethical concerns.
  • Suggestions for improving the content through literature and deeper research.

Part 2 – Rewriting a Section Using Supporting Literature (500 Words)

  • In the second part, you will select one theme from one of the AI-generated essays and rewrite it in your own words. This rewritten section must be supported by relevant academic literature and explanation. The aim is to demonstrate an understanding of the subject matter and improve upon the AI-generated content using credible sources.
  • More detail and guidance on both parts will be provided in lectures and seminars.

Assessment Details

Instructions to Students
Please read carefully the assessment and grade/marking descriptors overleaf:

Course Title(s): BA (Hons) Sport Business Management and BA (Hons) Sport Marketing
Module Title: Personal, Professional and Academic Development
Assessment Title: Portfolio – Skills Audit
Level: 4
Weighting: 20%
Criteria and Weighting 100-86 85-70 69-60 59-50 49-40 39-30 29-15 14-0

 

An exceptional evaluation of skills, with clear identification of strengths and areas for improvement. SMART goals are highly detailed and realistic, supported by a thorough action plan. Strong connections are made between current skills and future academic and professional contexts. The work is exceptionally organised, coherent and flawless in presentation. An excellent evaluation of skills with clear identification of strengths and areas for improvement. SMART goals are well-developed and realistic, supported by a solid action plan. Clear connections are made between current skills and future development. The work is well-organised, coherent and contains few errors. A very good evaluation of skills with very good identification of strengths and areas for improvement. SMART goals are clear but may lack depth, and the action plan is very good. Links to future development are present. The work is well-structured with minor issues in clarity or presentation. A good evaluation of skills with good identification of strengths and areas for improvement. SMART goals and the action plan are good and present. Connections are made to future development. The work is clear but may have several issues with structure or presentation. A satisfactory evaluation of skills with adequate identification of strengths and areas for improvement. SMART goals and the action plan are underdeveloped and lack clarity. Adequate connections to future development are made. The work has issues with organisation and presentation. A limited evaluation of skills with minimal identification of strengths and areas for improvement. SMART goals and the action plan are incoherent or unrealistic. Connections to future development are largely absent. The work is disorganised and difficult to follow. A very limited evaluation with little or no identification of strengths and areas for improvement. SMART goals and the action plan are largely missing. Connections to future development are absent. The work is unclear and contains numerous errors. No meaningful evaluation of skills, goals, or action plan. No connections to future development are made. The work is incoherent, unstructured, and does not meet the basic requirements.

 

Course Title(s): BA (Hons) Sport Business Management and BA (Hons) Sport Marketing
Module Title: Personal, Professional and Academic Development
Assessment Title: Portfolio – Research Skills Case Study
Level: 4
Weighting: 20%

 

Criteria and Weighting 100-86 85-70 69-60 59-50 49-40 39-30 29-15 14-0

 

An exceptional review of basic research methods, with highly insightful conclusions. The case study responses demonstrate a thorough basic understanding of research methods and applies them excellently to the context of sport management. The recommendations are well-developed, realistic, and based on robust evidence. The work is exceptionally structured and clearly presented. An excellent review of basic research methods, with clear and relevant conclusions. The case study responses show a strong basic understanding of research methods and applies them well to sport management. Recommendations are well-reasoned and based on solid evidence. The work is well-organised, coherent and contains few errors. A very good review of basic research methods, with insightful conclusions. The case study responses demonstrate a very good basic understanding of research methods. Recommendations are very good but could be more detailed. The work is well-structured but may have minor issues in clarity or presentation. A good analysis of basic research methods, though conclusions may be simple. The case study responses show a good basic understanding of research methods, with some inaccuracies or underdeveloped points. Recommendations are good but lack depth or evidence. The work is clear but may have some issues with structure or presentation. A satisfactory analysis of basic research methods, though conclusions may be limited. The case study responses show a satisfactory basic understanding of research methods, with some inaccuracies or underdeveloped points. Recommendations are present but lack depth or evidence. The work is clear but may have several issues with structure or presentation. A limited analysis of data, with minimal conclusions that lack clarity or relevance. The case study shows little understanding of research methods and is largely inaccurate or incomplete. Recommendations are largely absent or irrelevant. The work is disorganised and difficult to follow. A very limited analysis of data with little or no relevant conclusions. The case study demonstrates very limited understanding of research methods, with numerous inaccuracies. Recommendations are absent or unrelated to the case. The work is unclear and contains numerous errors. No meaningful analysis of data or conclusions. The case study demonstrates no understanding of research methods. Recommendations are completely missing, and the work is incoherent, unstructured, and fails to meet basic requirements.

 

Course Title(s): BA (Hons) Sport Business Management and BA (Hons) Sport Marketing
Module Title: Personal, Professional and Academic Development
Assessment Title: Portfolio – AI in Sport Management
Level: 4
Weighting: 60%

 

Criteria and Weighting 100-86 85-70 69-60 59-50 49-40 39-30 29-15 14-0
Academic References are provided and correctly utilised using the Leeds Beckett Harvard Referencing format to integrate citations/references into the student’s work.  A suitable academic reference list is also provided and justified by the work. (10%) Able to cite with precision and reference an extended and comprehensive balance of secondary source types. Flawless Harvard style throughout the essay. Able to accurately cite and reference a wide range and balance of secondary source types. Harvard style throughout the essay. Harvard style, some minor inaccuracies / omissions.  Very good list provided at the end and mainly accurate. Harvard style, occasional inaccuracies / omissions.  Good list provided at the end and mainly accurate. Harvard style, but consistent inaccuracies / omissions.  Basic list provided at the end and multiple inaccuracies / omissions Harvard style, but major occasional inaccuracies / omissions.  Poor list provided at the end and major inaccuracies. Harvard style, major inaccuracies / omissions.  Inadequate list provided at the end and major inaccuracies Not in Harvard style and major inaccuracies / omissions.  Very poor / no list provided at the end, major inaccuracies / omissions.
Review of AI Generated Essays (40%) An exceptional critique with highly insightful review of the AI-generated essays. Identifies multiple strengths and weaknesses in the content, argumentation, and accuracy. Discusses ethical implications of AI in academic work with thorough examples. The critique is exceptionally clear and well-structured. An excellent review with strong discussions on the AI-generated essays. Identifies clear strengths and weaknesses in the content, and discusses ethical considerations. The critique is well-organised, coherent, and contains few errors. A very good review that provides very good discussions on the AI-generated essays. Identifies strengths and weaknesses but may lack some depth in certain areas. Ethical considerations are addressed. The work is well-structured but may have minor issues in clarity or presentation. A good review that offers good insight to the AI-generated essays. Some strengths and weaknesses are identified, but the review may be underdeveloped or lack detail. Ethical considerations are briefly mentioned. The work is clear but may have some issues with structure or presentation. A satisfactory review with limited discussion of the AI-generated essays. Strengths and weaknesses are somewhat vague or unclear, and ethical considerations are adequately addressed. The work has issues with organisation, clarity, or presentation. A limited critique with minimal discussion. The discussion of strengths, weaknesses, and ethical concerns is largely absent or irrelevant. The work is disorganised and difficult to follow. A very limited review with little or no relevant discussions. Ethical considerations are not discussed, and the review lacks coherence. The work is unclear and contains numerous errors. No meaningful review provided. There is no review of the AI-generated essays, and ethical considerations are entirely absent. The work is incoherent and fails to meet basic requirements.
Rewriting Section of AI Essay (50%) A highly detailed and insightful rewrite, demonstrating an exceptional understanding of the topic. The section is rewritten in the student’s own words with robust use of supporting literature. The work is exceptionally well-organised, clear, and flawlessly presented. A well-developed and clear rewrite, showing an excellent understanding of the topic. The section is rewritten effectively with excellent use of supporting literature. The work is well-structured and free from errors. A very good rewrite, showing a very good understanding of the topic. The section is rewritten in the student’s own words, though some areas may lack depth. Insightful discussions are present and could be developed further. The work is clear with minor issues in structure or presentation. A good rewrite, showing a good understanding of the topic. The section is rewritten, though some areas may be underdeveloped or rely too heavily on the AI-generated content. Good use of supporting literature. The work is clear but may have some issues with structure or presentation. A satisfactory rewrite, showing a basic understanding of the topic. The section is rewritten with minimal insight and sufficient supporting literature. The work has issues with organisation and clarity. A limited rewrite, showing minimal understanding of the topic. The section is poorly rewritten with little or no supporting literature. The work is disorganised and difficult to follow. A very limited rewrite, showing little or no understanding of the topic. The section is poorly rewritten with no supporting literature. The work is unclear and contains numerous errors. No meaningful rewrite provided. The section is not rewritten in the student’s own words, and there is no use of supporting literature. The work is incoherent and fails to meet basic requirements.

 

Need last-minute online assignment help with your PPAD in Sport Management Module Handbook? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our management assignment help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free list of assignment samples and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

BUS105 Statistics Assignment Sample Solution Docx | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: Statistics (BUS105)

View Free Samples

MKT542 Digital Marketing Analytics Assignment Sample Answer

Category: Assignment

Subject: Marketing

University: Singapore University of Socical Sciences

Module Title: MKT542 Digital Marketing Analytics

View Free Samples

ELT201 Understanding Poetry SUSS Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: English

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: ELT201 Understanding Poetry

View Free Samples

BUS354 Customer Relationship Management Assignment Sample | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: BUS354 Customer Relationship Management

View Free Samples

ICT239 Web Application Development Assignment Sample | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Computer Science

University: Singapore University of Social Science (SUSS)

Module Title: ICT239 Web Application Development

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK
sadf