Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Newcastle University | Module Title | ISO8005 Web and Social Media Analytics |
| Word Count | 2000 (+/- 10%) |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Individual Report (Module weightage: 100%) |
| Academic Year | 2026-27 |
| Module Code: | ISO8005 |
| Module Title: | Web and Social Media Analytics |
| Assessment Type: | Individual Report (Module weightage: 100%) |
| Semester: | Semester 2 |
| Academic Year: | 2025-26 |
| Credits and Level | 10 Credit module, offered at Level 7 |
| Submission Method | Online via Canvas |
| Word Limit | 2000 (+/- 10%) |
| Module Tutor | Nick Howey - nick.howey@newcastle.ac.uk |
| Submission Date: | Deadline: May 6th, 2026 before 12 noon |
Intended Knowledge Outcomes
1.Introduction to Web and Social Media Analytics
2.Exploration of metrics and Key performance indicators
3.Data collection for web analytics and visualisation
4.Analysis techniques
5.Search Engine and Social Media Optimisation
6.Effective reporting and communicating
1.Apply appropriate data analytics knowledge and skills to enhance the capability to realise organisational benefits from web and social media data.
2.Interpret business problems and opportunities using data analytics to organise, manage, critically analyse, visualise, and communicate complex web and social media issues effectively.
3.Build appropriate models to increase informed decision-making capability.
Tyne Artisan Bakery: “From Oven to Online”
Tyne Artisan Bakery (TAB) is a small, independent bakery specialising in sourdough loaves, viennoiserie pastries, celebration cakes, and a weekly bread subscription box. Sales to date have been exclusively in-store and at weekend markets. The founders want to launch an e-commerce site to enable local delivery and click-and-collect, and to build a coherent social presence from scratch. Budgets are modest; they need a plan that finds quick wins, builds momentum, and demonstrates a credible path to profitable growth across the next 12–18 months. It should be noted that the owners of Tyne Artisan Bakery have limited to knowledge of website development and business-related social media.
Buy Custom Answer Of ISO8005 Web and Social Media Analytics Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Chat with Experts & Get AssignmentYou have been contracted as the digital strategist tasked to deliver a go-to-market plan. This plan needs to be communicated to the business owners in the form of a report, covering: e-commerce MVP, channel & content strategy, paid media approach, analytics framework, 12-month forecast, and a prioritised roadmap. You can use the assessment dataset to support analysis. The assessment dataset will become available after week 7 of semester 2. Required /expected deliverables within the report:
1.SMART objectives & KPIs (choose a North Star: e.g., active bread subscriptions).
2.E-commerce MVP (platform choice & rationale)).
3.Channel & content strategy:
oOrganic (SEO topics: sourdough methods, weekly menus, allergen info; email capture).
oPaid (role of Google vs. Meta vs. TikTok).
oSocial (Instagram/TikTok/Facebook; micro-influencers).
oExperimentation (A/B tests: hero banners, free delivery thresholds, PDP copy).
4.Measurement plan (events, weekly dashboard).
5.Data analysis (from assessment dataset): compute CVR, AOV, CAC, ROAS; analyse subscriptions/churn; seasonality around Easter/Xmas; region mix; A/B test outcome.
6.Forecast & budget (base/low/high scenarios; quarterly reallocation based on efficiency; retention plays for subscription).
Ethics, privacy & accessibility
Formative feedback will be provided to students based on generic and individual questions during designated assignment support sessions.
You may use generative AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Microsoft Copilot) to help you plan and create an outline structure for your work, but all original ideas, visuals created/used within the report, and text must have been written by you. If you use AI as a source of information, you must acknowledge and reference it. You may use generative AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Grammarly) to help improve spelling, grammar and make recommendations to improve your academic writing style, but you must review those suggestions critically. AI tools should not be used to automatically change the language, meaning and tone of your original work.
1.Reference materials used to support your work then please ensure you follow the University referencing guidelines, essentially Harvard referencing.
2.A 2000-word (+/-10%) report must be submitted via Turnitin link provided on Canvas.
3.You are advised to use screenshots of your visuals and submit your document as a pdf.
4.What is excluded from the wordcount: Assignment Cover Page (see the cover page attached), Executive summary, Content list, Reference list, Appendices, Visuals (Figures and Tables).
5.Appendices should be used to record any calculations and development works.
A step-by-step guide to Canvas Assignment Submission and guidance on dealing with submission issues is available on the Academic Skills Kit website Assignment Submission Guidance. pages.
Canvas displays a confirmation message when your work has been submitted.
If you do not see the confirmation message, you should assume that your submission has not been registered and try to submit your work again.
For this assessment will be available to you after 20 working days (not including weekends or public holidays). You can expect feedback, located within Turnitin in the form of Summary comments, In-text comments linked to the rubric and a page of generic feedback. For guidance on how to understand, interpret and the implement feedback from your assessment please visit the Academic Skills Kit website.
Any questions asked and answered regarding the assignment will be used to populate a FAQs page under the assignment information section in the canvas site for the module.
Module tutor – Nick Howey nick.howey@newcastle.ac.uk Education team - nubseducationadmin@newcastle.ac.uk Wellbeing - nubs.wellbeing@newcastle.ac.uk
PEC information - . Personal Extenuating Circumstances (PEC) | Student Progress | Newcastle University
Students are reminded of Newcastle University regulations concerning Student Progress site. and Plagiarism. You may wish to change or supplement this link with school specific guidelines Up until the submission deadline your assignment may be submitted.
Re-submission is not possible, please ensure your work is final and complete before submitting. Submissions made after the deadline will be identified as late and penalised. The University’s Policy on Assessment and Feedback outlines that work submitted after the deadline will be capped according to a sliding scale.
|
Criterion |
Weight |
Fail (<50) |
Pass (50–59) |
Merit (60–69) |
Distinction (70–100) |
|
Problem framing & SMART objectives |
10% |
Objectives unclear or missing; KPIs not measurable or inappropriate; no linkage to business outcomes; North Star absent or incorrect. |
Goals vague; limited KPI clarity; weak linkage to business outcomes; North Star under-defined. |
Goals stated; KPIs mostly measurable; some justification; partial articulation of business impact. |
Clear, concise business goals leading to measurable KPIs; clear North Star; targets justified via data and tied to commercial outcomes. |
|
E-commerce MVP & UX |
15% |
No credible platform choice; missing IA; major UX issues; accessibility ignored; critical policies (privacy/returns/allergen s) omitted. |
Weak rationale; IA lacks structure; minimal accessibility; conversion principles only superficially applied. |
Good platform rationale; IA adequate; minor UX/accessibilit y gaps; some conversion best practices. |
Platform choice & IA well reasoned; strong conversion best practices (PDP essentials, friction reduction); robust accessibility (alt text, contrast, mobile). |
|
Channel strategy & content |
15% |
No personas; disjointed tactics; unjustified budget; no testing roadmap; misaligned to funnel objectives. |
Fragmented strategy; weak personas; limited testing; budget split not well justified. |
Mostly coherent; personas present; budget split sensible; some testing outlined. |
Persona-driven, full-funnel plan; justified budget mix; coherent content pillars & cadence; clear experimentation plan. |
|
Analytics & measuremen t |
15% |
No event plan; UTMs absent/incorrect; no reporting plan; misuse of analytics or non-compliant measurement. |
Superficial approach; missing depth on events/UTMs; dashboard unclear; attribution largely ignored. |
Events & UTMs defined; dashboard basic; limited attribution awareness; reporting cadence implied. |
GA4-style event map; UTM taxonomy; sensible dashboards; attribution caveats noted; clear reporting cadence and governance. |
|
Data analysis quality |
15% |
Major calculation errors or missing analysis; visuals absent or misleading; no actionable insights. |
Errors in metrics; weak visuals; mostly descriptive with limited decision linkage. |
Minor calculation issues; visuals acceptable; insights present but not consistently actioned. |
Correct metrics; accurate calculations; clean visuals; insights tied to decisions (e.g., budget shifts, test priorities). |
|
Forecast & budget reallocation |
15% |
No model; inconsistent/implausible numbers; no budget logic; ignores retention or operational constraints. |
Naïve forecast; no scenarios; arbitrary budget changes; retention not addressed. |
Forecast reasonable; some scenario thinking; partial budget rationale; limited retention view. |
Triangulated assumptions; base/low/high scenarios; budget shifts justified with quantified impact; retention/subscriptio n plan included. |
|
Ethics, privacy, accessibility |
5% |
Non-compliant recommendations (privacy/consent); accessibility ignored; risks not identified. |
Minimal compliance coverage; accessibility treated superficially. |
Compliance addressed; some accessibility items; minor omissions noted. |
GDPR (consent, cookie banner, privacy), unsubscribe and data practices sound; inclusive design embedded with evidence. |
|
Presentation |
10% |
Disorganised; unclear; missing sections; poor/unreadable visuals; no coherent conclusion. Missing/Weak Executive summary. |
Disorganised in places; uneven visuals; conclusions under-developed Average Executive summary. |
Clear but less persuasive; acceptable structure and visuals; conclusions present. Good Executive summary. |
Persuasive, structured, executive-ready narrative; clear visuals; strong signposting and conclusions. Excellent ‘on point’ executive summary. |
Get Answer of ISO8005 Web and Social Media Analytics Assignment
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentStruggling with your ISO8005 Web and Social Media Analytics Assignment at Newcastle University? Our professional writers provide AI-free and plagiarism-free UK Digital Marketing Thesis Help to ensure you get top-notch, original content. With our expert writing services, you’ll receive quality assignments that meet all academic standards. We also offer a free list of assignment samples, written by skilled writers, to guide your work. Each assignment comes with an AI and plagiarism report for complete assurance. Contact us now for the best Assignment Help UK and see your grades soar!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content