Category | Assignment | Subject | Nursing |
---|---|---|---|
University | Auckland University of Technology | Module Title | HLAW701 Health Law and Policy |
Word Count | 2000 Words |
---|---|
Assessment Title | Assessment 2 |
Academic Year | Semester 2, 2025 |
Arlo, a counsellor in private practice, worked out of an office in his home. During a party at his home, some of his guests wandered into his office and browsed the client files on his desk. One of the files was about Rhonda. Rhonda was contacted the next week by one of the guests who had read in her client's file that she was unwell. Rhonda was horrified, as she had not told anyone about her illness.
Instructions:
Explain how the Health Information Privacy Code (HIPC) applies to Arlo.
Identify the legal grounds for any privacy complaint, including the relevant subrule from the HIPC. Link the grounds to the facts in the case study.
Explain the complaint pathway under the Privacy Act 2020, identifying the institutions involved in the process, and any appropriate final remedies at the relevant tribunal. Identify relevant sections from the legislation to support your answer.
Do not discuss the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights (CHDSCR) of the Health and Disability Commissioner (HDC).
Case Study
John, an oral health therapist, was convicted of assault under the Crimes Act 1961. He had attended a party, drank too much alcohol, and punched another man during an argument about the Warriors rugby league team.
John also had a conviction for criminal trespass from 4 years before. This conviction resulted from John repeatedly trespassing on his neighbour’s property after an argument about a shared fence.
As a result of the assault conviction, John is charged under s100(1)(c) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act (HPCAA) at the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal (HPDT).
Instructions
Identify two HPDT cases charged on the same ground under the HPCAA, with contrasting penalties. Explain why John’s penalties should be in line with one of the cases you have chosen, in contrast with the other.
Ensure you provide references for the HPDT cases.
Using NZ scholarly research published after 2021, identify and discuss two criticisms of the End of Life Choice Act 2019 (not the Bill), citing relevant sections. Consider how the law could be changed to address these issues.
Consider the Case
(applies across assessment).
Achieve Higher Grades with HLAW701 Assignment Solutions
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentAre you having trouble completing your HLAW701 Health Law and Policy? Our NZ Assignment Help service is the best for you. You can even check our free assignment samples before placing your order. We promise on-time delivery and 24/7 support, no matter your academic needs. From Business Management to technical subjects, we cover it all. We also provide Auckland University of Technology Assignment Samples that the phd expert writers have written. Contact us now!