Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Arden University | Module Title | HCM6001 Global Health and Sustainability |

As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit aGlobal Health and Sustainability assignment. Please refer to your StudentHandbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and generalinformation on preparing and submitting assignments.
After completing the module, you should be able to:
Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline, and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in AU Harvard system(s).
You should address all the elements of the task assignment listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.
You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.
Maximum word count: 1000 word academic poster equivalence.
Please refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework
Create an academic poster, presenting a coherent and informed case for a global health intervention initiative.
You should use learning from this module and the concepts explored to select an initiative and related country, for a global health intervention. The intention of the posters is to convince law and policy makers in the chosen country to act upon the issue and pilot the proposed intervention.
At this level of study, your ability to present complex information succinctly and in language pitched to the audience required, will be assessed. You should take responsibility identify the intervention and the direction of your work yourself.
Your poster should be presented as if a briefing paper, informing the law and policy makers of the context of the health intervention and requirements of the initiative proposed. This must be supported by facts, statistics, theories, and applicability.
Your poster can be formatted as you wish on a Word document, in portrait or landscape orientation and with boxes/images/columns as desired. All images and/or figures must be referenced, as well as data and literature sources as usual.
You will be assessed on:
(The word count meets the 3000-word essay equivalence for an academic poster)
(1000 words)
(100 marks)
(The: 1, 2, 3, & 4 GA)
This module is marked using the Arden University Categorical Marking Criteria
| Level 6 study represents the student's increasing autonomy and independence in relation to their knowledge, understanding and skills. At Level 6, students are expected to demonstrate problem solving skills in both practical and theoretical contexts. This should be supported by an understanding of appropriate theory, creativity in expression and thought based on independent but informed judgements. Students should demonstrate the ability to seek out, involve, analyze, and evaluate competing theories and claims to knowledge and work in a critically constructive manner. Work at this level is articulate, coherent, and skilled. |
| Grade | Mark Bands | Generic Assessment Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| First (1) | 80%+ | An outstanding knowledge base exploring and analyzing the discipline, its theory, and any associated ethics considerations. The work demonstrates outstanding independence of thought and originality. There is outstanding management of learning resources, and a high degree of autonomy is demonstrated which goes above and beyond the brief.The work demonstrates intellectual originality and creativity. Writing is exceptionally well structured and accurately referenced throughout. Where appropriate, outstanding professional skills are demonstrated. The work is original and with some additional effort could be considered for internal publication. |
| 70–79% | An excellent information base within which the discipline is explored and analyzed.There is considerable originality in the approach and the work demonstrates confidence and autonomy and extends to consider ethical issues. Learning resources have been managed with exceptional confidence and the work exceeds the assessment brief. Writing is exceptionally well structured and accurately referenced throughout.Where appropriate, an excellent level of professional skills are demonstrated and the work demonstrates at a high level of intellectual and academic skills. | |
| Upper Second (2:1) | 60–69% | Very good knowledge base which explores and analyzes the discipline, its theory, and any associated ethical issues.There is evidence of some originality and independence of thought. A very good range of learning resources underpin the work and there is clear evidence of self-directed research. The work demonstrates the ability to analyze the subject effectively. and apply theory with good academic and intellectual skills. Academic writing skills are very good, expression isaccurate overall, and the work is consistently referenced throughout. |
| Lower second(2:2 |
50-59% |
A good understanding of the discipline which supports some analysis, evaluation and problem-solving within thediscipline. There may be reference to some of the ethical considerations. The work shows a sound level of competencein managing basic sources and materials. Academic writing skills are good and accurate overall, and the work isplanned and structured with some thought. Professional skills are good (where appropriate). The work may lackoriginality, but academic and intellectual skills are moving into the critical domain. The work is referenced throughout. |
| Third (3) |
40-49% |
Satisfactory level of performance in which there are some omissions in the understanding of the subject, itsunderpinning theory, and ethical considerations. There is little evidence of independent thought, and the work shows abasic use of sources and materials. Academic and intellectual skills are limited. The work may lack overall structure.There are some difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). There is an attempt to reference thework. |
| Marginal Fail |
30-39% |
A limited piece of work in which there are clear gaps in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory, andethical considerations. The work shows a limited use of sources and materials. Academic and intellectual skills areweak and there are errors in expression and the work may lack overall structure. There are difficulties in developingprofessional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original thought and is largely imitative. |
| Clear fail |
29% and Below |
A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in knowledge and understanding, underpinning theory andethical considerations. The work shows little evidence in the use of appropriate sources and materials.Academic writing skills are very weak and there are numerous errors in expression.The work lacks structure overall.Professional skills (where appropriate) are not developed. The work is imitative. |
Looking for expert support with your HCM6001 Global Health and Sustainability Assignment? Our professional Online Assignment Writing Services for UK Students are here to help you achieve top grades with ease. We specialize in providing high-quality Arden University Assignment Help Online, tailored to meet academic standards and deadlines. Whether you need guidance, complete solutions, or well-structured University Assignment Examples, our experienced writers have you covered. Just say “Do my Assignment for me” and leave the stress behind—get plagiarism-free, well-researched, and timely submissions that boost your academic success.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content