OFFERS!
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%
Get Expert-crafted assignments
| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Suffolk | Module Title | GBM6ISM International Strategic Management |
| Module code and title: | GBM6ISM International Strategic Management | Assessment weighting: | 100% |
| Assignment type: | Individual Business Report (3000 words) |
Target feedback time and date: |
Three weeks from |
| Submission time and date: | Before 11.59pm 1st. Dec 2025 |
|
|
As a strategy consultant, you are required to write an Individual Business Report of 3000 words (100%). This report must provide guidance to an SME or MNE currently operating in the domestic market and contemplating international expansion. Your role involves critically evaluating strategic management concepts and models, navigating the strategic management process, and assisting the business in making informed decisions regarding international expansion.
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes:
LO1 Demonstrate a critical understanding of the key dimensions of strategic management as well as the concepts pertaining to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and multinational enterprises (MNEs).
LO2 Critically appraise the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its role in strategic decision making.
LO3 Critically evaluate the distinctions between traditional and contemporary modes of entry into international markets.
LO4 Critically assess key strategy focus areas and recommend the suitable market entry mode to grow a business from locally to internationally.
You must produce a 3000-word Individual Business Report (100%) in response to the above assignment task. Your business report MUST:
Are You Looking The Solution of GBM6ISM Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentYour work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates your achievement of the stated learning outcomes for this assignment (see above) and against other key criteria, as defined in the University’s grading descriptors.
This assignment will be marked according to the grading descriptors for Level 6.
This assignment should be submitted electronically via Moodle (module tutors will discuss this process with you during class time).
This assignment should be submitted to Moodle before 23:59 on 1st. Dec. 2025
You should submit all work for summative assessments by the above deadline. Work submitted up to three working days after the deadline will be accepted and marked, but the mark will be capped at the pass mark of 40% unless there is a valid reason for the late submission, i.e., having been granted an extension to the deadline or a deferral under the terms of the Extenuating Circumstances Policy.
Work submitted more than three working days after the deadline without a valid reason will not be accepted and will be recorded as 0% RN (refer, no work submitted).
For more information, please refer to:
[hyperlink to Student Programme Handbook to be inserted here]
Feedback and marks for this assignment will be available in three weeks from the submission deadline.
|
Level 6 |
||||||
|
In accordance with the FHEQ, at the end of Level 6 students should have coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding of their subject area, at least some of which is informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. They will be able to accurately deploy established techniques of analysis and enquiry within a discipline, using their conceptual understanding to devise and sustain arguments and/or to solve problems. They should be aware of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. They should be able to critically evaluate evidence, arguments, assumptions, abstract concepts and data (that may be incomplete), to make judgements, and to frame appropriate questions to achieve a solution - or identify a range of solutions - to a problem. They should be able to communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions effectively to both specialist and non-specialist audiences. |
||||||
|
|
Assessment category |
|||||
|
Coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding of the subject area, at least some of which is informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline |
Cognitive and intellectual skills |
Application of theory to practice (for courses with a professional practice element) |
Reading and referencing |
Presentation, style and structure Work that significantly exceeds the specified word limit may be penalized |
||
|
Pass mark, demonstrating |
G0%-100% |
Excellent work showing flawless understanding of subject matter, explicitly well-informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. |
Insightful and exemplary use of critical evaluation skills to support sophisticated, original and highly coherent judgements and arguments and/or creatively solve problems. Clearly articulates the significance of relationships between a range of ideas and concepts, enabling a new perspective to be applied. |
Sophisticated application of theory to practice, demonstrating insightful selection of theory and flawless application to practice, drawing skilfully on the latest research within the discipline. accurate application of referencing. |
Insightful and effective use of a carefully selected range of relevant reading, including literature informed by the latest research. Consistently |
Exemplary presentation of work that is fluent and flawless throughout. |
|
|
80%-8G% |
High quality work showing fluent, deep and highly detailed knowledge and understanding of subject matter, explicitly well- |
Excellent use of critical evaluation skills to apposite and highly coherent judgements and |
Excellent application of theory to practice, with all links fully appropriate and meaningfully applied, drawing skilfully on the latest research within the discipline. |
Consistent and balanced engagement with a refined range of relevant reading, including literature informed by the latest research. Consistently accurate application of referencing. |
Highly effective presentation of work that is coherently structured and clearly expressed throughout. |
|
Level 6 |
Coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding |
Cognitive and intellectual skills |
Application of theory to practice |
Reading and referencing |
Presentation, style |
|
|
Pass mark, demonstrating |
70% – 7G% |
Commendable work showing coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding of subject matter, explicitly informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. |
Effective use of critical evaluation skills to make well- informed and coherent judgements and arguments and/or creatively solve problems. Clearly articulates the significance of relationships between a range of ideas and concepts, enabling a new perspective to be applied. Use of a wide range of relevant supporting evidence. Work shows effective originality and creativity of thought and approach. |
Consistent and balanced engagement with a refined range of relevant reading, including literature informed by the latest research. Consistently accurate application of referencing. |
Consistent engagement with an extensive range of relevant reading, including literature informed by the latest research. Consistently accurate application of referencing. |
Well-formed presentation |
|
|
60% – 6G% |
Work of solid quality showing competent and consistent knowledge and understanding of subject matter, informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. |
Sound use of critical evaluation skills to make well- informed judgements and arguments and/or solve problems. |
Sound understanding and evaluation of application of theory to practice, with the student making clearly articulated and reasoned links between the two, informed by the latest research within the discipline. |
Critical engagement with a good range of relevant reading, including literature informed by the latest research Sound application of referencing, with no inaccuracies or inconsistencies. |
Competent presentation |
|
|
50% – 5G% |
Adequate work showing knowledge and understanding of subject matter, but lacking depth and breadth. Awareness of the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. |
Use of critical evaluation skills to make largely logical and coherent judgements and arguments and/or solve problems, but with gaps and/or inconsistencies. Use of an adequate range of relevant supporting evidence. Work of originality and creativity, which enhances aspects of the assignment. |
Mainly consistent, accurate and logical application of theory to practice, with the student making appropriate links between the two and evidence of evaluation. |
Engagement with an appropriate range of reading beyond essential texts, including literature informed by the latest research. Referencing may show minor inaccuracies or inconsistencies. |
Work is structured in a largely coherent manner and is for the most part clearly expressed. |
Buy Custom Answer Of GBM6ISM Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free QuoteIf you are worried about the GBM6ISM International Strategic Management Assignment? no need to worry anymore! Our experts provide Strategic Management Assignment Help that has been designed for the students. You will get expert guidance and help on assignments that will strengthen your concepts. We also provide you with free list of assignment samples that will help you understand. And the best part? All the content is 100% original, written by PhD expert writers, and well-researched, so that you get the best quality. So don’t delay now; boost your grades with our help!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
