| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | - | Module Title | Fin542 International Financial Management |
You will analyze topics in International Financial Management over five weeks, leading to a final report. The assignment is split into 5 phases, each week focusing on a specific task.
Objective: Choose a specific topic from the list and conduct preliminary research.
Topics to Choose from:
Tasks: Choose a topic and explain your choice in 250 words. Conduct preliminary research using at least 3-5 academic sources.
Deliverable: Topic description and initial bibliography due at the end of Week 1.
Rubric for Week 1: Topic Selection and Initial Research
| Criteria | Exemplary (4) | Proficient (3) | Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topic Selection | Clear, insightful, and relevant with strong rationale. | Relevant with reasonable rationale. | Somewhat relevant, lacks clear rationale. | Unclear or irrelevant with no rationale. |
| Initial Research | 5+ credible, relevant sources identified. | 3-4 credible sources identified. | 2 sources, weak relevance. | Few or no credible sources identified. |
| Submission Quality | On time, well-written, and formatted. | On time, mostly well-written and formatted. | On time, but lacks clarity or formatting. | Late or poorly formatted with errors. |
Total Points for Week 1: ___ / 12
Objective: Conduct detailed research and create an outline for your report.
Tasks: Gather information from academic journals, books, and reliable online sources. Develop an outline for your final report (600-800 words).
Deliverable: Detailed outline and at least 5-7 additional sources due at the end of Week 2.
Rubric for Week 2: In-Depth Research and Outline Development
| Criteria | Exemplary (4) | Proficient (3) | Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Depth | Comprehensive research with strong insights. | Good research, mostly relevant. | Basic research, lacking depth. | Minimal research with little relevance. |
| Outline Quality | Detailed and logical outline with clear structure. | Clear outline with logical structure. | Basic outline, lacks clarity. | Poorly structured, unclear outline. |
| Source Quality | 7+ high-quality, relevant sources included. | 5-6 relevant sources included. | 3-4 sources, mixed quality. | Few/no sources, low credibility. |
Total Points for Week 2: ___ / 12
Get the Solution of this Assessment. Hire Experts to solve this assignment Before your Deadline
Hire an Assignment HelperObjective: Write the first draft of your report based on the outline developed.
Tasks: Write a 2000-3000 word report on your topic. Include relevant examples and case studies.
Deliverable: First draft of your report due at the end of Week 3.
Rubric for Week 3: Drafting the Report
| Criteria | Exemplary (6) | Proficient (5) | Satisfactory (3-4) | Needs Improvement (1-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content Quality | In-depth analysis with examples and case studies. | Good analysis, some examples and case studies. | Basic analysis, limited examples or case studies. | Little to no analysis, few or no examples. |
| Research Integration | Strong integration of high-quality, relevant research. | Adequate integration of sources, not fully developed. | Limited use of sources, lacks depth. | Few/no sources, no integration. |
| Writing Clarity | Well-organized, clear, and error-free. | Generally clear, some organizational issues. | Some clarity issues, disorganized. | Poorly written, unclear, and unorganized. |
| Length Requirements | Meets or exceeds word count with thorough content. | Meets the minimum word count with adequate content. | Below word count, lacking depth. | Significantly below word count, minimal content. |
Total Points for Week 3: ___ / 24
Objective: Review and revise your draft for clarity, coherence, and depth.
Tasks: Peer review your draft and revise based on feedback.
Deliverable: Revised version of your report due at the end of Week 4.
Rubric for Week 4: Peer Review and Revision
| Criteria | Exemplary (4) | Proficient (3) | Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of Feedback | Provides comprehensive feedback with clear examples. | Provides relevant feedback, addressing several areas. | Basic feedback, lacks depth or specific examples. | Little/no feedback, unclear or unhelpful. |
| Constructive Critique | Constructive, with specific suggestions for improvement. | Mostly constructive, some suggestions for improvement. | Limited critique, suggestions unclear. | Unconstructive, minimal or no suggestions. |
| Engagement in Peer Review | Actively engaged, asked questions and helped improve work. | Some engagement, but not consistent. | Limited engagement with few questions or clarifications. | No engagement, no feedback provided. |
| Timeliness of Feedback | Provided on time, allowing time for revision. | Provided feedback on time, but with limited revision time. | Late feedback, limited revision opportunity. | Feedback not submitted or significantly delayed. |
Total Points for Week 4: ___ / 12
Objective: Submit the final report and reflect on the learning experience.
Tasks: Finalize your report, ensuring proper formatting and citations (APA). Write a reflective piece (300-500 words) on the learning experience and how your understanding has changed.
Deliverables: Final report and reflective piece due at the end of Week 5.
Struggle in Completing this Assignment and feeling stressed ? Take our Assignment Writing Services
Hire an Assignment HelperRubric for Week 5: Final Submission and Reflection
| Criteria | Exemplary (6) | Proficient (5) | Satisfactory (3-4) | Needs Improvement (1-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final Report Quality | Comprehensive, well-organized, error-free, and correct APA. | Mostly organized, with few errors, minor citation issues. | Several errors, some formatting or citation issues. | Poorly organized, numerous errors, formatting issues. |
| Reflective Piece | Insightful reflection with personal growth and understanding. | Good reflection with personal connection, some details. | Basic reflection lacks depth and connection. | Minimal reflection; lacks personal connection. |
| Depth of Reflection | Thorough exploration of lessons learned and how the assignment changed perspective. | Good exploration with some lessons learned. | Minimal reflection, lacks depth regarding challenges faced. | Little to no reflection on lessons or challenges. |
| Connection to Real-World | Clearly connects learning to real-world financial management. | Mentions real-world connections but lacks depth. | Minimal connection to real-world applications. | No connection made to real-world applications. |
Total Points for Week 5: ___ / 24
Overall Assessment
Total Points Earned: ___ / 100
Stuck on your Fin542 International Financial Management? Don't worry! Our Management Assignment Help service is the best for you. If you need help with assignments, our expert PhD writers will provide you with original content. And yes, you will also get free assignment samples, which will give you a perfect idea of how to write a top-quality assignment. Don't worry about the deadline, as we guarantee on-time delivery. Contact us now for high-quality and plagiarism-free work and boost your grades!
If you want to see the related solution of this brief, then click here:-International Financial Management
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
