| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Arden University (AU) | Module Title | DAT7002 Data Visualisation and Interpretation |
| Word Count | 3,500 words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | Part 1 - Poster Presentation |
As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit a Data Visualisation and Interpretation assignment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments.
After completing the module, you should be able to:
Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in AU Harvard system(s). You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.
You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.
Maximum word count: 3,500 words equivalent (see tasks for further guidance)
Please refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework
Please note the following:
Get Answer of DAT7002 Data Visualisation and Interpretation Assignment Before Deadline
Chat on WhatsApp NowThis assessment is worth 60% of the overall marks for this module.
Being able to communicate the outcomes of data analysis is potentially more important than being able to carry out the analysis in the first place. As data becomes increasingly widely used within organisations, there is a growing need to be able to communicate the outcomes of the analysis to people who may not fully understand the content. Visualising the data in an informative and effective way is essential in communicating these ideas.
In this assessment, you will have the opportunity to present the data from a given dataset in the form of an A0 poster and a written presentation deck (with speakers notes).
Before submitting your poster and presentation deck you will need to present your work and carry out the critique task:
Please note, that the presentations will take place approximately 10 days before the final submission deadline. The date and time of your presentation will be provided by your tutor beforehand. Once you have given your presentation (your 10 mins talk), you will be required to send both the poster and the presentation deck (with speakers notes) to your tutor (via email), so that you can receive a poster and a written presentation deck of another peer to perform the critique task (part 2 of the assignment).
If your poster and written presentation Deck have not received by your tutor at the end of your presentation day (UK time), you will not be given one of your peers work to critique it and will not be able to carry part 2 of the assignment.
For the final submission:
You should submit the following on Turnitin:
A large group of education providers wish to improve the way that they use email. A survey has been undertaken to understand the email usage habits within the group. You have been tasked with creating a poster presentation for senior management to help justify the development of a new training plan to improve email use.
Prepare an A0 poster for the dataset "Emailsurvey.sav" (You will require SPSS to analyse this data file, if you have not already downloaded the package as part of an earlier module please see the instruction file that accompanies this assessment) using the guidance above. You will then be required to present your poster during a 10-minute Adobe presentation to highlight the key points of your poster. Details on how to access the presentation session will be sent to you closer to the time.
(100 marks)
You have the opportunity to submit your poster to receive formative feedback.
The feedback is designed to help you develop areas of your work and it helps you develop your skills as an independent learner.
If you are a distance learning student, you should submit your work, by email, to your tutor, no later than 2 weeks before the actual submission deadline. If you are a blended learning student, your tutor will give you a deadline for formative feedback and further details.
Formative feedback will not be given to work submitted after the above date or the date specified by your tutor - if a blended learning student.
You MUST underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate and wide ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the AU Harvard system.
Follow this link to find the referencing guides for your subject: Arden Library
Assignments submitted late will not be accepted and will be marked as a 0% fail.
Your assessment can be submitted as a single Word (MS Word) or PDF file, or, as multiple files. If you chose to submit multiple files, you must name each document as the question/part you are answering along with your student number ie Q1 Section A STUXXXX. If you wish to overwrite your submission or one of your submissions, you must ensure that your new submission is named exactly the same as the previous in order for the system to overwrite it.
You must ensure that the submitted assignment is all your own work and that all sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assignments which show evidence of academic unfair practice. (See the Student Handbook which is available on the A-Z key information on iLearn.)
| Grade | Mark Bands | Generic Assessment Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Distinction | 80%+ | Outstanding analysis of key issues and concepts/ outstanding development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Outstanding research skills, independence of thought, an extremely high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, exceptional expressive / professional skills, and outstanding creativity and originality. Outstanding academic/intellectual skills. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and demonstrates an awareness of relevant ethical considerations. Work may be considered for publication by Arden University. |
| Distinction | 70–79% | Excellent analysis of key issues and concepts/ excellent development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Excellent research skills, independence of thought, an extremely high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, exceptional expressive / professional skills, and substantial creativity and originality. Excellent academic/intellectual skills. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and demonstrates an awareness of relevant ethical considerations. Work may be considered for publication by Arden University. |
| Merit | 60–69% | Very good level of competence demonstrated. High level of theory application. Very good analysis of key issues and concepts. Development of conceptual structures and argument making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Some evidence of original thought and a general awareness of relevant ethical considerations. |
| Pass | 55–59% | A good performance. A good knowledge of key issues and concepts. Fairly descriptive, with some analysis of existing scholarly material, and some argument development. Limited evidence of original thought. Some awareness of relevant ethical considerations. Good professional skills (where appropriate). |
| Pass | 50–54% | A satisfactory performance. Basic knowledge of key issues and concepts. Generally descriptive, with restricted analysis of existing scholarly material and little argument development. Use of scholarly conventions inconsistent. The work lacks original thought. Limited awareness of relevant ethical considerations. Satisfactory professional skills (where appropriate). |
| Marginal fail | 40–49% | Limited research skills impede use of learning resources and problem solving. Significant problems with structure/accuracy in expression. Very weak academic / intellectual / professional skills. Limited use of scholarly conventions. Errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. |
| Clear fail | 39% and below | A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in knowledge and understanding, underpinning theory and ethical considerations. Little evidence of research skills, use of learning resources and problem solving. Major problems with structure/accuracy in expression. Professional skills not present. Very weak academic / intellectual / professional skills. No evidence of use of scholarly conventions. |
Achieve Higher Grades of DAT7002 Data Visualisation and Interpretation Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentMany students finding help with DAT7002 Data Visualisation and Interpretation Assignment often struggle to understand the requirements and structure. Getting the right support can make the work easier and improve grades. Our Online Assignment Help UK service provides clear guidance, research support, and well-structured content prepared by experienced academic writers. Students studying at arden university can also explore useful Arden University Assignment Samples Examples to understand formatting, referencing, and writing style. These samples help learners build strong academic skills and complete their assignments with confidence and better understanding.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content