OFFERS!
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Computer Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Arden University (AU) | Module Title | COM3005NFC Introducing Research Skills |
As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit a Introducing Research Skills assignment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments.
After completing the module, you should be able to:
1. Describe and present information from given data
2. Understand how to plan research on a given topic
3. Collate, structure, present and use information from data
4. Be able to utilise this information to inform own writing
Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in AU Harvard system(s). You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.
You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.
Maximum word count: 3000 words
Please refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework
Please note the following:
Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment.
The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (including in text citations and references). The word count excludes numerical data in tables, figures, diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices. ALL other printed words ARE included in the word count.
Please note that exceeding the word count by over 10% will result in a 10-percentage point deduction.
As part of the formal assessment for Introducing Research Skills, you are required to submit a Portfolio (with a series of completed tasks) demonstrating that you have met the learning outcomes for this module.
| Formative Draft | Portfolio Submission |
|---|---|
| In Week 6, you will have the opportunity to submit a draft of task 1 and 2 of your portfolio. | This portfolio submission will evidence how you have met the module learning outcomes. |
| We will give you feedback on your draft in class in Week 7. | Your portfolio should include the following: |
| You can submit your draft to the Turnitin link on the module iLearn. | ✓ Portfolio Task 1 - Summarise the academic background to your chosen research topic (500 words) (LO1; LO3; LO4) |
| Feedback: You will receive feedback from your lecturer on your draft in class, and you will use this feedback to improve your final portfolio submission. | ✓ Portfolio Task 2 - Formulate a research question (300 words) (LO2) |
| ✓ Portfolio Task 3 - Describe your research methodology (400 words) (LO1; LO2; LO3; LO4) | |
| ✓ Portfolio Task 4 - Reference list (no word count) (LO1) | |
| ✓ Portfolio Task 5 - Using feedback to improve your work (200 words) (LO4) |
For this assignment, imagine you are a researcher, specialising in one of the research topics below:
The criminal justice system
You have the chance to apply for a grant to continue your research. However, to apply for
the grant, you have to put together a mini research proposal. The mini- proposal will explain what your research question is, and how you will go about answering your question.
To complete your mini research proposal, you will complete these five short tasks.
Search the university library database for at least three relevant book chapters (perhaps from undergraduate textbooks) about your subject. From your reading, what have you found out about your research topic? Summarise these key ideas in your own words and provide in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your mini proposal.
Explain to the people giving the grant how you would go about your research. You should consider the following points:
Include a statement explaining why this research should receive a grant - who will it help, and why?
Would your research project collect primary data or analyse secondary data? Which research approach (qualitative or quantitative) would best help you to answer your research question? Give reasons for your choice.
Include a reference list of all sources referred to in your portfolio. Refer to the Arden University Referencing and Avoiding Plagiarism webpage
(https://library.arden.ac.uk/referencing-and-avoiding-plagiarism) to help you format your
references correctly.
Write 200 words on how you have used the feedback on your formative draft (see below) to improve your final portfolio. You could discuss your choice of sources, the suitability of your research question, your writing style, the accuracy of your referencing, or anything else that is suggested by your lecturer. Please note you do not need to include your formative draft.
In Week 6, you will have the opportunity to submit a draft of task 1 and 2 of your portfolio. We will give you feedback on your draft in class in Week 7.
Please use this feedback to help you improve your portfolio and discuss the improvements you have made in Task 5 (see above).
If you do not submit the formative draft, it could affect your grade, as you will be unable to complete Task 5, so please ensure that you submit it by the given deadline.
You MUST underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate and wide ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the AU Harvard system(s).
Follow this link to find the referencing guides for your subject: Arden Library
Assignments submitted late will not be accepted and will be marked as a 0% fail.
Your assessment can be submitted as a single Word (MS Word) or PDF file, or, as multiple files.
If you chose to submit multiple files, you must name each document as the question/part you are answering along with your student number ie Q1 Section A STUXXXX. If you wish to overwrite your submission or one of your submissions, you must ensure that your new submission is named exactly the same as the previous in order for the system to overwrite it.
You must ensure that the submitted assignment is all your own work and that all sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assignments which show evidence of academic unfair practice. (See the Student Handbook which is available on the A-Z key information on iLearn.)
| Criteria based on Module Learning Outcomes | Good Pass | Bare Pass | Refer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge and Understanding | A comprehensive understanding is shown by the student with detailed knowledge of key concepts and ideas. A very good grasp of the subject, demonstrated through some in-depth responses. Learning outcomes have been met. A thorough answer to all the questions. Accurate answers given to the questions. | The student shows a basic knowledge of the subject. Some understanding and awareness of key concepts and ideas, questions and content. Addresses core aspects of questions at a basic level. Learning Outcomes have been met. | Fails to demonstrate very basic knowledge of the content. Lack of understanding of key concepts and ideas. No understanding or a faulty understanding of the questions. No content or irrelevant content. Fails to address all the important aspects of the questions. Learning Outcomes are not met. |
| The Argument | Well-articulated arguments supported with evidence and relevant examples. | A basic argument is attempted that is largely descriptive, with some attempt to connect core ideas and concepts. Remains descriptive. The argument is weak and difficult to direct. | Lacks an attempt at making a clear argument. Lacks connections between core ideas and concepts. |
| Research and Evidence | Demonstrates a good level of wider relevant reading, based on ability to locate and search for different sources of information. Ability to retrieve and engage with different materials. A variety of relevant sources have been referenced and AU Harvard referencing is followed throughout. | Some engagement with relevant research or other sources. Few signs of research. Limited referencing but with some adherence to AU Harvard referencing convention. A few sources have been used. | Lack of engagement with relevant research or other sources of knowledge. No evidence of research. No, or very few references used. Harvard referencing not used. No references used. No sources included. |
| Structure, Presentation | A well organised structure that communicates ideas very clearly. | A basic satisfactory structure is used to communicate ideas with some clarity and ability to present the work. | Lack of coherent structure of assignment. Ineffective communication of ideas. |
| Clarity of Writing and Communication of Ideas | Clear, concise, and accurate spelling and grammar writing throughout. | Some significant grammatical and spelling errors. | Unclear expressions. Significant grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate and incoherent writing. |
Get Answer of COM3005NFC Introducing Research Skills Assignment
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentDon’t let your COM3005NFC Introducing Research Skills assignment stress you out! We are here for assignment help. Our expert writers are here to support you with affordable, AI-free, and plagiarism-free computer science assignment help. We ensure well-researched, high-quality content. We offer free assignment samples and always deliver your work before the deadline. Reach out today and get the best support for your assignments—quick, easy, and reliable!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
