Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Asia Pacific International College | Module Title | BUS5002 Applied Accounting and Financial Management |
| APIC ASIA PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE | |||||
| Assessment Brief: BUS5002 Applied Accounting and Financial Management Trimester -2 2025-26 |
|||||
| Assessment Overview | |||||
| Assessment Task | Type | Weight | Length | Due | ULOs Assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment 1: Simulation Strategy (Collaborative discussion and individual plan) These contributions to the discussion forums focus on the understanding of the contents and issues relevant to the first five modules covered in this unit. In the process, students are required to actively participate in the discussion threads for the Weeks 1 - 5. |
Individual | 25% | 1500 words | Week 3 | ULO1 ULO3 |
| Assessment 2: Simulation (group assessment) This assessment focuses on your ability to read, interpret, and analyse financial statements. The task primarily requires creating and evaluating relevant financial ratios, identifying the strengths and weaknesses in the business and proposing strategies for future improvements. |
Group | 40% | 4000 words | Week 4 - 10 | ULO2 ULO4 |
| 3. Reflection - Presentation (Individual) Students will prepare an audio-visual reflection of the learnings from their experience. The focus will be on the decision processes they went through not the decisions themselves or the financial outcomes. |
Individual Invigilated |
35% | 15 mins (equiv. 1500 words) | Week 11 | ULO3 ULO4 |
| Due date: | Weeks 3 and 5 |
| Group/individual: | Collaborative discussion and individual plan |
| Word count/Time provided: | 1500 words (± 10%) |
| Weighting: | 25% |
| Unit Learning Outcomes: | ULO1, ULO3 |
You are expected to draw upon written material and required readings. However, to stand out, your contributions should be a synthesis of sources (i.e. one source is not enough). You should analyse questions from various lenses as necessary for instance, based on definitions, accounting principles, reporting regulations, research, examples (may include real life ones) or other possible sources. In your arguments, correct terminology and coherent expression should be interwoven throughout. Finally, it should be a synthesis of various sources, overlaid with your own view.
This assignment also assesses you for your overall participation in the discussion forums and the quality of interaction with other students. This is a perfect opportunity of communicating your point of view or strategies while being receptive, respectful and polite to various other possible opinions.
This assessment is further divided into part A and part B due at the end of weeks 3 & 5 respectively. Each descriptive question must be answered in 400 (+/- 10%) words. The part b) in Week – 5 is a numerical question and the word limit does not apply. The questions are as follows:
Week – 3
a) ‘The accounting process and the reporting requirements must be the same for a small family-owned milk bar and a listed company’. Do you agree with this statement?
b) ‘Ensuring that the accounting equation is strictly followed while recording all the business transactions guarantees the accuracy of the financial data recorded and reported in the financial statements.’ Discuss to validity of the statement.
Week – 5
a) ‘All costs are classified as Expense, recorded in the Income Statement and affect overall Equity of the business adversely.’ Discuss the statement.
The following information provides details of some of the activities of Ms Brown for the month of October 2020.
Ms Brown’s accountant has advised her to maintain a monthly reporting system using the accrual accounting basis. You must identify and record the relevant business transactions in the workbook format using the accounting equation. You may create meaningful accounts names as you need. Provide your assumptions if you make any.
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HD | D | C | P | N | ||
| Criterion 1 Critical Analysis (including an understanding of readings and outside references) |
Discussion postings display an excellent understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts, including correct use of terminology. Postings integrate an outside resource, or relevant research, or specific real-life application (work experience, prior coursework, etc.) to support important points. Well-edited quotes are cited appropriately. No more than 10% of the posting is a direct quotation. | Discussion postings display a good understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology. Postings integrate an outside resource, or relevant research to support important points. Well-edited quotes are cited appropriately. | Discussion postings display an understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology and proper citation. | Discussion postings repeat and summarise basic, correct information, but do not link readings to outside references, relevant research or specific real-life application and do not consider alternative perspectives or connections between ideas. Sources are not cited. | Discussion postings show little or no evidence that readings were completed or understood. Postings are largely personal opinions or feelings, or "I agree" or "Great idea", without supporting statements with concepts from the readings, outside resources, relevant research, or specific real-life application. | 12.0 |
| 12.0 to >9.59 pts | 9.59 to >8.39 pts | 8.39 to >7.19 pts | 7.19 to >5.99 pts | 5.99 to >0 pts | 12.0 | |
| Criterion 2 Quality of Writing, Proofreading and referencing | Elegant use of formal business English. Concise and precise writing. Error-free sentence-level grammar and punctuation; broad and fluent range of vocabulary. Correct use of business terms. Correct spelling. Perfect author-date referencing | Proficient use of formal business English. Concise and precise writing. Error-free sentence-level grammar; broad and fluent range of vocabulary. Correct use of business terms. Correct spelling. Near perfect referencing. | Proficient use of formal business English. Broad and fluent range of vocabulary. Correct use of business terms. Occasional spelling mistake. Occasional errors in grammar and punctuation. Occasional wordiness. Some errors in referencing | Limited range of vocabulary. Correct use of business terms. Several errors in spelling, grammar and. punctuation. Writing lacks precision and formality. Many errors in referencing. | Attempts at simple sentences often not successful; many grammatical errors; simple vocabulary, often inappropriately used; no attempt to use business terms; wordiness and lack of formality throughout. Missing referencing | |
| Due date: | Weeks 7 |
|---|---|
| Group/individual: | Group |
| Word count/Time provided: | 4000 words |
| Weighting: | 40% |
| Unit Learning Outcomes: | ULO2, ULO4 |
You are required to study the annual reports of a CSL company over the past three years and present your findings in a business report format. Your business report should evaluate the relative financial performance of the company based on the financial analysis results and propose strategies for future improvements. You are expected to draw upon written material and required readings. The financial analysis should be conducted using skills and techniques learned in this course. You are required to:
When interpreting the financial ratios, you are required to compare the ratios with various benchmarks such as prior years, the competitors and the industry averages. Please present your detailed calculations in an appendix. If you carry out your calculations using an Excel workbook (highly recommended), please copy and paste key excerpts in your appendix. Please also upload your Excel workbook for the course facilitator.
While discussing your analysis, correct terminology and coherent expression should be interwoven throughout. Finally, it should be a synthesis of various relevant financial ratios and their interpretation, overlaid with your own view of the overall health of the business followed by your recommendations.
The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HD | D | C | P | N | ||
| Criterion 1 Development of analysis ratios/tools and graphs (15%) |
The appropriate analysis ratios/tools and graphs are fully developed. | The appropriate analysis ratios/tools and graphs are mostly correctly developed. | The appropriate analysis ratios/tools and graphs are reasonably developed. | The appropriate analysis ratios/tools and graphs are somewhat correctly developed. | The analysis ratios/tools and graphs are not correctly developed. | 6.0 |
| 6 to >5.04 pts | 5.04 to >4.44 pts | 4.44 to >3.84 pts | 3.84 to >2.94 pts | 2.94 to >0 pts | ||
| Criterion 2 Quality of financial analysis (50%) |
Correct interpretation of the financial performance of the company. There is an excellent attempt to analyse the companies using benchmarks and various tools and offer in-depth insight. | The interpretation of the financial performance of the company is mostly correct. There is a good attempt to analyse the companies using benchmarks and various tools and offer in-depth insight. | Make some mistakes in the interpretation of the financial performance of the company. There is a reasonable attempt to analyse the companies using benchmarks and various tools and offer in-depth insight. | Make several mistakes in the interpretation of the financial performance of the company. There is a weak attempt to analyse the companies using benchmarks and various tools and offer in-depth insight. | Make many mistakes in the interpretation of the financial performance of the company. The financial analysis is insufficient or superficial. | |
| 20 to >16.80 pts | 16.80 to >14.80 pts | 14.80 to >12.80 pts | 12.80 to >9.80 pts | 9.80 to >0 pts | 20.0 | |
| Criterion 3 Conclusion and suggestions (15%) |
Consistently draws accurate conclusions on the strengths and weaknesses of the company and give persuasive suggestions. | There is a good attempt to draw accurate conclusions on the strengths and weaknesses of the company and give possible suggestions. | There is a reasonable attempt to draw accurate conclusions on the strengths and weaknesses of the company and give possible suggestions. | There is a weak attempt to draw accurate conclusions on the strengths and weaknesses of the company and give possible suggestions. | Does not draw an accurate conclusion on the strengths and weaknesses of the company and give possible suggestions. | |
| 6 to >5.04 pts | 5.04 to >4.44 pts | 4.44 to >3.84 pts | 3.84 to >2.94 pts | 2.94 to >0 pts | 6.0 | |
| Criterion 4 Quality of business writing (20%) |
Elegant use of formal business English. Concise and precise writing. Error-free sentence-level grammar; broad punctuation; broad and fluent range of vocabulary. Correct use of business terms. Correct spelling. | Proficient use of formal business English. Concise and precise writing. Error-free sentence-level grammar; broad and fluent range of vocabulary. Correct use of business terms. Correct spelling. | Proficient use of formal business English. Broad and fluent range of vocabulary. Correct use of business terms. Occasional spelling mistake. Occasional errors in grammar and punctuation. Occasional wordiness. | Limited range of vocabulary. Correct use of business terms. Several errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing lacks precision and formality. | Attempts at simple sentences often not successful; many grammatical errors; simple vocabulary, often inappropriately used; no attempt to use business terms; wordiness and lack of formality throughout. | |
| 8 to >6.72 pts | 6.72 to >5.92 pts | 5.92 to >5.12 pts | 5.12 to >3.92 pts | 3.92 to >0 pts | 8.0 |
| Due date: | Week 11 |
| Group/individual: | Individual |
| Word count/Time provided: | 15 minutes, 1500 words |
| Weighting: | 35% |
| Unit Learning Outcomes: | ULO3, ULO4 |
ABC Pty Ltd intends to form a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to be incorporated in Australia. This will involve building new water treatment facilities. ABC Pty Ltd intends to undertake the development of the proposed water treatment facilities through a project financing approach. The constructed facilities will be used as the business solution in providing clean water solutions to the local community.
The following are some of the in-principle agreements with the various parties after much negotiation:
1. The project is to be developed using a BOT arrangement where WaterSolution will finance and build, operate and transfer the facilities back to the state government at the end of 20 years.
2. There are three off-take agreements:
a. to sell CallWater Pty Ltd 450,000 cubic litre of treated water per day at a fixed price of $0.025 per cubic litre. This agreement will expire at the end of 20 years. The contract allows for the price to increase by 7% per annum.
b. to sell APWater Limited 550,000 cubic litre of treated water per day at a fixed price of $0.020 per cubic litre. This agreement will expire at the end of 20 years. The contract allows for the price to increase by 10% per annum.
c. to sell Nuwater Pty Ltd 600,000 cubic litre of treated water per day at a fixed price of $0.030 per cubic litre. This agreement will expire at end of 20 years. The contract allows for the price to increase by 5% per annum.
3. The capital expenditure (include construction cost plus all relevant professional fees, insurance) is estimated at $85,000,000 incurred at year 0.
4. WaterSolution has an agreement to buy untreated water 1,600,000 cubic litre from DirtyWater Ltd at the price of $0.012 per cubic litre. The price of untreated water will increase by 3% per annum.
5. The annual operation cost (starting from year 1) is estimated to be as follows: - Management fees $350,000 per annum with an increase of 10% per annum - Maintenance works $600,000 per annum with an increase of 10% per annum - Insurance cost $150,000 per annum with an increase of 5% per annum - Miscellaneous cost is fixed at $100,000 per annum Also, assume the following: 1. Current interest-free rate (based on Government bond) is 3.5%
Boost your academic performance with expert support for BUS5002 Applied Accounting & Financial Management Assessment at Asia Pacific International College (APIC). Our professional service offers high-quality Accounting Assignment Help tailored to your needs, ensuring clarity in financial concepts and practical application. Students seeking Australia Assignment Help can rely on our experienced writers for accurate and timely solutions. Explore our Free List of Assignment Samples Answers to understand structure and improve your submissions. Achieve better grades with reliable, affordable, and student-focused academic assistance designed to simplify complex accounting topics.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content