Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
---|---|---|---|
University | The University Of Law (UoL) | Module Title | BS254 Success Through Business Ethics |
Word Count | 2500 Words |
---|---|
Assessment Title | Individual written report |
Academic Year | 2025-26 |
Submission deadline: | Thursday 02 October 2025, no later than 16:30 (UK local time) |
Level: | 7 |
Students are expected to use Harvard Referencing throughout their assignments where required. Please follow the Harvard Referencing Handbook for all your assignments at the ULBS.
Submission Method: Turnitin - Your work will be put through Turnitin. All submissions will be electronically checked for similarity and the use of AI software.
You have the option to upload your work ahead of the deadline, more than once. ULBS will be reviewing your last submission only. You can only upload one file. For example, if your work contains a word document and power point slides/Excel spreadsheet you will need to copy your slides/spreadsheet into the word document.
The ULBS Assessment Office are here to help should you have any non-academic questions related to your assessments. You can contact them at assessmentoffice@law.ac.uk
Students are required to choose a FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) brand that fulfils the below criteria:
Students can use the following sources to assist in identifying a FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) brand to focus on:
-Global Growth Insights (2025). Top Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Companies in Global 2025. Online at: https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/blog/fast-moving-consumer-goods-fmcg-companies-663 [Accessed 17/04/2025]
-Consultancy.uk (2018). The 50 largest FMCG/ consumer goods companies. Online at: https://www.consultancy.uk/news/18765/the-50-largest-fmcg-consumer-goods-companies-in-the-world [Accessed 15/04/2025]
The word limit of the individual report is 2500 words.
For guidance, suggested word count for each section has been included below:
Buy Answer of BS254 Individual Report Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Request to Buy Answer
GRADE DESCRIPTORS
MARKING CRITERIA |
Mark Weight |
FAIL (0 - 49%) |
PASS (50 – 59%) |
COMMENDATION (60 – 69%) |
DISTINCTION (70-100%)
|
|
|
Exhibits an unsatisfactory grasp of the issues. Primarily descriptive and lacking in independent critical thought. Weak or no attempt at analysis, synthesis and critical reflection. Little evidence of ability to tackle the issues. Poor structure/grammar/ |
Satisfactory grasp of the issues, with limited independent critical thought appropriate to the tasks. Material is largely relevant to the tasks. Some evidence of analysis, synthesis and critical reflection. Work is presented in acceptable manner, with some minor errors. |
Good/very good understanding of the issue with some independent critical thought and approach to the tasks. Good attempt at analysis, synthesis and critical reflection, with evidence of some ability to tackle issues. Work is clearly presented in a fairly well organised manner. |
Excellent level of understanding. All requirements are dealt with to a high standard. Excellent analysis, synthesis and critical reflection. Evidence of independent and original judgement in relation to resolution of problems Excellently presented. |
Introductory section including: - Front Page/ Cover Sheet with all necessary course and module information - Table of Contents that is well-structured - Introduction section that explain the nature of business ethics citing academic references (Around 100 words). - Identify and introduce your brand that has been found to have been involved in unethical business practices and explain briefly, what these unethical business practices were (Around 250 words, LO3). - Reference list following the Harvard style of referencing for both in-text referencing (inside the report) as well as for reference list at the end. Also organise the list in alphabetical order. |
15 |
|
|
|
|
- Choose three of the normative ethical theories and critically explain their key principles. - Evaluate if the company adhered to or violated those ethical theories, that led to the identified unethical behaviours/scandal. (Around 900 words, LO1 and LO5). |
30 |
|
|
|
|
- Explain the theoretical aspect of the ethical decision making or social accounting. - Then critically apply the ethical decision making or social accounting theory on the chosen brand’s unethical business practices. (Around 500 words, LO2). |
20 |
|
|
|
|
- Critically explain the theoretical aspects and then evaluate the leadership style of the company. - Analyse how the leaders responded to the unethical business practices. (Around 450 words, LO4). |
15 |
|
|
|
|
Conclusions and Recommendations: - Conclusions that summarises the report and draws on the key aspects found through the analysis in the report (Around 100 words). - Provide two most important recommendations for the brand that are detailed and derived from the unethical practices that have been analysed in the report. (Around 300 words). |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Order Custom Answers for your BS254 Individual Report Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentGet expert assignment help for BS254 Success Through Business Ethics Report Assignment? We specialize in offering high-quality Business Management Assignment Help, with an option for students to pay our experts to take on their assignment challenges. Need a reference? We also provide a free list of assignment examples to help you get started. With years of experience, our writers deliver 100% plagiarism-free content and offer unlimited revisions to meet your needs. Trust us to help you excel in your studies!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content