Category | Assignment | Subject | Science |
---|---|---|---|
University | Birmingham City University | Module Title | BMS4005 Introduction into Microbiology |
Assessment Type | Lab Report\ Group Poster |
---|---|
Academic Year | 2024-25 |
Assessment(s) |
Category |
Type |
Scope |
1 |
Coursework |
Lab Report |
750 words |
2 |
In-Person |
Group Poster |
20 minutes |
Coursework – Lab Report
Weighting 60%
Submission Date: Monday, 07th April 2025 at 3:00 pm
Submission Details
Please upload a copy of your coursework to Moodle for plagiarism checking
Feedback: You will receive feedback on your assignment via Moodle.
Submissions handed in between 1 and 24 hours late will be penalised by 5%.
Work handed in up to 5 working days after the deadline will be penalised by 10%.
Work handed in more than 5 working days after the deadline: the work will be awarded zero
Assessment Title: Identification of an unknown organism
Assessment Task: This assessment addresses the following
During the lab sessions, you performed a series of tests on an unknown organism. This exercise aimed to introduce you to some of the many tests we can perform on microorganisms to help us identify and characterise them. These tests also introduced you to the wide differences in the properties of different microorganisms. To help you interpret some of the tests, you were also provided with examples of positive and negative control organisms.
This exercise aims to identify an unknown organism using a series of tests that have been performed in the lab.
When writing your report, remember to include your student ID on the front page, but not your name. This assessment is subject to anonymous marking.
Workshops will take place where you will have the opportunity to use laptops to begin seeking information and planning your assignment. Members of staff will be available to offer guidance and advice. Please attend the session assigned to you in your timetable
1. Research: You will receive guidance in workshops on which reference material is most appropriate to use. Much of the information that you need to answer the questions / complete your assignment can be found in textbooks in the library. Websites contain very good sources of material; however, some are better than others, and ensuring that the information that you use is from reputable sources is vital. Research articles and reviews report on the most recent findings in the scientific field. You will be provided with brief guidance on how to access these sources of material, and although you do not necessarily need to use them for this assignment, you will need to use them for future assessments as you progress through the course.
2. Referencing: Accurately referencing the information sources that you have used in your work is essential and is a significant component of this assessment. This was covered in Semester 1 (Essential Skills module); however, you will receive brief instruction on how to do this, following the BCU Harvard referencing style, and there will be examples in the Help Guide.
3. Academic Writing: This was covered in Semester 1; however, you will receive brief instruction on how to write in clear, scientific English and how to avoid writing in a conversational style. You will also receive guidance on how to correctly paraphrase and combine the information that you have gathered to structure your arguments.
4. Plagiarism and Artificial Intelligence: During workshops you will receive instruction and guidance on how to avoid plagiarism. You will also discuss the use of A.I. to understand how this can help in your assignments, but also critically, to understand how and where you are permitted to use A.I. in your work.
To help you compile this section, space has been provided for each test, giving guidance on the information we would like you to provide/consider. To complete each section, you must:
Seek information on each test that you performed to find out how and why they work, and what they tell us about the organisms.
A table with biochemical results will be provided to aid your investigation
Research each of the organisms listed below.
For some organisms, you may struggle to find information for a particular test. Where this happens, concentrate on other tests and use logical deduction to eliminate as many choices as possible.
Complete as much of this table as possible using the information you find during your research, and see which organism is the closest match to your unknown organism.
Carefully explain how you arrive at your decision regarding the most likely identity of your unknown organism.
Space has been set aside for each section to give you an idea of how much information you should include in your answers. If you need more room to complete your answers, you may continue writing, but keep the information relevant and concise.
The key to solving this challenge is research. Your organism will be from the following list (organisms may be subject to change)
Escherichia coli |
Proteus vulgaris |
Staphylococcus epidermidis |
Raoultella planticola |
Enterococcus faecalis |
Clostridium perfinges |
Bacillus cereus |
Bacillus subtilis |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Micrococcus luteus |
You will be assessed on how accurately you describe the tests, explain/interpret the outcome of each test and your conclusions. Once you have completed the table below, described and discussed each test and explained what organism you were given, answer the questions that follow. As this assessment requires significant amounts of research, you must include correctly formatted citations and references in the report.
References should ideally be taken from textbooks or scientific journals / reviews. You may also use respectable internet resources such as government websites and scientific organisations e.g. the CDC (Centres for Disease Control in the US), HPE (Health Protection England) and company websites where information relating to microbiological media may be found. Do Not Use Blogs or Other Non non-scientific resources, as the information May Be Inaccurate. Do Not Use Lecture Notes As a Reference for information used
Do You Need BMS4005 Assignment of This Question
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentTotal marks available: 80
Code of unknown organism:………………………………
Test |
Unknown organism: |
Escherichia coli |
Staphylococcus epidermidis |
Enterococcus faecalis |
Bacillus cereus |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Proteus vulgaris |
Raoultella planticola |
Clostridium perfinges |
Bacillus subtilis |
Micrococcus luteus |
Gram stain (+ / -) |
|
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Cell shape (rod R / coccus C) |
|
R |
C |
C |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
C |
Aerobic/facultative anaerobe/anaerobe (A/F/An) |
|
F |
F |
F |
F |
A |
F |
F |
An |
A |
F |
Motility (+/-) |
|
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
Oxidase (+/-) |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Var |
N |
Catalase (+/-) |
|
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
Spores (+/-) |
|
N |
N |
N |
Y |
N |
N |
- |
Y |
Y |
N |
Indole (+/-) |
|
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Acid (+/-) and Gas production (+/-) |
|
-/+ |
+/+ |
*-/- |
+/- |
+/- |
+/+ |
+/+ |
Var |
+/- |
+/+ |
H2S production (+/-) |
|
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+/- |
- |
- |
Urease (+/-) |
|
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Colonial morphology (2 Marks)
Gram stain (Total marks 10)
Spore stain (Total 6 marks)
Aerobicity (Total Marks 3)
Motility (Total marks 2)
Reduction of sodium thiosulfate and production of hydrogen sulphide (Total marks 5)
Indole test (Total marks 5) (Refer to SIM tube after Kovac’s reagent has been added)
Carbohydrate Fermentation test (CFT) (Total marks 5)
Urease production (Total marks 5)
Oxidase test (Total marks 6)
Catalase test (6marks)
Conclusion Part 1: (Total Marks 10)
Conclusion Part 2: (Total Marks 10)
What other relevant tests could you do to identify the unknown organism. Provide 2 examples and mechanisms of the tests
References (Including in-text citations and quality of sources, Formatting, Grammer) (5 marks)
Pre Labs and Workshops will take place where you will have the opportunity to experience various tests and organisms. In the workshops you will have an opportunity to go through the explanations of the tests and material to answer the questions the brief has stated. Members of staff will be available to offer guidance and advice. Please attend the session assigned to you in your timetable
In-Person Group Poster
Weighting 40%
Submission Date: Monday, 12h May 2025 at 15:00
Poster Presentation: The week of 12th May 2025 – Times and dates to follow
Assessment Title: Group Presentation of poster: Design and name your pathogen
Assessment Task This assessment addresses the following
Times for presentations will be given out closer to the time
The aim of this exercise is to develop your knowledge and understanding about the different strategies that pathogenic microorganisms have evolved to circumvent the body’s defences and how they cause damage to the host. To accomplish this, you must design your own pathogen using information that you have learned through research in journals and textbooks. Avoid using poor-quality, non-peer reviewed web sites to seek information for your poster.
To design your pathogen, you must firstly decide which part of the body your pathogen will infect and then undertake research on the pathogens that are already known to affect that area. For example, if you wished to design a pathogen that affects joints, you will need to find out about the pathogens that are already known to affect joints and find out what special adaptations they have evolved to assist them during infection. You should also give your pathogen a binomial (latin) name (e.g. Escherichia coli). Often, the species names of organisms give some clue to their properties such as Clostridium tetani causes tetanus, Vibrio cholerae causes cholera, Corynebacterium glutamicum produces large quantities of glutamic acid that can be produced industrially in large fermenters etc.
Remember to Write Bacterial Names in Intalics The Genus Starts with a capital latter The Species Starts with a small Letter.
Presentation of your work will be in the form of a poster and instructions for how to design the poster are below.
Posters are intended to convey information very quickly, so that the reader may get the important message without having to read large amounts of text. Posters feature heavily in many research conferences because delegates can quickly find out about different projects in a short time and may then talk with the authors of the posters to get more detail about the project. To encourage other people to read your poster, please follow the following:
You should use journals and text books to source the information that you need to prepare the poster. You may use figures from the Internet that help to illustrate any points you wish to make but you must always reference (and cite) them. You may also use official websites belonging to government or state-run institutions such as WHO, European Centres for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Public Health England (PHE), the Centres for Disease Control in the U.S. etc. Do not use material from non-official websites containing unverified information e.g. Wikipedia (anyone can edit the content of these websites!).
Deadline for handing-in poster: 15:00 pm Monday 12th May 2025
Please upload a copy of your coursework onto BMS4005 Moodle page for plagiarism checking.
Please note, Times for presentations will be emailed.
Failure to upload, may result in an automatic fail
All members must sign and date the sections they have contributed too, this must be uploaded with the poster
Note, only one member of the group, needs to upload the poster and the form with all signatures
For group assessments, anything submitted more than 1-hour late is not accepted for marking
This is an in-person assessment, and you must present your work in order to recieve a mark
Workshops will take place where you will have the opportunity to use laptops to begin seeking information and planning your poster. Members of staff will be available to offer guidance and advice. Please attend the session assigned to you in your timetable
This level descriptor describes what is required for a student to pass at the minimum threshold of this academic level.
Students will have a narrow but competent knowledge base of key course themes and will be able to communicate/present ideas accurately in a logical manner. They will be able to apply the principles of critical thinking to evaluate key course themes to formulate sound and valid conclusions. With support of module teams, students will be able to recognise the relevance, be able to search and access key texts and use this literature to communicate knowledge to their area of study.
Marking Criteria |
Marking Rubric |
||||||
Criterion 1 (20) |
0-19% Fail |
20-39% Fail |
40-49% |
50-59% |
60-69% |
70-79% |
80-100% |
Does not address the assignment brief. |
Addresses the Assignment Brief. |
||||||
Structure, Organisation, and Communication of Ideas. |
Very poor structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
An insufficient interaction that does not communicate ideas.
Discussions and topics are not relevant or are incomplete, with all points communicated being difficult to follow.
No conclusions. |
Poor structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
An inadequate interaction that does not appropriately communicate ideas.
Discussions and topics are incomplete, and most of the points communicated are difficult to follow.
No appropriate conclusions. |
Satisfactory structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
An adequate interaction with weak communication of ideas.
Discussion and topics are complete and mostly relevant, but points are not always clearly communicated.
Conclusions connect superficially with the points made in the interaction providing no overall context. |
Good structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
A reasonable interaction with adequate communication of ideas.
Discussions and topics are complete, relevant, and points are clearly communicated.
Conclusions adequately connect with the points made in the interaction providing some overall context. |
Very good structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
A convincing interaction with reasonable communication of ideas.
Discussions and topics are complete, relevant and points are communicated with some logical order.
Conclusions connect with the points made in the interaction providing overall context. |
Excellent structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
A commanding interaction with credible communication of ideas.
Discussions and topics are complete, relevant, and points are communicated in a logical order.
Conclusions connect with and attempt synthesis of the points made in the interaction, providing overall context. |
Outstanding structure, organisation, and communication of ideas.
For example:
A sophisticated interaction with persuasive communication of ideas.
Discussions and topics are complete, relevant, and points are communicated in a logical order which aligns to the main argument.
Conclusions connect with and synthesise points made in the interaction and align to the main argument. |
Marking Criteria |
Marking Rubric |
||||||
Criterion 2 (35) |
0-19% Fail |
20-39% Fail |
40-49% |
50-59% |
60-69% |
70-79% |
80-100% |
Does not address the assignment brief. |
Addresses the Assignment Brief. |
||||||
Very poor demonstration of knowledge and understanding.
For example:
Does not demonstrate an any understanding of the subject area. |
Poor demonstration of knowledge and understanding.
For example:
Does not demonstrate an understanding of the subject area.
Works shows insufficient knowledge and understanding of key concepts and ideas.
Work contains misunderstandings and factual errors.
|
Satisfactory demonstration of knowledge and understanding.
For example:
Demonstrates a superficial understanding of the subject area.
Work shows a superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and ideas.
Work contains minimal misunderstandings and few factual errors. |
Good demonstration of knowledge and understanding.
For example:
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject area.
Work shows a basic knowledge and understanding of key concepts and ideas.
Work contains minimal misunderstandings, but no factual errors. |
Very good demonstration of knowledge and understanding.
For example:
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the subject area.
Work shows basic knowledge and a purposeful attempt at understanding key concepts and ideas.
Work contains no misunderstandings, and no factual errors. |
Excellent demonstration of knowledge and understanding.
For example:
Demonstrates a substantial understanding of the subject area.
Work shows substantial knowledge and a thorough attempt at understanding key concepts and ideas.
Work contains no misunderstandings, and no factual errors. |
Outstanding demonstration of knowledge and understanding.
For example:
Demonstrates extensive understanding of the subject area.
Work shows extensive knowledge and an effective and at times insightful understanding of key concepts and ideas.
Work contains no misunderstandings, and no factual errors. |
Marking Criteria |
Marking Rubric |
||||||
Criterion 3 (35) |
0-19% Fail |
20-39% Fail |
40-49% |
50-59% |
60-69% |
70-79% |
80-100% |
Does not address the assignment brief. |
Addresses the Assignment Brief. |
||||||
Application of Critical Thinking Principles. |
Very poor application of critical thinking principles.
For example:
Presents ideas as bullet points.
No evidence of reading.
Content is reduced to student viewpoints and opinions only.
No attempt at identifying strengths and weaknesses.
No attempt to draw conclusions.
|
Poor application of critical thinking principles.
For example:
Very descriptive.
Inadequate evidence of reading.
Content is reduced to mainly student viewpoints and opinions only.
Inadequate attempt at identifying strengths and weaknesses.
Inadequate attempt to draw conclusions.
|
Satisfactory application of critical thinking principles.
For example:
Some descriptive thinking evident.
Evidence of reading.
Content of sources are described, but no attempt to explain.
An attempt at identifying strengths and weaknesses.
An attempt to draw conclusions. |
Good application of critical thinking principles.
For example:
Consistent critical thinking.
Adequate evidence of reading.
Content of sources are described with an attempt to explain.
Adequate attempt at identifying strengths and weaknesses.
Adequate attempt to draw conclusions. |
Very good application of critical thinking principles.
For example:
Consistent critical thinking.
Engages with key reading.
Content of sources are explained, explored, and used to develop an appropriate academic discussion.
Considers different viewpoints and identifies strengths and weaknesses.
Draws conclusions. |
Excellent application of critical thinking principles.
For example:
Consistent critical thinking.
Engages with key and wider reading.
Content of sources are explained, explored, evaluated, and used to develop an academic discussion.
Considers different viewpoints and identifies strengths and weaknesses to create a coherent argument.
Draws informed conclusions. |
Outstanding application of critical thinking principles.
For example:
Constant critical thinking.
Engages with key and wider reading.
Content of sources are explained, explored, evaluated, and at times interpreted to develop an academic discussion.
Considers different viewpoints and identifies strengths and weaknesses to create a reasoned argument.
Draws informed and persuasive conclusions. |
Marking Criteria |
Marking Rubric |
||||||
Criterion 4 (10) |
0-19% Fail |
20-39% Fail |
40-49% |
50-59% |
60-69% |
70-79% |
80-100% |
Referencing and Citing of Sources to Support Work. |
Very poor referencing and citing of sources to support work.
For example:
No sources are cited.
No reference list provided. |
Poor referencing and citing of sources to support work.
For example:
Limited sources are cited.
A limited reference list provided.
No paraphrasing.
No key authors cited or referenced.
No engagement with module reading list.
Use of inappropriate sources – all websites.
Many sources are missing a citation or a reference list item.
Inaccurate use of the BCU Harvard referencing system. |
Satisfactory referencing and citing of sources to support work.
For example:
Sources are cited.
Reference list provided.
Attempts at paraphrasing.
Few key authors cited or referenced.
Little engagement with module reading list.
Moderate use of inappropriate sources.
Little variety in sources used.
Some sources are missing a citation or a reference list item.
Few inaccuracies when using the BCU Harvard referencing system. |
Good referencing and citing of sources to support work.
For example:
Sources are cited.
Reference list provided.
Paraphrasing demonstrates understanding of reading.
Key authors cited and referenced.
Engages with module reading list.
Some variety in sources used.
Majority sources have a citation and a reference list item.
Few inaccuracies when using the BCU Harvard referencing system. |
Very good referencing and citing of sources to support work.
For example:
Sources are cited.
Reference list provided.
Paraphrasing demonstrates accuracy of understanding the reading.
Key authors cited and referenced.
Engages with the module reading list with some wider reading.
All sources have a citation and a reference list item.
Few inaccuracies when using the BCU Harvard referencing system.
|
Excellent referencing and citing of sources to support work.
For example:
Sources are cited.
Reference list provided.
Paraphrasing demonstrates accuracy of understanding the reading.
Engages both key authors and some of the module reading list to develop and construct academic discussion.
Wider reading beyond the module reading list is evident.
All sources have a citation and a reference list item.
Few inaccuracies when using the BCU Harvard referencing system.
|
Outstanding referencing and citing of sources to support work.
For example:
Sources are cited.
Reference list provided.
Paraphrasing demonstrates accuracy of understanding the reading and integrated within the discussion.
Engages both the key authors and the specific sources from the module reading list to develop and construct persuasive academic discussion.
Wider and deeper reading is evident.
All sources have a citation, a reference list item, and is fully accurate using the BCU Harvard referencing system. |
Hire Experts to solve this assignment Before your Deadline
Buy Today,Contact UsDo you need help with an assignment for BMS4005 Introduction to Microbiology? Look no further! We are here for science assignment help. We also provide free assignment solutions written by PhD expert writers—100% original content, no plagiarism! Plus, we also provide assignment help, that too completed before the deadline. Quality and accuracy are taken care of completely. So contact us today and be stress-free!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content