Category | Assignment | Subject | Entrepreneurship |
---|---|---|---|
University | Bath Spa University | Module Title | BMA5000 Creativity for Business |
Word Count | 1000 words |
---|---|
Assessment Type | Group Presentation\8-12 minutes |
Assessment Title | Assignment 1 |
Deadline | 5th August 2025 |
This assessment provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate your problem-solving, creativity skills, and your understanding of creativity in the wider sense. Presentations will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams. This is in response to an increased need to develop skills in communicating in a virtual environment.
From Week 4 onwards (W/C 07/07), students should begin delivering presentations to align with the August 5th deadline.
In groups of approximately 3 to 5, you are required to give a presentation of between 8 and 12 minutes. Your presentation must cover the following:
Students are required to create their presentations using PowerPoint and must include the PowerPoint file in their submission. Failure to do so will result in a failing grade for this assignment
This guidance is numbered to correspond with the list of requirements above.
Note: You will receive a group mark. However, the module leader and seminar leaders reserve the right to amend an individual’s mark where there is sufficient evidence that they have not participated fully in the assessment, including failing them entirely where there is evidence of negligible engagement.
Struggling with assignments and feeling stressed?
Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment
Criterion |
Failed attempt 0-39% |
Satisfactory attempt 40-49% |
Sound attempt 50-59% |
Good attempt 60-69% |
Excellent attempt 70-84% |
Outstanding attempt 85-100% |
Analysis, solution and use of creativity techniques (Content) 30%
|
Complete lack of strategy or problem-solving techniques or, where employed, these are substantially incorrectly/ inaccurately used. No logical connection of analysis(es) to solution. |
No apparent (or recognised) strategy, but some recognisable problem-solving techniques employed, perhaps not entirely accurately. Some connection of analysis(es) to solution. |
Clear strategy used consistently; Techniques used accurately, in the main; Solution could naturally flow from analysis(es). |
Strategy tailored so it’s fit-for-purpose here; Techniques clearly link, with excellent logical ‘flow’ between them; Solution, in turn, ‘flows’ from analysis(es) and is sensible. |
Brief/some critical analysis/ explanation of strategy and/or techniques employed; Excellent use of techniques with few, if any, errors; Solution, and its logical basis, are highly persuasive. |
Outstanding use of (tailored) strategy, with highly appropriate technique choice, used immaculately to produce highly cogent, logical and persuasive solution; Critical approach throughout. |
Presentation format (delivery and presentation aids) 20% |
Presentation lacking clarity, cogency, structure. Length of presentation significantly over/under time. |
Comprehensible presentation, perhaps lacking in efficacy. Length within reasonable proximity to min./max. time. |
Use of aids in presentation, if required; Well-paced; Well-timed so max. fully utilised; finishing just under max. time. |
Original approach; Highly effective content/‘message’ delivery; Clearly conveyed structure, easily followed by audience. |
High-quality aids to presentation used (where appropriate); Good use of aids; Structure and flow followed by audience effortlessly throughout. |
Faultless presentation throughout engendering persuasiveness, cogency and engagement. |
General requirements
English 20% |
Much incomprehensible. Messy, gaudy presentation, and/or a lack of colour where this is required for clarity. |
Comprehensible. Written in third person. |
Minimal grammatical, spelling & syntax errors; Proper paragraphs; Some structure. |
No errors; Concisely written; Structure evident throughout. |
Varied, engaging prose; Structure evident to sentence-level & substantially aids clarity. |
Immaculate prose of publishable quality. |
Formatting/quality of presentation aids 15% |
Messy, gaudy presentation, and/or a lack of colour where this is required for clarity. |
Generally consistent styling with some errors. |
Good use made of headings/ presentation guides; Consistency applied to headers/footers, etc. |
Several ‘levels’ of heading using with clearly defined styles. |
‘Clean’, professional, consistent styling. |
Immaculate presentation akin to large corporates’ quality. |
Referencing 15 % |
Neither in-text or post-script list of references correct (in convention used and/or format). |
Either in-text or post-script list of references correct. References are traceable. |
Both forms substantially correct; List of references alphabetised. |
Referencing wholly correct; Multiple papers from single year dealt with correctly. |
Referencing doesn’t interfere with flow of prose. |
Immaculate referencing. |
Stuck on your BMA5000 Creativity for Business? Don't worry! Our Entrepreneurship Assignment Help service is the best for you. If you need help with assignments, our expert PhD writers will provide you with original content. And yes, you will also get free assignment samples, which will give you a perfect idea of how to write a top-quality assignment. Don't worry about the deadline, as we guarantee on-time delivery. Contact us now for high-quality and plagiarism-free work and boost your grades!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content