BMA4005-20 Assessment Brief 2 - Professional Practice PD Portfolio

Criterion

Fail 0-39%

Poor quality

D 40-49%

Satisfactory quality

C 50-59%

Sound quality

B 60-69%

Good quality

A 70-84%

Excellent quality

A+ 85-100%

Outstanding quality

Introduction

Inadequate or incomplete and of poor quality.

Adequately introducing the portfolio.

Soundly written and introducing the portfolio.

Very well written and introducing the portfolio.

Excellently written and introducing the portfolio.

Outstandingly written and introducing the portfolio

Employability assets

Unsatisfactorily profiled and didn’t sufficiently contribute to the portfolio. No or poor content on leadership and customer service.

Weakly profiled and passably contributed to the portfolio. Little or weak content on leadership and customer service.

Reasonably well profiled and satisfactorily contributed to the portfolio. Sound content on leadership and customer service.

Very well profiled and competently contributed to the portfolio. Very good content on leadership and customer service.

Excellently profiled and very pleasingly contributed to the portfolio. Strong content on leadership and customer service.

Outstandingly profiled and potently contributed to the portfolio. Very strong content on leadership and customer service.

Enclosures and appendices

These were incomplete, inadequate, or poorly selected.

These were satisfactory only. They could have been better chosen or presented.

These were reasonably well chosen and functionally contributed to the portfolio.

These were very well chosen and competently contributed to the portfolio.

These were excellently chosen and very pleasingly contributed to the portfolio.

These were outstandingly chosen and potently contributed to the portfolio.

Creativity

Little creativity evident. More thought was needed here.

Some creativity is evident, but it lacks interest for the reader.

Average in terms of creativity. Think about how you could make your portfolio stand apart from the rest.

Above average in terms of creativity. Thought applied to making your portfolio interesting for the reader.

Excellence is achieved in creativity. The portfolio had a wow factor for the reader.

An outstanding standard of creativity was achieved. An exceptionally creative portfolio.

Writes appropriately and consistently. Carefully proofread.

Incomprehensible or unclear writing. Errors evident.

Comprehensible and clear writing.

Generally, error-free.

Generally, a sound standard of written communication is achieved. Some minor errors.

A good standard of written communication achieved. Few errors.

Excellence achieved in written communication. Minimal errors. 

An outstanding quality of written communication was achieved. Flawless.

Work is well presented and structured.

Poorly presented and structured.

Satisfactorily presented and structured.

A sound standard of presentation and structure was achieved.

A good standard of presentation and structure was achieved.

Excellence was achieved in presentation and structure.

An outstanding quality of presentation and structure achieved.

Sources and referencing – read additional books, journal articles, and references correctly according to Harvard.

Little evidence of adequate academic reading completed for assessment. In-text and post-script referencing errors are evident.

Evidence of adequate academic reading completed for assessment. Generally acceptable Harvard referencing and use of in-text references.

A few different sources were consulted and correctly applied. Sound Harvard referencing and use of in-text references.

As for C, with a greater range and depth of sources used. Good Harvard referencing and use of in-text references.

Evidence of wide reading intelligently used to include academic journal articles. Excellent referencing and use of in-text references.

As for A, but with a significant number of academic journal articles. Outstanding Harvard referencing and use of in-text references.