Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
---|---|---|---|
University | Northumbria University | Module Title | BM9720 Analytics for Competitive Advantage |
Word Count | 2000 Words |
---|
This component assesses MLO3, MLO4 and MLO5.
The hand in is electronically via Blackboard, all deliverables shall be labelled with project name, your student’s
name and university number.
The report will be assessed on one or more:
The report could broadly include the following sections:
Are You Looking BM9720 Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentThis assessment will contribute directly to the following programme goals and objectives.
|
0 - 39 |
40 - 49 |
50 - 54 |
55 - 59 |
60 - 69 |
70 - 100 |
Individual Report - weighted 60% |
Report is either not submitted or completed to a poor standard. Report may be poorly presented or lacking supporting information. The core methods of data management and visualization taught in the module are not shown in the report. The report has very little relevant literature referred and cited. The report has very limited evaluation and discussion of the business insights of the results. Very limited consideration of legal, social, ethical, security and professional issues. |
The report doesn’t have adequate technical quality. Produced and demonstrated a solution to the problem, which is flawed, despite some effort. Poor evidence of reviewing academic sources. Little evaluation and discussion of the results. Little consideration of legal, social, ethical, security and professional issues. Narrative difficult to follow. Poor quality of references and citations. |
The student demonstrated a sound knowledge of the data management and visualization methods covered within the module and has produced a report which has a limited research base and could be presented more professionally. The student has provided a basic evaluation and discussion of the business insights of the results, but does this with a limited literature base and does not offer any critical analysis. |
The student understanding of the data management and visualization methods is largely evident and report is generally well presented. Satisfactory technical quality. Produced and demonstrated good quality solution to the problem. Good evidence of reviewing multiple academic sources. Some references and citations. Good evaluation and discussion of the business insights of the results. Legal, social, ethical, security and professional issues fully considered. |
Report is presented to a high standard and are easy to follow. Very good technical quality. Produced and demonstrated very good quality solution to the problem. Sufficient information for the reader is provided to reproduce the results. Very good evidence of systematic review using multiple high quality academic sources. Logical, clear development of narrative. Appropriate references and citations. Very good evaluation and discussion of the business insights of the results. Legal, social, ethical, security and professional issues fully considered. |
Excellent technical quality report. Produced and demonstrated a comprehensive, high quality solution to the problem. Sufficient information for the reader is provided to reproduce the results. Outstanding evidence of systematic review using multiple high quality academic sources. Logical, clear development of narrative. High quality references and citations. Outstanding evaluation and discussion of the business insights of the results. Legal, social, ethical, security and professional issues fully considered. |
You are advised to read the guidance for students regarding assessment policies. They are available online here.
Academic Misconduct
The Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA) contain the Regulations and procedures applying to cheating, plagiarism, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems, and other forms of academic misconduct.
You are reminded that plagiarism, collusion, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems, and other forms of academic misconduct, as referred to in the Academic Misconduct procedure of the assessment regulations, are taken very seriously. Assignments in which evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic misconduct is found may receive a mark of zero.
Where coursework is submitted without approval, after the published hand-in deadline, the following penalties will apply. For coursework submitted up to 1 working day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline without approval, 10% of the total marks available for the assessment (i.e.100%) shall be deducted from the assessment mark.
For clarity: a late piece of work that would have scored 65%, 55% or 45% had it been handed in on time will be awarded 55%, 45% or 35% respectively as 10% of the total available marks will have been deducted.
The Penalty does not apply to Pass/Fail Modules, i.e. there will be no penalty for late submission if assessments on Pass/Fail are submitted up to 1 working day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline.
Coursework submitted more than 1 day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline without approval will be marked as zero but will be eligible for referral. The reassessment should where appropriate, and as determined by the Module Leader, be the same method (e.g. essay) but maybe with a different task (e.g. different essay title) or with the same task (e.g. the same essay title) as indicated in the Module handbook. In modules where there is more than one assessment component, Students are not required to complete all assessment components if an overall Pass Mark (40% UG, 50% PGT) has been achieved.
The only permitted exception will be in cases where the University is prevented from doing so by a PSRB requirement. In the case of PSRB requirements, a variation order will be required from the regulations.
In modules, where there is more than one assessment component and an overall pass mark has not been achieved, Students will be eligible for a referral* in the individual failed module and/or not attempted component(s) of assessment.
These provisions apply to all assessments, including those assessed on a Pass/Fail basis. The full policy can be found here
Word limits
The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment and the assignment cover sheet. The word count does not include:
e.g. appendices, glossary, footnotes, tables
Please note, in text citations [e.g. (Smith, 2011)] and direct secondary quotations [e.g. “dib-dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011 p.123)] are INCLUDED in the word count.
If this word count is falsified, students are reminded that under ARTA this will be regarded as academic misconduct.
For those assessments where students are required to keep to the word limit, it is proposed that they should be informed that the marker will stop reading at the point when they judge that the word limit exceeds the recommended word count by more than 10%. The marker will indicate the point at which they stop reading on the text.
Students must retain an electronic copy of this assignment (including ALL appendices) and it must be made available within 24hours of them requesting it be submitted.
The full Word Limit Policy is available here
Order Custom Answers for Your Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you trying to find a solution for the BM9720 Analytics for Competitive Advantage Assignment? You are at the right place. Our platform provides the best assignment help. We have talented writers who can provide assignments without any plagiarism and 100% original content. You are confident that our Business Management Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. No doubt about it! We also provide Northumbria University sample assignments for your guidance. Contact us now!
See the solution of this brief click here: BM9720 Assignment Samples
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content