| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Central Lancashire | Module Title | BM4106 Critical Issues in Business and Management Research |
| Word Count | 3000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Scaffolded Literature Review |
| Assessment Title | Assessment 1 |
| Academic Year | Semester 1, 2025-26 |
This assessment is worth 60% of the overall module mark.
This Assessment Pack consists of a detailed assignment brief, guidance on what you need to prepare, and information on how class sessions support your ability to complete successfully. You’ll also find information on this page to guide you on how, where, and when to submit. If you need additional support, please make a note of the services detailed in this document.
You will submit on Blackboard in the Turnitin submission point for Assignment 1 by Monday, 17 November 2025, by 23:59 (UK time)
The assignment is available to view on Blackboard immediately
Feedback will be provided by Monday, 8th December 2025
You should aim to submit your assessment in advance of the deadline.
Note: If you have any valid mitigating circumstances that mean you cannot meet an assessment submission deadline and you wish to request an extension, you will need to apply online, via MyUCLan, with your evidence before the deadline. Further information on Mitigating Circumstances via this link.
We wish you all success in completing your assessment. Read this guidance carefully, and any questions, please discuss them with your Module Leader.
The classes will include a session dedicated to assignment support (please see the Module Information Pack for the date and time of this session). In addition, we have arranged International Support Sessions throughout the module and will also provide online support sessions during the semester to help you with the assessments.
At this level, you are expected to make full use of the academic sources provided online by the University. You need to make use of the Reading List on your module page. Please remember that the Reading List is a starting point, and you should use the Internet search engines provided by the university. We do not recommend reliance on Google or Google Scholar – these engines will not provide full access to the academic material that you need for this assessment.
In this assignment, you will write a critical review of the literature related to ONE of the business and management topics below:
A critical literature review is a “detailed overview of the significant literature available about your chosen topic, providing a discussion and critical evaluation, and using a clear argument to contextualise and justify your research” (Saunders et al., 2018:33).
In this task, you will present how you have developed and structured your literature review, explaining how you have gathered your academic sources and how you have critically evaluated the way in which these sources support your literature review. We also ask students to identify and consider gaps in the current literature.
The assessment will consist of a synthesis matrix of 3000 words and a literature review of 1000 words.
The synthesis matrix will consist of information in tabular form, where you will describe the source used, how you located or found the source (for example, which internet search engine you used to find the material), the main themes that you hoped to explore in the literature review, and a summary of how each academic article supports your argument. You should use around 30 academic sources, with each source supported by 100 words of text.
In the literature review, you will provide a critical evaluation of the sources, demonstrating how different perspectives exist within the area of business and management research. The literature review will be fully referenced within the text and in the reference List using the Harvard system. The literature review must use robust and reputable academic sources. We expect you to use the University catalogue for your sources, utilising academic textbooks and academic journals.
The assessment criteria for this assignment are:
The assignment is designed to test the following learning outcomes:
| Classification | Distinction | Merit | Pass | Marginal Fail to Mid Fail | Low Fail to Non-Submission |
| Criteria and Percentage | 70 and above | 60 to 69 | 50 to 59 | 40 to 49 | 39 to 0 |
|
Criterion 1: Critically research and select appropriate academic material on which to base your literature review 25% |
The selection of material will be based on a rigorous and critical use of the academic resources found in the University Library database, using high-quality journals, and identifying around 30 academic sources. The selection will use sources that include the theoretical and conceptual underpinnings of the topic in question. | The selection of material will be based on a structured search of the resources, almost wholly found in the University Library database, identifying around 30 academic sources, some of which may be more practitioner-based. | The selection of sources is based on material mainly found in the University Library database. The selection of around 30 academic sources may be based on the convenience of access rather than their worth as articles that contribute to evaluating the topic. | The selection will have significantly fewer than the 30 academic sources required and may rely on databases not found within the University Library databases. The selection of material will be largely based on convenience rather than the material's contribution to evaluating the topic. | The selection will not use the Library database, will rely on non-academic sources, and will have significantly fewer than the 30 sources required |
|
Criterion 2: Create a synthesis matrix demonstrating and justifying your choice of academic material: 25%
|
The matrix will have a very precise indication of the source used, an accurate description of how the material was obtained, a precise identification of the topics covered in the material, and a concise and precise evaluation of how the material will be used. The edited entries will consist of around 100 words of text | The matrix will have a clear indication of the source used, an accurate description of how the material was obtained, accurate coverage of the topics used in the article, and an evaluation of how the material will be used. Entries may consist of more than 100 words and may include additional material for information rather than to use in the review | The matrix will provide an accurate indication of the material used, but the answer may be more general than specific. There may be some minor errors in the citation. The final two columns will be descriptive and may lack discretion in evaluating the material. The entries, while relevant, may be significantly in excess of the 100 words word count. | The matrix will contain several citation and location inaccuracies. The final two columns will be descriptive, lacking the application of discretion in terms of editing the material. The entries will rely on summaries of the articles rather than applying an evaluation. The word count per line will be significantly over 100 words per entry. Several boxes in the matrix may not be complete. | The matrix will contain significant errors in citation and location. The final columns will consist of descriptions of the article without any discretion applied in editing the material. Several parts of the table will not be complete. |
|
Criterion 3: Write a literature review using the material from the matrix to critically evaluate the material found within the academic literature 30% |
The literature review is coherently constructed with a clear line of argument demonstrating a critical approach to the topic using all the sources from the synthesis matrix. The student will have engaged critically with competing theoretical views of the topic. The review will end by identifying gaps in the literature. The review has been checked for grammar and British spelling conventions before submission. | The literature review is a coherent and structured piece of work using all the sources from the synthesis matrix. The review will end by identifying gaps in the existing literature. The review may concentrate more on the empirical aspects of the articles rather than the competing conceptual views of different authors. The review has been checked for grammar and British spelling conventions. | The literature will use the articles from the synthesis review to construct a generally clear piece of work. The review may reflect more on the articles as individual pieces of work rather than making comparisons between them. The structure of the review may consist of separate topics rather than linking each of the sections together. The review may focus more on the practical implications of the literature rather than on making appropriate comparisons. The review may not effectively address gaps in the literature. The final section may reflect that the student is addressing the issue itself rather than evaluating the literature. | The review will be largely descriptive rather than evaluative. The student may have omitted consideration of numerous articles from the matrix or have drawn inaccurate conclusions from the articles used. The student will either not have identified gaps in the literature or will attempt to address the topic rather than evaluate the literature. | The literature review will not have used the material from the matrix to source the review. The sources may be inaccurately described or used. |
|
Criterion 4: Reference the assignment accurately and comprehensively using the Harvard system of referencing 20% |
Accurate referencing in the text and in the Reference List, fully adhering to the Harvard system of referencing. The Reference List is set out in alphabetical order by surname. Any errors are minor. | Accurate referencing in the text and in the Reference List adheres to the Harvard system of referencing. The referencing may contain some errors, and/or omit the occasional source. | The referencing will be generally accurate, but may not follow the Harvard system of referencing. Several sources may be omitted, or the sources cited in the text may not match the sources found in the Reference List. The Reference List may not be wholly in alphabetical order by surname | The referencing does not follow the Harvard system of referencing. Numerous sources may be omitted from the Reference List, or the text citations may not match the Reference List | The text of the literature does not contain references or minimal references, and/or no Reference List is provided |
1. Academic support for this assessment will be provided by contacting your module tutors.
2. Our Library resources link can be found in the library area of the Student Hub or via your subject librarian, Zerry Harrison, at SubjectLibrarians@uclan.ac.uk.
3. Support with your academic skills development (academic writing, critical thinking and referencing) is available through WISER on the Study Skills section of the Student Hub.
4. For help with Turnitin, see Blackboard and Turnitin Support on the Student Hub
5. If you have a disability, specific learning difficulty, long-term health or mental health condition, and have not yet advised us, or would like to review your support, Inclusive Support can assist with reasonable adjustments and support. To find out more, you can visit the Inclusive Support page of the Student Hub.
6. For mental health and wellbeing support, please complete our online referral form or email wellbeing@uclan.ac.uk. You can also call 01772 893020, attend a drop-in, or visit our UCLan Wellbeing Service Student Hub pages for more information.
7. For any other support query, please contact Student Support via studentsupport@uclan.ac.uk.
8. For consideration of Academic Integrity, please refer to the detailed guidelines in our policy document. All assessed work should be genuinely your own work, and all resources fully cited.
Reflecting on Feedback: how to improve.
From the feedback you receive, you should understand:
Use the WISER: Academic Skills Development service. WISER can review feedback and help you understand your feedback. You can also use the WISER Feedback Glossary
Next Steps:
Achieve Higher Grades with BM4106 Assignment Solutions
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentStruggling with your BM4106 Critical Issues in Business and Management Research assignment? Let us help! Our Management Assignment Help service is the best for you. We offer professional, affordable assignment writing services that are AI-free, plagiarism-free, and delivered on time. Our team of PhD experts understands what universities expect and creates high-quality content tailored to your needs. We also offer free assignment samples so you can check our quality before booking. We’re available 24/7 to support you with Business Management or any subject. Don’t wait until the last minute—contact us now and make your academic life easier with trusted expert help! We also provide University of Central Lancashire Assignment Samples that have been written by the phd expert writers. Contact us now!
If you want to see the brief of this solution, then click here: BM4106
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
