7HURM025W HR Analytics Assessment 1 Brief | UOW

Criterion

Weighting

Clear structure and presentation

20%

Robust examination of evidence employing EBA

50%

Viability of the solution

30%

Criteria & weighting

Fail

(below 50)

Pass

(50-59)

Merit

(60-69)

Distinction

(70+)

Clear structure and presentation

(20% of total mark)

The business case structure is not adhered to well. Frequent lapses in clarity.

Executive summary is not written effectively, vital information is missing.

Rather limited or missing outline of EBA principles and of approach employed to evaluate evidence.

Referencing requires improvement.

Principles of the business case are not fully evident.

Executive summary could be more informative.

Some information on EBA principles and approach towards evidence evaluation.

Suitably referenced although minor slips might have occurred.

Appropriate business case structure.

Informative executive summary.

Clear outline of EBA principles and evidence evaluation.

Well referenced throughout.

Excellent business case structure. Clear organization and natural flow.

Succinctly written but packed with important information executive summary.

Informative section on principles of EBA & how evidence will be evaluated.

Perfect referencing in the text and in the reference list.

Analysis & EBA

(50% of total mark)

Limited understanding of Evidence Based Approach.

When evidence is discussed, it is not clearly differentiated in terms of its strength.

Some discussion of the impact of people analytics but not well supported with relevant and reliable evidence.

Some consideration of Evidence Based Approach but at places simplistic. Evidence of the impact of people analytics has been reviewed but rather derivatively. Discussion of the strength of evidence has been included but not developed in much depth.

Multifaceted application of Evidence Based Approach.  Evidence of the impact of people analytics has been evaluated and some critique offered. Strength of the evidence has been evaluated in sufficient depth but there is scope to extend.

Robust application of Evidence Based Approach. Strong evaluative and critical approach evident in discussion of the evidence of the impact of people analytics on organizations. Sophisticatedly developed evaluation of the strength of evidence.

Viability of the solution

(30% of the total mark)

Alternative options for the organisation have not been discussed sufficiently. Inadequate appreciation of different types/levels of HRA. Organizational characteristics could be considered further to provide stronger rationale for the proposed solution. Evidence supporting the proposed solution could be articulated more prominently.

Adequate discussion of  the alternative options which includes some discussion of different types/levels of HRA. Some organizational characteristics have been taken into account but there is scope to extend the discussion. Clear rationale for the proposed solution, which is well argued with reference to the strength of supporting evidence.

Strong discussion of alternative options which considers different levels/types of HRA. Viable solution is well argued for and considers the characteristics of the organization and supporting evidence.

Extensive discussion of the proposed solution which includes consideration of the alternatives in the form of different levels/types of HRA. Sensible solution is strongly set in the well-considered organizational context. Supporting evidence for the proposed solution is convincing and reveals sophisticated insights.