Category | Assignment | Subject | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of Hertfordshire (UOH) | Module Title | 7BUS2040 Strategic Marketing & Entrepreneurship |
Academic Year | 2025/26 |
---|
Module Title |
Strategic Marketing and Entrepreneurship |
Module Code: |
7BUS2040 |
Assignment Format & Maximum Word count |
Individual Report – max 10 pages [1550 words (+/-10%)] |
Assignment weighting |
50% |
Coursework Submission: |
Time:23: 59 Date: 25th November 2025 Method: Canvas |
Coursework return Date returned to students: |
Within 4 weeks (23rd December) |
Internal Moderator |
Approved Date: |
Module Board name |
PG BAS |
External Examiner |
Approved Date: |
Module Board date |
Feb 2026 |
Assessment eligible for an extension on submission date (subject to UPRs) |
YES |
Retrievable Assessment |
No |
Are You Looking Solution of 7BUS2040 Assignment 1
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentAssignment Title: Individual Report – Ideation and Market Analysis
This assignment requires you to apply strategic marketing and entrepreneurship concepts learned during tutorials to develop and analyse a new business idea. You will individually produce a structured report that evaluates your business idea, the industry and market in which it operates, competitive forces, and your value proposition.
The report integrates academic theory with practical application and demonstrates your ability to conduct structured analysis using key frameworks such as the Business Model Canvas, PESTEL, Porter’s Five Forces, and the Value Proposition Canvas. Use professional formatting and support your analysis with credible academic and industry references.
The assignment consists of five key activities, each building towards a clear and strategic understanding of your business idea and its market environment:
Activity 1: Create a Business Idea
Activity 2: Business Model Canvas (BMC)
Activity 3: Industry Trends and Growth (PESTEL)
Activity 4: Competitor Analysis (Porter’s Five Forces)
Activity 5: Value Proposition
Your report must be no more than 1550 words (±10%) & must not exceed 10 pages in total, excluding the cover page and references. Exceeding the word or page limits will result in a deduction of marks.
Section | Pages limit | Word limit |
Cover Page | 1 page | Not Counted |
Executive Summary | 1 page | 200 words |
Activity 1 | 2 pages | 350 words |
Activity 2 | 1 page | 200 words |
Activity 3 | 2 pages | 350 words |
Activity 4 | 1 page | 250 words |
Activity 5 | 1 page | 200 words |
References | 1 page | Not Counted |
Total | 10 pages | 1550 |
Section |
Description |
Weighting |
1. Idea Generation & Business Model (Executive Summary, Business Idea, BMC) |
|
20% |
2. Industry & Market Environment (PESTEL) |
|
20% |
3. Competitive Environment (Porter’s Five Forces) |
|
20% |
4. Value Proposition & Customer Fit |
|
20% |
5. Presentation, Structure & Referencing |
|
20% |
Refer to the detailed HBS Grading Criteria (Rubric) below for performance standards.
Section |
Weight |
Outstanding (90–100%) |
Excellent (80–89%) |
Very Good (70–79%) |
Good (60–69%) |
Clear Pass (50–59%) |
Marginal Fail(40–49%) |
Clear Fail (20–39%) |
Little or Nothing of Merit(0–19%) |
1. Idea Generation & Business Model (Executive Summary, Business Idea, BMC) |
20% |
Innovative and well- justified idea, supported by strong evidence; highly concise Executive Summary; BMC comprehensive and logically integrated. |
Strong idea with credible reasoning; clear Executive Summary; BMC mostly complete with minor gaps. |
Good idea; some justification missing; Executive Summary covers most points; BMC reasonable but incomplete. |
Adequate explanation with limited evidence; Executive Summary basic; partial BMC with gaps. |
Basic explanation, weak rationale; Executive Summary vague; limited BMC integration. |
Weak/unclea r idea; incomplete Executive Summary; BMC inconsistent or missing key parts. |
Very limited content; minimal rationale; BMC inaccurate/ irrelevant. |
No meaningful attempt. |
2. Industry & Market Environment (PESTEL) |
20% |
Highly insightful, deeply researched with strong references; industry size, growth, and key trends well- analysed; clear strategic implications. |
Well- researched with credible references; analysis sound; trends linked to implications. |
Solid analysis; some gaps in referencing or depth; implications partially clear. |
Adequate overview; limited depth; minimal links to implications. |
Basic coverage; weak referencing; superficial insights. |
Very limited analysis; poor evidence; implications unclear. |
Very weak or irrelevant analysis. |
No analysis attempted. |
3. Competitive Environment (Porter’s Five Forces) |
20% |
Insightful and accurate application of all five forces with strong evidence; clear strategic insights. |
Thorough analysis with good evidence; mostly accurate insights. |
Clear analysis of all forces; some minor evidence or interpretation gaps. |
Adequate analysis; descriptive with limited insight or referencing. |
Basic coverage of forces; superficial insights; weak references. |
Incomplete or vague; lacks meaningful evidence or value. |
Very limited, inaccurate, or irrelevant analysis. |
No attempt. |
4. Value Proposition & Customer Fit |
20% |
Excellent alignment between product/service and customer needs; clear differentiation and strong market understanding. |
Strong alignment; minor detail gaps; shows differentiation . |
Mostly aligned but some clarity missing; limited depth. |
Adequate explanation; partial alignment with customer needs. |
Weak explanation; unclear customer fit; little differentiation. |
Misaligned or vague; lacks clear value. |
Minimal or no relevant content. |
No evidence of understandi ng. |
5. Presentation, Structure & Referencing |
20% |
Professional formatting and seamless flow; flawless Harvard style throughout; all claims cited; excellent use of diverse sources; well beyond the minimum (10+) high-quality references, balanced between academic and industry. |
Clear and professional structure; strong use of sources; minor formatting or citation errors; meets and exceeds minimum 5 academic + 5 industry sources. |
Good use of credible sources; some missing citations or minor style inconsistencies; meets the minimum (5 academic + 5 industry) but balance may be uneven. |
Adequate referencing; weak integration; several citation/form atting issues; close to minimum but may fall short in either academic or industry coverage. |
Basic referencing with frequent omissions; many unsupported statements; less than minimum (e.g., 3–4 academic and/or 3–4 industry sources). |
Minimal credible sources; poor integration; major referencing issues; fails to meet minimum requirement s clearly. |
Little evidence of proper referencing; inaccurate or irrelevant sources. |
No referencing; report unstructure d or irrelevant. |
Buy Answer of 7BUS2040 Assignment 1 & Raise Your Grades
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you having trouble with your 7BUS2040 Strategic Marketing & Entrepreneurship Assignment 1? UK Assignment Help is here to help! Our skilled staff provides reliable Marketing Assignment Help tailored to your needs, whether you need professional advice on Strategic Marketing & Entrepreneurship or help improving your assignment. We also offer free assignment samples list. Don't worry about deadlines; get the best help now and confidently complete your best work. For personalized and quick assistance, contact Online Assignment Help now!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content