| Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Coventry University (CU) | Module Title | 7000HUM Dissertation |
| Word Count | 15000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Dissertation |
| Assessment Title | CW |
Your dissertation is assessed by the submission of 15,000 word response to your chosen research question
Length
The dissertation should be approximately 15,000 words. You will be penalised for either exceeding or falling short of this target by 10% or more. Appendices and textual footnotes, but not bibliographic references, should be included in the overall word count.
Paper size and spacing
Select an A4 format, and a 12 point type faced. Double or one-and-a-half line spacing should be used, except for indented quotations or footnotes where single-line spacing may be used.
Pagination
Pages must be numbered consecutively through the main text including photographs and/or diagrams which are included as whole pages. The pagination of appendices must be continuous but distinct from the main text.
Title Page
The title page must give the following information:
The dissertation must also include an abstract of around 300 words, setting out a synopsis of the work undertaken. The abstract should appear at the start of the dissertation, usually between the title page and the page of contents.
You must include a list of contents, clearly setting out chapter titles and any other content (e.g., appendices) with the corresponding page numbers.
Any abbreviations should be those in normal use and where necessary a key should be provided.
Quotations over 40 words should be indented and separated from the main text by a space above and below. Single spacing should be used for indented quotations. If material is omitted from within the quotation, 3 dots must be used to signify the omission. If the quotation ends in mid-sentence, dots must again be used to show this.
Make sure that tables and graphs, and any other form of diagrammatic representation, are labelled, understandable, support the conclusions you draw from them, and are referred to in the text.
Appendices may be used sparingly to extend or explain a particular aspect of the analysis, which is secondary, but still relevant, to the substance of the dissertation. Appendices are included in the overall word count.
A bibliography of all the significant sources referred to or consulted must be presented.
A copy of your ethics approval certificate/email should be appended to the end of your dissertation submission, or just a simple statement indicating that the submission has received approval from Coventry University’s ethical committee (including the project number and date of approval).
Section order
Traditionally, the sections are bound in this order (where appropriate):
1.Title page
2.Abstract
3.Acknowledgements (optional)
4.Contents page
5.List(s) of tables and/or illustrations
6.Abbreviations
7.Main text
8.Appendices
9.Bibliography
10.Ethics approval
How will my assignment be marked?
The completed dissertations will be marked internally (by two members of staff), with the agreed grade awarded being scrutinised by an external examiner for the programme. If it is thought to be necessary, an oral examination of the dissertation may be held to determine the final result, but this will be exceptional.
How will I receive my grades and feedback?
Provisional marks will be released on Turnitin
Feedback will be provided through Turnitin.
Details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief
The Learning Outcomes for this module align to the marking criteria which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:
|
Module Learning Outcomes |
Assessed in this assignment? |
|
|
LO1: |
Identify, select and review current information resources relevant to a particular research question |
Yes |
|
LO2 |
Offer a critical evaluation and analysis of a specific research question |
Yes |
|
LO3 |
Produce an extended piece of written work conveying a sustained and evidenced response answering a specific research question |
Yes |
|
LO4 |
Take account of any legal, social and ethical issues relating to research and project work |
Yes |
|
You will find full details of how these Learning Outcomes will be assessed by this assignment in the marking rubric at the end of this brief. You should read this as it explains how submitted work achieves certain grades. It will be useful in preparing your assignment as well as in understanding your feedback. |
||
Are You Looking The Solution of 7000HUM Dissertation
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentGUIDE TO MARKING CRITERIA
|
Mark band |
Outcome |
Guidelines |
|
90-100%
Distinction |
Meets learning outcomes |
Distinction - Exceptional work with very high degree of rigour, creativity and critical/analytic skills. Mastery of knowledge and subject-specific theories with originality and autonomy. Demonstrates exceptional ability to analyse and apply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the subject/discipline. Innovative research with exceptional ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Demonstrates, creativity, originality and outstanding problem-solving skills. Work completed with very high degree of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Exceptional communication and expression demonstrated throughout. Student evidences the full range of technical and/or artistic skills. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be strongly considered for external publication/dissemination/presentation. |
|
80-89%
Distinction |
|
Distinction - Outstanding work with high degree of rigour, creativity and critical/analytic skills. Near mastery of knowledge and subject-specific theories with originality and autonomy. Demonstrates outstanding ability to analyse and apply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the subject/discipline. Innovative research with outstanding ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Work consistently demonstrates creativity, originality and outstanding problem-solving skills. Work completed with high degree of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Outstanding communication and expression demonstrated throughout. Student demonstrates a very wide range of technical and/or artistic skills. With some amendments, the work may be considered for external publication/dissemination/presentation |
|
70-79%
Distinction |
|
Distinction - Excellent work undertaken with rigour, creativity and critical/analytic skills. Excellent degree of knowledge and subject-specific theories with originality and autonomy demonstrated. The work exhibits excellent ability to analyse and apply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the subject/discipline. Innovative research with excellent ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Work demonstrates creativity, originality and excellent problem-solving skills. Work completed with very consistent levels of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Excellent communication and expression demonstrated throughout. Student demonstrates a very wide range of technical and/or artistic skills. |
|
60-69%
Merit |
|
Merit - Very good work often undertaken with rigour, creativity and critical/analytic skills. Very good degree of knowledge and subject-specific theories with some originality and autonomy demonstrated. The work often exhibits the ability to fully analyse and apply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the subject/discipline. Very good research evidence and shows very good ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Work demonstrates creativity, originality and problem-solving skills. Work completed with very consistent levels of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Very good communication and expression demonstrated throughout. Student demonstrates a wide range of technical and/or artistic skills. |
|
50-59%
Pass
|
|
Pass - Good work undertaken with some creativity and critical/analytic skills. Demonstrates knowledge and subject-specific theories with some originality and autonomy demonstrated. The work exhibits the ability to analyse and apply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the subject/discipline. Good research and shows some ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Work demonstrates problem-solving skills and is completed with some level of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Satisfactory communication and expression demonstrated throughout. Student demonstrates some of the technical and/or artistic skills. |
|
40-49%
Pass |
|
Pass - Assessment demonstrates some advanced knowledge and understanding of the subject informed by current practice, scholarship and research. Work may be incomplete with some irrelevant material present. Sometimes demonstrates the ability to analyse and apply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the subject/discipline. Acceptable research with evidence of basic ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Demonstrates some originality, creativity and problem-solving skills but often with inconsistencies. Expression and presentation sufficient for accuracy and proficiency. Sufficient communication and expression with professional skill set. Student demonstrates some technical and/or artistic skills. |
|
30-39%
Fail |
Fails to achieve learning outcomes |
Fail - Very limited understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues with deficiencies in rigour and analysis. Some relevant material may be present but be informed from very limited sources. Fundamental errors and some misunderstanding likely to be present. Demonstrates limited ability to analyse and apply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the subject/discipline. Limited research scope and ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Limited originality, creativity, and struggles with problem-solving skills. Expression and presentation insufficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficient communication and expression and with deficiencies in professional skill set. Student demonstrates deficiencies in the range of technical and/or artistic skills. |
|
20-29%
Fail - |
|
Fail - Clear failure demonstrating little understanding of relevant theories, concepts, issues and only a vague knowledge of the area. Little relevant material may be present and informed from very limited sources. Serious and fundamental errors and virtually no evidence of relevant research. Fundamental errors and misunderstandings likely to be present. Little or no research with no evidence of utilisation of research methodologies. No originality, creativity, and struggles with problem-solving skills. Expression and presentation insufficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficient communication and expression and with serious deficiencies in professional skill set. Student has clear deficiencies in range of technical and/or artistic skills. |
|
0-19%
Fail |
|
Fail - Clear failure demonstrating no understanding of relevant theories, concepts, issues and no understanding of area. Little or no relevant material may be present and informed from minimal sources. No evidence of ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. No evidence of originality, creativity, and problem-solving skills. Expression and presentation deficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficient communication and expression and with deficiencies in professional skill set. Student has clear deficiencies in range of technical and/or artistic skills. |
|
GRADE
|
RESEARCH & KNOWLEDGE |
|
ANALYSIS & ARGUMENT |
|
STRUCTURE & COMMUNICATION |
|
SUMMARY |
|
Distinction
90-100% |
Innovative relevant contemporary research with exceptional ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Wide range of sources used, going beyond the recommended texts, and including scholarly articles, official reports, and case studies. Mastery of knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
Exceptional work with a very high degree of rigour, creativity, and critical/analytic evaluation of causes of the research topic, responses, and strategies. Demonstrates exceptional ability to synthesise and analyse information and apply relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. Demonstrates creativity, originality, and outstanding problem-solving skills. Work completed with very high degree of accuracy, proficiency, and autonomy.
|
|
Very clearly organised and logically structured, following through a coherent essay from aims to conclusion. Very well written, with good command of presentation grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation. Wide range of appropriately supporting evidence provided, which is accurately and consistently referenced throughout. Exceptional communication and expression demonstrated throughout.
|
|
An outstanding, well-structured, and appropriately referenced essay, demonstrating a high degree of understanding of the processes of the research topic and the current problems. Clear critical analysis and evaluation and argument throughout. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be strongly considered for external publication/dissemination/ presentation. Meets learning outcomes. |
|
Distinction
80-89% |
Innovative relevant contemporary research with outstanding ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Wide range of sources used, going beyond the recommended texts, and including scholarly articles, official reports, and case studies. Near mastery of knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
Outstanding work with a high degree of rigour, creativity, and critical/analytic evaluation. Demonstrates outstanding ability to synthesise and analyse information and apply relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. Demonstrates creativity, originality, and outstanding problem-solving skills. Work completed with high degree of accuracy, proficiency, and autonomy. |
|
Very clearly organised and logically structured, following through a coherent essay from aims to conclusion. Very well written, with good command of presentation grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation. Wide range of appropriately supporting evidence provided, which is accurately and consistently referenced throughout. Outstanding communication and expression demonstrated throughout. |
|
An outstanding, well-structured, and appropriately referenced essay, demonstrating a high degree of understanding of the processes of the research topic and the current problems. Clear critical analysis and evaluation and argument throughout. With some amendments, the work may be considered for external publication/dissemination/ presentation Meets learning outcomes. |
|
Distinction
70-79% |
Excellent relevant contemporary research with excellent ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Wide range of sources used, going beyond the recommended texts, and including scholarly articles, official reports, and case studies. Excellent knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
Excellent work undertaken with rigour, creativity, and critical/ analytic evaluation. Demonstrates excellent ability to synthesise and analyse information and apply relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. Demonstrates creativity, originality, and excellent problem-solving skills. Work completed with a high degree of accuracy, proficiency, and autonomy.
|
|
Very clearly organised and logically structured, following through a coherent essay from aims to conclusion. Very well written, with good command of presentation grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation. Wide range of appropriately supporting evidence provided, which is accurately and consistently referenced throughout. Excellent communication and expression demonstrated throughout.
|
|
An excellent, well-structured, and appropriately referenced essay, demonstrating a high degree of understanding of the processes of the research topic and essay specific current problems. Clear critical analysis and evaluation and argument throughout. Meets learning outcomes. |
|
Merit
60-69%
|
Very good relevant research with very good ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Wide range of sources used, going beyond the recommended texts, and including scholarly articles, official reports, and case studies. Very good degree of knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
Very good work often undertaken with rigour, creativity, and critical/ analytic evaluation. A generally clear line of critical and evaluative argument is presented. Relationships between statements and sections are easy to follow. The work often exhibits the ability to synthesise and analyse information and apply relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. Demonstrates creativity, originality, and problem-solving skills. Work completed with very consistent degree of accuracy, proficiency, and autonomy. |
|
Clearly organised and logically structured, following through a coherent essay from aims to conclusion. Well written, with generally good command of presentation grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation. A very good range of appropriately supporting evidence is used in a largely accurately and consistent way, and correctly referenced in the main. Very good communication and expression demonstrated throughout.
|
|
A very good, well-structured, and well reference referenced essay, demonstrating a a very good degree of understanding of the processes of the research topic and essay specific current problems. Very good critical analysis and evaluation and argument in the main. Meets learning outcomes.
|
|
Pass
50-59
|
Good relevant research with good ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. Appropriate range of sources used, to the recommended texts, and may include scholarly articles, official reports, and case studies. Demonstrates knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
Good work undertaken with some rigour, creativity, and critical/ analytic evaluation of the research topic. However, there are errors or omissions. Some critical discussion, through evaluation and argument is present, but the argument is not always convincing, and the work is descriptive in places, with over-reliance on others. Relationships between statements and sections are easy to follow. The work often exhibits the ability to synthesise and analyse information and apply relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. Demonstrates in places creativity, originality, and problem-solving skills. Work completed does not have a consistent degree of accuracy, proficiency, and autonomy. |
|
Organised and structured to a satisfactory standard. However, the essay lacks some cohesion and flow from aims to conclusion. Adequately written, with generally sound command of grammar and syntax, though with a few errors of spelling and punctuation. There is an adequate range and use of supporting evidence and sources, but referencing is not always correctly presented. Satisfactory communication and expression demonstrated throughout.
|
|
The answer demonstrates a good understanding of some relevant theories, concepts, and issues, but there are some errors and irrelevant material included. The structure lacks cohesion and clarity, and the critical evaluation of the subject is descriptive in places. Meets learning outcomes.
|
|
Pass
40-49
|
Acceptable research with evidence of basic ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. A limited range of sources used, work may be incomplete or outdated, with some irrelevant material presented. Demonstrates some knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
The work is descriptive with minimal critical evaluation or analysis.There are errors or omissions. Limited critical discussion and limited scholarly engagement, the arguments are not always clear, and the work is descriptive in places, with over-reliance on others. Sometimes demonstrates the ability to synthesise and analyse information and apply relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. Some but limited demonstration of creativity, originality, and problem-solving skills. Work completed does not have a good degree of accuracy or proficiency. |
|
The work is organised and structured to a sufficient standard. However, the essay structure is unclear in parts and lacks some cohesion and flow from aims to conclusion. Adequately written, with generally sound command of grammar and syntax, though with a few errors of spelling and punctuation. There is a limited range and use of supporting evidence and sources. Referencing is not always correctly presented. Sufficient communication and expression demonstrated throughout.
|
|
The answer demonstrates a sufficient understanding of some relevant theories, concepts, and issues, but this is based on limited research and use of sources.
The structure lacks cohesion and clarity, and the critical evaluation of the subject is largely descriptive in places.
Meets learning outcomes.
|
|
Fail
30-39% |
Limited research scope and ability in the utilisation of research methodologies. A limited range of sources used, work may be incomplete or outdated, with some irrelevant material presented. Some relevant material may be present but be informed from very limited sources. Very limited understanding of knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
The work is descriptive with minimal evidence of critical evaluation or analysis. There are errors or omissions. Very limited critical discussion and limited scholarly engagement, the arguments are unclear, and the work is very descriptive. Demonstrates limited ability to synthesise and analyse information and apply relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. Limited originality, creativity, and struggles with problem-solving skills Some deviation from the objectives of the assessment task. May not consistently address the assignment brief. At the lower end fails to answer the question set or address the learning outcomes. |
|
The work is disorganised and does not have a logical structure. It lacks cohesion and flow from aims to conclusion. It is very poorly written, with inadequate command of grammar and syntax, and with errors of spelling and punctuation. There is a very limited range and use of supporting evidence and sources. Referencing is poorly presented. Insufficient communication and expression demonstrated throughout.
|
|
Whilst some relevant material is present, the level of understanding is poor with limited evidence of wider reading. Poor structure and poor presentation, including referencing. At the lower end there is evidence of a lack of comprehension, resulting in an assignment that is well below the required standard. Fails to achieve learning outcomes.
|
|
Fail
20-29% |
Little or no research with no evidence of utilisation of research methodologies. Very limited range of sources used, work is incomplete or outdated, with irrelevant material presented. Little relevant material present and informed from very limited sources. Virtually no understanding of knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
The work is descriptive with little evidence of critical evaluation. Very limited critical discussion and limited scholarly engagement, any arguments are vague and demonstrates a vague knowledge. the arguments are unclear, and the. No synthesise and analysis of relevant information, or application of relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. No orginality, creativity, and struggles with problem-solving skills Some deviation from the objectives of the assessment task. Does not consistently address the assignment brief. |
|
The work is disorganised and does not have a logical structure. It lacks cohesion and flow from aims to conclusion. It is very poorly written, with inadequate command of grammar and syntax, and with errors of spelling and punctuation. There is a very limited range and use of supporting evidence and sources. Referencing is poorly presented. Insufficient communication and expression demonstrated throughout.
|
|
Little relevant material is present, the level of understanding is poor with limited evidence of wider reading. Poor structure and poor presentation, including referencing. At the lower end there is evidence of a lack of comprehension, resulting in an assignment that is well below the required standard. Fails to achieve larning outcomes |
|
Fail
0-19% |
Little or no research with no evidence of utilisation of research methodologies. Very limited range of sources used, work is incomplete or outdated, with irrelevant material presented. Little relevant material present and informed from very limited sources. No understanding of knowledge and awareness of current problems/ insights, related to the processes and definition of the research topic.
|
|
The work is descriptive with little or no evidence of critical evaluation or analysis. Little or no critical discussion and limited scholarly any arguments are vague and demonstrates a vague knowledge. the arguments are unclear, and the. No synthesise and analysis of relevant information, or application of relevant concepts within the complexities and uncertainties of the research topic. No originality, creativity, and struggles with problem-solving skills Some deviation from the objectives of the assessment task. Does not consistently address the assignment brief. |
|
The work is disorganised and does not have a logical structure. It lacks cohesion and flow from aims to conclusion. It is very poorly written, with inadequate command of grammar and syntax, and with errors of spelling and punctuation. There is no use of supporting evidence and sources. Referencing is poor. Insufficient communication and expression demonstrated throughout. |
|
No relevant material is present, the level of understanding is poor with limited evidence of wider reading. Poor structure and poor presentation, including referencing. At the lower end there is evidence of a lack of comprehension, resulting in an assignment that is well below the required standard. fails to achieve learning outcomes. |
|
Late submission |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Order Custom Answers for 7000HUM Dissertation
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment
If you need help on assignments 7000HUM Dissertation CW Assignment? now stress-free and get Dissertation Writing Services from our expert team. We also provide Coventry University Assignment Samples that have been written by PhD expert writers. We are available 24/7 to assist you. Now, be tension-free and focus on studying and give your assignment to our expert team. We will deliver your assignment before the deadline with well-researched results. Contact us today and boost your academic grades!
See the solution of this brief click here: 7000HUM Dissertation CW Assignment Sample
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
