WM9QJ-15 Sustainable Supply Chain Management and the Circular Economy Assignment Brief | UoW

Published: 02 Aug, 2025

Category	Assignment	Subject	Management
University	University of Warwick	Module Title	WM9QJ-15 Sustainable Supply Chain Management and the Circular Economy

Word Count	2,000 words +/- 10%
Assessment Type	Written Report
Academic Year	2025

WM9QJ-15 Assignment Brief and Front Sheet PGT

This front sheet for assignments is designed to contain the brief, the submission instructions, and the actual student submission for any WMG assignment. As a result, the sheet is completed by several people over time, and is therefore split up into sections explaining who completes what information and when. Yellow highlighted text indicates examples or further explanation of what is requested, and the highlight and instructions should be removed as you populate your section.

This sheet is only to be used for components of assessment worth more than 3 CATS (e.g. for a 15 credit module, weighted more than 20%; or for a 10 credit module, weighted more than 30%).

To be completed by the student(s) before final submission:

Your actual submission should be written at the end of this cover sheet file, or attached with the cover sheet at the front if drafted in a separate file, program or application.

To be completed (highlighted parts only) by the programme administration after approval and before issuing of the assessment; to be consulted by the student(s) so that you know how and when to submit:

Date set	22 April 2025
Submission date (excluding extensions)	Monday, 19 May 2025 by 12:00pm (UK Time)
Submission guidance	To be submitted electronically via Tabula
Marks return date (excluding extensions)	17 June 2025 (20 working days from submission)
Late submission policy	If work is submitted late, penalties will be applied at the rate of 5 marks per University working day after the due date, up to a maximum of 10 working days late. After this period the mark for the work will be reduced to 0 (which is the maximum penalty). “Late” means after the submission deadline time as well as the date – work submitted after the given time even on the same day is counted as 1 day late. For Postgraduate students only, who started their current course before 1 August 2019, the daily penalty is 3 marks rather than 5.
Resit policy	If you fail this module and/or component, the University allows students to remedy failure (within certain limits). Decisions to authorise resits are made by Exam Boards. These will be issued at specific times of the year, depending on your programme of study. More information can be found from your programme office if you are concerned. If this is already a resit attempt, this means you will not be eligible for an additional attempt. The University allows as standard a maximum of two attempts on any assessment (i.e. only one resit). Students can

only have a third attempt under exceptional circumstances via a Mitigating Circumstances Panel decision.

To be completed by the module leader/tutor before approval and issuing of the assessment; to be consulted by the student(s) so that you understand the assignment brief, its context within the module, and any specific criteria and advice from the tutor.

WM9QJ-15 Assignment Brief

Industry Analysis based on Manager Interviews

As a new Sustainability consultant hired by Sustainable Logistics Consultancy (SLC), a fictional consultancy firm, you must complete ONE sustainability consultancy project from a selection of four given Manager scenarios [see the link to the Manager interview recordings on Moodle].

Based on your chosen Manager scenario, you are required to produce a 2000-word consultancy report, which will be assessed in the following areas:

1. A brief analysis of the firm’s sustainability strategy to identify areas of best practice focusing on its supply chain management [400 words] 20 marks

2. A critical discussion of the main issues impacting the firm’s supply chain that you would advise the firm to address [800 words] 40 marks

3. A proposal including a set of recommendations for the firm to address the issues identified, including an evidence-informed implementation strategy [800 words] 40 marks

Total:-100 Marks

Question 1 [20 marks]:

Choose one of the four provided Manager scenarios. Selecting a firm outside of these four will result in a score of zero.
If you encounter any difficulties locating or accessing the Manager interview recordings on Moodle, promptly inform your Module Leader or Tutors.
Select a Manager’s scenario considering possible relevant experiences you may have from this sector, your interest in working within the firm’s sector in the future, or because you can find ample publicly available information about its supply chain and sustainability strategy to enhance the information provided in the interview and support your analysis.
You do not need to provide a generic overview of your chosen firm or explain why you chose this firm; instead, focus directly on its sustainability strategy.

This question should be answered within 400 words with a 10% +/- allowance. The question is awarded 20 marks and covers Learning Outcome 2.

Question 2 [40 marks]:

Ensure that the issues you discuss align with those raised during the Manager interview.
To facilitate a thorough analysis of the identified issues, consider limiting them to a maximum of three. This approach allows for more in-depth exploration.
You can conduct additional research to uncover further details from the firm’s website and relevant publications.
Please note that direct contact with the company for additional information is not permitted unless you have obtained ethical approval via the University’s ethics system. For this assessment, you are not required to collect primary data. Instead, base your analysis on the interview and any other publicly available materials.
Should you lack sufficient data for your analysis, consider choosing an alternative Manager scenario from the provided four scenarios.

This question should be answered within 800 words with a 10% +/- allowance. The question is awarded 40 marks and covers Learning Outcome 4.

Question 3 [40 marks]:

Ensure that each recommendation directly targets a previously identified issue. Also, make sure that your recommendation(s) are clear, well-detailed, justified, and feasible within this context.
Briefly explain the necessary actions the firm must take to implement these recommendations, highlighting any potential obstacles.
To facilitate a thorough analysis of those points, consider limiting the recommendations to a maximum of three (at least one recommendation for each issue identified). This approach allows for more in-depth exploration.

This question should be answered within 800 words with a 10% +/- allowance. The question is awarded 40 marks and covers Learning Outcome 5.

Presentation/References

Organise your report, use headings, sections and page numbers, and provide relevant evidence to support your findings.
Ensure that your report includes a list of references at the end. All in-text citations and references should follow the University’s referencing guidelines.
To cite the interviewee, use this referencing style: O’Brien, J. (2025, May 10). Building Towards a Net Zero Future: Insights from Company X Construction Supply Chain". [University of Warwick].

Further Guidance:

There is no need to include an introduction and a conclusion section. Address directly the three questions.
Your report may include a table of contents, a list of figures, a list of tables, etc. These elements won’t be counted toward the word limit.
You can include any supplemental information, e.g. some background information about the selected company, diagrams and charts, in the Appendices at the end of your report.
Avoid lengthy Appendices, as markers may not read them thoroughly, or they may not read them at all if they are too long. Only include very important information that may enhance the reader’s understanding without disrupting the main text.
Please be aware that the answers included in the Appendices will not be awarded any marks.

WM9QJ-15 Module Learning Outcomes

ILO1: Demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the fundamental principles of sustainable development and the prerequisites of major international agreements and policy initiatives for the development of sustainable supply chains.

ILO2: Identify and apply sustainable principles on the procurement, manufacturing and storage practices for products and materials.

ILO3: Strategically select and apply appropriate carbon auditing tools for life-cycle and scenario analyses, considering the use of different fuels, modes and vehicle technologies, and critically assess the resulting environmental and social implications.

ILO4: Critically evaluate the practical application of the most appropriate technological and engineering methods to recover energy and value from waste in line with the circular economy principles.

ILO5: Formulate and critically assess the performance of practical city logistics solutions for the industry and society.

Criteria	91-100	81-90	71-80	61-70	51-60	41-50	31-40	0-30
Learning Outcome	All requirements of the learning outcome are exceeded, and the answer is free from errors.	All requirements of the learning outcome are covered, and the answer is free from errors.	All requirements of the learning outcome are covered, and work is free from all but very minor errors.	All requirements of the learning outcome are covered, but there may be some minor errors.	Most requirements of the learning outcome are covered.	Only some of the requirements of the learning outcome are covered.	Few of the requirements of the learning outcome are covered.	None of the requirements of the learning outcome are covered.
Analysis	Extremely strong evidence of critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation.	Very strong evidence of critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation.	Strong evidence of critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation.	Satisfactorily evidence of critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation.	Critical discussion may be superficial or limited in places.	Critical discussion may be poor or very limited in places.	Minimal evidence of critical discussion.	Complete lack of critical discussion.
Understanding	Exceptional understanding and strong theoretical engagement.	Strong understanding and theoretical engagement.	Proficient understanding and theoretical engagement.	Competent understanding and theoretical engagement.	Basic understanding and theoretical engagement.	Limited understanding and theoretical engagement	Minimal understanding and theoretical engagement	Inadequate understanding and theoretical engagement
Clarity	Ideas are explained with exquisite lucidity and in an extremely structured manner.	Ideas are explained with great lucidity and in an extremely structured manner.	Ideas are explained very clearly and in a highly structured manner.	Ideas are explained clearly and in a well organised manner, with some minor exceptions.	Ideas are explained adequately but with some confusion and lack of organisation.	Ideas are poorly explained and organised.	The levels of expression and organisation in the work are inadequate.	The levels of expression and organisation in the work are very inadequate.
Originality	The answer demonstrates excellent originality of thought and the ability to tackle issues not previously encountered.	The answer demonstrates originality of thought and the ability to tackle issues not previously encountered.	There is good ability to tackle issues not previously encountered	A reasonable attempt is made to tackle issues not previously encountered.	There is limited ability to tackle issues not previously encountered.	There is difficulty in beginning to address issues not previously encountered.	There is great difficulty in beginning to address issues not previously encountered.	There is no evidence that issues not previously encountered can be addressed.
Presentation	Outstanding, well-presented report and answers.	Very well organised report and presented answers.	Well-organised report and presented answers.	Quite organised report and fairly- presented answers.	Fairly organised report and presented answers.	Poorly organised report and presented answers.	Very poorly organised report and presented answers.	Extremely poorly organised report and presented answers.
References	The references list is complete, and all references are precise.	The references list is complete, but a very few references lack precision.	The references list is complete, but some references lack precision.	The references list is incomplete with minor omissions and/or few references lacking precision.	The references list is incomplete with some omissions and/or many references lacking precision.	The references list is incomplete with significant omissions and/or most references lacking precision.	The references list is incomplete with too many omissions and/or almost all references lacking precision.	A reference list is missing.

Get the Solution of this WM9QJ-15 Assessment

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

Request Answer of this Assignment

Share this with your Friends

Facebook

Instagram

Stuck on your WM9QJ-15 Sustainable Supply Chain Management and the Circular Economy? Don't worry! Our Supply Chain Management Assignment Help service is the best for you. If you need help with assignments, our expert PhD writers will provide you with original content. And yes, you will also get free assignment samples, which will give you a perfect idea of how to write a top-quality assignment. Don't worry about the deadline, as we guarantee on-time delivery. Contact us now for high-quality and plagiarism-free work and boost your grades!

Latest Related Questions

Hire Assignment Helper Today!

Your Name

Word Count

Your Email

Mobile Number

Reference Style

Paper Style

Enter Subject

Education Level

Select Deadline

Turn it in Report
YES: NO:

Choose Attachment/AttachMents

Add File

WM9QJ-15 Sustainable Supply Chain Management and the Circular Economy Assignment Brief | UoW

WM9QJ-15 Assignment Brief and Front Sheet PGT

WM9QJ-15 Assignment Brief

Industry Analysis based on Manager Interviews

Question 1 [20 marks]:

Question 2 [40 marks]:

Question 3 [40 marks]:

Presentation/References

Further Guidance:

WM9QJ-15 Module Learning Outcomes

Share this with your Friends

Latest Related Questions

304HSC Research Project Assignment 1 Task

ACC707 Auditing And Assurance Major Assignment Questions

WM9F1-15 Procurement and Inventory Management Assignment Brief and Front Sheet PGT

6037BMS Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology CW2 Assignment Brief | CU

CT7205 Machine Learning and Optimization Assignment Questions

TLC101 Communication Skills for Undergraduate Study Learning Journal 1 Final Questions S2 2024-25

LD9634 Designing and Implementing SME Business Strategy Assessment Brief 2024-25 | NUN

CMP7241 Information Security Governance PG CWK Assessment Brief 2024-25 | BCU

Customer Experience Strategy Coursework 6 Summative Assessment Brief 2024-25 | BPP

BE281 Data-Driven Decision Making Report Assignment Questions | UOE

Hire Assignment Helper Today!

Latest Free Samples for University Students

Get 100% AI & Plagiarism Free Work, Connect With Our Writers Now!