| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | James Cook University | Module Title | TO5520 Professional Placement\ Internship |
| Word Count | 1000-1500 Words |
|---|
|
Aligned subject learning outcomes |
independently and critically reflect on and assess one's own capabilities and performance, and make use of one's experience and feedback as appropriate, to support personal and professional development effectively communicate, both written and oral, with professionals and community members work in a team within a professional environment; and exhibit self-management skills and pro-active demeanour |
|
Group or individual |
Individual assessment item |
|
Weighting and due date |
Due within 1 week after commencement of the placement (End of Week 2 of the trimester at the latest) – 10% |
|
Requirements for successful completion of this assessment item |
Students need to achieve an overall percentage of 50% or more across all assessment tasks, therefore a student may not need to pass this assessment task to pass this subject. |
|
Generative AI use |
Generative AI tools cannot be used in this assessment task In this assessment, you must not use Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for any elements of the assessment task including the generation of any materials or content in relation to the assessment item. |
Students need to complete the placement action plan based on the agreement between the lecturer, the placement host and the student with regards to structure, tasks and objectives of the placement. A template for that plan is provided on the LearnJCU site. Students need to submit the plan within a week of starting their placement.
|
Criteria |
Fail |
Pass |
Credit |
Distinction |
High Distinction |
|
Plan completion and submission (30%) |
Plan is not completed on the required template and/or submitted by the due date |
Plan is partially completed and submitted by the due date. |
Plan is completed on the required template and submitted by the due date. However, further details should be provided. |
Plan is completed on the required template and submitted by the due date |
Plan is completed on the required template and submitted by the due date. It is clear and well formatted. |
|
Clarity of Activities (40%) |
Required activities are unclear, vague, or poorly defined. Lacks specificity and coherence. |
Required activities are somewhat unclear and vague, or poorly defined. Specificity and coherence could be further improved. |
Required activities are defined, but lack specificity. Provides a plan for achieving objectives, which could be further improved. |
Required activities are defined, and specific. Provides a coherent plan for achieving objectives. |
Required activities are clearly defined, and specific. Provides a comprehensive and coherent plan for achieving objectives. |
|
Feasibility of Timeline (30%) |
Timeline is unrealistic, with activities poorly spaced or overlapping. Fails to account for necessary timeframes or milestones. |
Timeline is rather risky, without contingency plans provided. Prioritisation of tasks is lacking, which may result in time management issues. |
Timeline is realistic, however activities could be allocated and prioritised more appropriately. Potential challenges are somewhat addressed. |
Timeline is realistic, reasonably structured and paced. Demonstrates some understanding of time management and prioritization. Anticipates potential challenges and includes contingency plans. |
Timeline is realistic, well-structured, and appropriately paced. Demonstrates a clear understanding of time management and prioritization. Anticipates potential challenges and includes contingency plans. |
|
Aligned subject learning outcomes |
independently and critically reflect on and assess one's own capabilities and performance, and make use of one's experience and feedback as appropriate, to support personal and professional development demonstrate relevance of the codes of ethics and regulatory frameworks governing the relevant industry through the exercise of independent ethical judgement and analysis of industry scenarios critically review and apply concepts, theories, and standards for professional practice |
|
Group or individual |
Individual assessment item |
|
Weighting and due date |
Due Week 10 Written - Reflection/reflective task – 30% |
|
Generative AI use |
Generative AI tools cannot be used in this assessment task In this assessment, you must not use Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for any elements of the assessment task including the generation of any materials or content about the assessment item. |
Objective: The purpose of this assessment is to provide you with an opportunity to reflect on your internship/placement/project experience, evaluate your learning outcomes, and identify the skills and knowledge you have gained during this period.
Structure of the assessment
1. Introduction: Begin by providing a brief introduction to your internship experience. Include details such as the organization you interned with, your role or responsibilities, the duration of the internship, and any other relevant contextual information (no more than half a page).
2. Achievements and Challenges: Identify and discuss the key achievements and challenges you encountered during your internship. Reflect on specific projects, tasks, or responsibilities that you completed, as well as any obstacles you faced and how you overcame them.
3. Skills Development: Evaluate the skills you have gained or enhanced because of your internship. This may include technical skills related to your field of study, as well as transferable skills such as communication, teamwork, problem-solving, and time management.
4. Professional Growth: Reflect on how your internship experience has contributed to your professional growth and career development. Consider any insights you have gained into your chosen field, as well as the networking opportunities, mentorship, or industry exposure you have received.
5. Lessons Learned: Discuss any valuable lessons or takeaways from your internship experience. This may include both positive experiences and areas for improvement, as well as any unexpected discoveries or insights.
The length of your reflection should be approximately 1000-1500 words, no more than 4 pages, preferably less than 3 pages.
Important Note: Please ensure that your reflection is honest, thoughtful, and demonstrates your genuine engagement with the internship experience. Feel free to draw upon specific examples, anecdotes, or observations to support your reflections.
|
Criteria |
Fail |
Pass |
Credit |
Distinction |
High Distinction |
|
Depth of Reflection and Critical Analysis (25%) |
Limited reflection with superficial analysis. Fails to provide meaningful insights or connections to internship experience. |
Limited reflection with superficial analysis. Lack of meaningful insights or connections to internship experience. Presents very basic insights. |
Adequate reflection with some analysis of internship experience. Presents basic insights but lacks depth or critical thinking. |
Thoughtful reflection demonstrating an analysis of internship experience. Provides some connections and demonstrates critical thinking skills. |
Thoughtful reflection demonstrating insightful analysis of internship experience. Provides meaningful connections and demonstrates critical thinking skills. |
|
Clarity and Organisation of Ideas (25%) |
Disorganised presentation with unclear or confusing structure. Ideas are difficult to follow, and there is a lack of coherence. |
Organisation of the presentation requires improvement. Some ideas are presented logically, but the flow requires improvement. |
Organised presentation with a clear structure. Ideas are presented logically, but transitions may be somewhat abrupt or lacking in fluidity. |
A mostly well- organised presentation with a coherent structure. Ideas are mostly articulated and communicated well. Good overall flow of the reflection. |
Well-organised presentation with a coherent structure. Ideas are clearly articulated and effectively communicated. Transitions are smooth, enhancing the overall flow of the reflection. |
|
Connection Between Internship Experience and Learning Outcomes (25%) |
Fails to demonstrate understanding of how internship experience relates to learning objectives. Lacks specific examples or evidence to support connections. |
Demonstrates limited understanding of how internship experience relates to learning objectives. Provides limited examples or evidence to support connections. |
Demonstrates some understanding of how internship experience relates to learning objectives. Provides some examples or evidence to support connections. |
Mostly well- articulated how internship experience aligns with learning objectives. Provides examples and evidence to support connections adequately. Demonstrates an understanding of the relationship between experience and outcomes. |
Clearly articulates how internship experience aligns with learning objectives. Provides specific examples and evidence to support connections, demonstrating a strong understanding of the relationship between experience and outcomes. |
|
Demonstrated Understanding of Skills Development and Professional Growth (25%) |
Limited awareness of skills gained or enhanced during internship. Fails to provide |
Demonstrates some awareness of skills gained or enhanced during internship. Provides basic |
Demonstrates an awareness of skills gained or enhanced during internship. Provides adequate |
Identifies skills gained or enhanced during internship. Provides examples and evidence of professional growth, |
Clearly identifies skills gained or enhanced during internship. Provides detailed examples and evidence of |
|
|
concrete examples or evidence of professional growth. |
examples or evidence of professional growth, but lacks depth or specificity. |
examples or evidence of professional growth, but lacks depth or specificity. |
demonstrating an understanding of personal development and its relevance to future endeavours. |
professional growth, demonstrating a thorough understanding of personal development and its relevance to future endeavours. |
|
Aligned subject learning outcomes |
· effectively communicate, both written and oral, with professionals and community members · demonstrate relevance of the codes of ethics and regulatory frameworks governing the relevant industry through the exercise of independent ethical judgement and analysis of industry scenarios · work in a team within a professional environment; and exhibit self-management skills and pro-active demeanour · critically review and apply concepts, theories, and standards for professional practice |
|
Group or individual |
Individual assessment item |
|
Weighting and due date |
Due study vacation – 60% |
|
Generative AI use |
Generative AI tools cannot be used in this assessment task In this assessment, you must not use Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for any elements of the assessment task including the generation of any materials or content in relation to the assessment item. |
At the end of the trimester Placement hosts will be asked to complete an online survey evaluating the performance the student. The evaluation criteria that the hosts will use are listed in the next section.
The following are the two criteria that students will be evaluated on
|
Criteria |
Fail |
Pass |
Credit |
Distinction |
High Distinction |
|
Achievement of Learning Outcomes as set out in the agreed Internship/Project Plan (50%) |
Student failed to meet all or the majority of the learning outcomes. |
Student met a limited number of the learning outcomes at a barely adequate level. |
Student met some of the learning outcomes at a satisfactory level. |
Student met most of the learning outcomes at a high level. |
Student met all of the learning outcomes at an advanced level. |
|
Internship/Project Performance (50%) |
Student was unable to perform basic internship/project tasks and failed to take direction and ask for help when needed. |
Student was barely able to perform basic internship/project tasks and needed constant assistance in consulting with their workplace supervisor and addressing problems. |
Student was able to perform internship/project tasks, but frequently required assistance in consulting with their workplace supervisor and addressing problems. |
Student was able to adequately perform internship/project tasks and engaged in consultation with their workplace supervisor. Able to recognise problems and challenges and attempts to find solutions. |
Student was able to perform internship/project tasks to an exceptional standard and engaged in constructive consultation with their workplace supervisor. Able to encounter problems and challenges and find solutions; has a critical and innovative attitude towards knowledge, action and self- development. |
Need Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments
Order Non-Plagiarized Assignment
Looking for expert guidance in TO5520 Professional Placement\ Internship? Worry, no need! We are here to help you with assignments. Whether you need business management assignment help or well-structured solutions, we will provide everything. You will get free assignment examples that will make your study material stronger. our expert team are providing all assignment services, you will get accurate, clear, and original content. Now stop worrying about marks and complete your assignments hassle-free with expert support. So what's the delay? Get connected with us now and make your academic journey easy!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
