| Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Murdoch University (MU) | Module Title | TLC101 Communication Skills for Undergraduate Study |
| Assessment Title | Learning Journal 1: Critical Reflection and Source Evaluation (15%) |
|---|
Learning Journal 1: Critical Reflection and Source Evaluation (15%)
Due Sun 25 Aug by 11.59 pm
To engage you in critical thinking, reading and writing, on a given topic, as well as to practise referencing skill (APA 7) and self-reflection. Part A focuses on responding to a peer-reviewed journal article while Part B is on evaluating the article.
Note: This assessment does not permit any use of GenAI.
A.Critical reading, writing and thinking
Read the peer-reviewed journal article, “Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: local and global issues”. In this article, experts from different geographic regions prioritise the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in response to the global and local issues evidenced through research.
Now, read the full article by clicking on the link below which will take you directly to Murdoch Library. Don’t forget to download and save the document before you start reading and completing the questions below. Murdoch University
The following pages include questions and space to fill in your answers.
Do You Need TLC101 Learning Journal 1 Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentEnsure your answers are in complete sentences for readability and coherence. Type your answers in the box below. Do not boldface your answers. Keep to the suggested wordcount for each question where applicable.
1. Who are the authors of the article and what institutions are they affiliated with? What are their respective roles in the institutions where they work?
2. On a scale of 1 to 5, how confident are you in the authors’ analysis of the subject matter, considering their roles in the institutions? (1 being least confident and 5 being most confident). Give reasons to justify your rating. (about 50 to 100 words)
|
Click or tap here to enter text. |
3. What is the main purpose of this article? Copy and paste the sentence in the Abstract that provides this information.
|
Click or tap here to enter text. |
4. Table 1 in the article lists the 17 SDGs and their respective descriptions. Evaluate each aspect (i.e., clarity, inclusivity and relevance) of the SDGs in terms of implementing them, by highlighting the statement that best describes your opinion. Provide comments to support your ratings.
a. Clarity
Overall, the descriptions of the SDGs are clear and easy to comprehend.
Overall, the descriptions of the SDGs are mostly understandable, but some parts are ambiguous.
Overall, the descriptions of the SDGs are vague and difficult to understand.
Your comments:
|
Click or tap here to enter text. |
b. Inclusivity
The SDGs thoroughly consider and represent diverse cultural, social, and economic contexts.
The SDGs consider some aspects of diverse contexts, but there are notable gaps.
The SDGs do not adequately consider or represent diverse cultural, social, and economic contexts.
Your comments:
|
Click or tap here to enter text. |
c. Relevance
The SDGs address the most pressing issues and are applicable to a wide range of contexts.
The SDGs address many important issues, but some aspects may not be applicable to all contexts.
The SDGs do not address the most pressing issues or are not applicable to many contexts.
Your comments:
|
Click or tap here to enter text. |
5. In section 1.1, the experts from different regions highlight the main challenges evident in those regions and the associated SDGs to address them. Do you think these chosen SDGs are the most effective for each region? Why or why not? (about 100 words)
|
Click or tap here to enter text. |
6. Reflect on section 3.1 where the SDGs have been prioritised in various regions according to research findings. In what ways did the information surprise you, provoke new thoughts, or contradict your previous understanding of prioritising SDGs? (about 100 words)
|
Click or tap here to enter text. |
A. Use the CRAAP model below to evaluate the credibility of the peer-reviewed journal article you have read. Provide a score for each criterion and reflect on whether it would be a useful source for your research on the SDGs.
|
Criteria |
Excellent (21-25) |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
Your Score |
|
Currency |
The information is very up-to-date and reflects the most current research or findings. |
The information is relatively recent and still relevant. |
The information is somewhat outdated but still has some relevance. |
The information is outdated and not relevant to current research or findings. |
|
|
Relevance |
Directly related to your topic or research question and significantly enhances your understanding. |
Related to your topic and provides useful insights. |
Somewhat related to your topic but provides limited useful information. |
Not related to your topic or research question and provides little to no useful information. |
|
|
Authority |
The author(s) are well-recognized experts with relevant credentials and affiliations. |
The author(s) have appropriate credentials and some recognition in the field. |
The author(s) have some credentials but limited recognition. |
The author(s) lack relevant credentials and recognition. |
|
|
Accuracy |
The information is accurate, thoroughly researched, and well-documented with reliable citations. |
The information is mostly accurate with reliable citations. |
The information is partially accurate with few reliable citations. |
The information is inaccurate or lacks reliable citations. |
|
|
Purpose |
The source is objective, unbiased, and presents balanced viewpoints. |
The source is mostly objective with minor biases. |
The source has noticeable biases but still provides some useful information. |
The source is highly biased and lacks objectivity. |
|
Your reflection: Highlight the statement that best describes the usefulness of the source for your research on the SDGs.
1. The source is very useful
2. The source is moderately useful
3. The source is somewhat useful
4. The source is not useful
Buy Answer of TLC101 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you looking for TLC101 Communication Skills for Undergraduate Study Assignment? Worry no need! Ai–Free Best Assignment help you score high in the academic year without any hassle. Our experts provide 100% human written and well-structured assignments. Our Australia Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. Hire cheap assignment helpers today and complete your assignment before the deadline. Free assignment samples are also provided to determine the quality and structure of the assignment. Hire professionals now! And stay worry-free!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
