| Category | Assignment | Subject | Engineering |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | _______ | Module Title | SWE7303 DevOps |
| Assessment Type | Practical Project – Assessment 1 |
|---|
LO1: Plan, Construct, and Implement a DevOps solution for a given business scenario
LO2: Critically evaluate strategies for the implementation of a DevOps solution to a given business problem
LO3: Critically evaluate the tools used in the solution development and implementation cycle.
A business that offers clients an online service has recruited you. The service is powered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) and was developed utilising a microservices architecture.
You need to set up a DevOps pipeline so that the service can be continuously integrated and deployed. In order to ensure that the service is launched with the least amount of downtime possible, the pipeline should automate the development, test, and deployment processes.
The following requirements should be met:
1.The pipeline should be based on popular DevOps tools such as Git, Jenkins, and Docker, and AWS services such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS Elastic Beanstalk.
2.The pipeline should be able to handle multiple microservices.
3.The pipeline should include automated testing using the appropriate tool.
4.The deployment process should be designed to minimise downtime and ensure that the service is always available.
5.The pipeline should include monitoring and logging to detect issues early on and enable quick resolution.
6.The pipeline should include a rollback process in case of deployment failure.
7.The pipeline should be well-documented and easy to maintain.
Your deliverables should include a detailed design document outlining the pipeline architecture, a set of scripts and configuration files for implementing the pipeline, and a test report demonstrating that the pipeline is working as intended.
You will design and implement a DevOps solution for a project of your choice. To deliver a DevOps solution, you must adhere to the DevOps methodology and utilise the appropriate technology. This group project will serve as the basis for the entire module grade. You should concentrate on the appropriate portion of the week that the topic is covered because the technologies to be used while developing a solution are linked to instructional sessions. This will let you gradually come up with the solution.
At the end of your submission form provide a brief of the main skills that you have developed during delivering this module.
Please note: the deadline for submitting your portfolio is during WEEK 15.
You will need to submit your practical written report and justify the process and technologies used at each step. Your report should include the following:
1.Title Page
2.Abstract
3.Keyword
4.List of Tables
5.List of Figures
6.Gantt chart
7.Task/Work Division
8.Table of Contents
9.Introduction (why DevOps solution is required)
10.Methodology (Architecture of the DevOps system, Tools used)
11.Results and Discussion
12.Conclusion and Future Scope
13.Personal Reflections
14.Learning Reflections
15.References
16.Appendix
Are You Looking Solution of SWE7303 Assignment 1
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment|
Task |
Marks Allocation |
|
Project Proposal, Gantt chart, Work Division |
20% |
|
Presentation and Personal Reflection |
30% |
|
Project Report |
50% |
|
Total Marks |
100% |
The project report carries 50% of the marks, it shows the contribution of the group in developing the DevOps solution. Personal reflection carries 30% marks and indicates the individual contribution to the project.
The University has a strict plagiarism policy and references the policy on the website
The project report should consist of an indicative 5000 words.
Please refer to the Module Guide for information regarding indicative reading, guidelines for the preparation and submission of assignments, and the module learning outcomes.
(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply. Please see General Assessment Guidelines for Written Assessments Level HE7)
Minimum Secondary Research Source Requirements:
Level HE7 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include four refereed academic journals and five academic books.
|
|
|
% |
Relevance |
Knowledge |
Argument/Analysis |
Structure |
Presentation |
Written English |
Research/Referencing |
|
DISTINCTION |
|
85-100% |
Directly relevant to title/brief. Expertly addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.
|
Demonstrates an exceptional knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Insightfully interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates originality in conceptual understanding. |
Presents an exceptional critique of key research material resulting in clear, original and illuminating conclusions. Demonstrates distinctive, insightful and creative solutions to complex problems. Produces exceptional work that makes a contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area. |
Coherently articulated and logically structured.
An appropriate format is used. |
Exceptional presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP).
|
Exceptionally well written Style is clear, resourceful and academic.
|
Sources accurately cited in the text.
An extensive range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style. |
|
Excellent Quality |
70-84% |
Directly relevant to title/brief.
Expertly addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.
|
Demonstrates an excellent knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Expertly interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates originality in conceptual understanding. |
Presents an excellent critique of key research material resulting in clear, original and illuminating conclusions. Demonstrates insightful and creative thinking solutions to complex problems. Produces excellent work that makes a contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area. |
Coherently articulated and logically structured.
An appropriate format is used. |
Excellent presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP).
|
Excellently written Style is clear, resourceful and academic.
|
Sources accurately cited in the text. A wide range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style. |
|
|
MERIT |
Good Quality |
60-69% |
Directly relevant to title/brief.
Addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief well. |
Demonstrates a sound knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Comprehensively interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates originality in conceptual understanding |
Presents a cohesive critique of key research material resulting in clear and original conclusions. Demonstrates creative solutions to complex problems. Produces superior work that makes a contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area |
For the most part coherently articulated and logically constructed.
An appropriate format is used. |
Very good presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of FTP. |
Well written with
|
Sources accurately cited in the text. A range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style. |
|
PASS |
Satisfactory Quality |
50-59% |
Generally addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.
Minor irrelevance in places. |
Demonstrates an adequate knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Some minor omissions. Satisfactorily interprets some appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates some originality in conceptual understanding. |
Presents some critique of key research material resulting in original conclusions. Loss of focus in places. Demonstrates some creativity in solving complex problems. Produces satisfactory work that makes some contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area. |
Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure.
An acceptable format is used. |
The presentational style & layout is largely correct for the type of assignment.
Inclusion of FTP but lacks selectivity. |
Competently written with minor lapses in spelling and grammar.
Style is legible and mainly academic.
|
Key contemporary and relevant academic sources are drawn upon.
Most sources are accurately cited in the text and reference list/bibliography. Minor weaknesses evident. |
|
FAIL |
Borderline Fail |
45-49% |
Some implications of issues explored.
Some irrelevant and/or superficial arguments.
|
Some omissions evident in knowledge of theory and practice at this level. Insufficient understanding of appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates some conceptual understanding in places. |
A limited amount of critique of key research material with description in places. Lacks creativity. Some original conclusions.
|
Limited attempt at articulation and problems with structure.
Some formatting errors. |
Some weaknesses in the presentational style & layout.
Some inappropriate use of FTP. |
Intermittent lapses in grammar and spelling.
Style hinders clarity in places and is not academic throughout. |
Limited number of contemporary and relevant sources cited. Weaknesses in referencing technique. |
|
Fail |
30-44%
|
Significant degree of irrelevance to the title and/or brief.
Issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms. |
Demonstrates weaknesses in knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Limited understanding and application of concepts. |
A basic argument is presented, but too descriptive or narrative in style. Limited originality and creativity. Conclusions are not clearly stated. |
Poorly structured. Lack of articulation. Format deficient. |
For the type of assignment the presentational style &/or layout is lacking.
FTP ignored in text or not used where clearly needed. |
Deficiencies in spelling and grammar make reading difficult in places.
Simplistic or repetitious style impairs clarity. |
Inappropriate sources and poor referencing technique. |
|
|
<30%
|
Relevance to the title and/or brief is intermittent or missing. The topic is reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms. |
Demonstrates a lack of basic knowledge of either theory or practice for this level, with little evidence of conceptual understanding. |
Severely limited arguments. Descriptive or narrative in style with no evidence of critique and originality or creativity. Conclusions are sparse. |
Unstructured. Lack of articulation. Format deficient. |
For the type of assignment the presentational style &/or layout is lacking. FTP as above. |
Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in grammar, spelling, expression and style. |
An absence of academic sources and poor referencing technique. |
Buy Custom Answer Of SWE7303 Assignment 1 & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free QuoteFacing challenges with your SWE7303 DevOps Practical Project – Assessment 1? Well! Stop worrying now. You are at the right place. Our platform provides assignment help. We have experienced writers who provide high-quality, no-plagiarism assignments with 100% original content, and we are assured that our Software Engineering Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. And we also provide free assignment samples that content has been written by the phd expert writers Contact us now!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
