Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
---|---|---|---|
University | Dublin City University (DCU) | Module Title | PSY1059 Developmental Psychology across the Lifespan |
Assessment Type | Assignment 1 and 2 |
---|---|
Academic Year | 2025/26 |
The module introduces advances the study of developmental psychology to incorporate contemporary theories from the field. Students will gain a deeper understanding of the theories, themes and concepts in developmental psychology and appreciate that development continues beyond childhood to extend throughout the lifespan. The module aims to introduce advanced concepts in the study of developmental psychology across the lifespan, with specific emphasis on contexts, culture, transitions, and the application of theory and research to real-world challenges. Lectures will also introduce topics such as functioning and age, evolutionary psychology, and sexuality. Students will also examine research approaches pertinent to the study of development across the lifespan and explore, in particular, longitudinal, life course and life history methodologies as applied in current contexts.
This module will consist of eleven one-hour lectures (accounting for reading week) and five tutorials. Students will be required to submit work ahead of each tutorial and discuss the work in the tutorial. 25% (5% per tutorial) of the module marks will be allotted to this work.
Assessment 1 | Weighting | Mark type | Deadline | Word count | |
Submission Discussion of work | and Tutorial | 25% | Individual mark | Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8,
10 |
See below |
Tutorial | Pre-tutorial submission | Weighting/Mark type | Deadline | Word count |
Tutorial 1 | Critique of research paper | 5% Individual mark.
Pass/fail |
24 hours prior to tutorial | 300 words |
Tutorial 2 | Identifying the problem | 5%
Individual mark. Pass/fail |
24 hours prior to
tutorial |
150 words |
Tutorial 3 | Stakeholder analysis | 5%
Individual mark. Pass/fail |
24 hours prior to
tutorial |
150 words |
Tutorial 4 | Generating policy solutions | 5% Individual mark. Pass/fail | 24 hours prior to tutorial | 300 words |
Tutorial 5 | Marking a mock Interactive Oral with reflection | 5% Individual mark.
Pass/fail |
24 hours prior to tutorial | 200 words |
You will be assigned to a tutorial group at the beginning of the semester and cannot change once assigned. Late submission of pre-tutorial work will be subject to the School Late Penalties Policy. If you cannot attend your assigned tutorial time for one week you must provide a reason with supporting documentation (e.g., medical certificate). A make-up discussion will be held with the module coordinator at a later date. The allotted marks will only be awarded upon submission of the pre-work 24 hours prior to the tutorial each week and discussion of this work at the tutorial.
Assessment 2 | Weighting | Mark type | Deadline | Word count |
Submission of Policy Brief for Discussion | 5% | Individual Mark
Pass/Fail |
Prior to IO | 300 words |
Interactive Oral (IO) Assessment | 70% | Individual mark | Nov/Dec | 10 minutes |
An Interactive Oral Assessment is not a traditional question-and-answer assessment; it is a dynamic exchange that draws on your understanding of key course concepts. It allows you to demonstrate your knowledge by applying it in a real-world context while drawing on theory and research from developmental psychology. While the IOA is designed to be a discussion and free-flowing exchange of ideas in a low-pressure environment, remember that it is still an assessment, and your performance will be evaluated.
You are a lead policy manager in a non-governmental organisation (NGO), and you have developed a 300-word policy brief with a number of recommendations that align with the remit and work of the NGO. You have been granted a one-hour meeting with a government minister, Emma Nicholson, to describe the policy and outline to them why the recommendations should be adopted by the government.
You must select one of the following NGO’s and develop a policy within the stated scenario:
You must prepare and submit a 300-word policy brief ahead of the meeting which contains a number of policy recommendations to improve the selected issue. The policy recommendations must be based on a recognised theory from developmental psychology
(you must state which theory) and be supported with evidence from the research literature. You must consider and state the problem that the policy is trying to address. The policy/policies can be implemented at any point in the lifespan but you must consider the impact of the recommendations across the lifespan. Think about the outcomes from both a short-term and long-term perspective. The policy does NOT need to be “politically popular” or cost-effective – it must be evidence-based and have demonstrable outcomes for the affected population, and if relevant, wider society. The policy brief will not be marked but you must submit in advance of the IO and it will form the basis for the IO discussion.
Order Custom Answers for PSY1059 Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentThe 300-word policy brief should include the following:
(a) A brief introduction to the topic including:
i. A statement of problem
ii. Identify the stakeholders impacted by this problem
(b) A set of recommendations for policy and/or practice that may address the problem outlined above in order to affect change for the stakeholders
i. Use theory and research to support these recommendations
ii. Consider a developmental approach
Location: The Interactive Oral will take place online via Zoom. The IOA will be recorded on Zoom for moderation purposes only.
Deadline: Assessment slots will be available the week prior to the assessment week. Once your slot is assigned, you will be sent a Zoom link for the IOA.
If you are unable to attend the interactive oral during the selected timeslot, you will need to contact the module coordinator as soon as possible and provide supporting documentation (e.g., medical certificate) to explain your absence. An alternative IO will be arranged within two weeks of the original IO date.
Guidance: The process will be explained in detail during lectures and tutorials. Every effort will be made to maintain a stress-free environment. Guidance material is also provided in Loop along with recordings.
Apart from the content, the basic interactive oral assessment skills are the following:
Criteria | Outstanding (70-100%) | Very Good (6070%) | Good (50-60%) | Satisfactory (40-50%) | Needs Improvement (0-39%) |
Understan ding of Key Concepts and Theories | Demonstrates an exceptional, in-depth understanding of concepts and theory from developmental psychology with precise mastery of the impact over the lifespan. | Demonstrates a strong understanding of key concepts and theories in developmental psychology, with minor gaps or oversights in key concepts and regulations. | Shows a solid understanding of key concepts and theories in developmental psychology, though some depth may be lacking or there may be noticeable gaps. | Demonstrates a basic understanding of core concepts and theories from developmental psychology, with significant gaps or misconceptions present. | Shows limited to no understanding of core concepts and theory from developmental psychology, with frequent inaccuracies or confusion. |
Can critically evaluate and apply research findings to support policy recommen dations | Demonstrates exceptional critique of research evidence which presents a clear position supported by defensible arguments and integration of contrary viewpoints | Strong ability to critique research evidence -presenting a clear position with minor gaps or oversights in supporting arguments and less consideration of contrary viewpoints. | Demonstrates a solid ability to critique research with clear position but little supporting evidence and no consideration of contrary viewpoints. | Demonstrates basic skills in critique of research evidence with a lack of clarity on position and little to no supporting evidence, with some misconceptions present. | Demonstrates little to no critique of the research evidence with no clear position or supporting evidence provided. |
Criteria | Outstanding (70-100%) | Very Good (6070%) | Good (50-60%) | Satisfactory (40-50%) | Needs Improvement (0-39%) |
Ability to provide a critical view based on a defensible argument that the selected solutions are appropriat e | Applies course concepts to real-world scenarios with expert insight, demonstrating critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. | Applies most concepts effectively to real-world scenarios, with strong analytical skills and practical application. | Applies concepts to real-world scenarios adequately, but lacks depth in critical thinking or practical application. | Struggles to apply concepts fully, with superficial or incomplete application to scenarios. | Fails to apply any course concepts meaningfully, showing little critical thinking or real-world application. |
Argument ation & Persuasion | Constructs wellreasoned, compelling arguments based on sound evidence, demonstrating excellent strategic thinking. | Constructs clear, logical arguments supported by evidence, though some points may lack strength or focus. | Constructs somewhat clear arguments but may lack depth or coherence in reasoning and supporting evidence. | Arguments are unclear or poorly supported, with noticeable gaps in logic and evidence. | Fails to construct coherent or convincing arguments, with little or no evidence or support. |
Communi
cation & Delivery |
Communicates ideas confidently, with persuasive language, effective pacing, tone, | Communicates clearly with persuasive tone and good pacing, though minor improvements | Communicates ideas adequately but lacks some confidence or variability in tone, | Communication is basic and lacks fluency, with issues in pacing, clarity, or engagement with the audience. | Fails to communicate ideas clearly or engage the audience, with significant issues |
Criteria | Outstanding (70-100%) | Very Good (6070%) | Good (50-60%) | Satisfactory (40-50%) | Needs Improvement (0-39%) |
and excellent audience engagement. | could be made in delivery. | limiting audience engagement. | in tone, pacing, or clarity. | ||
Responsiv eness in Discussion | Responds thoughtfully and effectively to questions, demonstrating a high level of engagement and adaptability. | Responds well to most questions, though some responses could be more in-depth or considered. | Responds adequately to questions, but lacks depth or insight in some responses. | Responses are weak or unclear, with limited engagement or understanding in addressing questions or feedback. | Fails to respond meaningfully to
questions, showing little to no understanding or engagement in the discussion. |
Hire Experts to solve PSY1059 Assignment Before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentHaving trouble with your PSY1059 Developmental Psychology across the Lifespan Assignment? Our dedicated services provide Assignment Help Ireland specifically designed for students seeking assistance with assignments. Our Ireland Assignment experts are committed to guiding you through your coursework, ensuring personalized support for your academic success. We also provide free Assignment Samples.Trust our team to deliver original work and leverage our extensive experience. Contact us today to simplify your academic journey and reach your educational objectives with confidence.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content