Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Salford Manchester | Module Title | Property Development |
| Word Count | 1500 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | Site Analysis & Cashflow Valuation |
| Academic Year | 2026-27 |

To be used for all types of assessment and provided to students at the start of the module. Information provided should be compatible with the details contained in the approved module specification.
You are employed by a real estate development company (KASH Developments) that typically focuses on residential development projects in Manchester. Having obtained a new planning consent for a mixed-use scheme of houses with commercial office space in Warrington, due to the site location and commercial element being outside the normal scheme for KASH Development, rather than executing the project themselves, they are now seeking to sell this development opportunity and require a valuation of the site with the benefit of planning.
Your task is to provide a valuation report for the site based on the approved planning scheme using a period-by-period cashflow method of development valuation to obtain a residual land value.
The report should apply and reference the RICS Valuation of Development Property Professional Standard and should include:
Approved Planning
Residential
Commercial
Valuation Inputs
The coursework assessment should be presented in the form of a report with appendices. The introduction, conclusion, contents page and reference list will not be included in the word count.
You should use a clear, legible font, i.e., Arial size 12 or Calibri size 14, with line spaces set to 1.5.
Within the report, you should state the value calculated, and the detailed cash flow and sensitivity analysis can be provided within the report or within the appendices.
All sources used as part of your report should be referenced using the APA-Harvard style 7th edition in accordance with University guidelines.
For coursework assessments only: students with a Reasonable Adjustment Plan (RAP) or Carer Support Plan should check their plan to see if an extension to this submission date has been agreed.
This assignment MUST be submitted electronically through Blackboard/Turnitin®. By submitting the coursework on Turnitin®, you consent (insofar as your consent is needed) to the following:
a) The University will submit your assessments (including details of your name and course details) to the Turnitin® service so that your assessments can be compared with the database of works that is maintained by the Turnitin® service and that is drawn from various sources, including the internet; and
b) Your assessments may be stored in that database of works indefinitely (or until the University stops using the Turnitin® service and requests their deletion) to help protect your assessments from future plagiarism. Where there is a match between content in your assessments and content in other works, then your assessments may also be copied by the University and other users of the Turnitin® service to allow closer analysis.
You should look at the assessment criteria to find out what you need to do to complete this assessment.
Grades are given in the following bandings:
At Postgraduate Level 7, the following marking scale shall be used:
|
Outstanding |
90% – 100% |
|
Excellent |
80% – 89% |
|
Very good |
70% – 79% |
|
Good |
60% – 69% |
|
Satisfactory |
50-59% |
|
Needs improvement |
40-49% |
|
Needs significant revision |
30-39% |
|
Needs substantial work |
0-29% |
N.B. Further guidance regarding both the assessment criteria and how these relate to the university’s grade descriptors below is provided in the assessment rubric included in Appendix I.
On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:
You will develop a range of employability skills sought by employers through each assessment.
Through this assessment will have an opportunity to develop and demonstrate the following employability skills:
(please put a cross in the box for the skill and level demonstrated in the assessment)
|
Skill |
I |
U |
A |
D |
|
Communication |
|
|
|
X |
|
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving |
|
|
|
X |
|
Data Literacy |
|
|
|
X |
|
Digital Literacy |
|
|
|
X |
|
Industry Awareness |
|
|
X |
|
|
Innovation and Creativity |
|
|
|
|
|
Proactive Leadership |
|
|
|
|
|
Reflection and Life-Long Learning |
|
X |
|
|
|
Self-management and Organisation |
|
|
X |
|
|
Team Working |
|
|
|
|
I = You will have been introduced to this skill
U = You will have developed an understanding of this skill in the context of your subject
A = You will be able to apply this skill in the context of your subject
D = You will have demonstrated an enhanced understanding and application of this skill in a wider context
You can obtain support for this assessment by contacting me initially. My contact details are S.M.Haverly@salford.ac.uk
Please make an appointment.
Forward feedback sessions will be provided with the module schedule. You can find more information about understanding your assessment brief and assessment tips for success here.
Other sources of support
Issues affecting your assessment
If exceptional circumstances have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about the Exceptional Circumstances Procedure (previously Personal Mitigating Circumstances) here. Independent advice is available from the Students’ Union Advice Centre.
Academic Integrity and Academic Misconduct
You must learn and demonstrate good academic conduct (academic integrity). Good academic conduct includes the use of clear and correct referencing of source materials.
Academic integrity & referencing
Referencing
Academic misconduct is an action that may give you an unfair advantage in your academic work. Some examples are plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you, unauthorised use of AI or taking notes into an exam. The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously.
If you need to be reassessed, the reassessment will be the same, and the submission date will be shown within Blackboard and will take place in July 2026 (Date to be confirmed). There is no resubmission if you are on a retake attempt.
For students with accepted personal mitigating circumstances for absence/non-submission, this will be your replacement assessment attempt.
We know that having to undergo a reassessment can be challenging; however, support is available. Have a look at all the sources of support outlined earlier in this brief.
N.B. – This is to be used alongside the assessment criteria listed above.
Assessment Rubric
| Range | Planning analysis, Stakeholders and funding (30%). | Provide analysis on the market, comparable evidence, and build costs (25%). | Residual and Cashflow Appraisals – 35% | Presentation, grammar and referencing - 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5 | LO4, LO5 | LO1, LO2 | LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4 | |
| 90-100 | Outstanding ability to provide analysis of the planning policies in relation to the subject matter, including analysis of the stakeholders involved and funding options. | Outstanding ability to provide market analysis on both residential and commercial property markets, undertake rigorous comparable analysis and build cost analysis providing evidence using industry tools. | Outstanding ability to produce a standard residual valuation based on the evidence obtained. Outstanding knowledge of the inputs required to develop a professional and comprehensive site valuation using a period-by-period cash flow and understanding staged income and borrowing throughout the periods to obtain an accurate site valuation with no exclusions, contradictions or ambiguity. | Outstandingly well written with correct spelling and grammar. An articulate and fluid writing style that offers no opportunity for confusion. Outstanding use of appendices to illustrate your point and provide evidence. Referenced appropriately as stated within the brief and presented clearly using a clear font and line spacing. |
| 80-89 | Excellent ability to provide analysis of the planning policies in relation to the subject matter, including analysis of the stakeholders involved and funding options. | Excellent ability to provide market analysis on both residential and commercial property markets, undertake rigorous comparable analysis and build cost analysis providing evidence using industry tools. | Excellent ability to produce a standard residual valuation based on the evidence obtained. Excellent knowledge of the inputs required to develop a professional and comprehensive site valuation using a period-by-period cashflow and understanding staged income and borrowing throughout the periods to obtain an accurate site valuation with no exclusions, contradictions or ambiguity. | Excellently well written with correct spelling and grammar. An articulate and fluid writing style that offers no opportunity for confusion. Outstanding use of appendices to illustrate your point and provide evidence. Referenced appropriately as stated within the brief and presented clearly using clear font and line spacing. |
| 70-79 | Very good ability to provide analysis of the planning policies in relation to the subject matter including analysis of the stakeholders involved and funding options. | Very good ability to provide market analysis on both residential and commercial property markets, undertake rigorous comparable analysis and build cost analysis providing evidence using industry tools. | Shows very good ability to produce a standard residual valuation based on the evidence obtained. Good knowledge of the inputs required to develop a professional and comprehensive site valuation using a period-by-period cashflow and understanding staged income and borrowing throughout the periods to obtain an accurate site valuation with no exclusions, contradictions or ambiguity. | Very well written with only 1 o 2 errors in spelling and grammar. A fluid writing style that offers limited opportunity for confusion. Very good use of appendices. Referenced appropriately as stated within the brief and presented well using legible font and line spacing. |
| 60-69 | Good ability to provide analysis of the planning policies in relation to the subject matter including analysis of the stakeholders involved and funding options. | Good ability to provide market analysis on both residential and commercial property markets, undertake rigorous comparable analysis and build cost analysis providing evidence using industry tools. | Shows good ability to produce a standard residual valuation based on the evidence obtained. Good knowledge of the inputs required to develop a professional and comprehensive site valuation using a period-by-period cashflow and understanding staged income and borrowing throughout the periods to obtain an accurate site valuation with no exclusions, contradictions or ambiguity. | Well written with only minor errors in spelling and grammar. A fluid writing style that offers limited opportunity for confusion. Good use of appendices to provide evidence. Referenced appropriately as stated within the brief and presented well using legible font. |
| 50-59 | Adequate ability to provide analysis of the planning policies in relation to the subject matter including analysis of the stakeholders involved and funding options. | Adequate ability to provide market analysis on both residential and commercial property markets, undertake rigorous comparable analysis and build cost analysis providing evidence using industry tools. | Shows fair ability to produce a standard residual valuation based on the evidence obtained. Fair knowledge of the inputs required to develop a professional and comprehensive site valuation using a period-by-period cashflow and understanding staged income and borrowing throughout the periods to obtain an accurate site valuation with limited exclusions, contradictions or ambiguity. | Reasonably written with some minor errors in spelling and grammar. A fair writing style that offers and possibly some areas of confusion. Reasonable use of appendices. Referenced adequately as stated within the brief and presented reasonably using legible font. |
| 40-49 | Needs improvement to adequately provide analysis of the planning policies in relation to the subject matter, as well as analysis of the stakeholders involved and funding options. | Needs improvement to adequately to provide market analysis on both residential and commercial property markets, undertake rigorous comparable analysis and build cost analysis providing evidence using industry tools. | Needs improvement to be able to demonstrate an adequate standard residual valuation based on the evidence obtained. Limited knowledge of the inputs required to develop a professional and comprehensive site valuation using a period-by-period cash flow, and lacks the understanding of staged income and borrowing throughout the periods to obtain an accurate site valuation, with some exclusions and areas of contradictions or ambiguity. | Writing needs improvement, with some errors in spelling and grammar. Inadequate writing style with some areas of confusion. Poor use of appendices. Referenced adequately as stated within the brief and presented reasonably using a legible font. |
| 30-39 | Significant revision needed to adequately provide analysis of the planning policies in relation to the subject matter as well as analysis of the stakeholders involved and funding options. | Significant revision needed to adequately provide market analysis on both residential and commercial property markets, undertake rigorous comparable analysis and build cost analysis providing evidence using industry tools. | Significant revision is needed to be able to demonstrate an adequate standard residual valuation based on the evidence obtained. Limited knowledge of the inputs required to develop a professional and comprehensive site valuation using a period-by-period cash flow, and lacks or no understanding of staged income and borrowing throughout the periods to obtain an accurate site valuation with exclusions and areas of contradictions or ambiguity. | Writing requires significant revision with many errors in spelling or grammar. Inadequate writing style, which leads to areas of confusion. Poor or no appendix. Referenced inadequately, did not follow the brief, and the presentation could be improved. |
| 0-29 | Substantial work is needed to adequately provide an analysis of the planning policies in relation to the subject matter, as well as an analysis of the stakeholders involved and funding options. | Substantial work needed to adequately provide market analysis on both residential and commercial property markets, undertake rigorous comparable analysis and build cost analysis providing evidence using industry tools. | Substantial work is needed to be able to demonstrate an adequate standard residual valuation based on the evidence obtained. Limited to no knowledge of the inputs required to develop a professional and comprehensive site valuation using a period-by-period cash flow, and little to no understanding of staged income and borrowing throughout the periods to obtain an accurate site valuation with many exclusions and or many areas of contradictions or ambiguity. | Writing needs substantial work with too many errors in spelling or grammar. Extremely poor writing style, which is confusing. Extremely poor or no appendix. Referenced inadequately or not referenced, and the presentation was extremely poor. |
Buy a Custom Answer to the Property Development Assignment
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentDo you need support with your Property Development Assignment? Our easy and friendly Project Management Assignment Help is here to guide you through every topic. You can use our clear assignment examples and Samples to understand how to structure your work and improve your learning. With reliable Assignment Help UK, you get simple explanations, helpful tips, and study guidance to boost your confidence. Make your assignment journey stress-free—learn better, understand more, and move forward with success!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content