| Category | Assignment | Subject | Sociology |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | BPP Business School | Module Title | Personal Effectiveness |
| Word Count | 1000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Formative Assessment |
| Assessment Title | Coursework |
The required submission for this formative assignment is an 800-word (plus 200-word introduction, optional) “Personal Effectiveness Report”.
Students are required to complete one task:
1. Reflect on your own skill set in relation to a career goal.
The Learning Outcomes to successfully pass this assessment are:
(LO2) Appraise the key skills and behaviours required to be effective in a professional context.
1. Using a model of reflective practice, reflect on how you attempt any task at work or university to identify your own skill set. Identify both strengths and weaknesses.
2. Analyse the skills you identified with reference to your choice of career or job.
N.B. To support your answer, you should refer to the reflective model by Gibbs or Schön and additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles on wider leadership concepts and personal effectiveness from the online library.
(This task meets LO2)
(Total marks for Task 1: 35% weighting)
Your business report should contain the following:
|
Assessment task |
0-29% 30-39% Fail |
40-49% Low Fail |
50-59% Pass |
60-69% Merit |
70-79% 80-100% Distinction |
|||
|
|
Task 1 (35% weighting, LO2) |
Inadequate reflection with little or no clarity and precision in identifying personal skill set. Fails to use a reflective model effectively. Does not identify both strengths and weaknesses.
Inadequate analysis of skills with little or no clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. Fails to reference the choice of career effectively. |
Weak reflection with limited clarity in identifying personal skill set. Applies a reflective model but with limited depth. Identifies some strengths and weaknesses with limited analysis.
Weak analysis of skills with limited clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. Makes some reference to the choice of career but with limited depth. |
Limited reflection with some clarity in identifying personal skill set. Applies a reflective model effectively to some extent. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses but lacks depth in analysis.
Limited analysis of skills with some clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career but lacks depth in analysis. |
Satisfactory reflection with explicit identification of personal skill set. Applies a reflective model effectively. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with a satisfactory level of depth and analysis.
Satisfactory analysis of skills with explicit links to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career effectively with a satisfactory level of depth and analysis. |
Good reflection with clear identification of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model effectively. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with depth and clarity in analysis.
Good analysis of skills with clear and coherent links to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career effectively with depth and clarity in analysis. |
Excellent reflection with a deep and balanced understanding of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model exceptionally well. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses comprehensively with exceptional depth and precision. Excellent analysis of skills with a thorough understanding of their relevance to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career comprehensively with exceptional depth and precision in analysis. |
Outstanding reflection with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model with outstanding depth and coherence. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with exceptional clarity and coherence. Outstanding analysis of skills with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of their direct application to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career with exceptional clarity and coherence in analysis. |
|
|
Presentation (10% weighting) |
Inadequate references with inconsistencies, errors or omissions. Limited structure and expression. |
Weak references but may contain inconsistencies, errors or omissions. Limited structure and expression. |
Limited references with errors or inconsistencies. Limited structure and expression. |
Satisfactory with full and appropriate references. Satisfactory structured layout and mainly accurate expression. |
Good with precise, full and appropriate references. Well-structured layout and professional and accurate expression. |
Excellent with precise, full and appropriate references. Excellent structured layout and professional and accurate expression. |
Outstanding with precise, full and appropriate references. Outstanding structured layout and professional and accurate expression. |
Do You Need Personal Effectiveness Assignment for This Question
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentNeed last-minute help with your Personal Effectiveness Assignment? We are here for sociology assignment help! From Business Management to technical subjects, we’ve got you covered. Explore our free assignment samples and experience the quality for yourself. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress! We also provide BPP Business School Assignment Samples that have been written by the phd expert writers.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
